PSN+ so much ownage... xbox live where u at ?

[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="Rage010101"]

Yes, he lost a long time ago, even before he tried.  Guy is trying so hard to say ps+ sales are better than pc's when at this point it is pretty much widely known as a fact that pc game sales cannot be beat, I mean not even close!

lostrib

I didn't realize that Dishonored, Far Cry 3, BF3, Hitman Absolution, Borderlands 2, and Tomb Raider were clearance rack titles

Ya, I wanna know where hes finding these games at flea markets, thrift shops and pawn shops! :lol:

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

PinkiePirate

It's not free when you had to pay to get those, also they don't belong to you.  When you decide not to pay a certain month, they're gone, basically making them a glorified renting service and nothing more.

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

PinkiePirate

Well, Saints Row The Third (plus all DLC) regular goes on sale for as low as $7.50 (The base game was in the THQ Humble Bundle), XCOM was free with BioShock Infinite, Deus Ex Human Revolution is constantly on sale for $5 and The Missing Link DLC can be had for $1.25, and Battlefield 3 + Premium was on sale for $20 last week (BF3 standalone was $5).

I'm not disagreeing that PS+ is an excellent value, but sales on Steam/GMG/Amazon/GoG are fantastic and they stay with you instead of being tied to a certain generation since there is no BC next gen.

Not bad for a console market ;)

Got Borderlands 2 for 14 bucks on Steam, but it turned out to be worth full price of admission, so 20 is still a steal. 

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

PinkiePirate

[QUOTE="PinkiePirate"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

Rage010101

It's not free when you had to pay to get those, also they don't belong to you.  When you decide not to pay a certain month, they're gone, basically making them a glorified renting service and nothing more.

So much ownage form PSN+ :lol: Now with added features like pay to unlock half your games. Isn't that right cows?

bu bu bu bu spin spin spin moo moo moo.

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

PinkiePirate

Thanks Godny.

I heard M$ is finally giving their fans free games.

After 8 years.

Too bad it is a game that launched in 2007 and that everyone has played by now.

And they still haven't committed to it with the launch of the Xbone.

Poor lems. 

senses_fail_06

No they don't. I'm a ps+ member for almost two years now. Paying Sony a subscription fee instantly negates the term free. Paying can't equal free. If I don't pay Sony I have tons of worthless used space on my hdd. Is psn a great value? Yes, that's why I'm a member. But stop buying that Sony pr shit. If I pay them, its not free.cainetao11

I know what free means. In context, free means adding content at no additional cost. It's very similar to OnLive's PlayPack, the only difference being that OnLive gives you all 120+ games that have accumulated over the years from the start.

Latest PSN update LOL!

Sony sucks. PS+ is not worth it.

[QUOTE="cainetao11"]No they don't. I'm a ps+ member for almost two years now. Paying Sony a subscription fee instantly negates the term free. Paying can't equal free. If I don't pay Sony I have tons of worthless used space on my hdd. Is psn a great value? Yes, that's why I'm a member. But stop buying that Sony pr shit. If I pay them, its not free.PinkiePirate

I know what free means. In context, free means adding content at no additional cost. It's very similar to OnLive's PlayPack, the only difference being that OnLive gives you all 120+ games that have accumulated over the years from the start.

Oh yeah and my local store sells for retai lthose games for the same price. Except downloadable games only ofc.

Cows getting ripped of. They have to pay for discounts (Wahahahaha :lol:) en the best of al is that the new price iss the same as in the local retail stores hahaha.

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

legalize82

Oh yeah and my local store sells for retai lthose games for the same price. Except downloadable games only ofc.

 

Cows getting ripped of. They have to pay for discounts (Wahahahaha :lol:) en the best of al is that the new price iss the same as in the local retail stores hahaha.

speedfog

[QUOTE="legalize82"][QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

dommeus

I fail to see the ownage, cheap old games, congrats cows. Enjoy a shitty online experience that you now have to pay for lol.

PS+ gives me free games pals, all I have to do is pay Sony money every month and its all free. Jack-Burton

:lol: Sheens are amazing...I will now start calling them the Cartmans of system wars because they are able to do amazing mental acrobatics to make themselves believe they are awesome and every one doesn't hate them.

:lol: Sheens are amazing...I will now start calling them the Cartmans of system wars because they are able to do amazing mental acrobatics to make themselves believe they are awesome and every one doesn't hate them.

WilliamRLBaker

But you're still paying to get discounts.

Rage010101

[QUOTE="SexyJazzCat"]

Steam has better sales. And it's free.

PinkiePirate

[QUOTE="Rage010101"]

But you're still paying to get discounts.

CajunShooter

[QUOTE="CajunShooter"][QUOTE="Rage010101"]

But you're still paying to get discounts.

Davekeeh

It's not yours, you're just renting them.  Your games are being held hostage by a pay wall.  The moment you decide to not pay for a month of ps+, all those games will vanish.  Steam on the other hand, games are cheap and they stay with you, unlimited downloads, til the end of time.  Nice try, but sorry you can't beat that!

how can lems claim xbl offers more value or anywhere near the value ps+ does. Take this for example. Out of this list, I own Uncharted 3, Deus Ex HR and Saints Row 3. In Australia, the price for an annual subscription is $69. If i were to purchase PS Plus right now, I would get Xcom, LBP Karting, Machinarium, Gods eater burst and Virtues Last Reward, all for the price of $69 which in reality if i were to purchase each game individually, would most definitely be more than $69. So far, its already paid for itself. Now this is just 1 month.... 11 more months of games being swapped around means there will be like 70+ games that I could play for free (as the $69 already paid for games I would have gotten anyways). And most of these games are like <1 year old. There is no drawback to ps plus, please dont give me some lame excuse like "but you dont OWN them, you only RENT them and once the subscription finishes, you lose those games" Well... 2 things for you. 1. Why stop subscribing? You are going to get hundreds and hundreds of dollars worth of games for only $69. 2. Do ppl seriously play ALL their old games? I have a decent size collection of games and I barely go back and play the games which i finished years ago :/ and if it bothers you so much, go buy the games you actually would want to keep playing FOREVER and still have all these games coming at you. campzor

Because Value is subjective. Not fact.

In your example, I've played and beat every single one of those games except for LBP Karting and LOL do I want to play that.

I keep track of what PSN adds every month and its always something Ive already played or something I was never interested in in the first place, so why bother. The only reason it was enticing on the PS4 was that it offered Drive Club day one, but now we know its actually a gimped version of Drive Club.

Why are lems hiding behind PC? Closeted lems again?kuraimen

What a pathetic bunch!

[QUOTE="campzor"]how can lems claim xbl offers more value or anywhere near the value ps+ does. Take this for example. Out of this list, I own Uncharted 3, Deus Ex HR and Saints Row 3. In Australia, the price for an annual subscription is $69. If i were to purchase PS Plus right now, I would get Xcom, LBP Karting, Machinarium, Gods eater burst and Virtues Last Reward, all for the price of $69 which in reality if i were to purchase each game individually, would most definitely be more than $69. So far, its already paid for itself. Now this is just 1 month.... 11 more months of games being swapped around means there will be like 70+ games that I could play for free (as the $69 already paid for games I would have gotten anyways). And most of these games are like <1 year old. There is no drawback to ps plus, please dont give me some lame excuse like "but you dont OWN them, you only RENT them and once the subscription finishes, you lose those games" Well... 2 things for you. 1. Why stop subscribing? You are going to get hundreds and hundreds of dollars worth of games for only $69. 2. Do ppl seriously play ALL their old games? I have a decent size collection of games and I barely go back and play the games which i finished years ago :/ and if it bothers you so much, go buy the games you actually would want to keep playing FOREVER and still have all these games coming at you. RR360DD

Because Value is subjective. Not fact.

In your example, I've played and beat every single one of those games except for LBP Karting and LOL do I want to play that.

I keep track of what PSN adds every month and its always something Ive already played or something I was never interested in in the first place, so why bother. The only reason it was enticing on the PS4 was that it offered Drive Club day one, but now we know its actually a gimped version of Drive Club.

Steam puts both of them over a barrel and has it's way with them.

.

[QUOTE="RR360DD"]

[QUOTE="campzor"]how can lems claim xbl offers more value or anywhere near the value ps+ does. Take this for example. Out of this list, I own Uncharted 3, Deus Ex HR and Saints Row 3. In Australia, the price for an annual subscription is $69. If i were to purchase PS Plus right now, I would get Xcom, LBP Karting, Machinarium, Gods eater burst and Virtues Last Reward, all for the price of $69 which in reality if i were to purchase each game individually, would most definitely be more than $69. So far, its already paid for itself. Now this is just 1 month.... 11 more months of games being swapped around means there will be like 70+ games that I could play for free (as the $69 already paid for games I would have gotten anyways). And most of these games are like <1 year old. There is no drawback to ps plus, please dont give me some lame excuse like "but you dont OWN them, you only RENT them and once the subscription finishes, you lose those games" Well... 2 things for you. 1. Why stop subscribing? You are going to get hundreds and hundreds of dollars worth of games for only $69. 2. Do ppl seriously play ALL their old games? I have a decent size collection of games and I barely go back and play the games which i finished years ago :/ and if it bothers you so much, go buy the games you actually would want to keep playing FOREVER and still have all these games coming at you. legalize82

Because Value is subjective. Not fact.

In your example, I've played and beat every single one of those games except for LBP Karting and LOL do I want to play that.

I keep track of what PSN adds every month and its always something Ive already played or something I was never interested in in the first place, so why bother. The only reason it was enticing on the PS4 was that it offered Drive Club day one, but now we know its actually a gimped version of Drive Club.

Firstly, its not free.

Secondly, thats cool. I'm not about to bash people who think PSN+ is great. But PSN+ being useful or full of value isnt true for everyone. If I want a game, I'll get it day 1 usually, I certainly won't wait for it to come available on PSN, so the service just isn't useful to me.

Steam puts both of them over a barrel and has it's way with them.

Sagem28

[QUOTE="Sagem28"]

Steam puts both of them over a barrel and has it's way with them.

freedomfreak

Figured you might like that.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="Sagem28"]

Steam puts both of them over a barrel and has it's way with them.

Sagem28

Figured you might like that.

[spoiler]

.

[/spoiler]

Willy105

lol, good one.

2006 should be 2012 though.
To emphasize the cow hypocrisy.