@joshrmeyer said:
@kingtito: Look, simple question: Why doesn't their $200+ controller use AA batteries if that's what gamers consider to be better? Premium devices use internal batteries. It's been that way for a while now. Options can be a good thing, but not when it's gonna cost me more(buying more batteries or a recharge pack) for an inferior product. Simple solution would be for MS to include the recharge pack with each controller. Then you'd still have that option of using AA batteries if you wanted to (not sure why anyone would want to.. if battery goes dead while playing a game, plug the cord in. Or switch to another controller. I can't think of many scenarios at all where AAs would benefit anyone besides MS pocket).
Look I don't really care why since I don't own an elite controller but just because they added it in there $200 controller doesn't mean it's the best option for everyone.
The cost of replacing a controller once the battery dies isn't to much? Or buying a 2nd controller because your built in battery dies before you're done playing? Or you forgot to charge your controller and you haven't played in a little while so your controller is almost dead when you do get a chance to play? Sorry bud but my eneloop batteries didn't cost much, last a long time on a single charge and I can use them for just as long as the built in ones if not longer since I don't have to charge them as often.
Not really a simple solution since cows will complain about that as well. The only ones that really have a problem with this are cows.
Because nothing says "next gen gaming" by having a cord on your controller like it's the 90s.
So spend $70 on a new controller to use in case the battery in your 1st dies while playing?????? Not very cost effective now is it?
Kind of like having a built in battery that last 4-5 hours thereby forcing it's customers to purchase a $70 2nd controller. What were you saying pot?
Log in to comment