Skyrim is the most overrated RPG ever made.....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Skyrim is just Oblivion 2.0.texasgoldrush

Skyrim, in no way shape or form, is similar to Oblivion. Never compare it to that pile of cow sh!t.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]Look it's a juvenile making a 'my ridiculous judgements and claims are facts' thread. Look obnoxious capitalisation and a distinct lack of formatting. Yes Skyrim's writing is atrocious, its plot terrible and VA work etc. horrible. That's obviously not one of the games strengths. Have you ever taken a moment to ask why it was so well received despite this, or are you really that wound up in your own bubble?

Nevermind the horrendous leveling system, the exploits, and the bugs...GAMEPLAY problems.

Yes, it has its faults kiddo, I'm not disagreeing with that; I for one can empathise with your issues with the game entirely, I haven't taken to Skyrim. However as I said, if you're going to act big-headed and proclaim 'hurrr durrr it's the worrrst' without acknowledging the blatant strengths of it, that you might just not look for in a game, then you're never going to clearly understand why it was both successful and critically acclaimed. Which goes to show how much of a perceptive hole you're digging for yourself. So take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#103 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]Are you still talking? Hilarious. Skyrim is the better game too bad so sad.

Also New Vegas is crap much like all Obsidian games. Good story doesn't excuse abysmal QA. How can you talk about bugs in Skyrim as a flaw and then go on to praise the design of New Vegas?

Vaasman

Because I admit that New Vegas's has bugs...like every BETHESDA game. In fact its hypocrisy. New Vegas gets slammed for its bugs, but Skyrim's are brushed off, whatever. Bethesda is just as bad as Obsidian...see Daggerfall.

We're talking about Skyrim pal. New Vegas is plagued with completely game breaking bugs and awful design. More bugs and crashes in a main story than you'd see in the entirety of Skyrim. In fact in over 100 hours of Skyrim it never crashed to the desktop once, at worst I saw the mammoths spawning in midair, buggy physics, and a couple unbeatable quests.

Must hurt to know Skyrim got GOTY and Mass Effect 3 won't.

Good-good-let-the-butthurt-flow-through-

No, there IS plot stopping bugs with Skyrim...try again. Esbern for example. Nevermind that my game has crashed many times...more so than New Vegas. And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs? Almost everything but graphics is better than Skyrim.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#104 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]Look it's a juvenile making a 'my ridiculous judgements and claims are facts' thread. Look obnoxious capitalisation and a distinct lack of formatting. Yes Skyrim's writing is atrocious, its plot terrible and VA work etc. horrible. That's obviously not one of the games strengths. Have you ever taken a moment to ask why it was so well received despite this, or are you really that wound up in your own bubble?

Nevermind the horrendous leveling system, the exploits, and the bugs...GAMEPLAY problems.

Yes, it has its faults kiddo, I'm not disagreeing with that; I for one can empathise with your issues with the game entirely, I haven't taken to Skyrim. However as I said, if you're going to act big-headed and proclaim 'hurrr durrr it's the worrrst' without acknowledging the blatant strengths of it, that you might just not look for in a game, then you're never going to clearly understand why it was both successful and critically acclaimed. Which goes to show how much of a perceptive hole you're digging for yourself. So take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.

I admitted the "blatant strengths" the atmosphere and the music. The moddabilty counts as well. However, its the same strengths as Oblivion. It basically IS oblivion. And games better than Skyrim has the same "blantant strengths"....New Vegas for example.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs?texasgoldrush
Quite a bit tbh. The enemy attack patterns, interior level design and interior technical framework of the engine, the wonky stealth system, the diluted 'hardcore' mode, the broken quest links, and of course - the horrendous introduction (be it from a writing or design angle). And I say that as someone who adored NV. It has a plethora of technical faults and design quirks, I can see why people love it and people loathed it.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#106 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]Skyrim is just Oblivion 2.0.ChubbyGuy40

Skyrim, in no way shape or form, is similar to Oblivion. Never compare it to that pile of cow sh!t.

Lets see.....level scaling, the big four gild quests, the daedric quests, the fast travel system, the city quests....face it, its the same. Compare Daggerfall to Morrowind, Morrowind to Oblivion......far more different than Oblivion to Skyrim.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#107 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Because I admit that New Vegas's has bugs...like every BETHESDA game. In fact its hypocrisy. New Vegas gets slammed for its bugs, but Skyrim's are brushed off, whatever. Bethesda is just as bad as Obsidian...see Daggerfall.texasgoldrush

We're talking about Skyrim pal. New Vegas is plagued with completely game breaking bugs and awful design. More bugs and crashes in a main story than you'd see in the entirety of Skyrim. In fact in over 100 hours of Skyrim it never crashed to the desktop once, at worst I saw the mammoths spawning in midair, buggy physics, and a couple unbeatable quests.

Must hurt to know Skyrim got GOTY and Mass Effect 3 won't.

No, there IS plot stopping bugs with Skyrim...try again. Esbern for example. Nevermind that my game has crashed many times...more so than New Vegas. And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs? Almost everything but graphics is better than Skyrim.

God you are so mad. Look man ME3 wasn't everything it was cracked up to be time to move on.

I'm sure the next Bioware game will be great. In fact they already said Dragon Age 3 has been inspired by Skyrim. What an awful game, so awful that Bioware will look to it for inspiration.

You can talk about New Vegas all you want but there is no one on Earth who would agree it was a better and more stable game than Skyrim, which I would say is as close to wrong as you can get with an opinion.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#108 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs?skrat_01
Quite a bit tbh. The enemy attack patterns, interior level design and interior technical framework of the engine, the wonky stealth system, the diluted 'hardcore' mode, the broken quest links, and of course - the horrendous introduction (be it from a writing or design angle). And I say that as someone who adored NV. It has a plethora of technical faults and design quirks, I can see why people love it and people loathed it.

Also in Skyrim...all the above apply to Skyrim as well, save for the hardcore mode which is anything but diluted.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#109 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]We're talking about Skyrim pal. New Vegas is plagued with completely game breaking bugs and awful design. More bugs and crashes in a main story than you'd see in the entirety of Skyrim. In fact in over 100 hours of Skyrim it never crashed to the desktop once, at worst I saw the mammoths spawning in midair, buggy physics, and a couple unbeatable quests.

Must hurt to know Skyrim got GOTY and Mass Effect 3 won't.

Vaasman

No, there IS plot stopping bugs with Skyrim...try again. Esbern for example. Nevermind that my game has crashed many times...more so than New Vegas. And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs? Almost everything but graphics is better than Skyrim.

God you are so mad. Look man ME3 wasn't everything it was cracked up to be time to move on.

I'm sure the next Bioware game will be great. In fact they already said Dragon Age 3 has been inspired by Skyrim. What an awful game, so awful that Bioware will look to it for inspiration.

You can talk about New Vegas all you want but there is no one on Earth who would agree it was a better and more stable game than Skyrim, which I would say is as close to wrong as you can get with an opinion.

Oops, some posters here other than me already have said than New Vegas is better than Skyrim...wooops. No, ME3 is what its cracked up to be, featuring some of the genre's best character writing and the best use of a save import feature in gaming. Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Nevermind the horrendous leveling system, the exploits, and the bugs...GAMEPLAY problems.

Yes, it has its faults kiddo, I'm not disagreeing with that; I for one can empathise with your issues with the game entirely, I haven't taken to Skyrim. However as I said, if you're going to act big-headed and proclaim 'hurrr durrr it's the worrrst' without acknowledging the blatant strengths of it, that you might just not look for in a game, then you're never going to clearly understand why it was both successful and critically acclaimed. Which goes to show how much of a perceptive hole you're digging for yourself. So take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.

I admitted the "blatant strengths" the atmosphere and the music. The moddabilty counts as well. However, its the same strengths as Oblivion. It basically IS oblivion. And games better than Skyrim has the same "blantant strengths"....New Vegas for example.

It plays to the same strengths Oblivion does - and that's delivering a complex open sandbox adventuring world, absolutely huge amounts of content and ways to interact as well as tons of detail and places to explore. Difference here is that Skyrim is a ton more coherent in how it goes about things, and the streamlining works to its powerfantasy advantage - Oblivion was a horribly mixed bag in this regard. Sure games like NV have more strengths in many regards, I don't disagree, however it's not nearly as polished and doesn't nearly push the open-world power fantasy aspect as Skyrim does; despite having a helluvalot more depth. And that's where you ask if things come down to taste, preference, and direction. I'll always rather NV, but I can see why many folks rather Skyrim - even the fantasy setting itself is divisive. I care more about the game design and writing, other people care about a coherent experience, empowered fantasy, and a game that won't implode in on itself. I can respect that for sure.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs?texasgoldrush
Quite a bit tbh. The enemy attack patterns, interior level design and interior technical framework of the engine, the wonky stealth system, the diluted 'hardcore' mode, the broken quest links, and of course - the horrendous introduction (be it from a writing or design angle). And I say that as someone who adored NV. It has a plethora of technical faults and design quirks, I can see why people love it and people loathed it.

Also in Skyrim...all the above apply to Skyrim as well, save for the hardcore mode which is anything but diluted.

Going by critical reception and personal experience of buying both games on release I'd have to say no in terms of technicals - however aye, Skyrim does have a horrendous introduction and some wonkiness. So?
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#112 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] Yes, it has its faults kiddo, I'm not disagreeing with that; I for one can empathise with your issues with the game entirely, I haven't taken to Skyrim. However as I said, if you're going to act big-headed and proclaim 'hurrr durrr it's the worrrst' without acknowledging the blatant strengths of it, that you might just not look for in a game, then you're never going to clearly understand why it was both successful and critically acclaimed. Which goes to show how much of a perceptive hole you're digging for yourself. So take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.

I admitted the "blatant strengths" the atmosphere and the music. The moddabilty counts as well. However, its the same strengths as Oblivion. It basically IS oblivion. And games better than Skyrim has the same "blantant strengths"....New Vegas for example.

It plays to the same strengths Oblivion does - and that's delivering a complex open sandbox adventuring world, absolutely huge amounts of content and ways to interact as well as tons of detail and places to explore. Difference here is that Skyrim is a ton more coherent in how it goes about things, and the streamlining works to its powerfantasy advantage - Oblivion was a horribly mixed bag in this regard. Sure games like NV have more strengths in many regards, I don't disagree, however it's not nearly as polished and doesn't nearly push the open-world power fantasy aspect as Skyrim does; despite having a helluvalot more depth. And that's where you ask if things come down to taste, preference, and direction. I'll always rather NV, but I can see why many folks rather Skyrim - even the fantasy setting itself is divisive. I care more about the game design and writing, other people care about a coherent experience, empowered fantasy, and a game that won't implode in on itself. I can respect that for sure.

However, the problem with Skyrim is that its not very much more coherent in how it goes about things. It did not improve enough, the same flaws are still there. Thats the problem. And its leveling system is far from coherent.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Also in Skyrim...all the above apply to Skyrim as well, save for the hardcore mode which is anything but diluted.texasgoldrush

No. Skyrim's Gamebryo evolved far beyond the bugfest that Oblivion's early Gamebryo had.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#114 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] No, there IS plot stopping bugs with Skyrim...try again. Esbern for example. Nevermind that my game has crashed many times...more so than New Vegas. And what awful design does New Vegas have other than the bugs? Almost everything but graphics is better than Skyrim.texasgoldrush

God you are so mad. Look man ME3 wasn't everything it was cracked up to be time to move on.

I'm sure the next Bioware game will be great. In fact they already said Dragon Age 3 has been inspired by Skyrim. What an awful game, so awful that Bioware will look to it for inspiration.

You can talk about New Vegas all you want but there is no one on Earth who would agree it was a better and more stable game than Skyrim, which I would say is as close to wrong as you can get with an opinion.

Oops, some posters here other than me already have said than New Vegas is better than Skyrim...wooops. No, ME3 is what its cracked up to be, featuring some of the genre's best character writing and the best use of a save import feature in gaming. