show me a console game like this ( no 56k)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#201 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts

[QUOTE="grimhope"]What if i said Mc donalds had better food than OUtback steak house. I mean maby i enjoy the food at mcdonalds more, and i really dont like outback........but you would say i was an idiot if i thought the QUALITY OF FOOD at mcdonalds is better wouldnt you, i mean that would be a blatent lie no way around it........everyone is entitled to their opinion....but in the end some opinions ARE FACT AND SOME ARE FICTION .....When it comes to the grafix of Stalker vs Gears your opinion IS FICTION and a MISCONCEPTION. That being said you have every right to like it better than gears if you like.....Its just every major reviewer site and reasonable non fanboy will tell you you are wrong BECAUSE YOU ARE WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT UNBIASEDLY...Vandalvideo
So how exactly is my opinion that Gears has dispropotional meat chunks for humans that look plastic and shiney fiction and a misconception. They look like that to me, its my opinion they look like that. Its not like I've said, "STALKER's graphics are technically more advanced than Gears" or anything, even if the lighting system may be. (OMG i just said it).

 

Well see its your opinion.....How than would you suggest we decide witch looks better.......I mean im not saying that you cant think whatever you want im just pointing out that you are wrong...Find me a review that says Stalker is the best looking game they have ever played:  JUST ONE REVIEW.....how about you prove your opinion to be fact for once!!!! 

Avatar image for Dopemonk736
Dopemonk736

2731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 Dopemonk736
Member since 2006 • 2731 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.

Vandal, I got the joke in your video, do I get a clap? :) Claps for me!!!!
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#203 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Dopemonk736"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.

Vandal, I got the joke in your video, do I get a clap? :) Claps for me!!!!

Wow you did? Congratulations on the you understand bad jokes award. :D..............:(
Avatar image for 360_Degrees
360_Degrees

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 360_Degrees
Member since 2007 • 354 Posts

Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.Vandalvideo

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt. 

Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#205 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="grimhope"]What if i said Mc donalds had better food than OUtback steak house. I mean maby i enjoy the food at mcdonalds more, and i really dont like outback........but you would say i was an idiot if i thought the QUALITY OF FOOD at mcdonalds is better wouldnt you, i mean that would be a blatent lie no way around it........everyone is entitled to their opinion....but in the end some opinions ARE FACT AND SOME ARE FICTION .....When it comes to the grafix of Stalker vs Gears your opinion IS FICTION and a MISCONCEPTION. That being said you have every right to like it better than gears if you like.....Its just every major reviewer site and reasonable non fanboy will tell you you are wrong BECAUSE YOU ARE WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT UNBIASEDLY...grimhope

So how exactly is my opinion that Gears has dispropotional meat chunks for humans that look plastic and shiney fiction and a misconception. They look like that to me, its my opinion they look like that. Its not like I've said, "STALKER's graphics are technically more advanced than Gears" or anything, even if the lighting system may be. (OMG i just said it).

 

Well see its your opinion.....How than would you suggest we decide witch looks better.......I mean im not saying that you cant think whatever you want im just pointing out that you are wrong...Find me a review that says Stalker is the best looking game they have ever played: JUST ONE REVIEW.....how about you prove your opinion to be fact for once!!!!

 

YOu say that two websites that say gears is the best looking game isnt good enough proof for you.  You say the fact that 85% of people including people in hear that are defending stalker say gears looks better isnt good enough.  You say the fact that gears scored a 10 in grafix and stalker scored and 8 isnt good enough.....I mean We have presented a plethera of evidence that GEARS LOOKS BETTER where is even a small snipet of yours?????  Oh thats right you have none......because you are wrong.. 

Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="hoankiemdinh"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="hoankiemdinh"]If the thread creator claims such no console game can match that then why did Gears of War get a 10 in graphics? Stalker got an 8. Plus why did so many review say that "Gears of War is the best looking game right now"hoankiemdinh

Standards of the platforms are far different. You can't directly compare raw number scores across platforms. Gamespot doesn't work that awy.

-When Critics say it "The best looking game out NOW"..they mean all GAMEs. Even including PC games. Get Owned.

I TRUST MY OPINIONS. i DONT CARE ABOUT M$ PR BS. GEARS OF WAR IS A MINI-GAME. STALKER IS A MASTERPICE. AND CONSOLE BOYS? IM STILL WAITING FOR A VIDEO LIKE THE ONE I POSTED... WHERE IS IT?

It pretty funny how a mini-game scored Game of the Year and recieve the highest possible points at GS last year with Oblivion. But Stalker...8.5, RFOM> Stalker....now that saying soemthing

again. i dont care about scores. the reviewer clearly lacks brains / knowledge... on par with hl2? i dont know what he is smoking. HL2 it looks good. true. but its has constant loading times. you make 2 steps, loading. another 2 loading. and is has no ambitions. just an example of how much reviews talk without really knowing. hl2 has no trees. maybe 1 or 2. stalkers has ton of foliage, huge world, even with slightly ees detailed models stalker is the single most amazing experience wright now. THIS GAME IS BETTER THAN GEARS / OBLIVION/ FEAR.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#207 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.360_Degrees

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt. 

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#208 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="grimhope"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="grimhope"]What if i said Mc donalds had better food than OUtback steak house. I mean maby i enjoy the food at mcdonalds more, and i really dont like outback........but you would say i was an idiot if i thought the QUALITY OF FOOD at mcdonalds is better wouldnt you, i mean that would be a blatent lie no way around it........everyone is entitled to their opinion....but in the end some opinions ARE FACT AND SOME ARE FICTION .....When it comes to the grafix of Stalker vs Gears your opinion IS FICTION and a MISCONCEPTION. That being said you have every right to like it better than gears if you like.....Its just every major reviewer site and reasonable non fanboy will tell you you are wrong BECAUSE YOU ARE WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT UNBIASEDLY...grimhope

So how exactly is my opinion that Gears has dispropotional meat chunks for humans that look plastic and shiney fiction and a misconception. They look like that to me, its my opinion they look like that. Its not like I've said, "STALKER's graphics are technically more advanced than Gears" or anything, even if the lighting system may be. (OMG i just said it).

 

Well see its your opinion.....How than would you suggest we decide witch looks better.......I mean im not saying that you cant think whatever you want im just pointing out that you are wrong...Find me a review that says Stalker is the best looking game they have ever played: JUST ONE REVIEW.....how about you prove your opinion to be fact for once!!!!

 

YOu say that two websites that say gears is the best looking game isnt good enough proof for you.  You say the fact that 85% of people including people in hear that are defending stalker say gears looks better isnt good enough.  You say the fact that gears scored a 10 in grafix and stalker scored and 8 isnt good enough.....I mean We have presented a plethera of evidence that GEARS LOOKS BETTER where is even a small snipet of yours?????  Oh thats right you have none......because you are wrong.. 

And that plethora of evidence I have quickly destroyed. You can't compare games cross platform, popular opinoin isn't fact,.........was gonna add something after this parenthesis but there wasn't anything left to discredit. Bummer.
Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts
I do not think that Stalker deserved an 8 in sound, it really should have gotten higher, they scored it down because the majority of Characters spoke in Russian Only, Despite the fact that The game is made by Ukranian Developers, and takes place in Ukraine. But the whole Guitar Music that the Stalkers would play around campfires, is just really amazing.
Avatar image for Dopemonk736
Dopemonk736

2731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 Dopemonk736
Member since 2006 • 2731 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Dopemonk736"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.

Vandal, I got the joke in your video, do I get a clap? :) Claps for me!!!!

Wow you did? Congratulations on the you understand bad jokes award. :D..............:(

I WIN!!!!!! *feels proud of winning fake award on internets*
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
You guys sound like some little girls, so let me end this argument...all the games mentioned here suck and are worthless..there its all over now.
Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#212 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts
[QUOTE="hoankiemdinh"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="hoankiemdinh"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="hoankiemdinh"]If the thread creator claims such no console game can match that then why did Gears of War get a 10 in graphics? Stalker got an 8. Plus why did so many review say that "Gears of War is the best looking game right now"machitocaliente

Standards of the platforms are far different. You can't directly compare raw number scores across platforms. Gamespot doesn't work that awy.

-When Critics say it "The best looking game out NOW"..they mean all GAMEs. Even including PC games. Get Owned.

I TRUST MY OPINIONS. i DONT CARE ABOUT M$ PR BS. GEARS OF WAR IS A MINI-GAME. STALKER IS A MASTERPICE. AND CONSOLE BOYS? IM STILL WAITING FOR A VIDEO LIKE THE ONE I POSTED... WHERE IS IT?

It pretty funny how a mini-game scored Game of the Year and recieve the highest possible points at GS last year with Oblivion. But Stalker...8.5, RFOM> Stalker....now that saying soemthing

again. i dont care about scores. the reviewer clearly lacks brains / knowledge... on par with hl2? i dont know what he is smoking. HL2 it looks good. true. but its has constant loading times. you make 2 steps, loading. another 2 loading. and is has no ambitions. just an example of how much reviews talk without really knowing. hl2 has no trees. maybe 1 or 2. stalkers has ton of foliage, huge world, even with slightly ees detailed models stalker is the single most amazing experience wright now. THIS GAME IS BETTER THAN GEARS / OBLIVION/ FEAR.

 

Of course you dont care about the scores because they prove that you are WRONG...... 

Avatar image for Dopemonk736
Dopemonk736

2731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#213 Dopemonk736
Member since 2006 • 2731 Posts
You guys sound like some little girls, so let me end this argument...all the games mentioned here suck and are worthless..there its all over now.Kahuna_1
lawlz
Avatar image for 360_Degrees
360_Degrees

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 360_Degrees
Member since 2007 • 354 Posts
[QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.Vandalvideo

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

 

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#215 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.360_Degrees

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

 

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

They said that the PS3 doesn't have the same kind of online support as xbox live yes, but they never clearly said that it affects the actual score. There isn't anything anywhere that even suggests that. Inference is bad for your health. I do believe that Skating falls under "sports" so its being compared to all those other sports games on the PS3. See what I jsut did? Inference. Wewt.
Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#216 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.360_Degrees

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

 

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

 

 

Look man you have givin this guy ample evidence that gears looks better than stalker.....He has provided no evidence only his opinion............Its on him to prove us wrong and he cant....He has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING BUT HIS OPINION......and his opinion is wrong... 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#217 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Grimhope: Uhh.....inference isn't evidence, nor is it proof. Its like saying that the government caused 911 because omg thermite. Theres no proof, but you could infer it from the evidence presence.
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="grimhope"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="grimhope"]What if i said Mc donalds had better food than OUtback steak house. I mean maby i enjoy the food at mcdonalds more, and i really dont like outback........but you would say i was an idiot if i thought the QUALITY OF FOOD at mcdonalds is better wouldnt you, i mean that would be a blatent lie no way around it........everyone is entitled to their opinion....but in the end some opinions ARE FACT AND SOME ARE FICTION .....When it comes to the grafix of Stalker vs Gears your opinion IS FICTION and a MISCONCEPTION. That being said you have every right to like it better than gears if you like.....Its just every major reviewer site and reasonable non fanboy will tell you you are wrong BECAUSE YOU ARE WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT UNBIASEDLY...grimhope

So how exactly is my opinion that Gears has dispropotional meat chunks for humans that look plastic and shiney fiction and a misconception. They look like that to me, its my opinion they look like that. Its not like I've said, "STALKER's graphics are technically more advanced than Gears" or anything, even if the lighting system may be. (OMG i just said it).

Well see its your opinion.....How than would you suggest we decide witch looks better.......I mean im not saying that you cant think whatever you want im just pointing out that you are wrong...Find me a review that says Stalker is the best looking game they have ever played: JUST ONE REVIEW.....how about you prove your opinion to be fact for once!!!!

YOu say that two websites that say gears is the best looking game isnt good enough proof for you. You say the fact that 85% of people including people in hear that are defending stalker say gears looks better isnt good enough. You say the fact that gears scored a 10 in grafix and stalker scored and 8 isnt good enough.....I mean We have presented a plethera of evidence that GEARS LOOKS BETTER where is even a small snipet of yours????? Oh thats right you have none......because you are wrong..

LOL. YOUR RANDOM EVIDENCE MEANS NOTHING. JUST BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE LIKES FAST FOOD IT DSNT MEAN ITS GOOD FOOD. JUST BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE USE WINDOWS IT DSNT MEAN WINDOWS ITS GOOD. MAKE UP YOUR ON MIND SHEEP.
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
Gears is so small and linear it really cannot be compared...Kahuna_1
COMPARED TO STALKER GEARS IS LIKE THE MINI-GAMES INSIDE DOOM 3
Avatar image for 360_Degrees
360_Degrees

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 360_Degrees
Member since 2007 • 354 Posts
[QUOTE="360_Degrees"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.Vandalvideo

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

 

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

They said that the PS3 doesn't have the same kind of online support as xbox live yes, but they never clearly said that it affects the actual score. There isn't anything anywhere that even suggests that. Inference is bad for your health. I do believe that Skating falls under "sports" so its being compared to all those other sports games on the PS3. See what I jsut did? Inference. Wewt.

 

Whats a review written for? To give an accurate suggestion on a game, for the most part. So when its clearly in the review that Xbox Live is what made the alternate version of the game better, then thats perfect evidence of how it affects the score of the game. Reviewers assume we don't need a bold at the top of the review saying "THIS GAME IS BETTER ON XBOX 360 BECAUSE IT OFFERS XBOX LIVE WHICH BOOSTS THE SCORE" because they assume we aren't idiots. Plain and simple, and yes, I just called you an idiot.

 

And no, there aren't any other skate games on PS3, even to this date.

Well I'm glad that arguement has been settled, PC does not have higher standards and STALKER does not have more impressive graphics than a game such as Gears of War (as stated from a plethora of reviewers).

-I'm out. 

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#222 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
You're still using inferences degress and now you called me an idiot. Thats not very nice nor is it very productive to proving me wrong using accurate evidence instead of inferences.
Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#223 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts

If i was colorblind and i saw the sky as gray, i told you it was gray, and you say no man its blue  Could you prove it to me?  No you couldnt.....but that doesnt mean the sky isnt blue.   You just dont want to accept the evidence that has been presented  Gs

 

 

GEARS GRAFIX=10

 

Stalker=8

 

You prove to me that the games are graded differently because they are on different platforms, you prove that Gs reviews games in different genras differently.  You prove that a pc game is graded 2 numbers lower than the 360 in terms of grafix.....Whats that you cant prove any of that??????  This is what i mean when i say you manipulate the truth when it benifits you.....You have no proof of the amount of the difference in review scores betweeen the pc and 360 yet you spout it like it is the truth??  WTF?

Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="360_Degrees"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.grimhope

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

Look man you have givin this guy ample evidence that gears looks better than stalker.....He has provided no evidence only his opinion............Its on him to prove us wrong and he cant....He has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING BUT HIS OPINION......and his opinion is wrong...

my video says otherwise. SHOW ME A VIDEO OF GEARS THAT LOOKS BETTER THAN THE ONE I POSTED. UNTIL THEN YOUR NUMBERS MEAN NOTHING.
Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#225 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts
[QUOTE="grimhope"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="360_Degrees"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Degrees: They don't mention the 360 version in "The Bad" The Bad: Frame rate is frequently unstable; no online support; skater creation options aren't as in-depth as they have been in previous installments. Those are comparisons that could be made to other games on the same platform. Whether or not they were referenced in the text of the review is not a clear indication that it is included in the score.machitocaliente

 

Online was in the 360 version and was mentioned in the 360 review.

My point about Xbox Live is still valid as it in the conclusion of the review which highlights the positives and negatives of the game (concluding the game's deserved score).

pwnt.

How am I owned if its merely inference. The bad section could be a comparison to other skating/sports games for all you know. Theres no clear indication they are talking about the 360 version. It doesn't matter if its in the text of the review. Like I said, inferences are useless against me.

 

Alright, name some other skateboarding games that are available for the PS3 at the time THP8 came out.

And yes, there is indication they are talking about the 360 version. THEY CLEARLY MENTION XBOX LIVE AS AN ADVANTAGE ON THE 360'S VERSION OF THE GAME THUS ALLOWING IT TO SCORE HIGHER.

Sometimes, when you admit defeat in an arguement, it is better than trying to pick apart every single word and beingly overly-technical and completely straying from your points. You are at that stage right now, and its not going to get any better man.

 

 

Look man you have givin this guy ample evidence that gears looks better than stalker.....He has provided no evidence only his opinion............Its on him to prove us wrong and he cant....He has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING BUT HIS OPINION......and his opinion is wrong...

my video says otherwise. SHOW ME A VIDEO OF GEARS THAT LOOKS BETTER THAN THE ONE I POSTED. UNTIL THEN YOUR NUMBERS MEAN NOTHING.

 

 

My numbers>YOur opinion

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#226 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

If i was colorblind and i saw the sky as gray, i told you it was gray, and you say no man its blue  Could you prove it to me?  No you couldnt.....but that doesnt mean the sky isnt blue.   You just dont want to accept the evidence that has been presented  Gs

 

 

GEARS GRAFIX=10

 

Stalker=8

 

You prove to me that the games are graded differently because they are on different platforms, you prove that Gs reviews games in different genras differently.  You prove that a pc game is graded 2 numbers lower than the 360 in terms of grafix.....Whats that you cant prove any of that??????  This is what i mean when i say you manipulate the truth when it benifits you.....You have no proof of the amount of the difference in review scores betweeen the pc and 360 yet you spout it like it is the truth??  WTF?

grimhope
I just got into bed but I guess I'll answer this last one. Review the gamespot review faq, they clearly state that games are based off same genre same platform. PERIOD. The PC isn't split into generations like consoles, and has over 165 AAA titles every new game has to compare to by what the review faq states. The more games to compare to, the steeper the competition. The Steeper the competition, the higher the standards. You can not compare games from different platforms off of mere score alone, since the review faq clearly states the aforementioned fact.
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts

If i was colorblind and i saw the sky as gray, i told you it was gray, and you say no man its blue Could you prove it to me? No you couldnt.....but that doesnt mean the sky isnt blue. You just dont want to accept the evidence that has been presented Gs

 

 

GEARS GRAFIX=10

 

Stalker=8

 

You prove to me that the games are graded differently because they are on different platforms, you prove that Gs reviews games in different genras differently. You prove that a pc game is graded 2 numbers lower than the 360 in terms of grafix.....Whats that you cant prove any of that?????? This is what i mean when i say you manipulate the truth when it benifits you.....You have no proof of the amount of the difference in review scores betweeen the pc and 360 yet you spout it like it is the truth?? WTF?

grimhope

 

GEARS OF WAR = HORRIBLE GAME. TERRIBLE. SHORT. ( 5 HRS) SMALL ( 4 ENEMYS)  DUMB ( AUTO- AIM)  

STALKER IS THE TOTAL OPPOSITE. ITS A SUPERB GAME.   

Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlLU1CTEYWI&feature=PlayList&p=45CB72FA56894C53&index=2

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoJBOTGYRow

 

 

 

 

 

 WHERE IS THE VIDEO CONSOLE BOYS?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

machitocaliente
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#229 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits. I came upon a humanoid that I thought was a bandit, turns out it was a monster that turned invisible and it ran away. I walked off and 2 minutes later I could swear that thing was stalking me. So I killed some bandits and climbed on top of a building that was once under construction. Guess who I saw below on the rail road tracks? The invisible monster wandering around where I was last standing.
Avatar image for metalmonkey268
metalmonkey268

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#230 metalmonkey268
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

Ok guys, don't kid yourself. The graphical engine is dated.

There's so much greatness about this game to mention, don't even bother mentioning the graphics. Atmosphere, story, gameplay, etc etc and so forth. Stop arguing about the graphics. 

Avatar image for Nex_Ownage
Nex_Ownage

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 Nex_Ownage
Member since 2004 • 4753 Posts
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. still looks good, and its visuals are on par with Half-Life 2. GS review
now I haven't played Stalker but if it's "on par" with HL2 then it doesn't stand a chance in comparison to games like LP let alone GeoW.
Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
Both games smell bad...
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts

Ok guys, don't kid yourself. The graphical engine is dated.

There's so much greatness about this game to mention, don't even bother mentioning the graphics. Atmosphere, story, gameplay, etc etc and so forth. Stop arguing about the graphics.

metalmonkey268
Atmosphere?... I wonder why? COULD IT BE AMAZING GRAPHICS?
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#235 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
How did this thread get into a graphics whore contest? No, stalker does not have the best graphics but the gameplay is far ahead of any console game out right now. As said by real PC gamers earlier it is on par with Deus Ex. I have never been so engulfed by a game as Deus Ex and it has been a good 3 or 4 years since that first happened. Finally I now have another game that has me captivated by its ambience and the constant feeling of death around every corner. No game ever has given me such a feeling. I have never played a game that places such an emphasis on survival. This game can be run on lower end rigs, please go try it and you'll see what I mean. Even while traveling through an open field of grass in the "rookie area" you fear a creature or bandit will wander upon you and end your life. The urge to survive while playing this game is intense.
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="GS review"]S.T.A.L.K.E.R. still looks good, and its visuals are on par with Half-Life 2. Nex_Ownage
now I haven't played Stalker but if it's "on par" with HL2 then it doesn't stand a chance in comparison to games like LP let alone GeoW.

YOUR QUOTE AND POST ARE BOTH BS
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#237 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
[QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!
Avatar image for metalmonkey268
metalmonkey268

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#238 metalmonkey268
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

Atmosphere?... I wonder why? COULD IT BE AMAZING GRAPHICS? machitocaliente

 

No, the graphics are fine. They aren't stunning or groundbreaking. They're just good. The atmostphere comes from the ambient sound, the npc AI. Animals roaming around by their own free will. Fellow Stalkers sitting by camp fire talking or playing songs. All that.

 

Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!

LOL. SUCKY PLAYER. I BET YOU USE THE DEFAULT CONTROLS OF THE GAME. EVEN WITH THE FIRST GUN, I CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM MILES AWAY. JUST 2 SHOTS . DEAD
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#240 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts

[QUOTE="machitocaliente"]Atmosphere?... I wonder why? COULD IT BE AMAZING GRAPHICS? metalmonkey268

No, the graphics are fine. They aren't stunning or groundbreaking. They're just good. The atmostphere comes from the ambient sound, the npc AI. Animals roaming around by their own free will. Fellow Stalkers sitting by camp fire talking or playing songs. All that.

Those things give me the sense the world is alive. A-Life ftw! I love the stalkers playing the guitars.
Avatar image for Nex_Ownage
Nex_Ownage

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 Nex_Ownage
Member since 2004 • 4753 Posts
[QUOTE="Nex_Ownage"][QUOTE="GS review"]S.T.A.L.K.E.R. still looks good, and its visuals are on par with Half-Life 2. machitocaliente
now I haven't played Stalker but if it's "on par" with HL2 then it doesn't stand a chance in comparison to games like LP let alone GeoW.

YOUR QUOTE AND POST ARE BOTH BS

Stop acting like an idiotic fanboy and actually read the damn review.. http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/stalker/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary%3Breview&page=2 ..sheesh..~_~...and i thought hermits were the mature ones..
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#242 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
[QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!

LOL. SUCKY PLAYER. I BET YOU USE THE DEFAULT CONTROLS OF THE GAME. EVEN WITH THE FIRST GUN, I CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM MILES AWAY. JUST 2 SHOTS . DEAD

I'm sure. You've proven to me that you are just here to cause problems.
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!

LOL. SUCKY PLAYER. I BET YOU USE THE DEFAULT CONTROLS OF THE GAME. EVEN WITH THE FIRST GUN, I CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM MILES AWAY. JUST 2 SHOTS . DEAD

I'm sure. You've proven to me that you are just here to cause problems.

NOT REALLY. YOUR POST IS FULL OF SELFOWNAGE. YOU CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM FAR AWAY . YOU JUST LACK THE SKILL TO DO IT. IN THESE CASE. DONT BLAME THE GAME, BLAME THE PLAYER.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#244 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!

LOL. SUCKY PLAYER. I BET YOU USE THE DEFAULT CONTROLS OF THE GAME. EVEN WITH THE FIRST GUN, I CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM MILES AWAY. JUST 2 SHOTS . DEAD

I'm sure. You've proven to me that you are just here to cause problems.

NOT REALLY. YOUR POST IS FULL OF SELFOWNAGE. YOU CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM FAR AWAY . YOU JUST LACK THE SKILL TO DO IT. IN THESE CASE. DONT BLAME THE GAME, BLAME THE PLAYER.

Hey, fanboy, see the button next to the "A" key on your keyboard? To your left? Read what it says (if you can): It says: "Caps lock", doesn't it? Now, press it, shut up, close your screen, and don't post on here EVER again. Good boy!
Avatar image for machitocaliente
machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 machitocaliente
Member since 2007 • 832 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"][QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="cametall"]An amazing game, Its the only other FPS that reminds me of Deus Ex. Excellent environments and creatures. Gun fights are harder since most weapons have very little accuracy and you need to get fairly close to score hits.

not really. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE CLOSE. JUST CROUCH, DUCK, TAKE YOUR TIME AND AIM CAREFULLY. WITH 1 / 2 BULLETS + GOOD GUN / AMMUNITION I USUALLY KILL MOST GUYS ( AND THEY ARE FAR AWAY) BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN

Notice how you said "GOOD GUN/AMMUNITION... BY THE WAY MY LEVEL = VETERAN." Well I'm 10 hours or so into the game and I am just getting the M4 Carbine type weapons. Lets think our statements through. ADD: Sorry for the double post!

LOL. SUCKY PLAYER. I BET YOU USE THE DEFAULT CONTROLS OF THE GAME. EVEN WITH THE FIRST GUN, I CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM MILES AWAY. JUST 2 SHOTS . DEAD

I'm sure. You've proven to me that you are just here to cause problems.

NOT REALLY. YOUR POST IS FULL OF SELFOWNAGE. YOU CAN SHOOT A GUY IN THE HEAD FROM FAR AWAY . YOU JUST LACK THE SKILL TO DO IT. IN THESE CASE. DONT BLAME THE GAME, BLAME THE PLAYER.

Hey, fanboy, see the button next to the "A" key on your keyboard? To your left? Read what it says (if you can): It says: "Caps lock", doesn't it? Now, press it, shut up, close your screen, and don't post on here EVER again. Good boy!

NOP, I THINK I WONT DO THAT. NOW TAKE YOUR EMO SALTY TEARS ELSEWHERE.
Avatar image for cametall
cametall

7692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#247 cametall
Member since 2003 • 7692 Posts
Anyone else ever hear of Three Mile Island? We almost had our own Chernobyl here in America.