RUMOR: Retro Studios Working on Metroid/Star Fox Crossover

  • 137 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Enforcedspot
Enforcedspot

2915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Enforcedspot
Member since 2010 • 2915 Posts
I'll wait for e3 before jumping on conclusion.
Avatar image for Enforcedspot
Enforcedspot

2915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Enforcedspot
Member since 2010 • 2915 Posts
Gotta love stupid pre-E3 rumours.Haziqonfire
This.
Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts
once again, Retro stuck with old franchises instead of creating a new IP. Way to go Nintendo, keep on relying on those 20+ years old franchises. Hope this isn't true no matter how good this game might look.
Avatar image for Shirokishi_
Shirokishi_

11206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Shirokishi_
Member since 2009 • 11206 Posts

Sounds too crazy stupid to be true. Im sure if something like that was being made it would be an original IP.
Id be on board if it was true but Im sure its not.

Avatar image for David719
David719

2187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 David719
Member since 2007 • 2187 Posts

Sounds like a stupid idea

Avatar image for web966
web966

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#56 web966
Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts
I doubt this is true, but Retro could probably pull this off.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

once again, Retro stuck with old franchises instead of creating a new IP. Way to go Nintendo, keep on relying on those 20+ years old franchises. Hope this isn't true no matter how good this game might look.laus_basic
what the f*ck does it matter if the game is good :/

Retro has proven that they're more than capable of putting a fresh spin on exsisting franchises

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#58 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts

[QUOTE="laus_basic"]once again, Retro stuck with old franchises instead of creating a new IP. Way to go Nintendo, keep on relying on those 20+ years old franchises. Hope this isn't true no matter how good this game might look.Shinobishyguy

what the f*ck does it matter if the game is good :/

Retro has proven that they're more than capable of putting a fresh spin on exsisting franchises

People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#59 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I think it sounds awesome. Retro are the king of pacing and level design. They'll know how to execute this perfectly. I have complete faith in them.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#60 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

That sounds idiotic and pointless, just let them make a Metroid game.

Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts

[QUOTE="laus_basic"]once again, Retro stuck with old franchises instead of creating a new IP. Way to go Nintendo, keep on relying on those 20+ years old franchises. Hope this isn't true no matter how good this game might look.Shinobishyguy

what the f*ck does it matter if the game is good :/

Retro has proven that they're more than capable of putting a fresh spin on exsisting franchises

what the f*ck do some of you refuses to see a talented studio do an ambitious brand new IP. Am I saying this can't end up being a great game, absolutely not especially coming from a talented house like Retro. I'm just tired of seeing the same characters, the same enemies, the same world. Give these guys the creative freedom they deserve. Retro has proven themselves countless times and never once did they had the chance to create something of their own, something completely new. And even if you people are satisified with playing the same old franchises over and over again, Nintendo need new IPs whether you like or not. Even Miyamoto admited that they can't just rely only on their old franchises anymore and it's about time to create something new, new characters.
People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?nintendoboy16
When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#62 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?laus_basic
When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?

Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?laus_basic
When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?

But they make new IPs all the time. Some recent new IPs are Xenoblade Chronicles for the Wii.

Most of the new IPs are on handhelds though.

Edit* Most of the time when somebody points out Nintendo's new IPs they usually respond it's not Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Pokemon, or Smash Bros. so it sucks.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#64 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="laus_basic"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?nintendoboy16

When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?

Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

Yeah, I'm sure Nintendo wouldn't know where to begin promoting a game. :|
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

[QUOTE="laus_basic"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]People just want to see Retro make a new IP for Nintendo, but with the lack of attention with whatever new IP's Nintendo spawns nowadays, is it all that surprising?nintendoboy16

When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?

Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

Circular argument, although I can confidently state if Nintendo comes up with a new IP and gives it the same push that they give Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Smash Bros, Kirby, Donkey Kong, and Mario Kart, it will definitely sell. Look at Kid Icarus- a 'new' IP, and in a genre (genres?) where it shouldn't have sold, particularly given the system it was on, and it was a success. All Nintendo needs to do is really try. When they try, they are successful. When they don't, they aren't.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#66 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]

[QUOTE="laus_basic"] When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?charizard1605

Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

Circular argument, although I can confidently state if Nintendo comes up with a new IP and gives it the same push that they give Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Smash Bros, Kirby, Donkey Kong, and Mario Kart, it will definitely sell. Look at Kid Icarus- a 'new' IP, and in a genre (genres?) where it shouldn't have sold, particularly given the system it was on, and it was a success. All Nintendo needs to do is really try. When they try, they are successful.

Not really, not since Pikmin.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

nintendoboy16

Circular argument, although I can confidently state if Nintendo comes up with a new IP and gives it the same push that they give Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Smash Bros, Kirby, Donkey Kong, and Mario Kart, it will definitely sell. Look at Kid Icarus- a 'new' IP, and in a genre (genres?) where it shouldn't have sold, particularly given the system it was on, and it was a success. All Nintendo needs to do is really try. When they try, they are successful.

Not really, not since Pikmin.

That's also because they have never tried since Pikmin. When they did- Animal Crossing, Nintendogs, Brain Age, Wii Series, Kid Icarus- they were.
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
sounds pretty cool... too bad the Wii U isnt on my list...
Avatar image for NoirLamia777
NoirLamia777

3180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 NoirLamia777
Member since 2012 • 3180 Posts

I'm not going to flat out and say I don't want this, I want to see where it's headed first and what it's going to be like. I personally think if it's an action-adventure title with some platforming similar to Starfox Adventures or Metroid:Other M I will enjoy it a lot.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts

Unless I missed something, i'm still waiting for this game.

Avatar image for LastRambo341
LastRambo341

8767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 LastRambo341
Member since 2010 • 8767 Posts

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

Renegade_Fury
How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#73 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]

[QUOTE="laus_basic"] When's the last time Nintendo went all out on a brand new IP? And by that I mean Nintendo treating a brand new IP just like they do their main franchises (Mario for ex). Having a big talented team working on it, giving them all the ressources they need, giving the advertising push it need to sale?Cherokee_Jack

Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

Yeah, I'm sure Nintendo wouldn't know where to begin promoting a game. :|

Even if Nintendo knew (and they do), do you seriously expect it to get big? This is why they resist doing stuff like this, because it never pays off for them.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#74 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

That would be one strange crossover if true.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#75 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts
[QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

LastRambo341
How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?

Review scores mean nothing to gamers. Why do you think well scoring Sonic, Mortal Kombat, or Star Fox games get flak from fans?
Avatar image for Republican11
Republican11

1029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Republican11
Member since 2008 • 1029 Posts

Its retro studios I wouldnt be too worried about it being a bad game.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

[QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

LastRambo341

How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?

I don't care nor have I ever bothered to check what reviews it got. All I know is that I hated it, and it ranks up there as one of the biggest disappointments of the gen for me. I don't even care about the story, I thought the gameplay sucked, the map layout sucked, the music sucked, the lack of exploration sucked, and overall, it just wasn't Metroid to me. Even if Fox is chained to Samus' leg, at least if this rumor is true, Retro will be the one working on this series again,

Avatar image for Bangerman15
Bangerman15

1978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Bangerman15
Member since 2010 • 1978 Posts
whats up with all the haters i think it sounds freakn epic
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#79 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]Should they even BOTHER if NO ONE is going to buy it ANYWAY?!

nintendoboy16

Yeah, I'm sure Nintendo wouldn't know where to begin promoting a game. :|

Even if Nintendo knew (and they do), do you seriously expect it to get big?

Yes?

Are you suggesting a new high-profile franchise by Nintendo wouldn't be big? Lesser companies have had success with new franchises this gen.

If Nintendo's only definition of "big" is "40 million units", then maybe it wouldn't be "big" for them, but if thats the case then they need to get their priorities straight.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#80 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts

I hope this aint true. I want a new star fox and metroid but not in the same game together.

Avatar image for wewantdoom4now
wewantdoom4now

1792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 wewantdoom4now
Member since 2012 • 1792 Posts

[Quote="Paul Gate Network"] -Some folk at Retro Studios wanted to develop a new ip that involved 3rd person sci-fi action with intense aerial combat.
- Others apparently were leaning towards taking the Star Fox helm.
- Nintendo sees Retro Studios as a very competent developer and worked with them in creating the hybrid title of Star Fox ? Metroid: Fusion Saga.
- The title has multiple gameplay mechanics and needed a wide staff of talent to incorporate the many ideas.
- The story begins as you control Fox McCloud and the Star Fox team on deep space mission in your Arwing, flying through a Meteos-like stage. As you enter a light speed warp, there?s a collision with an orange ship (Samus?) and the game continues with you now plummeting to a planet as Samus in her craft. You?re in mild control of her ship, using the Wii U controller to look around and touch screen press the lit up buttons to prepare for impact (while the TV stays locked on what you see out of the cockpit). You?re now on land, as a ?yet again? stripped down Samus Aran with the most basic of weapon abilities, in first person perspective, traversing through this unknown planet.
- The game switches off between intense Arwing space and planetary battles as Fox makes his way to the planet that Samus crashed on and a Metroid Prime-like experience of gameplay as Samus on this planet, gradually uncovering its mysteries, leveling up, etc.
- The Star Fox stages represent what the series is best known for, including the chatter and coming to the aid of the rest of your team, all range mode battles, and on rails stages.
- The Metroid part of the game puts you alone, void of human or any talking character contact, and like the Prime series, sees you gaining upgrades, battling bosses, and in this case, repairing your ship.
- The game is said to be epic in size, scope, ambition.
- The pacing has been perfected to not interrupt what the feeling is behind either franchise, since Star Fox is more often known for being acceptable to have short sessions with and Metroid rather the opposite. You can opt to continue playing either just Samus? part or Fox?s part without crossing over for much of the main game (or play it as it?s scripted back and forth), but will eventually have to complete both, as the characters will ultimately meet up.
- There will be later parts in the game where you do get to control Samus? ship and fly it Star Fox style.
- Likewise, Fox McCloud will be controllable by foot (both the above and this bullet point represent a period in the game after the two sides meet up) and be played via 3rd person perspective. Think of Jet Force Gemini with Fox?s known agility as he?s portrayed to having in the Smash Bros. series. (Fox will move more like Ryu Hayabusa from Ninja Gaiden and less like he did in Star Fox Adventures).
- Though a tentative title, the idea behind the story of ?Fusion Saga? is both a play on the fact that the two series are fusing together into one game and of course, a storyline behind Andross using Metroids to enhance himself, his army, etc.
- Star Fox ? Metroid: Fusion Saga is wholly a satisfying adventure game as Samus, an equally electrifying aerial combat game as Fox, and something that delivers an exciting, special change that fans will love.
- In consideration was the Star Fox portion having 4 player co-op online, but instead the game will have leaderboards for time and percent complete for all parts of the game and multiplayer will be simply versus mode based.charizard1605

This is the same site that leaked Playstation All Stars Battle Royale and Donkey Kong Country Returns, so...

I mean, it sounds crazy, but then again. who's to say it's crazy enough?

retro studios is horrible.
Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#82 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts

Man, I just want them to do a Star Fox game. But, I'm sure they're well-intentioned.

Avatar image for milannoir
milannoir

1663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 milannoir
Member since 2008 • 1663 Posts

Didn't even read the OP, even though I usually hate the people who don't...

I'm a fan of both Metroid and Starfox, and I believe a crossover between the two is the dumbest idea ever. I really can't believe this could ever happen.

"Hey Samus, I'm Starfox, how you doin'?" Bull****

Avatar image for LastRambo341
LastRambo341

8767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 LastRambo341
Member since 2010 • 8767 Posts

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

Renegade_Fury

How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?

I don't care nor have I ever bothered to check what reviews it got. All I know is that I hated it, and it ranks up there as one of the biggest disappointments of the gen for me. I don't even care about the story, I thought the gameplay sucked, the map layout sucked, the music sucked, the lack of exploration sucked, and overall, it just wasn't Metroid to me. Even if Fox is chained to Samus' leg, at least if this rumor is true, Retro will be the one working on this series again,

LMAO :lol: oh wow
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

Didn't even read the OP, even though I usually hate the people who don't...

I'm a fan of both Metroid and Starfox, and I believe a crossover between the two is the dumbest idea ever. I really can't believe this could ever happen.

"Hey Samus, I'm Starfox, how you doin'?" Bull****

milannoir
From GAF: Samus: Fox senpai, it is so damn hot in this lava cave. I might not make it. Fox: Ok, i am authorizing the varia suit... Slippy: Yeah, this baby can take temperatures up to 9000 degrees! Samus: Oh no! I saw Ridley...my PTSD hits me again... Peppy: Do a barrel roll!
Avatar image for LastRambo341
LastRambo341

8767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 LastRambo341
Member since 2010 • 8767 Posts
[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

After how much Other M sucked, I guess I'll take this even though I'm not big on Star Fox.

nintendoboy16
How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?

Review scores mean nothing to gamers. Why do you think well scoring Sonic, Mortal Kombat, or Star Fox games get flak from fans?

Because "fans" suck and are uneducated. They're like babies. They never get satisfied.
Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts
To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.

And you do realise that it's possible to innovate and come up with new ideas even within an existing franchise right :/ it's not like they're being "shackled" or whatever hyperbolic term you prefer to use
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#89 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I'd rather a new Metroid game than a new IP. There hasn't been a real Metroid game since MP2.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

[QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

[QUOTE="LastRambo341"] How did it suck if it got favorable review scores?LastRambo341

I don't care nor have I ever bothered to check what reviews it got. All I know is that I hated it, and it ranks up there as one of the biggest disappointments of the gen for me. I don't even care about the story, I thought the gameplay sucked, the map layout sucked, the music sucked, the lack of exploration sucked, and overall, it just wasn't Metroid to me. Even if Fox is chained to Samus' leg, at least if this rumor is true, Retro will be the one working on this series again,

LMAO :lol: oh wow

Oh wow, what? I didn't like it, and you asked why I thought it sucked. :?

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Don't see how these two universes would merge well. Maybe if it were an action-adventure in the vein of Star Fox Adventures but that game wasn't exactly the most well received so yeah...

I'd rather Retro make Prime 4 and the new Star Fox could be handeled by the Miyamoto team (keeping true to SNES original and SF64).

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#92 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.Shinobishyguy
And you do realise that it's possible to innovate and come up with new ideas even within an existing franchise right :/

It's possible but by no means is it unlimiting.

There are many possibilities they could only explore if they started from scratch.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#93 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Don't see how these two universes would merge well. Maybe if it were an action-adventure in the vein of Star Fox Adventures but that game wasn't exactly the most well received so yeah...

I'd rather Retro make Prime 4 and the new Star Fox could be handeled by the Miyamoto team (keeping true to SNES original and SF64).

nameless12345

They did that with Star Fox Command. Well not the Miyamoto part but Star Fox Command and Star Fox 64 3D were developed by many of the same people that worked on Star Fox and Star Fox 64 when they were a Argonaut Software but now they are at Q Games.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.Cherokee_Jack

And you do realise that it's possible to innovate and come up with new ideas even within an existing franchise right :/

It's possible but by no means is it unlimiting.

Depends on the franchise with games like Kid Icarus, it might as well be a new IP
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#95 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42247 Posts
[QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.

Since 2001-2002, whenever Nintendo makes a new IP, people cry foul saying there is no Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, etc, but then they end up calling them out with terms like "milkage" and then ask them to make new IP's when they spat on whatever new IP's released.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#96 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Weird...very weird, but is Retro and Metroid, so i'm willing to give it a chance.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#97 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"] And you do realise that it's possible to innovate and come up with new ideas even within an existing franchise right :/Shinobishyguy

It's possible but by no means is it unlimiting.

Depends on the franchise with games like Kid Icarus, it might as well be a new IP

They don't have infinite dormant franchises like that to draw on. Kid Icarus takes a lot from the original game anyway, its always referencing it. And the whole setting and characters are mostly the same.
Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.

And you do realise that it's possible to innovate and come up with new ideas even within an existing franchise right :/ it's not like they're being "shackled" or whatever hyperbolic term you prefer to use

I do and I'm not saying to abolish old franchises. Nintendo did that with Mario Galaxy. It was crtically acclaimed and lots of people loved it. Good for them. And while I thought it was a good game, I didn't really enjoy my time with it all that much. Not because the game s*****, but because everything was way too familiar, even moreso since I've been playing these games since the very first iteration. I just prefer seeing new IPs than the X number of iterations of an old(and often tired) franchises. I encourage developers that want to create something new and don't settle for less. That take risks in creating the next big thing. Unlike some who clearly don't seem to care about it and are satisfied just playing existing ones.
Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="laus_basic"]To those who say "why bother, I'm ok with the same old same old", "it wouldn't sell anyway" or "who cares, as long as the game's good." You people do realize that with that kind of mentality, the games you like so much would've never been borned right. Just saying.

Since 2001-2002, whenever Nintendo makes a new IP, people cry foul saying there is no Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, etc, but then they end up calling them out with terms like "milkage" and then ask them to make new IP's when they spat on whatever new IP's released.

well I can say I'm glad I'm not one of those people.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#100 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Circular argument, although I can confidently state if Nintendo comes up with a new IP and gives it the same push that they give Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Smash Bros, Kirby, Donkey Kong, and Mario Kart, it will definitely sell. Look at Kid Icarus- a 'new' IP, and in a genre (genres?) where it shouldn't have sold, particularly given the system it was on, and it was a success. All Nintendo needs to do is really try. When they try, they are successful.charizard1605

Not really, not since Pikmin.

That's also because they have never tried since Pikmin. When they did- Animal Crossing, Nintendogs, Brain Age, Wii Series, Kid Icarus- they were.

you realize that, AC aside, all of those examples from you are post-pikmin, thus making your "they never tried since pikmin" line kinda silly?