Developed by Lightspeed & Quantum Studio, the game looks and runs amazing for the platform it's on. So far it only has an upcoming China release, along with another version of the game that focuses on land, sea and air battles. There are currently over 75 million people pre-registered for the game.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)
2.6 million players today at peak.
I know Fortnite is currently higher.
But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated
Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)
2.6 million players today at peak.
I know Fortnite is currently higher.
But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated
Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.
Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).
And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.
Cool it gives hope for what the console versions will eventually get to. Reduced poly and game renders only what it can. The rest draws when you get there, right in front of you. Look at that landing now that's whats optimization is all about. Great work by Lightspeed & Quantum Studio.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)
2.6 million players today at peak.
I know Fortnite is currently higher.
But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated
Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.
Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).
And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.
You'd think that EA/DICE would be in the perfect position to create the market leading Battle Royale game.
They have one of the most gorgeous engines out there, with fantastic animations. Already supports 65 players for years with decent net code.... already has a large vehicle system in place.
People praise big publishers way too much around here, they are ALWAYS behind the curve.
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
I think PUBG only appears to be in a decline because some of the Chinese userbase are moving over to the Tencent version there is already 10 million pre registered users for it. But the mobile versions are getting crazy downloads both mobile versions in China already have over 75 million pre registrations combined. But is probably going to decline since Battle Royale's are becoming trendy with more and more being announced every day and some of them may find a niche that pulls players away from PUBG or are simply just bettered polished that attracts more people towards it.
PUBG has already decline on PC, but I can see PUBG will be popular on Mobile due to China's popularity over there and it doesn't take much efforts to get it running good on Mobile since there's not much to work on then for console version X1X.
A decline is a relative term... 70% of players still playing in the last 2 weeks out of all buyers (20 milllions active, 30 million bought)
2.6 million players today at peak.
I know Fortnite is currently higher.
But decline is waaaaaaay over exagurated
Not only that, but Fortnite should be expected to have a higher concurrent player base. It's free to play and available on one more outlet. I'm surprised it even took this long, given the conditions.
Fortnite looks too cartoony vs the more realistic PUBG. It's going to take a better version of PUBG to knock off the champ. (better graphics, better controls, some improvements in design).
And yeah, I went exaggerating over PUBG PC at the number of players playing, but make no mistakes, new games are releasing and gamers are gonna find something else to play.
You'd think that EA/DICE would be in the perfect position to create the market leading Battle Royale game.
They have one of the most gorgeous engines out there, with fantastic animations. Already supports 65 players for years with decent net code.... already has a large vehicle system in place.
People praise big publishers way too much around here, they are ALWAYS behind the curve.
And now EA are looking into a Battle Royale mode or something similar with their next battlefield. Can't wait for E3 when all the AAA companies announce their battle royale mode/game.
There is one game I'm forward to which is called Project X and is going to show gameplay at the PC Gamer Weekender on Feb 17th. It's going to be a 1000 player MMO tactical shooter with a 400 player Battle Royale mode. I'm more interested in the 1000 player mode because we have not gotten a shooter of this scale in a long time. All we have is Planetisde and I'm getting tired of it. It's about time that game got competition especially since Daybreak are getting lazy with it, maybe Project X will be the fire under them that gets them serious again.
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
...
.......
.............
Headphone Sound Stage
headphone Bass
better for cinema, not for games. too bad.
yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
...
.......
.............
Headphone Sound Stage
headphone Bass
better for cinema, not for games. too bad.
yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome
Ah yes the magic Diminishing returns of overpriced technology! that 10% better range! That rumble that brings your house down yet drowns everything else out!
Nervermind the surround system that is larger than your screen (more than likely) making a disconnect between what you are seeing and hearing.
There's a reason you don't see competitive gamers using friggin speaker systems for surround. ITS FOR TV.
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
...
.......
.............
Headphone Sound Stage
headphone Bass
better for cinema, not for games. too bad.
yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome
Ah yes the magic Diminishing returns of overpriced technology! that 10% better range! That rumble that brings your house down yet drowns everything else out!
Nervermind the surround system that is larger than your screen (more than likely) making a disconnect between what you are seeing and hearing.
There's a reason you don't see competitive gamers using friggin speaker systems for surround. ITS FOR TV.
I’lmao you really gonna try and deminish the awesomeness of a subwoofer. Gtfo man, this shit is just laughable.
Try using something other than the beats kiosk at bestbuy.
@GioVela2010 said:
@MBirdy88 said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@zaryia said:
@MBirdy88 said:
Not only that.
A TV no matter it's quality doesn't fill your vision as much as a monitor.
A good Studio Reference open-speaker headset with simulated surround sound would be far more useful than a room full of speakers at varied distances from you.
Literally, he has a cinema setup and assumes its somehow better for gaming.
Can't get through to some!
Nah breh, it's okay that most games are categorically and factually worse on XBOX1.....I have ATMOS!
...
.......
.............
Headphone Sound Stage
headphone Bass
better for cinema, not for games. too bad.
yeah pretending low frequencies don’t exist is awesome
Log in to comment