"Sony won't invest heavily in Playstation 4"

  • 183 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

"garbage like the cell"????????????

I don't even know where to begin:roll:

Well I guess I could begin with tons of devs who have had nothing but praise for the "garbage" you speak of...

mztazmz

Are those devs first party?

Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
Expect a rewamped Cell CPU or off the shelf quad core cpu, 4-8X more RAM and off the shelf GPU. Then you have a nice system that can launch at the price of $399.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
It took three of Nvidia's best card to run the Samaritan demo. I wouldn't expect consoles to run that anytime soon without costing an arm and a leg. Plus, the good thing about consoles is the amount of optimization they allow the developers. If current consoles can put out the kind of games we're seeing with the dated hardware they got now I'd imagine the 5770 would be able to keep us impressed for at least a few years. MrSelf-Destruct
They[epic] said that they could get it down to 1 580 with optimization. And a 5770 in a couple years, I'd be pissed, I have a 5850, which is quite a good bit better.

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]Last I heard 'bout that, they just said that they weren't going to buy production facilities for garbage like the cell again -.-, not like they're going down the wii route..mztazmz

"garbage like the cell"????????????

I don't even know where to begin:roll:

Well I guess I could begin with tons of devs who have had nothing but praise for the "garbage" you speak of...

Carmack seemed to hate it.. Said something along the lies of "it slows to a crawl if anything is vaguely off, and it's not obvious things.." And that it took a ton more work to get it to run.
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
it probably means it will go the way of using the same tech....they bought back the cell production plant so they may use a newly updated one with a blu ray drive and focus most of the attention on ram and gpu....heck if i was them id go the route of a new cell or multiple new ones with a stacked gpu
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#55 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Good news. Less expensive stuff, more useful stuff.
Avatar image for johnlennon28
johnlennon28

2158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 johnlennon28
Member since 2008 • 2158 Posts
ms and nintendo proved sony that you dont need a powerful console to sell, ninty's not hd but it sells, 360's hardware is crap but it sells, all you gotta do is good advertising and good gimicks to catch the casuals attention, although i hope sony doesnt go that way and keep the quality exclusive games coming,
Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

Fine by me. The days of graphics and console power need to take a step back and make way for what truly matters. Gameplay.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

360's hardware is crapjohnlennon28

360 and PS3 are nearly identical in performance. :|

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="johnlennon28"]360's hardware is crapwaltefmoney

360 and PS3 are nearly identical in performance. :|

And the 360's video card is a good bit better than the silly pos in the ps3.

Also, (I know I've said this a million times 'bout the 360...) on release, it had the best single gpu on the market, so it really wasn't crap at all.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

I don't want them investing on a bundle of hardware and peripherals anyways. Just give us a powerful next gen system that works like now (but powerful enough to be next gen) and I'm good. I'm fine with the current controller design anyways.

campzor
yup this... this is all i ever ask for in new generations of hardware.

your sig is so out of date and so wrong, i play my games on 1080p through HDMI and the 360 makes less sound than a Ps3 when you install the games to the HDD, anyway, it worked for MS this gen, standardised hardware on the cheap, i can see where SONY are coming from, they sank all there money into new technology and it ended up only being marginally more powerful than a much cheaper to produce console, SONY has always done well having the weaker console anyway, PS1 was weaker than the N64 yet it trounced it and the Ps2 was the weakest of all the consoles apart from the DC last gen yet it still came out tops.
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#61 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
That might just mean they wont go with a different cpu architecture and they might as well go with a decent 4/8core x86 CPU. The only downside to that would be backward compatibility but other than that i think it would be better to go x86
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
That might just mean they wont go with a different cpu architecture and they might as well go with a decent 4/8core x86 CPU. The only downside to that would be backward compatibility but other than that i think it would be better to go x86adamosmaki
Brute force emulation imo :D
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#63 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Sony should look at this gen´s Microsoft. Theydevelopped an equally powerfull console with half the resourses and hype. Just invest a bit more and make is reliable.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Sony should look at this gen´s Microsoft. Theydevelopped an equally powerfull console with half the resourses and hype. Just invest a bit more and make is reliable.

PAL360

I'd suggest the same thing, but my 360 has took a **** 5 times now and I'd hate to see Sony go that route. I'd much rather see them try to make their next console Nitnendo-quality. That stuff is indestructable I tell ya!

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Sony should look at this gen´s Microsoft. Theydevelopped an equally powerfull console with half the resourses and hype. Just invest a bit more and make is reliable.

ChubbyGuy40

I'd suggest the same thing, but my 360 has took a **** 5 times now and I'd hate to see Sony go that route. I'd much rather see them try to make their next console Nitnendo-quality. That stuff is indestructable I tell ya!

My PCs have been pretty indestructible, last one lasted ~40k hours on, I say, Sony just make a normal sized pc, and call it a console. :D None of those silly overheating problems.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#66 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Sony should look at this gen´s Microsoft. Theydevelopped an equally powerfull console with half the resourses and hype. Just invest a bit more and make is reliable.

ChubbyGuy40

I'd suggest the same thing, but my 360 has took a **** 5 times now and I'd hate to see Sony go that route. I'd much rather see them try to make their next console Nitnendo-quality. That stuff is indestructable I tell ya!

Well, then they should do a 50/50.

I like new consoles to be at least 4 times more powerfull than previous ones :P

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Sony should look at this gen´s Microsoft. Theydevelopped an equally powerfull console with half the resourses and hype. Just invest a bit more and make is reliable.

PAL360

I'd suggest the same thing, but my 360 has took a **** 5 times now and I'd hate to see Sony go that route. I'd much rather see them try to make their next console Nitnendo-quality. That stuff is indestructable I tell ya!

Well, then they should do a 50/50.

I like new consoles to be at least 4 times more powerfull than previous ones :P

My video card, I think.., is rated at >6x more powerful x.x (a measly 5850)
Avatar image for LucidJubilation
LucidJubilation

1165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 LucidJubilation
Member since 2010 • 1165 Posts
[QUOTE="mojosodopee"]

If this is true i won't be getting a playstation 4, i want the best of the best when it comes to gaming. I'll hate to do it but ill go back to xbox

Inconsistancy
It just means they didn't buy facilities and aren't going to push a new format (most likely).... :roll:

but arent you guessing? :roll:
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts
Won't invest heavily as in they are not going to help make another format like black-beam disks.LOXO7
This, I take the PS3 capabilties as the min. which is still very incredicble .... just better CPU, GPU and bigger RAM ... wallah, you had ur PS4.
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

If anything, Sony may wind up going the Wii route in terms of power & graphics the next time around.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24433 Posts
[QUOTE="Jynxzor"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

http://www.industrygamers.com/news/sony-wont-make-massive-investment-in-ps4/

This is very disappointing if true

hockeyruler12
That doesn't mean much really, Nintendo pulled the Wii and DS out of it's behind while suffering from the bomb of the Gamecube. It's always possible that a tight budget might make them rethink adding rediculously expensive equipment and less time spent researching peripherals for the system that don't come out for years "Sup move". Saying that the PS4 will suck because of a stringest development budget isn't the best way to think about it. Sounds more like they aren't going to fund wastefull spending.

I don't think it will suck, but it may not be as impressive as the PS3 hardware was at launch. Xbox might be the most powerful console, which actually might be bad for MS, as the most powerful console has not won the past 2 generations in sales.

not because of power though... because of market saturation mostly.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="mojosodopee"]

If this is true i won't be getting a playstation 4, i want the best of the best when it comes to gaming. I'll hate to do it but ill go back to xbox

LucidJubilation
It just means they didn't buy facilities and aren't going to push a new format (most likely).... :roll:

but arent you guessing? :roll:

Yea... speculation(guessing) is all that's occurring here from either side, however I do recall reading something on that on the last time someone brought up this topic, with a different link, if I could remember it better, I'd find it. Or if Chrome's history wasn't poorly implemented garbage.
Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
Nintendo is making a console barely more powerful than the current ones, Microsoft will most likely build a console around kinect and Sony realised that console business is not that profitable after all. Is this the beginning of the end for console gaming as we know it? Good thing pc gaming will always be here for everyone.
Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#74 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

This is good, maybe I will be able to buy their console! Im not being sarcastic either. I am poor and dont have a job yet (hopefully I get hired in the upcoming week or so).

Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#75 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

Nintendo is making a console barely more powerful than the current ones, Microsoft will most likely build a console around kinect and Sony realised that console business is not that profitable after all. Is this the beginning of the end for console gaming as we know it? Good thing pc gaming will always be here for everyone.SamiRDuran

But the specs havent been officially announced or confirmed by Nintendo:|

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

This is good, maybe I will be able to buy their console! Im not being sarcastic either. I am poor anddont have a job yet (hopefully I get hired in the upcoming week or so).

Gamingclone
Invest - to put (money) to use, by purchase or expenditure, in something offering potential profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value.

Just sounds like they're not as likely to make it more out of more valuable parts than it's sale price and not push a new tech with it, says nothing about final price, that can still be high.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60815 Posts

I'm just gonna assume that they aren't gonna design a whole new CPU architecture AND a whole new disc format.

ChubbyGuy40
I agree and this alone would save them a ton of money.
Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

leave it to msoft to just put out another crappy pc in a small box and call it the next "xbox"

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

leave it to msoft to just put out another crappy pc in a small box and call it the next "xbox"

dxmcat
what?
Avatar image for Com64-2
Com64-2

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Com64-2
Member since 2011 • 134 Posts

My specs of PS3:

GPU: Imagination Technologies Rogue Power VR 6, SGX6RMP8 ,

256bit UMA 4Gb GDDR5 ram, 132 GB/s Bandwidth at 800 Mhrz

8 core GPU, 8x210GFlops=1680GFlops,

8x5=40 Billions per second visible pixel fillrate (Forward rendered), 8x13=104 Billions per second visible pixel fillrate (Deferred Render)

Peak Polygon rate: 8x350= 2800 million polygons per second ( In game with all effects only 700 Million polygons per second and 22.33 Millions polygons per frame if 30 frames per second**)

** Thats about 12x times the poly count of Uncharted 2.

OpenGL and DirectX and can do all new effects DX11+ if coded.

TDP is 15 watt per core***= 120 watt in 40nm but when ps4 arrives at 20nm it will get sliced to 60watt for gpu. *** Power VR 6 Rogue specs

CPU:

IBM 7 derative 6 core ( two core disabled) and cpu is ``out of order`` meaning each core is many many times faster than cell PPE.

3.4 Ghrz x 6

TDP: 90watt in 22nm **** ****IBM power 7 specs: 240 watt tdp for 8 core version 3.4 Ghrz at 45nm

And system is max 200 watt total

And offcourse a faster Blueray drive and 500GB HDD

Price: 399.99 US dollar, E3 2012, Release date: Q1 2013,
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

This doesn't mean they will make the weakest system. Sony is all about pride and excellence and only the best, they always try to have the best tech products out there. See their other products. This just means they won't bother with facilities trying to make another so called "The Cell" chip all over again. This proved wasteful to them.

Blazerdt47

Basically this ^

Sony isnt going to spend tons of cash on R&D, they'll go a more standard route, decent vid card, cpu, etc. But no new disc format or "DA CELL 2" BS.

Keep it simple and keep it strong, is probably what they're aiming at.

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#83 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
they could be more like nintendo and just outsource their chip technology. For Nintendo you might as well call the gamecube and wii IBM's entrance into the console race.
Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts
If they can make it developer friendly and stick with bluray and the option of dd. They should be able to have a decent spec console at a good price. They might want to think about making a profit on each console this time, even if it is a small amount. They don't need to go down the wii route, they could have something "next gen" in power, but have it well priced.
Avatar image for Gamingclone
Gamingclone

5224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#85 Gamingclone
Member since 2009 • 5224 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamingclone"]

This is good, maybe I will be able to buy their console! Im not being sarcastic either. I am poor anddont have a job yet (hopefully I get hired in the upcoming week or so).

Inconsistancy

Invest - to put (money) to use, by purchase or expenditure, in something offering potential profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value.

Just sounds like they're not as likely to make it more out of more valuable parts than it's sale price and not push a new tech with it, says nothing about final price, that can still be high.

Uh thanks, though I already knew the meaning of Invest. Besides, you cant invest in something if you dont have the money.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

Cheap hardware? I sure hope their launch batch of consoles last more than 3 years this time. YLOD and RROD, I've suffered them both multiple times.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Not surprising. Sony invests a lot in the PS3 and people decide to buy the console that breaks, that charges for online and that has overpriced accesories which makes it end up costing more than the PS3. Investing is not worth it when people buy based on hype. Better invest $500 million hyping a gimmick like Kinect and be done with it.
Avatar image for mojosodopee
mojosodopee

280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 mojosodopee
Member since 2010 • 280 Posts

If anything, Sony may wind up going the Wii route in terms of power & graphics the next time around.

garland51

My thoughts exactly. I can just see sony announcing ps4 and the graphics be exactly like the ps3 or even worst. I was hoping ps4 games will look twice as good as witcher 2 & killzone 3 but now i can forget about it.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

http://www.industrygamers.com/news/sony-wont-make-massive-investment-in-ps4/

This is very disappointing if true

hockeyruler12
Not at all it can still be pretty powerful,remember the PS3 high cost was do to a new format,XDR and Cell,Replace XDR by normal DDR now which is cheaper,replace Cell with a PC CPU which also mean it would be cheaper than Cell was on 2006,and add Blu-Ray as the medium which now is way cheaper,and would be even more cheaper when the next gen arrive.And you have a pretty powerful console that cost allot less to manufacture. What they mean by that probably is saying hey we will not use a new medium for games,considering Blu-Ray still has allot of space,we will not use some fancy Ram or Custom build CPU,they will probably get a Nvidia GPU like the RSX,probably more powerful than the RSX by time frame.
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#91 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
This probably just means Sony is not going to spend $1 billion developing a proprietary CPU again. It didn't work out well for the PS3-- it made the system more expensive, and it made development more expensive and complicated. The PS4 will probably have a more standard multi-core CPU made by Intel or AMD.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

lower then 600 dollars confirmed?

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

Not surprising. Sony invests a lot in the PS3 and people decide to buy the console that breaks, that charges for online and that has overpriced accesories which makes it end up costing more than the PS3. Investing is not worth it when people buy based on hype. Better invest $500 million hyping a gimmick like Kinect and be done with it.kuraimen
Hey. Say what you will about the 360's milkage factor, but the lower price and smoother, more solid online element played an important role in its success.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#94 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Well most of the costs have already been covered by the PS3, the Cell cost Sony millions and now it's much more advanced it's gone from 90nm to i think 35nm die, plus Sony own the manufacturing plant so that means the chips will be even cheaper with no middle man to pay. Blu-Ray was also co-developed by Sony and all the work has been done so even a 4x or 8x Blu-Ray drive will be really cheap this time round. I think we'll barely notice the tighter budget this time around but the PS3 was a lesson for Sony in that just because the PS2 sold millions and ruled the roost doesn't mean it's yours forever.
Avatar image for SpyhunterReborn
SpyhunterReborn

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 SpyhunterReborn
Member since 2011 • 45 Posts

Did people read the source material?

They basically said that they will never invest into hardware like they did with the PS3. Seems like the reasonable conclusion to me. Beyond that, there is no need for any conjecture, as they really didn't leave anything out there to make such leaps.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

who can blame them after getting schooled this gen the way they were.

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

So,it isn't going to be equipped with hardware a satellite needs to function properly?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#98 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50077 Posts
Sony is talking some sense, with all the red they've experienced in the past few years... I don't blame them for not wanting to heavily invest in a console.
Avatar image for WreckEm711
WreckEm711

7362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 WreckEm711
Member since 2010 • 7362 Posts

This doesn't mean they will make the weakest system. Sony is all about pride and excellence and only the best, they always try to have the best tech products out there. See their other products. This just means they won't bother with facilities trying to make another so called "The Cell" chip all over again. This proved wasteful to them.

Blazerdt47

You either started gaming this generation or you pretend the PS1 and PS2 werent underpowered compared to the competition :P

Avatar image for Giant_Panda
Giant_Panda

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Giant_Panda
Member since 2007 • 982 Posts

Sony should just buy standard PCparts and then unify the gamepad and motion control with the Move Shock. It won't be anything new but if it is refined and the best at what it does it will succeed.