Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yeah how old is this game and its been ported to the pc, so what did it get when it came out on the first xbox. I dont think we have been obliterated because this is a pc port, we get to play halo 3 beta now.xjet039
And it's SO much better than Halo 2 because... ?
[QUOTE="xjet039"]yeah how old is this game and its been ported to the pc, so what did it get when it came out on the first xbox. I dont think we have been obliterated because this is a pc port, we get to play halo 3 beta now.Overthrow
And it's SO much better than Halo 2 because... ?
For the same reasons the sequels to your favorite games are. thats why.i think you want too direct this thread too hermits.Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
kornbone
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.
Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.kornbone
Cows are really really grasping for straws.
This is a PC game, not an Xbox game. Get it straight. THHBO!
But in reality, no one was hyping it, so no one was owned. Good try! ;)
[QUOTE="kornbone"]i think you want too direct this thread too hermits.Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.johnusabeis
Why? We have had superior FPS years before Halo: CE even came out. Gamespot's comments on this review only confirm what we've been saying all along, and put these lemmings in their place.
We don't need Halo and never did.
[QUOTE="kornbone"]Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.-KinGz-
Cows are really really grasping for straws.
I love how you blame everything on PS3 fans.
[QUOTE="johnusabeis"][QUOTE="kornbone"]i think you want too direct this thread too hermits.Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.Overthrow
Why? We have had superior FPS years before Halo: CE even came out. Gamespot's comments on this review only confirm what we've been saying all along, and put these lemmings in their place.
We don't need Halo and never did.
reguardless. its still the PC version. how do you not understand that?Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.kornbone
actually, the Xbox version got 9.4 and they said it had a lackluster storyline.
[QUOTE="johnusabeis"][QUOTE="kornbone"]i think you want too direct this thread too hermits.Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.Overthrow
Why? We have had superior FPS years before Halo: CE even came out. Gamespot's comments on this review only confirm what we've been saying all along, and put these lemmings in their place.
We don't need Halo and never did.
They are comparing a 3 year old port to PC FPS games that are out now, i wonder what is superior
[QUOTE="-KinGz-"][QUOTE="kornbone"]Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.shungokustasu
Cows are really really grasping for straws.
I love how you blame everything on PS3 fans.
He didn't blame anything on Cows accept their tendencies to currently claim ownage for the stupidest things to compensate for the fact that their console of choice is being hit with MASSIVELY negative comments.
Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.kornbone
Yes, I'm sure being released almost three years later on a different platform had *nothing* to do with the lackluster score... the storyline was frustrating, but let's get real here, the Xbox version deserved a 7.0? Are you nuts? Halo CE on the PC got a worse score too - you're throwing it onto a different platform where the controls just aren't as tight, the storyline is, at that point, uninteresting (reviewers have seen it before), the gameplay has become dated, and the multiplayer isn't the same furious furor it was on Xbox LIVE...
It's not the same game that fanatics are playing on the Xbox, and that's reflected in the review score.
Read the review. He flat out said Halo couldn't keep up with PC standards. Thats why it scored so low, despite having improved sound, graphics, and content.how is it lemmings
te one for the xbox got a 9.6 or wahtever
replace lemmings with hermit
ziggy87
Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.kornbone
How did Lemmings get owned? Last time I checked, no one was going on and on saying Halo 2 for Vista would get a good score. -_-
Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.kornbone
i'm just curious how this effects lemmings in any way. yes the pc version got a 7.0 but the last time i checked the xbox version got a 9.4. using your logic if the ps3 gets a crappy port of a good 360 game then it hurts lemmings too. think about it.
[QUOTE="kornbone"]Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.-KinGz-
Cows are really really grasping for straws.
I agree.
[QUOTE="-KinGz-"][QUOTE="kornbone"]Halo 2 for PC got a 7.0
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/halo2/review.html?sid=6171591
Notice the part in which the reviewer mentions the lackluster storyline. That's what the original Xbox version should've gotten.fuzzysquash
Cows are really really grasping for straws.
I agree.
I agree too, this is really really just getting weird now. It seems Cows hate Halo so much or are so jealous of not having it maybe that they bash it as much as possible even if it means you don't make sense or make any kind of logical statements.
