SFIV 360 superior to arcade version, PS3 not so much

I've played it on both and there is no difference in any way shape or form.

patriots7672

what's your gamertag? oh that's right, you don't have a 360

[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]I bet if it was the other way round it would be proof that the PS3 is more powerful But offcourse, Cows will dismiss this:roll:PAL360

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]I bet if it was the other way round it would be proof that the PS3 is more powerful But offcourse, Cows will dismiss this:roll:killa4lyfe

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

no one claimed such a thing, stop putting words in people's mouth. fanboys :roll:

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Screw image quality, gameplay is much more important. If I had a PS3 I'd get the game for that system because of the d pad. The d pad on the 360 controller is terrible for fighting games.Erik_Lensherr

Anyone who uses a PS3 or a 360 controller for a fighting game isn't serious about it anyway so your point is Moot..

Wow that has to be the most sillyiest thing I ever heard.

[QUOTE="Joust_"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

ogvampire

If Killzone 2 can have graphics the 360 can't top then that's all you need to say the PS3 is superior graphically.

Of course you'd have to think that KZ2 graphics are the best console graphics to date... Which a lot of people seem to do.

yeah, its amazing what you can do when you develope a game for 4 years!

So what was Too Human's problem, it took them 10 years, and the game was still grabage.

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]I also found this bit interesting: [quote="Eurogamer"]It all comes down to bandwidth - the amount of data that can stream in and out of the graphics chip at any given point. RSX can handle 22GB/s of data, but the 7900GS trumps it with double that. This all suggests that Capcom maximised the strengths of the 7900GS and the lack of bandwidth hurts the PS3 conversion. Transparent textures in particular require a ton of bandwidth. On Xbox 360, this isn't really an issue, most likely due to the 10MB of RAM directly connected to the Xenos graphics chip, which as an effective speed of a staggering 256GB/s.PoppaGamer

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Joust_"]

If Killzone 2 can have graphics the 360 can't top then that's all you need to say the PS3 is superior graphically.

Of course you'd have to think that KZ2 graphics are the best console graphics to date... Which a lot of people seem to do.

CubanBlunt

yeah, its amazing what you can do when you develope a game for 4 years!

So what was Too Human's problem, it took them 10 years, and the game was still grabage.

The truth is the visual disparity is very noticeable. I spent almost an hour and a half at HMV playing SF4 on the kiosks with random kids, switching from the PS3 to 360 kiosks all the while. I was completely confused which console to buy it on. As I had imagined the PS3 controller was far better for this game, however, what I didn't imagine was how much better this game looks on the 360, unfortunately the PS3 is marred with noticeable aisling. The 360 version on the other hand looks like a drawing come to life. Despite all this, since its been impossible for me to find a fightpad at a reasonable price, I think I will try and return my 360 disc for the PS3 disc. But, honestly, I just played both versions side by side, and the difference is surprisingly big.KingNabster

Like how? Maybe the TV settings were different? You know the thumbsticks work just as good as the D-pad for fighting in this game, so why are you worried about buying a fight pad?

I bet if it was the other way round it would be proof that the PS3 is more powerful But offcourse, Cows will dismiss this:roll:FirstDiscovery

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

[QUOTE="KingNabster"]The truth is the visual disparity is very noticeable. I spent almost an hour and a half at HMV playing SF4 on the kiosks with random kids, switching from the PS3 to 360 kiosks all the while. I was completely confused which console to buy it on. As I had imagined the PS3 controller was far better for this game, however, what I didn't imagine was how much better this game looks on the 360, unfortunately the PS3 is marred with noticeable aisling. The 360 version on the other hand looks like a drawing come to life. Despite all this, since its been impossible for me to find a fightpad at a reasonable price, I think I will try and return my 360 disc for the PS3 disc. But, honestly, I just played both versions side by side, and the difference is surprisingly big.patriots7672

Like how? Maybe the TV settings were different? You know the thumbsticks work just as good as the D-pad for fighting in this game, so why are you worried about buying a fight pad?

I bet if it was the other way round it would be proof that the PS3 is more powerful But offcourse, Cows will dismiss this:roll:FirstDiscovery

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

[QUOTE="KingNabster"]The truth is the visual disparity is very noticeable. I spent almost an hour and a half at HMV playing SF4 on the kiosks with random kids, switching from the PS3 to 360 kiosks all the while. I was completely confused which console to buy it on. As I had imagined the PS3 controller was far better for this game, however, what I didn't imagine was how much better this game looks on the 360, unfortunately the PS3 is marred with noticeable aisling. The 360 version on the other hand looks like a drawing come to life. Despite all this, since its been impossible for me to find a fightpad at a reasonable price, I think I will try and return my 360 disc for the PS3 disc. But, honestly, I just played both versions side by side, and the difference is surprisingly big.KingNabster

Like how? Maybe the TV settings were different? You know the thumbsticks work just as good as the D-pad for fighting in this game, so why are you worried about buying a fight pad?

Read my post above and read carefully the part where it says they couldn't find any visual disparity between the 2 versions. How do you do it? You hate PS3 or what?

SF 4 has the same art design to the characters as Prince of Persia and Afro Samurai and it's a simple fighting game which the PS3 and 360 can easily render and load. They're identical!patriots7672

What are you talking about. The PS3 version drops resolution because it can't cope, is missing lighting effects and has no AA. These are facts, not someones opinion.

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]

[QUOTE="KingNabster"]The truth is the visual disparity is very noticeable. I spent almost an hour and a half at HMV playing SF4 on the kiosks with random kids, switching from the PS3 to 360 kiosks all the while. I was completely confused which console to buy it on. As I had imagined the PS3 controller was far better for this game, however, what I didn't imagine was how much better this game looks on the 360, unfortunately the PS3 is marred with noticeable aisling. The 360 version on the other hand looks like a drawing come to life. Despite all this, since its been impossible for me to find a fightpad at a reasonable price, I think I will try and return my 360 disc for the PS3 disc. But, honestly, I just played both versions side by side, and the difference is surprisingly big.KingNabster

Like how? Maybe the TV settings were different? You know the thumbsticks work just as good as the D-pad for fighting in this game, so why are you worried about buying a fight pad?

If it was a big difference every website thats crediable would say so and make you take notice.

SF 4 has the same art design to the characters as Prince of Persia and Afro Samurai and it's a simple fighting game which the PS3 and 360 can easily render and load. They're identical!patriots7672

denial at its best

[QUOTE="patriots7672"]SF 4 has the same art design to the characters as Prince of Persia and Afro Samurai and it's a simple fighting game which the PS3 and 360 can easily render and load. They're identical!speedsix

What are you talking about. The PS3 version drops resolution because it can't cope, is missing lighting effects and has no AA. These are facts, not someones opinion.

some people just can't take the truth

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]I bet if it was the other way round it would be proof that the PS3 is more powerful But offcourse, Cows will dismiss this:roll:yoyo462001

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

[QUOTE="yoyo462001"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Of course! Hundreds of games look better on 360 than on PS3 but Killzone2 is the proof that PS3 is superior! "cows" :lol:

vaderhater

i dont see what in killzone 2 cant be done on the 360. so i kinda agree with that part

It's sad that lemmings have to result to EUrogamer (most laughable gaming journalism next to Gamedaily) to fuel their ego about SF4's slight faster loading time and 'graphics' while other major gaming sites such as here at Gamespot and IGN and etc clearly state they are equal.peacenutman

Eurogamer technical comparisons are created by Beyond3D.com. Go there now and read the forums and come back and tell me their understanding of such a thing is laughable.

On the forums there posts discussing console comparisons are banned from any sort of subjective or personal opinion and are purely restricted to the technical aspects, which is pretty much what you see in the Eurogamer articles they create.

[QUOTE="vaderhater"][QUOTE="yoyo462001"] its no surprise cows are very selective over what they brag about and dismiss everything which isnt K2 or MGS4ogvampire

i dont see what in killzone 2 cant be done on the 360. so i kinda agree with that part

[QUOTE="peacenutman"]It's sad that lemmings have to result to EUrogamer (most laughable gaming journalism next to Gamedaily) to fuel their ego about SF4's slight faster loading time and 'graphics' while other major gaming sites such as here at Gamespot and IGN and etc clearly state they are equal.speedsix

Eurogamer technical comparisons are created by Beyond3D.com. Go there now and read the forums and come back and tell me their understanding of such a thing is laughable.

