Since a lot of people don't own an Xbox 360, 360/PC shared games can be called..

  • 191 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#51 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Fusible
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

You could buy a PC thats exactly like a console in every single facet for the same price. Just thworing that out there.
Avatar image for wmc540
wmc540

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 wmc540
Member since 2006 • 2620 Posts
Plain and simple. Console gamers don't recongnize PC gamers. PC gamers wants a little respect. It's like the Gieco Caveman commercials.shungokustasu
I think you just woke up on the wrong side of the rock.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Scroll up buff. How does that ilnk prove that Microsoft's original statement of 200million with gaming PCs is wrong? It just shows that games bought aren't proportional to systems owned. Now, disprove Microsoft. GO ahead, I'm waiting.Vandalvideo

Dude, Microsoft was referring to PC's actively used to play games - games like Solitaire included, not PC's with the "ability to play games." More than 200 million own PC's - and all of them have the ability to play a "game" so that 200 million estimate doesn't hold water using your logic. However, currently around 200 million PC's currently have "games" on them - this includes programs like Solitaire that come packed-in to the vast majority of the last decade's worth of PC sales. Hence the "200 million own gaming PC's."

Great, infer all you want. Now PROVE thats what they mean't.

The validity of his post is proof enough for me...it's not like he isn't making sense....
Avatar image for wmc540
wmc540

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 wmc540
Member since 2006 • 2620 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Fusible
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

If by PC exclusive you mean it isn't on the Mac then that makes sense. But if you mean PC exclusive as if it isn't on consoles then that doesn't make sense.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]Plain and simple. Console gamers don't recongnize PC gamers. PC gamers wants a little respect. It's like the Gieco Caveman commercials.wmc540
I think you just woke up on the wrong side of the rock.

:roll:
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
[QUOTE="Fusible"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Vandalvideo
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

You could buy a PC thats exactly like a console in every single facet for the same price. Just thworing that out there.

Will you stop that! Just because two things can preform thesame functions DOES NOT make them the same, ever.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#57 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Scroll up buff. How does that ilnk prove that Microsoft's original statement of 200million with gaming PCs is wrong? It just shows that games bought aren't proportional to systems owned. Now, disprove Microsoft. GO ahead, I'm waiting.Spartan070

Dude, Microsoft was referring to PC's actively used to play games - games like Solitaire included, not PC's with the "ability to play games." More than 200 million own PC's - and all of them have the ability to play a "game" so that 200 million estimate doesn't hold water using your logic. However, currently around 200 million PC's currently have "games" on them - this includes programs like Solitaire that come packed-in to the vast majority of the last decade's worth of PC sales. Hence the "200 million own gaming PC's."

Great, infer all you want. Now PROVE thats what they mean't.

The validity of his post is proof enough for me...it's not like he isn't making sense....

He can have the most logical post in the world. That is far from disproving that 200 millino people own gaming PCs. Its merely a big inference.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Plain and simple. Console gamers don't recongnize PC gamers. PC gamers wants a little respect. It's like the Gieco Caveman commercials.shungokustasu
This is system wars not console wars, a lot of people tend to forget that.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#59 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Fusible"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Spartan070
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

You could buy a PC thats exactly like a console in every single facet for the same price. Just thworing that out there.

Will you stop that! Just because two things can preform thesame functions DOES NOT make them the same, ever.

I modded my old PS2 into a grill. For all intents and purposes it is now a grill. Even though it used to be a gaming machine, it now uses charcoal and cooks meat. So I guess its still a game console, even though its a grill?
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#60 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

The PC/Xbox360 game's exclusivity should not even be in question to begin with. If the game is the same(other then controls, it would be silly to call Call of Duty 3 on the Xbox an exclusive title because the PS3 has a different controller) on the other platform then why should you call it an exclusive title?smokeydabear076

Well I think that's a really bad analogy because the PS3 is still a gaming console, and in direct competition with the Xbox 360. The PC market is not in direct competition with the console market, at least not where I stand. In System Wars, to abide by the "rules" I consider the PC to be in direct competition with consoles, but outside this place, I consider the PC to be a completely seperate entity from consoles. So yes, outside of SW, I do consider games that are on the PC and 360 to be exclusive to the 360, as far as consoles go. I also consider games that are developed solely for WIndows to be PC exclusive but since there are very few games released on the Mac and PC, this is rarely an issue.

I will consider a game on the PC/360 to be a non exclusive for the 360 in System Wars, since that is the established rule here, but outside of this place, I consider it to be console exclusive.

Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts
[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Scroll up buff. How does that ilnk prove that Microsoft's original statement of 200million with gaming PCs is wrong? It just shows that games bought aren't proportional to systems owned. Now, disprove Microsoft. GO ahead, I'm waiting.Vandalvideo

Dude, Microsoft was referring to PC's actively used to play games - games like Solitaire included, not PC's with the "ability to play games." More than 200 million own PC's - and all of them have the ability to play a "game" so that 200 million estimate doesn't hold water using your logic. However, currently around 200 million PC's currently have "games" on them - this includes programs like Solitaire that come packed-in to the vast majority of the last decade's worth of PC sales. Hence the "200 million own gaming PC's."

Great, infer all you want. Now PROVE thats what they mean't.

Hahaha.

Here are some facts:

670 million own PC's today (http://news.cnet.com/A+billion+PC+users+on+the+way/2100-1003_3-5290988.html . Keep in mind that link is two years old, so the current number is probably around 800 mill.) All of them have the abolity ot play a "game." However, not all of them have or are used to play games, this is why they are not included in the estimate. The "ability to play a game" does not qualify a PC as a gaming PC or else the entire number would've been included in the "Gaming PC" estimate.

Around 200 million own PC's that have one or more games within them - even simple pack-in games like Solitaire are included (as stated in the link I gave you on page 2.)

Microsoft claimed that 200 million "owned" gaming PC's - meaning PC's that either have games or are used to play games (once again, Solitaire included as Microsoft has always included this under tha gaming umbrella.) However, the vast majority of these "PC Gamers" have no impact on the retail PC gaming market - as reflected in the unit sales of retail PC games (Sims, Half Life, WOW, etc.) They merely play simple "games" like Minesweeper, Solitaire, etc. and nothing else.

Those are the facts - draw whatever conclusions you like, although I'm am 100% right, and you seem to be confused.

Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"]Plain and simple. Console gamers don't recongnize PC gamers. PC gamers wants a little respect. It's like the Gieco Caveman commercials.smokeydabear076
This is system wars not console wars, a lot of people tend to forget that.

I persoanlly don't see PC as a gaming unit myself. It's a multi-purpose system. Yes, it plays games, but the system itself has many other main purposes. I know what you going through, you just want to fit in; however, comparing yourself to a console system is kinda self-ownage. You lowering your standards. Blame microsoft for making PC a monopoly, and killing off mostly all competition.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#63 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Scroll up buff. How does that ilnk prove that Microsoft's original statement of 200million with gaming PCs is wrong? It just shows that games bought aren't proportional to systems owned. Now, disprove Microsoft. GO ahead, I'm waiting.Buff-McBlumpkin

Dude, Microsoft was referring to PC's actively used to play games - games like Solitaire included, not PC's with the "ability to play games." More than 200 million own PC's - and all of them have the ability to play a "game" so that 200 million estimate doesn't hold water using your logic. However, currently around 200 million PC's currently have "games" on them - this includes programs like Solitaire that come packed-in to the vast majority of the last decade's worth of PC sales. Hence the "200 million own gaming PC's."

Great, infer all you want. Now PROVE thats what they mean't.

Hahaha.

Here are some facts:

670 million own PC's today (http://news.cnet.com/A+billion+PC+users+on+the+way/2100-1003_3-5290988.html . Keep in mind that link is two years old, so the current number is probably around 800 mill.) All of them have the abolity ot play a "game." However, not all of them have or are used to play games, this is why they are not included in the estimate. The "ability to play a game" does not qualify a PC as a gaming PC or else the entire number would've been included in the "Gaming PC" estimate.

Around 200 million own PC's that have one or more games within them - even simple pack-in games like Solitaire are included (as stated in the link I gave you on page 2.)

Microsoft claimed that 200 million "owned" gaming PC's - meaning PC's that either have games or are used to play games (once again, Solitaire included as Microsoft has always included this under tha gaming umbrella.) However, the vast majority of these "PC Gamers" have no impact on the retail PC gaming market - as reflected in the unit sales of retail PC games (Sims, Half Life, WOW, etc.) They merely play simple "games" like Minesweeper, Solitaire, etc. and nothing else.

Those are the facts - draw whatever conclusions you like, although I'm am 100% right, and you seem to be confused.

You keep infering that these 200 million are those solely for solataire. I'd like to see some case study proving this. otherwise its an inference.
Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts
[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Scroll up buff. How does that ilnk prove that Microsoft's original statement of 200million with gaming PCs is wrong? It just shows that games bought aren't proportional to systems owned. Now, disprove Microsoft. GO ahead, I'm waiting.Vandalvideo

Dude, Microsoft was referring to PC's actively used to play games - games like Solitaire included, not PC's with the "ability to play games." More than 200 million own PC's - and all of them have the ability to play a "game" so that 200 million estimate doesn't hold water using your logic. However, currently around 200 million PC's currently have "games" on them - this includes programs like Solitaire that come packed-in to the vast majority of the last decade's worth of PC sales. Hence the "200 million own gaming PC's."

Great, infer all you want. Now PROVE thats what they mean't.

Hahaha.

Here are some facts:

670 million own PC's today (http://news.cnet.com/A+billion+PC+users+on+the+way/2100-1003_3-5290988.html . Keep in mind that link is two years old, so the current number is probably around 800 mill.) All of them have the abolity ot play a "game." However, not all of them have or are used to play games, this is why they are not included in the estimate. The "ability to play a game" does not qualify a PC as a gaming PC or else the entire number would've been included in the "Gaming PC" estimate.

Around 200 million own PC's that have one or more games within them - even simple pack-in games like Solitaire are included (as stated in the link I gave you on page 2.)

Microsoft claimed that 200 million "owned" gaming PC's - meaning PC's that either have games or are used to play games (once again, Solitaire included as Microsoft has always included this under tha gaming umbrella.) However, the vast majority of these "PC Gamers" have no impact on the retail PC gaming market - as reflected in the unit sales of retail PC games (Sims, Half Life, WOW, etc.) They merely play simple "games" like Minesweeper, Solitaire, etc. and nothing else.

Those are the facts - draw whatever conclusions you like, although I'm am 100% right, and you seem to be confused.

You keep infering that these 200 million are those solely for solataire. I'd like to see some case study proving this. otherwise its an inference.

Not true. That's not at all what I'm implying, and I haven't implied that at any point either - I have only said that those that play games like Solitaire are included in that 200 million estimate. Obviously the majority of those do not buy retail PC games otherwise the number of PC game software units sold would be astronomical and would greatly eclipse console sales. Since this isn't the case the only possible conclusion you can draw is that most who play "games" (Solitaire included) are in fact not buying retail PC game software despite the fact that they're considered to be "playing games." Obviously "hardcore" PC gamers are included in that number as well (like the members of this forum who play PC games) but occupy a minority of that 200 million estimate.

Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts

Any sensible person can see that you're not making very much sense here.

I'm going back to work now.

PS: Not every computer comes with Solitaire - in fact a majority don't (like those PC's sold in developing countries.)

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#67 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Any sensible person can see that you're not making very much sense here.

I'm going back to work now.

Buff-McBlumpkin
Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Twiddle. Exclusives don't matter unless you own both (all) systems. I never cared for the term exclusive or not exclusive anyhow. If it's on the PC and the 360, then it's exlcusive to those machines. Same if it's on the 360 and PS3. Or the Wii and the PS2 (hehe). Regardless, the PC and Wii get the most true exclusives (Wii because of Nintendo, and wii remote, PC because it just does, and mouse).
Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts
[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

Any sensible person can see that you're not making very much sense here.

I'm going back to work now.

Vandalvideo

Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.

IF YOU INCLUDE GAMES LIKE SOLITAIRE. How can you not get this?

If 200 million actively used PC's to play retail game software than PC game sales would be enormous - much more than console sales. That's not the case though.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.

Whatever. Solitaire is a game. So is minesweeper, and nethack, and old DOS games, and Yahoo internet games. Anything that can play those can be a gaming PC.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#71 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

Any sensible person can see that you're not making very much sense here.

I'm going back to work now.

Buff-McBlumpkin

Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.

IF YOU INCLUDE GAMES LIKE SOLITAIRE. How can you not get this?

If 200 million actively used PC's to play retail game software than PC game sales would be enormous - much more than console sales. That's not the case though.

So you're including solitaire in the mix. Ok then, now prove that all 200 million aren't full fledged gaming machines. Even if these numbers include solitaire, by no means doe sthat prove its not a gaming machine.
Avatar image for fatzombiepigeon
fatzombiepigeon

8199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#72 fatzombiepigeon
Member since 2005 • 8199 Posts
Oh man, Casey you're awesome. :P
Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#73 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.



You can't disprove alot of things. But the world doesn't work like that.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.



You can't disprove alot of things. But the world doesn't work like that.

Woot. Cakeofdeath doing massive damage.
Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word. Jandurin
Whatever. Solitaire is a game. So is minesweeper, and nethack, and old DOS games, and Yahoo internet games. Anything that can play those can be a gaming PC.


Exactly, that's what I've been saying - those are considered to be gaming PC's by companies like Microsoft - hence the 200 million estimate. However, most playing those games have no impact on the retail PC game software market. How do I know - by looking at the sales numbers for PC games. It's clear most of them are not buying retail PC games. End of story.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#76 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.



You can't disprove alot of things. But the world doesn't work like that.

Alright then, your point?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#77 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word. Buff-McBlumpkin

Whatever. Solitaire is a game. So is minesweeper, and nethack, and old DOS games, and Yahoo internet games. Anything that can play those can be a gaming PC.


Exactly, that's what I've been saying - those are considered to be gaming PC's by companies like Microsoft - hence the 200 million estimate. However, most playing those games have no impact on the retail PC game software market. How do I know - by looking at the sales numbers for PC games. It's clear most of them are not buying retail PC games. End of story.

But by no means does that disprove that there are 200millino out there with gaming machines. AT ALL
Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.



You can't disprove alot of things. But the world doesn't work like that.

Alright then, your point?



That the burden of proof is on you, the person who is making the claim that there are 200 million PCs used for gaming.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#79 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Thats your rebuttle? Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word.



You can't disprove alot of things. But the world doesn't work like that.

Alright then, your point?



That the burden of proof is on you, the person who is making the claim that there are 200 million PCs used for gaming.

No I'm not. Microsoft made that claim. I'm saying, "Disprove them".
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
But by no means does that disprove that there are 200millino out there with gaming machines. AT ALLVandalvideo
Just like you can't prove that more than 10% of those 200million are people that purchase games for their "gaming" PCs.
Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
No I'm not. Microsoft made that claim. I'm saying, "Disprove them".Vandalvideo


The the burden of proof is on them. It is still not up to people go and find information to refute their claims.
Avatar image for reticulate
reticulate

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 reticulate
Member since 2006 • 418 Posts
Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
Avatar image for Fusible
Fusible

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#83 Fusible
Member since 2005 • 2828 Posts
[QUOTE="Fusible"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Vandalvideo
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

You could buy a PC thats exactly like a console in every single facet for the same price. Just thworing that out there.

Like you said "like", but it's not.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#84 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]No I'm not. Microsoft made that claim. I'm saying, "Disprove them".cakeorrdeath


The the burden of proof is on them. It is still not up to people go and find information to refute their claims.

So a random person can say "There are not 200 million", and fo all intents and purposes not be refuted? Thats garbage. If yuo make a statement like that you best be ready to prove it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
reticulate
Sure, but it's as much a gaming machine as any other. If it's the same game, why shouldn't it be considered as multiplatform when also on the PC? Bioshock will be the same, you know, on both.
Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts
[QUOTE="Buff-McBlumpkin"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Look, I'll repeat. YOU CAN NOT DISPROVE PROVE THAT these 200 million are gaming PCs int he full sense of the word. Vandalvideo

Whatever. Solitaire is a game. So is minesweeper, and nethack, and old DOS games, and Yahoo internet games. Anything that can play those can be a gaming PC.


Exactly, that's what I've been saying - those are considered to be gaming PC's by companies like Microsoft - hence the 200 million estimate. However, most playing those games have no impact on the retail PC game software market. How do I know - by looking at the sales numbers for PC games. It's clear most of them are not buying retail PC games. End of story.

But by no means does that disprove that there are 200millino out there with gaming machines. AT ALL

Jesus Christ.

This has to be one of, if not the dumbest argument(s) I've ever been involved in.

The fact that you can't cobble together the simplest logic doesn't bode well for you. Maybe you should go back and re-read my posts, everything I've said has been 100% factual, and all you've said amounts to "prove it." I'm not attacking your platform of choice either, I don't think you realize this.

I'm going back to work now, have fun.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#87 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Fusible"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]It makes sense to me. You guys get the "console exclusive" title and we can call it "PC exclusive". It would end a lot of pointless arguments about exclusivity.
Fusible
I agree. Since console, and pc are 2 different things. I think it should.

You could buy a PC thats exactly like a console in every single facet for the same price. Just thworing that out there.

Like you said "like", but it's not.

How is it not? It does everything a console does. For all intents and purposes it is a console.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#88 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="reticulate"]Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
Jandurin
Sure, but it's as much a gaming machine as any other. If it's the same game, why shouldn't it be considered as multiplatform when also on the PC? Bioshock will be the same, you know, on both.

There is where I disagree with you. PC =/= gaming system of the console level.
Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#89 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
So a random person can say "There are not 200 million", and fo all intents and purposes not be refuted? Thats garbage. If yuo make a statement like that you best be ready to prove it.Vandalvideo


Isn't it up for Microsoft to show some kind of evidence and/or statistics proving there are 200 miliion gaming PCs?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#90 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Buff: Stating sales numbers does not by any means say "there are not 200 million PC gaming machines out there". It just means people aren't buying games by a logical standpoint.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#91 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="reticulate"]Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
shungokustasu
Sure, but it's as much a gaming machine as any other. If it's the same game, why shouldn't it be considered as multiplatform when also on the PC? Bioshock will be the same, you know, on both.

There is where I disagree with you. PC =/= gaming system of the console level.

Explain.
Avatar image for Buff-McBlumpkin
Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Buff-McBlumpkin
Member since 2007 • 566 Posts

[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]No I'm not. Microsoft made that claim. I'm saying, "Disprove them".Vandalvideo


The the burden of proof is on them. It is still not up to people go and find information to refute their claims.

So a random person can say "There are not 200 million", and fo all intents and purposes not be refuted? Thats garbage. If yuo make a statement like that you best be ready to prove it.

I'm not saying there isn't 200 million, I'm saying I don't consider a person who plays a game like Solitaire, and only that game, to be a "PC Gamer" in the context of this forum. Why? BECUASE THEY DON'T BUY RETAIL PC GAMES OR PC GAMING HARDWARE UPGRADES (as evidenced by sales numbers.) Solitaire and Minesweeper don't contribute to the retail PC gaming software market.

If you include games like Solitaire - yes, there are 200 million+ "gaming" PC's.

That's what I've been saying all along.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]The PC/Xbox360 game's exclusivity should not even be in question to begin with. If the game is the same(other then controls, it would be silly to call Call of Duty 3 on the Xbox an exclusive title because the PS3 has a different controller) on the other platform then why should you call it an exclusive title?The_Game21x

Well I think that's a really bad analogy because the PS3 is still a gaming console, and in direct competition with the Xbox 360. The PC market is not in direct competition with the console market, at least not where I stand. In System Wars, to abide by the "rules" I consider the PC to be in direct competition with consoles, but outside this place, I consider the PC to be a completely seperate entity from consoles. So yes, outside of SW, I do consider games that are on the PC and 360 to be exclusive to the 360, as far as consoles go. I also consider games that are developed solely for WIndows to be PC exclusive but since there are very few games released on the Mac and PC, this is rarely an issue.

I will consider a game on the PC/360 to be a non exclusive for the 360 in System Wars, since that is the established rule here, but outside of this place, I consider it to be console exclusive.

I understand and agree with what you have to say.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="reticulate"]Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
shungokustasu
Sure, but it's as much a gaming machine as any other. If it's the same game, why shouldn't it be considered as multiplatform when also on the PC? Bioshock will be the same, you know, on both.

There is where I disagree with you. PC =/= gaming system of the console level.

You think the PC is inferior?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#95 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]No I'm not. Microsoft made that claim. I'm saying, "Disprove them".Buff-McBlumpkin



The the burden of proof is on them. It is still not up to people go and find information to refute their claims.

So a random person can say "There are not 200 million", and fo all intents and purposes not be refuted? Thats garbage. If yuo make a statement like that you best be ready to prove it.

I'm not saying there isn't 200 million, I'm saying I don't consider a person who plays a game like Solitaire, and only that game, to be a "PC Gamer" in the context of this forum. Why? BECUASE THEY DON'T BUY RETAIL PC GAMES OR PC GAMING HARDWARE UPGRADES (as evidenced by sales numbers.) Solitaire and Minesweeper don't contribute to the retail PC gaming software market.

If you include games like Solitaire - yes, there are 200 million+ "gaming" PC's.

That's what I've been saying all along.

Yes.........but now prove that those included as solitaire owners don't actually own full fledged gaming machines that are just used for solitaire.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#96 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Explain.

We can't compar PC with consoles. The standards are different. Because they do the same thing, don't make them the same. It's like comparing a Nascar to a Kia.
Avatar image for wmc540
wmc540

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 wmc540
Member since 2006 • 2620 Posts
I honestly can't figure out what Vandalvideo is even trying argue about.
Avatar image for Cicatraz_ESP
Cicatraz_ESP

1993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Cicatraz_ESP
Member since 2006 • 1993 Posts
I don't play pc games, I play console games. When I compare my games I compare my 360 to the wii and ps3, not the pc.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="reticulate"]Exclusivity is a console concept.

The PC isn't a console.
Jandurin
Sure, but it's as much a gaming machine as any other. If it's the same game, why shouldn't it be considered as multiplatform when also on the PC? Bioshock will be the same, you know, on both.

There is where I disagree with you. PC =/= gaming system of the console level.

You think the PC is inferior?

I think PC is superior.
Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#100 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]] Yes.........but now prove that those included as solitaire owners don't actually own full fledged gaming machines that are just used for solitaire.



Prove that they do.