I mean if this 7.0 is ownage with it being a PC title then I guess from now on Bioshock and Mass Effect etc.. and those games on PC/360 should be consider overall exclusive to Lemmings since Halo 2 on PC getting a 7 is somehow ownage for Lemmings
Very sad
Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
Actually, the reasons FF7 scored low was rightfully so. The sound was all midi, and there were many problems with the game itself. The reason Halo scored low was because it cuoldn't keep up with today's standards. Big difference.Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
WilliamRLBaker
Story is timeless. Halo 2 should have been less than A because its story blows.NobuoMusicMaker
The Xbox version should had received an AA at maximum imo. Multiplayer was great, sure, but campaign was the heart of the game, and Bungie didn't deliver well enough there.
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]Actually, the reasons FF7 scored low was rightfully so. The sound was all midi, and there were many problems with the game itself. The reason Halo scored low was because it cuoldn't keep up with today's standards. Big difference.Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
Vandalvideo
big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.
You might see a difference but I do not.
P.S: sound and cut scenes aren't the only problems mentioned in the review.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]Actually, the reasons FF7 scored low was rightfully so. The sound was all midi, and there were many problems with the game itself. The reason Halo scored low was because it cuoldn't keep up with today's standards. Big difference.Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
WilliamRLBaker
big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.
You might see a difference but I do not.
Read the respective reviews for FF7. The sound composition was a mess, it was all in midi, and there were porting issues. The FF7 PC version was rightfully worse than the PS1 version. The Halo 2 for vista, however, is better than the console counterpart.
Wondering whats the point of buying halo 2 on pc if you already have the game on xbox. Only reason i can see ppl playing halo 2 on PC if they never played it on xbox or dont a xbox/360. It sucks that the pc version was a bad port but oh well what can you do. stuff happens.
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]Actually, the reasons FF7 scored low was rightfully so. The sound was all midi, and there were many problems with the game itself. The reason Halo scored low was because it cuoldn't keep up with today's standards. Big difference.Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
Vandalvideo
big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.
You might see a difference but I do not.
Read the respective reviews for FF7. The sound composition was a mess, it was all in midi, and there were porting issues. The FF7 PC version was rightfully worse than the PS1 version. The Halo 2 for vista, however, is better than the console counterpart.
and as per my edit you read the review, Sound and cutscenes aren't the only problems mentioned in the review, My critique is still valid, He is comparing the pc version released what 2 years after the xbox version to the original versions score and saying the lemmings got owned.
As well if halo 2 doesn't hold up? why is it still one of the highest played games on xbox live? it obviously must stand up in some capacity for it to log something like 50,000 game hours a day played.
The PC version wasn't a bad port by all acounts. It had upgrades in sound (EAX), graphics (higher resolutions for textures), and content. The only real problems is that its a three year old game that can't keep up with today's PC standards. Simple as that.Wondering whats the point of buying halo 2 on pc if you already have the game on xbox. Only reason i can see ppl playing halo 2 on PC if they never played it on xbox or dont a xbox/360. It sucks that the pc version was a bad port but oh well what can you do. stuff happens.
istreakforfood
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]Actually, the reasons FF7 scored low was rightfully so. The sound was all midi, and there were many problems with the game itself. The reason Halo scored low was because it cuoldn't keep up with today's standards. Big difference.Ps1 cows have been obliterated... ff7 fans have been obliterated...
ff7 for ps1
http://www.gamespot.com/ps/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
ff7 for pc
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/finalfantasy7/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=tabs&tag=tabs;reviews
WilliamRLBaker
big difference? i see no difference... I see a game scoring one score on one platform, then a year and a half or more later scoring lower on a completely different platform.
You might see a difference but I do not.
Read the respective reviews for FF7. The sound composition was a mess, it was all in midi, and there were porting issues. The FF7 PC version was rightfully worse than the PS1 version. The Halo 2 for vista, however, is better than the console counterpart.
and as per my edit you read the review, Sound and cutscenes aren't the only problems mentioned in the review, My critique is still valid, He is comparing the pc version released what 2 years after the xbox version to the original versions score and saying the lemmings got owned.
As well if halo 2 doesn't hold up? why is it still one of the highest played games on xbox live? it obviously must stand up in some capacity for it to log something like 50,000 game hours a day played.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment