Obvious bullshots are obvious. Resistance 3 does not have 8XAA.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
confirmed "In-Game" or just confirmed to be using the games engine? all you have to do is look at the lack of Aliasing on the Telephone lines to know its not rendered in realtime on any console :? Seriously i'd of thought people would have learnt this by now.[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]
Wut? did you even READ?
Insomniac: "The build is a couple months old (to be included in the Battle: LA disc). It is a complete demo though (not leaked code). Since then we have added a lot more polish and tweaks to the entire game."
Image below is CONFIRMED in-game
marklarmer
the funny thing is that even the tc knows that they're bullshots.
i'm not sure who he's trying to fool here, us or himself...
Pure haters in this thread.Insomniac spends 3 years making this game after the **** storm they had to face after R2 and people seriously believe that R3 will be sub HD ?????Name one PS3 exclusive thats sub HD(except HAZE).I dare you.conistant
mgs4 is sub-hd :lol:
[QUOTE="conistant"]Pure haters in this thread.Insomniac spends 3 years making this game after the **** storm they had to face after R2 and people seriously believe that R3 will be sub HD ?????Name one PS3 exclusive thats sub HD(except HAZE).I dare you.KarateeeChop
mgs4 is sub-hd :lol:
BAM. :lol: Of course, a game being sub-HD means absolutely nothing, but whatever.confirmed "In-Game" or just confirmed to be using the games engine? all you have to do is look at the lack of Aliasing on the Telephone lines to know its not rendered in realtime on any console :? Seriously i'd of thought people would have learnt this by now.[QUOTE="marklarmer"]
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]
Wut? did you even READ?
Insomniac: "The build is a couple months old (to be included in the Battle: LA disc). It is a complete demo though (not leaked code). Since then we have added a lot more polish and tweaks to the entire game."
Image below is CONFIRMED in-game
KarateeeChop
the funny thing is that even the tc knows that they're bullshots.
i'm not sure who he's trying to fool here, us or himself...
Im not fooling anyone, just stating the truth. Besides, not every console game has jaggies, notably GOW3 or LBP2, unlike 360 exclusives.[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]
[QUOTE="marklarmer"]confirmed "In-Game" or just confirmed to be using the games engine? all you have to do is look at the lack of Aliasing on the Telephone lines to know its not rendered in realtime on any console :? Seriously i'd of thought people would have learnt this by now.
Nayef_shroof
the funny thing is that even the tc knows that they're bullshots.
i'm not sure who he's trying to fool here, us or himself...
Im not fooling anyone, just stating the truth. Besides, not every console game has jaggies, notably GOW3 or LBP2, unlike 360 exclusives. Every game has jaggies.Im not fooling anyone, just stating the truth. Besides, not every console game has jaggies, notably GOW3 or LBP2, unlike 360 exclusives.
Nayef_shroof
well i guess r3 is just one ugly exception then :lol:
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]
the funny thing is that even the tc knows that they're bullshots.
i'm not sure who he's trying to fool here, us or himself...
Im not fooling anyone, just stating the truth. Besides, not every console game has jaggies, notably GOW3 or LBP2, unlike 360 exclusives. Every game has jaggies. Sure, but im stating that the R3 image is in game, since I just showed you images of other games that use MLAA, yet they dont have jaggies. Anything else youd like to add? Why dont you play Duke nukem? Oh wait...It didnt do so well, did it?[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]Every game has jaggies. Sure, but im stating that the R3 image is in game, since I just showed you images of other games that use MLAA, yet they dont have jaggies. Anything else youd like to add? They're not. They're from IGN, which means bullshots.[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"] Im not fooling anyone, just stating the truth. Besides, not every console game has jaggies, notably GOW3 or LBP2, unlike 360 exclusives.Nayef_shroof
here, tc, since you seem to be fine with bullshots
vs
i mean come on, resistance 3 can't even beat a 4 year old console game? :lol:
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
who cares about what it looks like, it's resistence, it's so boring that i never even finished the second one.
it just sits there in my entertainment system waiting for the day when other games are so bad that it actually looks appealing to put it back in the system.
will that day ever come?
Adamantium4k2
Who is this thing?
Someone who doesn't realise that he can't (no matter how hard he tries) put a game back into a system while it's still sitting in the system. :Plol nice try, but this is what the game really look like. you can't fool anyone with your bullshots.
and the sad thing is that even the bullshots look awful :lol:
KarateeeChop
Yeah thats exactly how it looks like on a STANDARD DEFINITION TV.
It's funny the Lemmings in here saying they arent impressed meanwhile they gots nuthing but love for their halo games running in sub HD on a last gen engine. :lol:
Let me show you something:
Resistance 2, screenshot prior to release (Sep 2008 ). Notice it has no HUD:
Now a screenshot, after release (Nov 2008 ). Notice any differences?
KiZZo1
well this kills the thread
Yeah, it looks good. The Resistance series are also the best console shooters this gen imo (better than both, Halo and Killzone).
[QUOTE="mitu123"]Do you mean the edges of the images? If so, thats just the codachrome artstyle Insomniac implemented that blurs out the edges of the screen Like low-res textures, which was prevalent in R1 and R2. Look at that alien's arm and most of the character model. In the third picture, low-res textures, lack of textures, and detail in the environment. It looks like Resistance 2 with a slightly different art style and color tone. Hardly a difference, imho. Remember, still images will always look better than the actual gameplay. Especially when publishers/developers release bullshots all the time to hype up their game.It looks good but not that impressive in some areas.
Nayef_shroof
What's this then, and why should I believe it won't look like this?
SaltyMeatballs
Because those look worse than the first two Resistance games. I highly doubt R3's graphics magically became worse than it's predecessor's. Not that that's impossible, but from a quality developer like Insomniac? Very doubtful.
It's funny the Lemmings in here saying they arent impressed meanwhile they gots nuthing but love for their halo games running in sub HD on a last gen engine. :lol:
Pray_to_me
Lol, 360 gamer here. That Halo engine def looks mad old. Reach's graphics were alright, but 3 looked like an updated Halo 2 engine from the original xbox days. As for the topic though, it is about how Resistance "actually looks" so calling bullshots is def fair game... Even for Halo fanatics.
[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]Not that impressive, even for bullshots. RR360DDYa, great insight there chief :P. Maybe if your name wasnt 360 oriented or your sig/avy wasnt filled with master chief images, youd have a bit more credibility You really expect the final game to look like that? Remember the R2 bullshots?
I remember R2 being a pretty good looking game, all things considered. It's not as polished as U2 or GoW III, but it's also not as tightly controlled either.
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]I agree, I own R1 and R2. Picked both of 'em up used for a combined $15 and I'm having a hard time understanding why people are getting excited for R3. If the resistance series was multiplat few people would give a rip about this mediocre series.who cares about what it looks like, it's resistence, it's so boring that i never even finished the second one.
it just sits there in my entertainment system waiting for the day when other games are so bad that it actually looks appealing to put it back in the system.
will that day ever come?
getyeryayasout
pretty much this.
I agree, I own R1 and R2. Picked both of 'em up used for a combined $15 and I'm having a hard time understanding why people are getting excited for R3. If the resistance series was multiplat few people would give a rip about this mediocre series.[QUOTE="getyeryayasout"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
who cares about what it looks like, it's resistence, it's so boring that i never even finished the second one.
it just sits there in my entertainment system waiting for the day when other games are so bad that it actually looks appealing to put it back in the system.
will that day ever come?
KarateeeChop
pretty much this.
I play R2 for Co-op (I recommend mr.Riverwofl to play it instead of that boring campaign next time he thinks about the game), MP wasn't that bad but kind of dated by today's standard. The campaign was very dissapointing for me. It was obviously rushed. The story was terrible too. R1 has a pretty good SP for the time, but it was only relevant due to the lack of games on the PS3 then. It's pretty obsolete now. Calling the series mediocre is going too far though... I suppose it goes by in our SW hyperbole convention. Also, why don't we wait for the game to be released before comparing teh graphix? Even if you actually care about that more then the game itself.I obviously edited this thread again due to the fact another biased lemming (CobraMax) brought up the stupidly false claim that R3 is sub HD (Which it obviously isnt) BTW, heres another gameplay video[QUOTE="Nayef_shroof"]
First off, for those who noticed in Cobras biased thread, he was using cherry-picked images of the PRE-ALPHA stage boat demo that came with Battle: Los Angeles.
Insomniac: "The build is a couple months old (to be included in the Battle: LA disc). It is a complete demo though (not leaked code). Since then we have added a lot more polish and tweaks to the entire game."
http://www.examiner.com/video-game-news-in-national/insomniac-games-responds-to-complaints-about-resistance-3-s-psn-demo
Every thread that was claiming resistance 3 ran in sub HD resolutions were using images from the very old blu-ray movie boat demo, even contradicting the fact that insomniac clearly stated thatthe game is 720p (Just like the previous titles in the series).
Heres also videos of Resistance 3, proof that the game isnt nearly as blurry as the biased CobraMax makes it out to be
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/06/14/resistance-3-dev-diary-cold-new-world/
Nayef_shroof
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfhQCFURXNY&feature=relmfu
First off. I'm not a "lemming". Second that is the resolution for that demo. You can tap dance around that situation all you want... But that specific demo was sub hd. If the newer builds are in HD... Then that's good. You're taking this far too seriously.
sorry, but this is the way the game looks. disappointed? so am i. :(
but it is impressive how they managed to make this one look even worse than the previous two games in the series.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment