That's why many publishers now focus more on consoles. They're cheaper to develop and make more money
nameless12345
This.
Damn PC with it's royalty fees and retail only games!!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]
[QUOTE="1Stark1"]
OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like?Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCsarent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are,they're basicallyan embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpureleases,computers can use them unlike consoles.Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become morepowerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.
heretrix
You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspx
When people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.
Spending money on an Alienware anything isn't wise either.If you're spending $1,000 on a laptop then yes it is wise.
It's perfectly acceptable for someone to say the PC is the best console, because that's their opinion. The thing that's NOT acceptable is bashing the PS3 and 360 for not being able to match the PC's graphics. When someone brings that up, I facepalm.SoraX64
1st of all - PC is not a console.
2nd - It IS acceptable to bash the PS3,360,PC,Wii because it's SW.
[QUOTE="SoraX64"]It's perfectly acceptable for someone to say the PC is the best console, because that's their opinion. The thing that's NOT acceptable is bashing the PS3 and 360 for not being able to match the PC's graphics. When someone brings that up, I facepalm.coreybg
1st of all - PC is not a console.
2nd - It IS acceptable to bash the PS3,360,PC,Wii because it's SW.
1 - Oh my bad, I usually just replace system with console. :P 2 - I'm not saying people can't bash them, but you have to admit that it IS a little ridiculous to troll consoles because they can't match PC graphics 4 years after they release...[QUOTE="SoraX64"]It's perfectly acceptable for someone to say the PC is the best console, because that's their opinion. The thing that's NOT acceptable is bashing the PS3 and 360 for not being able to match the PC's graphics. When someone brings that up, I facepalm.coreybg
1st of all - PC is not a console.
2nd - It IS acceptable to bash the PS3,360,PC,Wii because it's SW.
Beat me to it! And saying we can't talk about PC graphics is like saying we can't compare the 360/PS3's online to the Wii's. In both cases, the more advanced systems have a clear advantage, and it shouldn't be ignored.[QUOTE="coreybg"][QUOTE="SoraX64"]It's perfectly acceptable for someone to say the PC is the best console, because that's their opinion. The thing that's NOT acceptable is bashing the PS3 and 360 for not being able to match the PC's graphics. When someone brings that up, I facepalm.SoraX64
1st of all - PC is not a console.
2nd - It IS acceptable to bash the PS3,360,PC,Wii because it's SW.
I'm not saying people can't bash them, but you have to admit that it IS a little ridiculous to troll consoles because they can't match PC graphics 4 years after they release... I don't know about trolling, but an advantage is an advantage. If this were "console wars" and someone made a thread about whether Halo Reach or Super Mario Galaxy 2 is graphics king, a Cow would be perfectly justified to come in and state it's Uncharted 2.Spending money on an Alienware anything isn't wise either.heretrix
Spending money on an Alienware anything isn't wise either.[QUOTE="heretrix"]
[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]
You should've spent your money more wisely on a laptop that costs over $1,000 then.
http://www.alienware.com/Landings/m11x.aspxWhen people refer to PCs here, they refer to gaming PCs, most of which today are easily more powerful than consoles. No one ever said all, but it's easier to say PC than to explain all that each time.
Mystic-G
If you're spending $1,000 on a laptop then yes it is wise.
I could argue that spending a grand on a laptop isn't wise, but I won't because they aren't my thing.For a grand I can built a pretty sweet PC. That and the fact that Alienware products are usually more money than they should be.[QUOTE="SoraX64"][QUOTE="coreybg"]1st of all - PC is not a console.2nd - It IS acceptable to bash the PS3,360,PC,Wii because it's SW.Head_of_gamesI'm not saying people can't bash them, but you have to admit that it IS a little ridiculous to troll consoles because they can't match PC graphics 4 years after they release... I don't know about trolling, but an advantage is an advantage. If this were "console wars" and someone made a thread about whether Halo Reach or Super Mario Galaxy 2 is graphics king, a Cow would be perfectly justified to come in and state it's Uncharted 2. I think you've misunderstood me. It's perfectly fine to say that the PC has the best graphics because it is true. What I have a problem with is when that suddenly becomes a FAULT of the consoles. "Consoles suck because they can't match my high end PC's graphics" - random poster Well duh. :?
[QUOTE="1Stark1"]
OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like? Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCs arent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are ,they're basically an embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpu releases,computers can use them unlike consoles. Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become more powerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.
AiurProtoss
you do realise a gaming PC from 2005 can still play games at higher resolutions than consoles right?? and when we get into the 2006 and 2007 years they completely destroy them.
Well no crap, computers can like upgrade:roll:
[QUOTE="AiurProtoss"]
[QUOTE="1Stark1"]
OK, I'm gonna get flamed for this but I gotta get it off my chest. Why is it that some posters in system wars act as if PC is some sort of unique platform.The PC is a just a generic computer. I don't mean that in a bad way, but it has multiple manufacturers, and it isn't meant specifically for games. Does it have a launch date, how many games were available for launch,what does it look like? Now I'm not here to bash PC, just the way people use the term PC here. For example, I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCs arent a unique gaming platform like the consoles are ,they're basically an embodiment of current processing technology. When a new processor or gpu releases,computers can use them unlike consoles. Computers aren't static like gaming consoles,so why again are we comparing the two. Another thing, computers have potential to become more powerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.
1Stark1
you do realise a gaming PC from 2005 can still play games at higher resolutions than consoles right?? and when we get into the 2006 and 2007 years they completely destroy them.
Well no crap, computers can like upgrade:roll:
Ok, simple yes or no question: Do you or do you not think that a gaming PC with all the latest tech is a better system than the consoles?[QUOTE="1Stark1"][QUOTE="AiurProtoss"]
you do realise a gaming PC from 2005 can still play games at higher resolutions than consoles right?? and when we get into the 2006 and 2007 years they completely destroy them.
Head_of_games
Well no crap, computers can like upgrade:roll:
Ok, simple yes or no question: Do you or do you not think that a gaming PC with all the latest tech is a better system than the consoles?In a technical aspect of course, as it should. Computers are well computers:| Of course I prefer to game on consoles, but hey thats just me.I never said computers aren't more advanced than consoles, you have me all wrong here. What I'm fed up with is how Hermits act as if its something to bring up all the time, as If PC is a console or something.Computers constantly upgrade and are always offered in various configurations, brands, etc. Why should they be compared to static machines that are build for gaming. Basically Computers should be compared to consoles and all Hermits know it. Some just come on this board to throw around their misguided feelings of superiority over consolites and its BS because its a no S&^# situation that computers are more powerful than consoles as they're general use machines that have been around for ages.
Because we're talking about the PC as a platform we have to take the best example possible. If it was about your personal PC vs PS3 then fine but it is about the entire platform and so you take the best example in each platform and compare them. In the same way comparing a broken PS3 to a working 360 would be idiotic, you have to take the best examples of each platform.Another thing, computers have potential to become more powerful than consoles, but why is it that posters act like all of them are more powerful. My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.
1Stark1
[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]
[QUOTE="heretrix"]Spending money on an Alienware anything isn't wise either.
heretrix
If you're spending $1,000 on a laptop then yes it is wise.
I could argue that spending a grand on a laptop isn't wise, but I won't because they aren't my thing.For a grand I can built a pretty sweet PC. That and the fact that Alienware products are usually more money than they should be. I am very aware of what you can build with $1,000. I'm merely speaking to him if he were set on buying a laptop at that price.[QUOTE="heretrix"]I could argue that spending a grand on a laptop isn't wise, but I won't because they aren't my thing.For a grand I can built a pretty sweet PC. That and the fact that Alienware products are usually more money than they should be. I am very aware of what you can build with $1,000. I'm merely speaking to him if he were set on buying a laptop at that price. while thats true, Ive seen some nice msi laptops for that price on ncix. I cant link it, but its core i5 and 5850 with 15.4 inch screen for 1200 canadian. Seems pretty stupid to buy a crappy hp laptop like the one tc got. I even understand it has a blu-ray drive, but even those should only cost about 100 dollars more than dvd.[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]
If you're spending $1,000 on a laptop then yes it is wise.
Mystic-G
I would simply stick with the games and at a best-case scenario. PC gamers vary in their hardware. Console gamers vary in the televisions they have their consoles hooked up to. I know more than a few (including my own kid plus nieces and nephews) who still game on an SDTV.
I guess no one gets where I'm coming from.......sigh
1Stark1
that's not tue.
the people that understand just don't want to argue with the people who can't accept rational logic because it's pointless...as you are finding out the hard way.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]What laptop do you have?1Stark1
http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee
That one, but in white.
You got ripped off. Why did you waste your money on that? You could have gotten a Phenom II Quad Core with HD 5730 and it would have trashed your Xbox 360 AND PS3 both of them combined (and it const less than $1000:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220755
Because the hardware is leagues better than that in consoles, despite you not owning it. It's system wars, that's why it is compared.skrat_01
so then for someone to factually say "PC is the best" they would have to be referring to their own PC that has hardware that is better than every other PC out there correct?
Because if my PC isn't as powerful as current gen consoles and yet if people are say "PC is the best " it would have to include mine to which would make that statement no longer ture right? or no lol?
lol here's another example
Can I say PC is the weakest if I have a crap PC? or does it automatically upgrade to the best because another random guy out there has one better than mine?
PS3's, 360's, and wii's are all the same however TC makes a very valid point, people are just chosing to ignore it.
What, Alienwares are crap, well I mean the hardware isn't crap but the price is, you can find a better computer for less a price if you just look around a bit. Alienware is like the mac of pcs. SAGE_OF_FIREThis. I hate to be an ass, but I just can not respect some guys opinion that PC gaming is meh when he is rocking a Mac.... I mean Alienware Laptop. Hell I think it is lame to buy laptops for gaming to begin with, but meh whatever.
:!:
I just came up with a new idea.
I don't think people should be able to say "PC is the best" unless THEY themselves have a PC that can Put out the optimal graphics which they speak about. Because simply saying "PC is the best" when not PC have the same graphics, ability and configuration is an out right lie.
You could say MY PC is the best. etc and list your specs and give graphics from YOUR computer to comparie against everything else and see if people agree but not some phantom system that someone has that isn't even relevant to experience.
Super Mario Galaxy 2
GOW3
Gears of War 2
all look and play the same on what ever version of those consoles you play but PC is the only system that say "crysis" will not look the same on everybody's setup and even the proformance is affected on PCs that have diffrent setups, so it could only even be prime if it's YOUR version that you're referring to.
No that is a terrible idea. Then you would have people asking for configurations and such. PC is the best and that is all there is to it. Besides I highly doubt that half the console players in here know anything about hardware.:!:
I just came up with a new idea.
I don't think people should be able to say "PC is the best" unless THEY themselves have a PC that can Put out the optimal graphics which they speak about. Because simply saying "PC is the best" when not PC have the same ability and configuration is a lie plain and simple.
georgia_bulll
No that is a terrible idea. Then you would have people asking for configurations and such. PC is the best and that is all there is to it. Besides I highly doubt that half the console players in here know anything about hardware.[QUOTE="georgia_bulll"]
:!:
I just came up with a new idea.
I don't think people should be able to say "PC is the best" unless THEY themselves have a PC that can Put out the optimal graphics which they speak about. Because simply saying "PC is the best" when not PC have the same ability and configuration is a lie plain and simple.
millerlight89
lol it's a terrible idea because it would expose alot of fanboys to be fake boys is what you mean.
I mean if ALL you guys have such amazingly power PC 10 million time more powerful than anything on consoles then why shouldn't you have to show it because I can say PC is the worst because I have a terrible PC gaming set up (I don't I have a pretty good PC just saying)
No that is a terrible idea. Then you would have people asking for configurations and such. PC is the best and that is all there is to it. Besides I highly doubt that half the console players in here know anything about hardware.[QUOTE="millerlight89"]
[QUOTE="georgia_bulll"]
:!:
I just came up with a new idea.
I don't think people should be able to say "PC is the best" unless THEY themselves have a PC that can Put out the optimal graphics which they speak about. Because simply saying "PC is the best" when not PC have the same ability and configuration is a lie plain and simple.
georgia_bulll
lol it's a terrible idea because it would expose alot of fanboys to be fake boys is what you mean.
I mean if ALL you guys have such amazingly power PC 10 million time more powerful than anything on consoles then why shouldn't you have to show it because I can say PC is the worst because I have a terrible PC gaming set up (I don't I have a pretty good PC just saying)
Just because you have PC that is worse doesn't mean it's the worst. PC is the best when it comes to graphics.
I saw a poster say "The PS3 and 360 will never surpass the PC" Like really?PCs arent a unique gaming platform
1Stark1
When a new processor or gpu releases,computers can use them unlike consoles.
1Stark1
If you keep dismissing what makes the PC unique then it's only natural you're going to be left with conclusion you've made. In this post you have stated over and over again what makes gaming on the PC unique but maintained that it isn't unique.
My laptop doesn't touch my PS3 or 360 in terms of spec and it costs over $1000.
1Stark1
That's because it's a laptop.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]What laptop do you have?1Stark1
http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.CM_SCID.coll.item.E165748.desc.HP-DV7-173-Notebook-6GB-RAM-500GB-HD-Bluray-Win73YR-McAfee
That one, but in white.
It's your fault you chose to get a laptop with a blu ray player instead of a more powerful video card. I bet that laptop blu ray player was a fortune. Plus, you bought it off QVC... What a deal. :roll:This is a really stupid thread and the only thing I've learnt is TC knows how to waste his money.
Example for a little over $1000 you can get this: ($1,174)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220700&Tpk=ASUS%20G51JX-X1
I compare them, because they share so many games. However monthly upgrades? You're pushing it now buddy.Ok posters, in the real world, do you guys think that general use computers with monthly upgrades should be compared to consoles, if so, please explain why?
1Stark1
Because they both play games?Ok posters, in the real world, do you guys think that general use computers with monthly upgrades should be compared to consoles, if so, please explain why?
1Stark1
Edit: I haven't upgraded my pc since I bought it 3 years ago and it still plays most games.
All i gather from this is that you brought a laptop crap for games and now your pissed off. $1000 for crap Notebook laptop you brought its your own fault for not doing your research....Like the other poster said the M11x alienware lapton is under $1000 and that will out perform the 360 and PS3 combined. On top of that gaming laptops are more expensive then gaming rigs. And on top of that Alienware are alot more expensive then building your own.
So the fact you have not actually had a gaming laptop or rig tells me you know nothing about PC gaming.
I own a PC that is a capable gaming machine and therefore comparable to consoles. I'm sure the majority of people here who own a PC and compare it to a console have some sort of gaming PC, otherwise as you say, there would be no point in comparing. But then I can take your argument and spin it this way, why bother comparing consoles to the PC, it's using 5 year old tech, there's no way it can live up to such a high standard.Ok posters, in the real world, do you guys think that general use computers with monthly upgrades should be compared to consoles, if so, please explain why?
1Stark1
Ok posters, in the real world, do you guys think that general use computers with monthly upgrades should be compared to consoles, if so, please explain why?
1Stark1
Well, first of all we're in a forum which follows a different set of rules, thus why would we bring the "real world" into it? Secondly, PC's aren't upgraded monthly and not all computers are general use. Mine is specifically for gaming as my laptop does my general uses.
All i gather from this is that you brought a laptop crap for games and now your pissed off. $1000 for crap Notebook laptop you brought its your own fault for not doing your research....Like the other poster said the M11x alienware lapton is under $1000 and that will out perform the 360 and PS3 combined. On top of that gaming laptops are more expensive then gaming rigs. And on top of that Alienware are alot more expensive then building your own.
So the fact you have not actually had a gaming laptop or rig tells me you know nothing about PC gaming.
mattuk69
Actually, I'm happy with my laptop, it has the features I wanted. The only computer games I want to playare Crysis and Stalker, so I saw no point in going for a stronger GPU versus a bigger screen and Bluray .My point is that all PCs arent equal, therefore, saying stuff like PC is more powerful than console is invalid. It should be more like 2010 tech is better than 2005 tech since PCs arent set hardware like consoles.Computers shouldn't be compared to consoles, thats the gist of this thread.
All I get from this thread is TC brought an overpriced laptop that is crap compared to what you can get for the same price as shown by other and now he is ticked of at PC games and PC gaming hardware beacuse of his overpriced laptop that he brought. Typical example of consoler who knows nothing about PC gaming or PC hardware.
Do, yourself a favor return that laptop and buy one of thegaming laptop that we posted for the same price.Better yet, if you want one with a Blu-ray you could just spend a little more and get a gaming laptop AND blu-ray.
[QUOTE="mattuk69"]
All i gather from this is that you brought a laptop crap for games and now your pissed off. $1000 for crap Notebook laptop you brought its your own fault for not doing your research....Like the other poster said the M11x alienware lapton is under $1000 and that will out perform the 360 and PS3 combined. On top of that gaming laptops are more expensive then gaming rigs. And on top of that Alienware are alot more expensive then building your own.
So the fact you have not actually had a gaming laptop or rig tells me you know nothing about PC gaming.
1Stark1
Actually, I'm happy with my laptop, it has the features I wanted. The onlycomputer games I want to playare Crysis and Stalker.My point is that all PCs arent equal, therefore, saying stuff like PC is more powerful than console is invalid. It should be more like 2010 tech is better than 2005 tech since PCs arent set hardware like consoles.Computers shouldn't be compared to consoles, thats the gist of this thread.
My PC stomps consoles.... so no PC >consoles. You can argue and nitpick all you want. You still will not have changed anything.I haven't upgraded my computer since March 2009 and I still run today's games.:|[QUOTE="1Stark1"]
Ok posters, in the real world, do you guys think that general use computers with monthly upgrades should be compared to consoles, if so, please explain why?
mitu123
Ive had my current pc for 3.5 years and havnt upgraded anything, might get a new graphcis card next year thats it.
Its funny how people act like you have to upgrade your PC every month lol.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment