Should Crysis come to PS3 or Xbox 360?

I'd just play it on my PC.

Well ive played Wiisis and it is awesome! Wii! :D

None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.pyromaniac223

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

Well according to consolites Crysis sucks, so no reason for it to be on consoles.

It won't come to a console, one it has pretty graphics but in gameplay it has been done before. If anything it'll be on the ps3. If they want the graphics, story, and multiplayer all one disc with the stunning graphics than they would probaly have to use blu-ray. The 360 has the power to run it(i'm just assuming, i am probably terribly wrong on everything im saying) but it probably couldn't fit on one dvd and the publishers are too scared to release a game on two discs on the fear of thinking they'll look outdated and not using the newest technology. But that's just what I think, but what do i know. THE212Warrior

Crysis total install size is around 6GB, Warhead is about 7Gb, and Wars is about 8Gb, any one could fit on a single DVD uncompressed.

Shocking really, STALKER and Farcry 2 are the same, around 5-7GB, and then you have UE3 games with 8-12GB.

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.Vandalvideo

Lol at fanboys who think the ps3 is technologically superior to the 360. They are the same really, the HDD is what differs them. SAGE_OF_FIRE

Also, the PS3s 256mb of Ram runs at 3.2ghz......... I'd say that's a huge difference wouldn't you?

Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolNephilim83

It's not that simple, this explains it a bit.

"I know what you're thinking: hey, GTAIV and Far Cry 2 work well on consoles, and they're open-world games, so what makes Crysis so special?
This is both true and false. Whilst GTAIV and Far Cry 2 doprovide the illusion of continuous open-worlds, they manage to fit the experience on the console by chopping up the levels into smaller pieces of several hundred square meters. Basically, when your character passes acertain point, you are thrown into anew chunk, while everything else is off in the background, the hardware is only monitoring the activity going on in that chunk. This is why, in Far Cry 2, you can enter an area, fight afew soldiers, run away to aspecific distance, and then come back to find that they've reset their behaviors and that all of the damage you've done to the environment has disappeared.

Although Crysis is more focused and linear than either of these two games, each of the game's levels are rendered and monitored in real-time. What this means is, if you found an appropriate spot, you could look several kilometers across alevel to find the same patrolling AI that you would encounter if you went to that area. If you shot arocket across this distance, they would actively notice you and the game would never forget the effect that you have on the environment while you have that level loaded. Consoles simply can't remember this due to their limits on RAM."

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.THE212Warrior

Running Crysis on full has little to do with disk space. It has everything to do with RAM availability and the GPU/CPU. Consoles cannot run Crysis at or near max settings, especially with everything that would need to be rendered at once. There is just not enough RAM.

[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]Lol at fanboys who think the ps3 is technologically superior to the 360. They are the same really, the HDD is what differs them. Nephilim83

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.Nephilim83

[QUOTE="Nephilim83"]Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolAnnoyedDragon

It's not that simple, this explains it a bit.

"I know what you're thinking: hey, GTAIV and Far Cry 2 work well on consoles, and they're open-world games, so what makes Crysis so special?
This is both true and false. Whilst GTAIV and Far Cry 2 doprovide the illusion of continuous open-worlds, they manage to fit the experience on the console by chopping up the levels into smaller pieces of several hundred square meters. Basically, when your character passes acertain point, you are thrown into anew chunk, while everything else is off in the background, the hardware is only monitoring the activity going on in that chunk. This is why, in Far Cry 2, you can enter an area, fight afew soldiers, run away to aspecific distance, and then come back to find that they've reset their behaviors and that all of the damage you've done to the environment has disappeared.

Although Crysis is more focused and linear than either of these two games, each of the game's levels are rendered and monitored in real-time. What this means is, if you found an appropriate spot, you could look several kilometers across alevel to find the same patrolling AI that you would encounter if you went to that area. If you shot arocket across this distance, they would actively notice you and the game would never forget the effect that you have on the environment while you have that level loaded. Consoles simply can't remember this due to their limits on RAM."

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="12345678ew"] it would be extremely easy at low settings, but on top settings, with full anti-alias, your right. and it could never come to 360.Nephilim83

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="Nephilim83"]Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolmitu123

It's not that simple, this explains it a bit.

"I know what you're thinking: hey, GTAIV and Far Cry 2 work well on consoles, and they're open-world games, so what makes Crysis so special?
This is both true and false. Whilst GTAIV and Far Cry 2 doprovide the illusion of continuous open-worlds, they manage to fit the experience on the console by chopping up the levels into smaller pieces of several hundred square meters. Basically, when your character passes acertain point, you are thrown into anew chunk, while everything else is off in the background, the hardware is only monitoring the activity going on in that chunk. This is why, in Far Cry 2, you can enter an area, fight afew soldiers, run away to aspecific distance, and then come back to find that they've reset their behaviors and that all of the damage you've done to the environment has disappeared.

Although Crysis is more focused and linear than either of these two games, each of the game's levels are rendered and monitored in real-time. What this means is, if you found an appropriate spot, you could look several kilometers across alevel to find the same patrolling AI that you would encounter if you went to that area. If you shot arocket across this distance, they would actively notice you and the game would never forget the effect that you have on the environment while you have that level loaded. Consoles simply can't remember this due to their limits on RAM."

And this post should end the thread.mitu123

And yet it never does.

I don't think people are actually interested in playing Crysis, they just want something called Crysis that looks like it; so they can boast Crysis is on consoles.

If they wanted to play Crysis they wouldn't want to butcher its game play, changing the whole experience, just to get it running on consoles.

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.12345678ew

It's not a graphics power problem; it's a RAM problem. Crysis uses up to +2200MB and more of pure RAM. This doesn't get much lower even on minimum settings. The layout of the huge maps takes up that much memory. Even with streaming, it would be impossible to port the game in any way that resembles the PC version on current hardware.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

It's not that simple, this explains it a bit.

"I know what you're thinking: hey, GTAIV and Far Cry 2 work well on consoles, and they're open-world games, so what makes Crysis so special?
This is both true and false. Whilst GTAIV and Far Cry 2 doprovide the illusion of continuous open-worlds, they manage to fit the experience on the console by chopping up the levels into smaller pieces of several hundred square meters. Basically, when your character passes acertain point, you are thrown into anew chunk, while everything else is off in the background, the hardware is only monitoring the activity going on in that chunk. This is why, in Far Cry 2, you can enter an area, fight afew soldiers, run away to aspecific distance, and then come back to find that they've reset their behaviors and that all of the damage you've done to the environment has disappeared.

Although Crysis is more focused and linear than either of these two games, each of the game's levels are rendered and monitored in real-time. What this means is, if you found an appropriate spot, you could look several kilometers across alevel to find the same patrolling AI that you would encounter if you went to that area. If you shot arocket across this distance, they would actively notice you and the game would never forget the effect that you have on the environment while you have that level loaded. Consoles simply can't remember this due to their limits on RAM."

pyromaniac223

Wow, cows are delusional if they think that they have an advantage over the 360, if anything, Crysis would only run on the 360 and not on the PS3 because of the lack of RAM, theoretically.404-not-found

[QUOTE="mitu123"]And this post should end the thread.AnnoyedDragon

And yet it never does.

I don't think people are actually interested in playing Crysis, they just want something called Crysis that looks like it; so they can boast Crysis is on consoles.

If they wanted to play Crysis they wouldn't want to butcher its game play, changing the whole experience, just to get it running on consoles.

[QUOTE="Nephilim83"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] IT has more to do with level size than resolution and post production assets. There isn't enough RAM to render that much space. They'd have to chop it up on consoles, henc it cant be done in its current form.JangoWuzHere

[QUOTE="Nephilim83"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] IT has more to do with level size than resolution and post production assets. There isn't enough RAM to render that much space. They'd have to chop it up on consoles, henc it cant be done in its current form.JangoWuzHere

Something that's great about Crysis is being able to snipe and fire nukes across the map and watch the environment get destroyed miles away. That's an important feature of Crysis and getting rid of that wouldn't be worth it even if it was possible in bringing it to consoles. But, still, it's impossible, even with chopping it up and making the land in the distance uninteractable. Another post proves this.

How many times has this thread been done? When will this madness stop?

Honestly, if Crysis ever did come to consoles, (which I doubt) console owners will tear it apart. Its an average shooter with nice visuals, but even then, nice by a very broad and general standard. Nothing would make me happier than having the game exposed for what it is to the console gaming public: a decent, well made shooter but nothing outstanding.beekayjay

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="Nephilim83"] Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolNephilim83

And it delivers that better than any FPS this generation. Only Gears Of War 2 comes close, in my opinion.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

It's not that simple, this explains it a bit.

"I know what you're thinking: hey, GTAIV and Far Cry 2 work well on consoles, and they're open-world games, so what makes Crysis so special?
This is both true and false. Whilst GTAIV and Far Cry 2 doprovide the illusion of continuous open-worlds, they manage to fit the experience on the console by chopping up the levels into smaller pieces of several hundred square meters. Basically, when your character passes acertain point, you are thrown into anew chunk, while everything else is off in the background, the hardware is only monitoring the activity going on in that chunk. This is why, in Far Cry 2, you can enter an area, fight afew soldiers, run away to aspecific distance, and then come back to find that they've reset their behaviors and that all of the damage you've done to the environment has disappeared.

Although Crysis is more focused and linear than either of these two games, each of the game's levels are rendered and monitored in real-time. What this means is, if you found an appropriate spot, you could look several kilometers across alevel to find the same patrolling AI that you would encounter if you went to that area. If you shot arocket across this distance, they would actively notice you and the game would never forget the effect that you have on the environment while you have that level loaded. Consoles simply can't remember this due to their limits on RAM."

pyromaniac223

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="Nephilim83"] Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolNephilim83

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="Nephilim83"] Yeah, those are some pretty massive levels (especially the island) but like you said they could just chop it up. There's no reason to see that much of the island in that much detail all at once! Throw a little fog on there and get to pawning some Koreans! lolNephilim83

Honestly, if Crysis ever did come to consoles, (which I doubt) console owners will tear it apart. Its an average shooter with nice visuals, but even then, nice by a very broad and general standard. Nothing would make me happier than having the game exposed for what it is to the console gaming public: a decent, well made shooter but nothing outstanding.beekayjay

Care to elabourate on why you think it's a average shooter?

:lol:

This again? Crysis, in it's current state on PC, will never be on consoles. Get...over...it...

Wow, talk about beating a dead horse.

[QUOTE="404-not-found"]Wow, cows are delusional if they think that they have an advantage over the 360, if anything, Crysis would only run on the 360 and not on the PS3 because of the lack of RAM, theoretically.Nephilim83

Honestly, if Crysis ever did come to consoles, (which I doubt) console owners will tear it apart. Its an average shooter with nice visuals, but even then, nice by a very broad and general standard. Nothing would make me happier than having the game exposed for what it is to the console gaming public: a decent, well made shooter but nothing outstanding.beekayjay

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]None. It's not possible to do it on consoles.Nephilim83

This entire post is terrible. I wish it never existed. The world would be a much better place.

:lol:

This again? Crysis, in it's current state on PC, will never be on consoles. Get...over...it...

Wow, talk about beating a dead horse.

Puckhog04

[QUOTE="beekayjay"]Honestly, if Crysis ever did come to consoles, (which I doubt) console owners will tear it apart. Its an average shooter with nice visuals, but even then, nice by a very broad and general standard. Nothing would make me happier than having the game exposed for what it is to the console gaming public: a decent, well made shooter but nothing outstanding.AnnoyedDragon

Care to elabourate on why you think it's a average shooter?

I doubt he's played it so he probably won't respond. The console gamers just bash it because it's one of the great games that can't physically ever come to consoles. They envy it and, therefore, they must bash it.