It looks good to me, I'm expecting smooth, good (not great) graphics.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]I agree, I own R1 and R2. Picked both of 'em up used for a combined $15 and I'm having a hard time understanding why people are getting excited for R3. If the resistance series was multiplat few people would give a rip about this mediocre series. Just like if Halo and Gears Of War, yes? It's funny how after Mass Effect went mutliplatform, people were claiming it to be "medicore" left, right and centre :Dwho cares about what it looks like, it's resistence, it's so boring that i never even finished the second one.
it just sits there in my entertainment system waiting for the day when other games are so bad that it actually looks appealing to put it back in the system.
will that day ever come?
getyeryayasout
[QUOTE="getyeryayasout"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]I agree, I own R1 and R2. Picked both of 'em up used for a combined $15 and I'm having a hard time understanding why people are getting excited for R3. If the resistance series was multiplat few people would give a rip about this mediocre series. Just like if Halo and Gears Of War, yes? It's funny how after Mass Effect went mutliplatform, people were claiming it to be "medicore" left, right and centre :D No one states ME2 is mediocre. However, a lot of people agree it is a disappointment.who cares about what it looks like, it's resistence, it's so boring that i never even finished the second one.
it just sits there in my entertainment system waiting for the day when other games are so bad that it actually looks appealing to put it back in the system.
will that day ever come?
PhoenixWraith
... Pixel counting doesn't lie. The game is 960x704 with QAA. Even the newer direct feed screenshots. Nothing has changed and the pixel counters are never wrong(worst mistake was being off by like 15 horizontal pixels, which basically amounts to missing a single "step".
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment