Resistance is garbage.

Well kids, Had a chance to play the game again, didn't play much of it in the past but i have to admit....the game just sucks. The story/gameplay/weapons everything about it is just pathetic.

An old World war type game with aliens? come on....Insomniac could of done better..

Those silly weapons they added were cheap hated using them, the whole rachent and clank type of look (concerning weapons) they tryed to add into the shooter failed, IMO.

The gameplay was dull and boring...just the feel of shooting something and blowing them up felt weak, Don't know if it was the missing rumble...but it felt bad, the explosions wern't there and the animations were even worse...same goes for A.I.

The only positive thing i can say about it..was some of the level designs and overall many things going on at once. Yes i know its an old game..but i feel the need to get it out.

Even tho it was a bad game, Nothing can take the crown of WORST shooter than Perfect dark Zero...now that my E-friends is rubbish, and only way it scored high was because it was one of the FIRST Nextgen shooters and gamespot fell into the nextgen excitement and went overboard with the score...boy, they must feel stupid now.

Anyways, thoughts..opinion...spit it out, ladies?

I liked it.

Although I was comparing it to PDZ *A.K.A. Trash* throughout, and I never got a chance to play online unfortunately. I dunno, I never thought that I would like garbage more than trash.

I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...SpaceDragonMan

Tell me about it...they tried to pull it off, but failed badley, IMO.

An old World war type game with aliens? come on....Insomniac could of done better-Maddog-

Nope they couldn't. Insomniac is the queen of rehashes imo (the king is obviously EA)

Resistance was the first game I bought for PS3. Never made it pass the first couple of missions....just couldnt get pass the whole mediocre-ness. Waste of $60 if you ask me.

I sort of agree about PDZ too, I liked it then maybe because I was wraped up in the hole next gen hype, but looking back makes me wonder how the heck did it get AAA..

I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...SpaceDragonMan

Resistance is awesome. The guns are brilliant, all really fun to use, the graphics and art design are amazing, the level design is excellent, great variety of enemies, intense shooting... everything about it kicks ass. Sure, it borrows a heap of stuff from HL2. But what's wrong with copying when you're copying the best?

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...ragrdoll21

It's the best launch title I ever played. Well at least to my opinion, not GS's.:Pleviathan91

I think people forget that it was a launch title.

I think it's a good game.

I'm playing it right now!!!!

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]It's the best launch title I ever played. Well at least to my opinion, not GS's.:Pball_of_air

I think people forget that it was a launch title.

Yeah, but it didn't live up to what Sony kept saying (1080p, 60FPS, 120FPS, etc) but it was still fun. I guess the reason why lems compared Gears was that they wanted to prove that the PS3 wasn't that powerful.

Single player isn't the best, but I don't understand some of your complaints.

The weapons are pretty sweet. Don't know what your problem is with them. Good variety and all of them are very useful. What weapons are bad exactly? I'm guessing you didn't beat the game and unlock the extra ones like the Reapers.

The AI in this game is good. Everybody that says its bad is either playing it on the Easy difficulty or have never played the game. Put it on Hard or Superhuman. The chimera circle strafe. They duck and jump behind objects. If you try and grenade them, but don't target bomb them, they'll jump out of the way. If you camp behind an object they will either grenade you, or advance on your position and surround you. The steelheads will charge at you or auger the crap out of you if you take cover.

The online for this game was the reason to buy it and the reason it deserved a 9. Unfortunately IG released serveral patches to make the game more noob friendly and also introduced lag with the addition of the worldwide servers.

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

I didn't really like the demo.

But I'm still going to rent it to give it a chance.

Well is Resistance is garbage then PDZ must be aids and Gears cancer.Lazy_Boy88

:roll: Oh lord...

*Leaves thread*

[QUOTE="ragrdoll21"][QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...ragrdoll21

it had guns...... and aliens??

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NAPK1NS

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

[QUOTE="SpaceDragonMan"]I think its a complete rip off. They took Half-Life 1/2+Halo series+Call of Duty and glued it together to get Resistance...ragrdoll21

This guy doesnt know good games. Ok so what if its world war 2 with a twist. Tell me how many games that are already ot have done something similar to that. They could have done better? Ok so they should have just amde a normal wwii or modern fps like everybody else?

[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NavigatorsGhost

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

i'm sorry, but matchmaking should have been part of the game originally.

And quit complaining about checkpoints.

Resistance: "Ah there are no checkpoints, this game sucks cause its too hard"

Bioshock: "Ah there are vita chambers, this game sucks cause its too easy"

[QUOTE="NavigatorsGhost"][QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

3picuri3

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.

i'm sorry, but matchmaking should have been part of the game originally.

I'm sorry but at the time Resistance came out, what console game had 40 player maps (usually with no lag, mind you)? You're complaining about a game where the developers have actually stuck with the game and fix any problems that arise with it and continue to modify it. People complained about all the glitchers and cheaters. Resistance instituted a report and ban function. People complained about the ratio of Meltdown games to CTF games, they fixed it. People complained about Chimera vs Chimera Team Deathmatch games, they got rid of them. They complained the games were too long, they made time limits. They complained about Conversion, they changed it. Laark was too powerful, they lessened the damage. Range on the shotgun was too large, they cut it down. Worldwide servers, extra maps, new game types.

More bs complaints about a better than average game.

I wouldn't call it garbage, but it was definitely disappointing. For a mainly single player focused first-person shooter, the dry presentation of the story, dull documentary-style narrative and generic main characters were a let-down. The levels also felt very disconnected with the main storyline -- the cities just felt like rest stops along the road, with the actual objective often being unclear. This gave poor incentive to play on and made it feel very monotonous. Thankfully the multiplayer saved the game.

I wouldn't call it garbage, but it was definitely disappointing. For a mainly single player focused first-person shooter, the dry presentation of the story, dull documentary-style narrative and generic main characters were a let-down. The levels also felt very disconnected with the main storyline -- the cities just felt like rest stops along the road, with the actual objective often being unclear. This gave poor incentive to play on and made it feel very monotonous. Thankfully the multiplayer saved the game.

-Spock-

[QUOTE="NAPK1NS"]

I can't stand it. The checkpoints nearing the end of the game are just stupid. You will play 20 minute streaches, and not a single checkpoint will come up.

The multiplayer "matchmaking" will pair up people so that the teams are uneven, or put five people on a 32 player map. Yeah, best PS3 game yet by butt. Sigma FTW.

NavigatorsGhost

Actually matchmaking fixed the problem of uneven teams that existed before. Games no longer start unless they have even teams or maybe one team will have a single extra player, which is actually a disadvantage. Before the first patch, the games didn't even have a time limit. It would put 2 people against 10 in a 32 player map for example. They fixed all that crap. The only reason teams become unfairly balanced now is when a team of random players goes against a clan or party in a ranked team game. Most of the randoms will quit and the game does not break up clans or parties to balance the teams after the first round. If two teams of randoms go against each other and the teams are unbalanced after the first round, then the game will shuffle players appropriately. So quit lying, you've been called on it.