Read Dead Redemption looks so much better on 360. How?

Essentially when a game is ported to a different platform it is being optimised for it. Any links for RDR not using any of the SPEs as someone mentioned? (course not)

Let me break it down.... From your own experiences, which gives better graphics?

1- A PC with an average CPU and good GPU (360)

2- A PC with an average GPU and good CPU (PS3)

Its clearly the first option. There are arguments to both sides (Ps3- lazy developers, xbox- reason why ps3 exclusives look better is because MS doesnt push 1st party development).

THE ONLY VALID WAY TO COMPARE SOMETHING IS WHEN YOU HAVE CERTAIN CONTROLS BEING THE SAME, IE MULTIPLATS. And we all know 360 takes the prize here.

Its like saying Mario Sunshine would look better on the PS2, when the real answer is "no you n00b its not out on that platform so you will never know!"

But throughout this form its clear that the PS3 fanboys have an inferiority complex, you hear them harp on about uncharted and killzone not being able to be done on the 360. When in actuality "no you n00b its not our on that platform so you will never know!"

And its totally irrational and stupid to say PS3 is more powerful because of their exclusives, yet in the same vain say that developers are lazy when it comes to multi plats. The proof is in the pudding and the 360 can push more polygons than the PS3 - fact! Which is the most important aspect of graphics!Talk about denial!

i swear there was a link posted on here to a rockstar insider saying that the team had put little effort into the ps3 version at the "request" of MS to make the 360 seem better.

[QUOTE="bryn8150"]

because the PS3 is a game machine that has difficulties with game optimization. when a PS3 exclusive title like uncharted comes out that utilizes the PS3's strenghths its a great looking game.

thats because Naughty dog will NEVER tell you that the cell processor is really the 360 Xenos and vice versa.

dean tekahashi explains this in his book better than i can

LINK

http://www.amazon.com/Xbox-360-Uncloaked-Microsofts-Next-Generation/dp/0977784215

The 360 cpu was basically ripped off from the cell, its a variant of it made to work better with current dev tools. but COWS will NEVER accept this as they have been trained for 15 years to believe EVERYTHING sony tells them.

but the true test of your system is how well it handles Multiplatform titles in comparison with its nearest competition. and in that battle the PS3 has been losing to 360 year after year.

how gamers got tricked into believing that the PS3 is so much more powerful than the 360 based off of Uncharted 2 is beyond me.

this is further exasperated by lying PS3 developers like naughty dog and suckerpunch quoting the now famous '' this game can only be done on PS3 '' crap.

when in reality Uncharted 2 would have probably ran smoother and looked sharper on the 360.

now SW fans, how do we know this, the past 6 years of 360 multiplats ( Bayonetta, RDR, GTA 4, MW2 the list goes on to infinity ) should tell you this. Rage next year will tell you this also, and how about Enslaved by the makers of Heavenly Sword.

remember how the Heavenly Sword Engine was only possible on the PS3? and how the visuals of HS were ONLY possible on the CELL?

Well here is the Heavenly Sword engine running on the 360

Enslaved xbox 360

LINK

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/142/14249395/imgs_1.html

you have to learn to listen to none of what Sony and their fans say and believe half of what you see.

they will NEVER give the 360 its due after Gears of War curbstomped Resistance back in 2006.

lets move on please.

Adamantium4k2

:lol:

rofl

To be honest its more abuot people loving to complain about everyting 24/7. i played the PS3 verison and saw nothing wrong with it. its still expensive tho, i will buy it when its cheaper

finalstar2007

i swear there was a link posted on here to a rockstar insider saying that the team had put little effort into the ps3 version at the "request" of MS to make the 360 seem better.

_zeldredz_

It is like the "insider" tht said Rare had 10 hardcore games in the making, almost ready for releaseand cancelled them all to make the sports title for Kinect ?

Well, you do know how credible those insiders are

Many ppl thought PS3 was more powerfull but both are just....equal. That´s the problem of the hype

PAL360

[QUOTE="italygamer"][QUOTE="ThePsTriple"] [QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Lazy devs has the PS3 version looking worse, I own it and it doesn't help how blurry it can look(sub HD at 640p v.s. 720p on 360) along with a bad framerate at times. And using QAA instead of 2xAA like on 360 is not cool.

donalbane

Am i the only one who dosent know what a bad framerate is or what a QAA is or screen tearing is or a 30 to 60FPS is or any other screen crap out there lol, its better that i dont know so i wont be a screen whore like everyone else on sw :P

60fps is what you want. 30fps or below is not what you want. The higher the framerate the smoother the game plays because it's rendering the images at a faster rate.

I guess it is lucky in a sense that you only own a PS3. While you get piss poor performance you don't own a 360 or PC to compare it to, so you'll never know how bad you have it at times.

I can't even stand bad frame rates anymore. Not when my PC is busting out 60+ fps in all the games I play. It's annoying, and frustrating to deal with. Must be why I love my Dreamcast so much. That system has a ton of games that run flawlessly on it.

Didn't GTA 4 look the same though. Why couldn't rockstar do the same for rdr?

bphan

[QUOTE="donalbane"]

[QUOTE="italygamer"][QUOTE="ThePsTriple"] [QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

60fps is what you want. 30fps or below is not what you want. The higher the framerate the smoother the game plays because it's rendering the images at a faster rate.

I guess it is lucky in a sense that you only own a PS3. While you get piss poor performance you don't own a 360 or PC to compare it to, so you'll never know how bad you have it at times.

I can't even stand bad frame rates anymore. Not when my PC is busting out 60+ fps in all the games I play. It's annoying, and frustrating to deal with. Must be why I love my Dreamcast so much. That system has a ton of games that run flawlessly on it.

Cheesehead9099

We will never know, since all its great looking exclusives are set in tiny stages that are mostly coriddors

In opne games like RDR, did not do so well

Rage will reveal the truth about PS3, huge open world with the best graphics as everyone said after E3