Sheep logic=Flawed.

  • 125 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
[QUOTE="ps3-nikita"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
GundamGuy0

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.



2, Is really about nostalgia, many old skool gamers forget this. It is also why in context of todays graphics, it is really a lame argument that goes even against what the Snes was about. Being a suped up nes. A super Nintendo System. If the graphics were marginally better then the Nes. Megadrive would have crushed the Snes. You wouldnt be playing no Wii, I doubt you would even have seen the GC. This is why, whenever that lame comeback is used I laugh. 99% of the time it is out of context.

To any sheep or anyone lame enough to try and use the past to justify the graphics on the Wii, dont. Pretty much every new genertaion or new system has improved enough in that area. So please dont use the we had fun on the 8bit or 16bit games, its a moot point. The truth is if 99% of the snes games looked like the nes games. You woulnt have had the need to buy one. You would have a Megadrive for your 16bit games and kept your old nes. If it were up to Nintendo you would be still playing the snes.

 

Enough is a subjective term, the Wii improved enough in that area too as far as I am concerned.

 

Do you have an empirical test to qualify graphic improvement?

Stick a regular controller on the Wii and tell me if the graphics have improved enough. I think you will find that the controler for the Wii is Nintendos pass on the graphics. That an all those graphically enhanced games of their generation. Funny how graphics dont matter to sheep in this gen. Home consolewise it has since the snes. Then again, maybe they shouldnt have had a catergory for graphics when reviewing a game for the snes or megadrive. Did people actually choice one version over another bsed upon which looked better or closer to the arcade. That cant be, according to sheep and some old skool games graphics didnt matter. That would make Neo Geo the better console, because the controls were better. Right sheep as its all about the controls.
Avatar image for TheJustin
TheJustin

2197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#52 TheJustin
Member since 2006 • 2197 Posts
IMO- all fanboys logic is flawed. Oroin


Hit the nail on the head.
Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts
[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Oroin

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different.  The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

He's probably going to say, "Coud've gotten zelda for the GC (which scored better) and Trauma Center is a mini game.."" The usual fanboy response

My counter to it will be this: Zelda is better on Wii.  It feels waaaay better when played on the Wii than on the GC.  And if he calls Trauma Center a minigame collection, he has never played it.

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

-The-G-Man-

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Oh hell no. The 7th installment was the best. FF CC was crap even the sheep said it. But if they remade FF CC for Wii with casual friendly tones, they would claim it as the best ever.

Oh the good days when sheep cared for good quality games is now long gone. Now they seem to want to play last-gen ports, minigames, and just waggle their controller without thinking to win.

Learn to stop bending over to Nintendo and demand some quality games. Instead of getting crap yall should be getting some real support.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different.  The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

Yea i give you Zelda, but you can also play it on GC, which I prefer because of camera control. Trauma Center? What makes you think I wanna play that? Do you think I wanna play some hospice game where I perform surgeries? If I wanted to do that I would be in medical school. I play real games, sheesh.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="ps3-nikita"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
ps3-nikita

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.



2, Is really about nostalgia, many old skool gamers forget this. It is also why in context of todays graphics, it is really a lame argument that goes even against what the Snes was about. Being a suped up nes. A super Nintendo System. If the graphics were marginally better then the Nes. Megadrive would have crushed the Snes. You wouldnt be playing no Wii, I doubt you would even have seen the GC. This is why, whenever that lame comeback is used I laugh. 99% of the time it is out of context.

To any sheep or anyone lame enough to try and use the past to justify the graphics on the Wii, dont. Pretty much every new genertaion or new system has improved enough in that area. So please dont use the we had fun on the 8bit or 16bit games, its a moot point. The truth is if 99% of the snes games looked like the nes games. You woulnt have had the need to buy one. You would have a Megadrive for your 16bit games and kept your old nes. If it were up to Nintendo you would be still playing the snes.

 

Enough is a subjective term, the Wii improved enough in that area too as far as I am concerned.

 

Do you have an empirical test to qualify graphic improvement?



Stick a regular controller on the Wii and tell me if the graphics have improved enough. I think you will find that the controler for the Wii is Nintendos pass on the graphics. That an all those graphically enhanced games of their generation. Funny how graphics dont matter to sheep in this gen. Home consolewise it has since the snes. Then again, maybe they shouldnt have had a catergory for graphics when reviewing a game for the snes or megadrive. Did people actually choice one version over another bsed upon which looked better or closer to the arcade. That cant be, according to sheep and some old skool games graphics didnt matter. That would make Neo Geo the better console, because the controls were better. Right sheep as its all about the controls.

 

The graphics chip in the Wii is more powerfull then that in the GC. It's enough of a jump IMO.

 

How much of a jump is enought? It's not something that you can measure because it's opinion. The Wii is enough of a jump.  

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts
[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

Sorry but FF:CC for the GC was utter crap. Oh you need a Game Boy advance to play with other players, which was milkage and forcing you to buy yet another crappy Nintendo product.

But anyways it is really sad to see sheep give up on good quality gaming they always craved for utter crap that the Wii is spewing out, you only praise it because it is selling well. I bet most of you are sitting there lonely with your Wii and feeling like crap. I bet you that Prime, Galaxy and Brawl will be aimed towards casuals and all they have to do is Waggle the controller and win.

So therefore, the Wii is ruining this industry and Nintendo is laughing devilishy to the bank. I dont want to play crap, I want good quality games which the 360 and PS3 are doing.

And if the 360 and PS3 were selling between $279-$379 bucks, Nintendo would be dead last, they are only doing good at the moment because of their cheap price.

 

Ninten007

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Oh hell no. The 7th installment was the best. FF CC was crap even the sheep said it. But if they remade FF CC for Wii with casual friendly tones, they would claim it as the best ever.

Oh the good days when sheep cared for good quality games is now long gone. Now they seem to want to play last-gen ports, minigames, and just waggle their controller without thinking to win.

Learn to stop bending over to Nintendo and demand some quality games. Instead of getting crap yall should be getting some real support.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different. The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

Yea i give you Zelda, but you can also play it on GC, which I prefer because of camera control. Trauma Center? What makes you think I wanna play that? Do you think I wanna play some hospice game where I perform surgeries? If I wanted to do that I would be in medical school. I play real games, sheesh.

No you don't. Trolls don't play games. That's why they are so trollish.  

Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
[QUOTE="Oroin"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

-The-G-Man-

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different.  The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

He's probably going to say, "Coud've gotten zelda for the GC (which scored better) and Trauma Center is a mini game.."" The usual fanboy response

My counter to it will be this: Zelda is better on Wii.  It feels waaaay better when played on the Wii than on the GC.  And if he calls Trauma Center a minigame collection, he has never played it.

did you play Zelda on the Wii first and how different is truma center to the ds version.
Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts

Yea i give you Zelda, but you can also play it on GC, which I prefer because of camera control. Trauma Center? What makes you think I wanna play that? Do you think I wanna play some hospice game where I perform surgeries? If I wanted to do that I would be in medical school. I play real games, sheesh.

Ninten007

Trauma Center is a great game.  And I would guess your definition of "real game" is anything that isn't on a Nintendo console.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts
[QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Oroin"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="-The-G-Man-"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

ps3-nikita

If Crystal Chronicles was on the PS2, you would be praising it as the best Final Fantasy ever.

Zelda and Trauma Center say different. The Wii DOES have quality games, those two being an example.

He's probably going to say, "Coud've gotten zelda for the GC (which scored better) and Trauma Center is a mini game.."" The usual fanboy response

My counter to it will be this: Zelda is better on Wii. It feels waaaay better when played on the Wii than on the GC. And if he calls Trauma Center a minigame collection, he has never played it.


did you play Zelda on the Wii first and how different is truma center to the ds version.

 

I like Truma center on teh Wii more, It's much easyer to control, because of the nuncuk switching, and it's got some great new levels.  

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="ps3-nikita"][QUOTE="Maelkav"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
ps3-nikita

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

You opened up a whole can of worms, but I'll try to be polite.

1)Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3 Does it? That is totally up to opinion.

2)If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics I still whip out my old SNES and have just as much fun with it as I did in the old days. Many "hardcore" gamers would agree with me.

3)And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC Um....didn't you just say a few lines before that graphics DO matter? You should be happy that the idiotic Nintendo has taken your superior idea to heart.



2, Is really about nostalgia, many old skool gamers forget this. It is also why in context of todays graphics, it is really a lame argument that goes even against what the Snes was about. Being a suped up nes. A super Nintendo System. If the graphics were marginally better then the Nes. Megadrive would have crushed the Snes. You wouldnt be playing no Wii, I doubt you would even have seen the GC. This is why, whenever that lame comeback is used I laugh. 99% of the time it is out of context.

To any sheep or anyone lame enough to try and use the past to justify the graphics on the Wii, dont. Pretty much every new genertaion or new system has improved enough in that area. So please dont use the we had fun on the 8bit or 16bit games, its a moot point. The truth is if 99% of the snes games looked like the nes games. You woulnt have had the need to buy one. You would have a Megadrive for your 16bit games and kept your old nes. If it were up to Nintendo you would be still playing the snes.

 

Enough is a subjective term, the Wii improved enough in that area too as far as I am concerned.

 

Do you have an empirical test to qualify graphic improvement?



Stick a regular controller on the Wii and tell me if the graphics have improved enough. I think you will find that the controler for the Wii is Nintendos pass on the graphics. That an all those graphically enhanced games of their generation. Funny how graphics dont matter to sheep in this gen. Home consolewise it has since the snes. Then again, maybe they shouldnt have had a catergory for graphics when reviewing a game for the snes or megadrive. Did people actually choice one version over another bsed upon which looked better or closer to the arcade. That cant be, according to sheep and some old skool games graphics didnt matter. That would make Neo Geo the better console, because the controls were better. Right sheep as its all about the controls.

Yet to you a Sony cows graphics all of a sudden are the driving factor to you? Oh the hypocricy in this is to ironic.

Sega Master System > NES

Game Gear > Gameboy

Neo Geo Pocket > Gameboy Color

TG16, Neo Geo, Sega CD > SNES

PSP > DS

The N64 was the only time Nintendo clearly had the strongest Hardware on the Market. Your myth has been busted.

 

Avatar image for phatkav
phatkav

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 phatkav
Member since 2005 • 1357 Posts
I guess this topic and "the PC can't do HD yet" topic have made my day.
Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts
Am I supposed to make some sort of counter-argument to this thread? I mean, I would if I had any logical point to argue against, but all I see is piss-poor fanboy ranting and crying. "bu bu teh sheep don't like quality!!!" Cry more.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#63 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
Ok, not everyone cares about graphics. If that were the case everyone would be buying high end gaming computers and PS3s and Xbox360s would be in every other home. The wii has mass apeal and its cheap. In my office six of us own wiis, zero PS3 and Xb360s. And we do photo-real CGI, so we know a thing or to about visual quality.
Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#64 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
TC, all fanboys are irrational and use flawed logic. They twist their views to fit whatever side they support. Also, in attempts to make others look bad they resort to such tactics as broad and meaningless generalizations, gross over-simplification, and other such failures to properly express reality.

Last gen with the GC, they said it is all about the quality of the games. Look the PS2 and Xbox are only for casuals who cant take gaming seriously and have a lot of crap on their systems. LOLZ !!! The GC is for the more serious and hardcore gamer and we get the uber quality games, LOL at PS2 and Xbox games selling like crazy appealing to idiot casuals, Ha ha ha!! We get teh Metroids, Marios, Zeldas, and games with true gameplayz, LOL at PS2 and Xbox getting teh crappy movie spinoffs, 50 Cent Bulletproof, GTA, sports gamez.......

Now with the Wii it is a complete reversal, and a lot of crap is spewing out of the system and sheep act like its the best thing ever while bashing the 360 and PS3 for it being hardcore? So this time they are getting loads of crap games instead of good quality games.

Sense the hypocritism? You just do whatever Nintendo tells you. If Nintendo says graphics and the quality of the games are the most important, you all bow down to them, If they say you need 64-graphics with waggle gameplay and half-arsed games, then you bow down.

Ninten007
See what I mean? Case in point.
Avatar image for MrDziekuje
MrDziekuje

7730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#65 MrDziekuje
Member since 2004 • 7730 Posts

Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
foxhound_fox

Exactly. This gets pointed out everytime.

Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts
I wonder if Nintend007 has realized that hypocritism isn't a word yet.
Avatar image for Zhengi
Zhengi

8479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Zhengi
Member since 2006 • 8479 Posts
I think the funniest part of this thread is how people have predicted Ninten007's responses so accurately. It's almost as if he has a textbook for trolling in front of him and he just spews what has already been spewed 100 times before :lol:
Avatar image for UssjTrunks
UssjTrunks

11299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 UssjTrunks
Member since 2005 • 11299 Posts
:o Oh noez! Let's go kill them!
Avatar image for Pangster007
Pangster007

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#69 Pangster007
Member since 2004 • 4426 Posts
I think the funniest part of this thread is how people have predicted Ninten007's responses so accurately. It's almost as if he has a textbook for trolling in front of him and he just spews what has already been spewed 100 times before :lol:Zhengi
:lol::lol: good one.
Avatar image for Tamarind_Face
Tamarind_Face

2270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Tamarind_Face
Member since 2007 • 2270 Posts

You have a point but we call them sheep for a reason.

 

They dont think, Nintendo thinks for them. They go where the shepard goes.

Avatar image for flashattackfina
flashattackfina

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 flashattackfina
Member since 2007 • 1468 Posts
good one Tamarind_Face
Avatar image for drewtwo99
drewtwo99

9156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 drewtwo99
Member since 2005 • 9156 Posts

Sheep logic= Flawed

Cows logic= Flawed

Lemmings logic= Flawed

/thread:|

Kev_Unreal
Absolutely 100% positively true
Avatar image for Phanrang
Phanrang

1496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 Phanrang
Member since 2005 • 1496 Posts
Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :D
Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts

Wow. I've seen ownage before but the TC is becoming the poster boy for it.

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts

Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :DPhanrang

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Avatar image for Stabby2486
Stabby2486

6688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Stabby2486
Member since 2006 • 6688 Posts

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

    

. . . . .

Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :DNinten007

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Yeah, because MS and Sony never use dirty business tactics.

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#79 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :DNinten007

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Does anyone care what you do or don't play, or what you would or wouldn't have a problem with?
Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#82 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts
Anyone notice how long it takes for the TC to response everytime he gets owned by an intelligent post then ignores it and quotes someone else?
Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts

"I would not have no problem with them. "

That is two negatives. That would mean you would have a problem with them.

Your English = Flawed.

Avatar image for super_mario_128
super_mario_128

23884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 super_mario_128
Member since 2006 • 23884 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :Dithilgore2006

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Does anyone care what you do or don't play, or what you would or wouldn't have a problem with?

Apparantly, yes, we should care about his life decisions. ;)
Avatar image for Stabby2486
Stabby2486

6688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Stabby2486
Member since 2006 • 6688 Posts

Sony and MS will redeem Capcom after they spew out their crap on the Wii.

 

They will?

Avatar image for haols
haols

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 haols
Member since 2005 • 2348 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Cows:

last-gen: gameplay>graphics

this-gen: graphics>gameplay
Ninten007

Thats not true. The PS2 was graphically capable of going up against the more powerful GC and Xbox. Look at such games as MGS 3, God of War, Star Wars Battlefront, RE 4? Point was that the PS2 was quite on the same level as the other systems.

The Wii is not on the same level as the more powerful consoles. Actually right now the gameplay on the Wii sucks compared to the 360 and PS3.

And 1 more thing, graphics do matter and help enhance gameplay. If you dont believe this statement, we should still be playing on SNES graphics. And if graphics dont matter, why did Nintendo make the Wii a little more powerful than GC?

NO, it never was. Just look at the screens of RE4 on GC, then on PS2. It had to suffer, rather much. Look at the frame rate in SOTC, it is nothing short of horrible, throughout the entire game.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#88 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yea, Crapcom=Wii ports. Last gen port of RE 4 with waggle controls, RE UC a FPS running on rails. Thats crap! Why? Because of the cheapness factor of the Wii. Nintendo made Crapcom with the Wii.

The true Capcom= working on a true version of the 5 installment in the RE series and an all new game DMC 4, no freaking ports on the big boy's systems. Sony and MS will redeem Capcom after they spew out their crap on the Wii.

Ninten007


You just don't stop do you? You must have a trolling text in front of you.

RE:UC will be like Time Crisis and House of the Dead... two highly acclaimed rail shooters. RE4 was a critically acclaimed game that now will be available to Wii owners who might have missed it.

I think you need a lesson in what a "big boy" system is.
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#89 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="Stabby2486"]

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Ninten007

. . . . .

Yea, Crapcom=Wii ports. Last gen port of RE 4 with waggle controls, RE UC a FPS running on rails. Thats crap! Why? Because of the cheapness factor of the Wii. Nintendo made Crapcom with the Wii.

The true Capcom= working on a true version of the 5 installment in the RE series and an all new game DMC 4, no freaking ports on the big boy's systems. Sony and MS will redeem Capcom after they spew out their crap on the Wii.

Hang on, RE5 and DMC$ will have to be developed on one of the systems and then ported to the other. I thought you said there's no ports from Capcom on the "big boy's" consoles?
Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#90 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts
Oh and TC, how does porting one game from the GC make Capcom all of a sudden "Crapcom"? Last time I checked, it was one freakin'. Or are you going to a lame excuse that RE: UC is all of a sudden a port as well?
Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :DIronMaidenLives

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Yeah, because MS and Sony never use dirty business tactics.

In the Console space. Nintendo crossed that mark. They shouldnt have even be allowed to continue, thats how strongly I feel about what they did. They did save any industry and dont give me that ?ET or Nintendo seal crap. They crossed the line, pure and simple. No justification, but because its Nintendo the press leave that alone. They have np reminding you with Microsoft
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23353 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :Dps3-nikita

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Yeah, because MS and Sony never use dirty business tactics.

In the Console space. Nintendo crossed that mark. They shouldnt have even be allowed to continue, thats how strongly I feel about what they did. They did save any industry and dont give me that ?ET or Nintendo seal crap. They crossed the line, pure and simple. No justification, but because its Nintendo the press leave that alone. They have np reminding you with Microsoft

What did they do that was so bad?
Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts
[QUOTE="IronMaidenLives"][QUOTE="Ninten007"]

[QUOTE="Phanrang"]Hahaha this TC is one of the most stupid cows I have seen around. Continue to entertain me guys! :Dps3-nikita

A cow? I own every Nintendo console out there and I learned my lesson after the crap they are spewing out on the Wii. I believe all the prior systems stood for good quality gaming but the Wii does not.

So the hell with Nintendo and their dirty business tactics that wont bring you real gaming and their mario boys who dont buy 3rd party games.

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Yeah, because MS and Sony never use dirty business tactics.


In the Console space. Nintendo crossed that mark. They shouldnt have even be allowed to continue, thats how strongly I feel about what they did. They did save any industry and dont give me that ?ET or Nintendo seal crap. They crossed the line, pure and simple. No justification, but because its Nintendo the press leave that alone. They have np reminding you with Microsoft

Make some sense when you post, will ya?

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Stabby2486"]

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

ithilgore2006

. . . . .

Yea, Crapcom=Wii ports. Last gen port of RE 4 with waggle controls, RE UC a FPS running on rails. Thats crap! Why? Because of the cheapness factor of the Wii. Nintendo made Crapcom with the Wii.

The true Capcom= working on a true version of the 5 installment in the RE series and an all new game DMC 4, no freaking ports on the big boy's systems. Sony and MS will redeem Capcom after they spew out their crap on the Wii.

Hang on, RE5 and DMC$ will have to be developed on one of the systems and then ported to the other. I thought you said there's no ports from Capcom on the "big boy's" consoles?

 Keyword here is last-gen ports........duh, The next gen systems are getting new versions.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

Sheep if you love your Wii so much why are you talking on these forums? Bored much of that crap? LOL

It si time for Nintendo to pop their Wii outta yall's mouth, it is so unbelivable you actually believe them on this revolutionary gamplay thing and yet every game has been worse than it has been on traditional controls.

On rails? For the whole freaking game? That is a n00b-fest, just point and shoot. Everyone's granny could do that. Where is the sense of exploration and the moody atomsphere? Guess what it is gonna be on RE5 on the big boy's consoles not that kiddy nongamer console Wii.

 

Ninten007

 

Troll much?  

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#98 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts

Sheep if you love your Wii so much why are you talking on these forums? Bored much of that crap? LOL

It si time for Nintendo to pop their Wii outta yall's mouth, it is so unbelivable you actually believe them on this revolutionary gamplay thing and yet every game has been worse than it has been on traditional controls.

On rails? For the whole freaking game? That is a n00b-fest, just point and shoot. Everyone's granny could do that. Where is the sense of exploration and the moody atomsphere? Guess what it is gonna be on RE5 on the big boy's consoles not that kiddy nongamer console Wii.

Ninten007
I take it you couldn't think of anything to counter any of us then? That's why you're just repeating your fanboy nonsense we already heard again?
Avatar image for IronMaidenLives
IronMaidenLives

703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 IronMaidenLives
Member since 2007 • 703 Posts

Sheep if you love your Wii so much why are you talking on these forums? Bored much of that crap? LOL

It si time for Nintendo to pop their Wii outta yall's mouth, it is so unbelivable you actually believe them on this revolutionary gamplay thing and yet every game has been worse than it has been on traditional controls.

On rails? For the whole freaking game? That is a n00b-fest, just point and shoot. Everyone's granny could do that. Where is the sense of exploration and the moody atomsphere? Guess what it is gonna be on RE5 on the big boy's consoles not that kiddy nongamer console Wii.

Ninten007

Funny, you are here as much as us. Maybe you should shut your computer off, it saves you the humiliation.

Nice username by the way.

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#100 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="Ninten007"][QUOTE="Stabby2486"]

IF they had made a system with 360 like graphics and were delivering quality gaming and getting some good titles like GTA 4, Assassian's Creed, Star Wars:Force Unleashed, RE 5, DMC 4, next-gen Indiana Jones, next-gen Bond gaming, Burnout, Kane and Lynch then I would not have no problem with them.

I dont play crap like Elebits, Cooking Mama, Pinball, Line-Rider, Ubi-ports, Crapcom ports, EA ports, Wario Wares, etc.

Ninten007

. . . . .

Yea, Crapcom=Wii ports. Last gen port of RE 4 with waggle controls, RE UC a FPS running on rails. Thats crap! Why? Because of the cheapness factor of the Wii. Nintendo made Crapcom with the Wii.

The true Capcom= working on a true version of the 5 installment in the RE series and an all new game DMC 4, no freaking ports on the big boy's systems. Sony and MS will redeem Capcom after they spew out their crap on the Wii.

Hang on, RE5 and DMC$ will have to be developed on one of the systems and then ported to the other. I thought you said there's no ports from Capcom on the "big boy's" consoles?

Keyword here is last-gen ports........duh, The next gen systems are getting new versions.

What keyword? You just said ports in your post.