On the forums there posts discussing console comparisons are banned from any sort of subjective or personal opinion and are purely restricted to the technical aspects, which is pretty much what you see in the Eurogamer articles they create.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="vaderhater"]If KZ2 had been a multiplat from the start then it would still look just as good as it does now on the PS3 and mabey a little better on the 360 :P Sure I kid but the way multiplats seem to favor the 360 it just may have.ermacness

i dont see what in killzone 2 cant be done on the 360. so i kinda agree with that part

[QUOTE="peacenutman"][QUOTE="speedsix"]

Eurogamer technical comparisons are created by Beyond3D.com. Go there now and read the forums and come back and tell me their understanding of such a thing is laughable.

On the forums there posts discussing console comparisons are banned from any sort of subjective or personal opinion and are purely restricted to the technical aspects, which is pretty much what you see in the Eurogamer articles they create.

-DrRobotnik-

[QUOTE="speedsix"]

[QUOTE="peacenutman"]It's sad that lemmings have to result to EUrogamer (most laughable gaming journalism next to Gamedaily) to fuel their ego about SF4's slight faster loading time and 'graphics' while other major gaming sites such as here at Gamespot and IGN and etc clearly state they are equal.peacenutman

Eurogamer technical comparisons are created by Beyond3D.com. Go there now and read the forums and come back and tell me their understanding of such a thing is laughable.

On the forums there posts discussing console comparisons are banned from any sort of subjective or personal opinion and are purely restricted to the technical aspects, which is pretty much what you see in the Eurogamer articles they create.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="vaderhater"]If KZ2 had been a multiplat from the start then it would still look just as good as it does now on the PS3 and mabey a little better on the 360 :P Sure I kid but the way multiplats seem to favor the 360 it just may have.ermacness

i dont see what in killzone 2 cant be done on the 360. so i kinda agree with that part

let me ask you this first: what does kz2 do that the 360 cant handle?

Wow, after reading the whole thread, I realize lemmings are on full force on this lmao. I guess after that terrible flop of Halo Wars, lemmings need something to make them feel better (or superior?) by using Eurogamer to "prove" SF4 is better on X360. I guess if Eurogamer said the same thing about FEAR 2, lemmings would eat that up too.

Unless every other major sites state that the PS3 version is inferior (which clearly not the case) like Fallout 3, I won't buy this nonsense.

[QUOTE="ermacness"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]

i dont see what in killzone 2 cant be done on the 360. so i kinda agree with that part

vaderhater

Has anyone installed the 360 version? If so, is there any improvement or benefit apart from loading noise?

I have both versions of the game, this is super dumb.

Also, the PS3 does load faster than the 360, why don't you all go check this out for yourself instead of trusting the HUMAN BEING that wrote this piece.

Too funny.

Has anyone installed the 360 version? If so, is there any improvement or benefit apart from loading noise?

SgtWhiskeyjack

I have installed SF4 on 360, and I haven't noticed any major benefit, but it may load faster, I'm not sure. I can tell you that side by side, the PS3 loads faster.

I install most of my most played games, so I actually don't know how SF4 performs without an install for the most part.

[QUOTE="vaderhater"][QUOTE="ermacness"]so what game comes close or look just as good as KZ2 on the 360?ermacness

It all comes down to bandwidth - the amount of data that can stream in and out of the graphics chip at any given point. RSX can handle 22GB/s of data, but the 7900GS trumps it with double that. This all suggests that Capcom maximised the strengths of the 7900GS and the lack of bandwidth hurts the PS3 conversion. Transparent textures in particular require a ton of bandwidth. On Xbox 360, this isn't really an issue, most likely due to the 10MB of RAM directly connected to the Xenos graphics chip, which as an effective speed of a staggering 256GB/s.Eurogamer

[QUOTE="peacenutman"]

Wow, after reading the whole thread, I realize lemmings are on full force on this lmao. I guess after that terrible flop of Halo Wars, lemmings need something to make them feel better (or superior?) by using Eurogamer to "prove" SF4 is better on X360. I guess if Eurogamer said the same thing about FEAR 2, lemmings would eat that up too.

Unless every other major sites state that the PS3 version is inferior (which clearly not the case) like Fallout 3, I won't buy this nonsense.

CreepyBacon

Tip: Change your signature. No one likes a liar.

----

Once again the 360 reigns supereme and defends it's title of graphics king, another superior title for the little white box.

[QUOTE="ermacness"][QUOTE="vaderhater"]So what we hypothesized was that if KZ2 had been done on both systems at the same time with the same amount of effort would they be identical? Because it is easy to take something you know wont be done on the other system and sell it as the be all end all of graphics. It is a safe bet where you know you can't be proved wrong. Isnt it?vaderhater