Sheep logic=Flawed.

Last gen with the GC, they said it is all about the quality of the games. Look the PS2 and Xbox are only for casuals who cant take gaming seriously and have a lot of crap on their systems. LOLZ !!! The GC is for the more serious and hardcore gamer and we get the uber quality games, LOL at PS2 and Xbox games selling like crazy appealing to idiot casuals, Ha ha ha!! We get teh Metroids, Marios, Zeldas, and games with true gameplayz, LOL at PS2 and Xbox getting teh crappy movie spinoffs, 50 Cent Bulletproof, GTA, sports gamez.......

Now with the Wii it is a complete reversal, and a lot of crap is spewing out of the system and sheep act like its the best thing ever while bashing the 360 and PS3 for it being hardcore? So this time they are getting loads of crap games instead of good quality games.

Sense the hypocritism? You just do whatever Nintendo tells you. If Nintendo says graphics and the quality of the games are the most important, you all bow down to them, If they say you need 64-graphics with waggle gameplay and half-arsed games, then you bow down.

Everyone defends their own console. You know why?

I'd wager it's because everyone ENJOYS their own console.

So, when you tell Wii owners "The Wii sucks"and "The Wii is not fun at all", they look at themselves and wonder, "Then what the hell have I been enjoying these past few months? I'm having lots of fun." In response to that - of course - people cry "casual".

Same goes for PS3 cows. Yeah, some people didn't like the low # of PS3 launch titles, but they bought it anyways? You know why? Because they enjoyed it. They wouldn't have bought it if it had NO games. PS3 obviously has SOME games. But now (just like when the 360 came out), people are bashing it because it "doesn't have enough games"....Pfffft. If a PS3 owner is satisfied, then that's fine with me. I don't need to bash his system to make myself feel better.

Please......ALL Fanboy logic is just a matter of convenience at the time....

PS3: no rumble......now YAY rumble

360: no HDMI or large HDD......now Elite 360 (with hdmi and large HDD)

Sheep: GC for the hardcore gamers.....now Wii is for grandmas,grandpas,mom,dad, etc.

Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
foxhound_fox

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

IMO- all fanboys logic is flawed. Oroin

yep. Fanboyism = mental illness. 

Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
foxhound_fox

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

Ninten007

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
Ninten007

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

i completely agree with your last paragraph thats why sheep logic is COMPLETELY flawed!

All it is is a continuous cycle of self-ownage where Fanboys blindly follow what companies hand them regardless of what they thought before or even think right now.

It's like "Well OK, this is what Mario/Halo is gonna look and play like this Generation........whatever"

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
Ninten007

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

foxhound_fox

Crazy enough Rogue Squadren II is better looking then most PS2 games...  

Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
foxhound_fox

Rumble is a gimmick until the Dual Shock

Analog sucked until Dual Shock

Tilt and Motion sensing was a gimmick until Six Axis

Sales determined that PS1 and PS2 were winnning but can't be used to claim Wii is winning

Rumble isn't needed until you guys go crazy about it coming back

Xbox is a shooter brand yet Resistance Fall of Man is Sony's only worth while exclusive.

2 SKU's is the dumbest thing ever created MS are idiotsand then Sony did it too.

Having software emulation for BC is dumb when Sony has hardware BC until that was taken away.

Next gen doesn't start until we say so yet PS3 doesn't have one game that looks or plays better then GeOW

PS1 and PS2 weak graphics, we don't need graphics games are where its at Why did this change with PS3?

You guys go on and on about graphics yet no PS3 game looks better then Gears of War

All fanboys have crap logic Cows just seems to be just as bad.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

foxhound_fox

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

It is so pathetic that you are willing to let Nintendo control your feeble minds. Last gen it is all about the quality games and you believed that and bashed the PS2 and Xbox for being too casual friendly and saying it was ruining gaming.

This gen Nintendo is appealing to casuals with cheap arsed games and you say it is saving gaming?

Oh by the way PS2 and Xbox casual games >>>>>>>>such crap like Elebits, Wii Play, Wario Ware, Excitetruck.

The Wii is just getting hand me downs from last-gen games, so where is the quality in that? For $250 you should expect more than just a repackaged GC with a waggle controller.

Sheep logic= Flawed

Cows logic= Flawed

Lemmings logic= Flawed

/thread:|

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

God of War is published by Sony. :|

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

Ninten007

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

Maybe because....those games were all franchised to one system at the time(not sure about Battlefronts, though).

Besides, MP and MP2 had graphics LEAPS and BOUNDS above many PS2 and XBOX games. Again, your logic fails. The gaming market will be laughing a year from now as Wii continues to rock.

Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
foxhound_fox

imagine the Wiimote with next gen graphics. nobody would doubt the revolution.danneswegman

And you know what......I almost guarantee that combination right there would have failed for Nintendo.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

Ninten007

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

It is so pathetic that you are willing to let Nintendo control your feeble minds. Last gen it is all about the quality games and you believed that and bashed the PS2 and Xbox for being too casual friendly and saying it was ruining gaming.

This gen Nintendo is appealing to casuals with cheap arsed games and you say it is saving gaming?

Oh by the way PS2 and Xbox casual games >>>>>>>>such crap like Elebits, Wii Play, Wario Ware, Excitetruck.

The Wii is just getting hand me downs from last-gen games, so where is the quality in that? For $250 you should expect more than just a repackaged GC with a waggle controller.

Waits for this fanboy to come in damage controlling lol

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

Blackbond

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

It is so pathetic that you are willing to let Nintendo control your feeble minds. Last gen it is all about the quality games and you believed that and bashed the PS2 and Xbox for being too casual friendly and saying it was ruining gaming.

This gen Nintendo is appealing to casuals with cheap arsed games and you say it is saving gaming?

Oh by the way PS2 and Xbox casual games >>>>>>>>such crap like Elebits, Wii Play, Wario Ware, Excitetruck.

The Wii is just getting hand me downs from last-gen games, so where is the quality in that? For $250 you should expect more than just a repackaged GC with a waggle controller.

Waits for this fanboy to come in damage controlling lol

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

Ninten007

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

First the God of War games were published by Sony... Why didn't the PS2 get Super Mario Sunshine?

Second GTA, Battlefront and Final Fantasy were determed by there developers and publishers that they wouldn't sell enough copys on the Gamecube, because of the userbase, (Singificantly lower then the PS2) and not into those games historicaly, to not be worth while ventures, on teh GC, It has nothing to do with capabilities.  

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

tegovoltio

It has good looking games, but i'd not say the best looking games.  

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
Maelkav

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.

[QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
ps3-nikita

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.

Enough is a subjective term, the Wii improved enough in that area too as far as I am concerned.

Do you have an empirical test to qualify graphic improvement?

Waits for this fanboy to come in damage controlling lol

Blackbond

In the meantime, we just need to sit back, relax, and look at all dat juice.

Oh, just wait for his "witty" comeback where he says "good Final Fantasies". As if that just erases FF: CC from existance.ithilgore2006

[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

GundamGuy0

It has good looking games, but i'd not say the best looking games.

If the GC was so capable why didnt it get Battlefronts, God of Wars, Final Fanasties, GTA, etc?

It is so pathetic that you are willing to let Nintendo control your feeble minds. Last gen it is all about the quality games and you believed that and bashed the PS2 and Xbox for being too casual friendly and saying it was ruining gaming.

This gen Nintendo is appealing to casuals with cheap arsed games and you say it is saving gaming?

Oh by the way PS2 and Xbox casual games >>>>>>>>such crap like Elebits, Wii Play, Wario Ware, Excitetruck.

The Wii is just getting hand me downs from last-gen games, so where is the quality in that? For $250 you should expect more than just a repackaged GC with a waggle controller.

Ninten007

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win. 

Ninten007

Brawl uses a GC controller.

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

Can you rectify those two statments? Apparently you think all Nintendo Products are "crappy." Yet sheep have given up on good quality gaming? How can the previous products be "crappy," and provide "good quality gaming" at the same time?

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

Parts of this I agree with........

I do think that the Wii taking over this popular demand does have bad implications for future products (although I hope not). 

I also say that if you put the Wii, PS3 and 360 all at $250 .......well we all know who would not win.....

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Brawl uses a GC controller.

What do you base Galaxy and Prime being aimed at casuals on?

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

tegovoltio

It has good looking games, but i'd not say the best looking games.

Well of course. I expect that something on the Wii might pass Gundam PS3, and Gun Xbox 360 as well.  

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

-The-G-Man-

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

nintendofreak_2

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

H'ed be using it in this very arguement, trying to claim ownage on the GC because it doesn't have FF: CC.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

-The-G-Man-

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Oh hell no. The 7th installment was the best. FF CC was crap even the sheep said it. But if they remade FF CC for Wii with casual friendly tones, they would claim it as the best ever.

Oh the good days when sheep cared for good quality games is now long gone. Now they seem to want to play last-gen ports, minigames, and just waggle their controller without thinking to win.

Learn to stop bending over to Nintendo and demand some quality games. Instead of getting crap yall should be getting some real support.

Waits for this fanboy to come in damage controlling lolBlackbond

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

Ninten007 not realizing that AA games are actually good and that the Gameboy Advance isn't another crappy Nintendo product 

Oh hell no. The 7th installment was the best. FF CC was crap even the sheep said it. But if they remade FF CC for Wii with casual friendly tones, they would claim it as the best ever.

Oh the good days when sheep cared for good quality games is now long gone. Now they seem to want to play last-gen ports, minigames, and just waggle their controller without thinking to win.

Learn to stop bending over to Nintendo and demand some quality games. Instead of getting crap yall should be getting some real support.

Ninten007

[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Oh hell no. The 7th installment was the best. FF CC was crap even the sheep said it. But if they remade FF CC for Wii with casual friendly tones, they would claim it as the best ever.

Oh the good days when sheep cared for good quality games is now long gone. Now they seem to want to play last-gen ports, minigames, and just waggle their controller without thinking to win.

Learn to stop bending over to Nintendo and demand some quality games. Instead of getting crap yall should be getting some real support.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different.  The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

-The-G-Man-

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different.  The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

He's probably going to say, "Coud've gotten zelda for the GC (which scored better) and Trauma Center is a mini game.."" The usual fanboy response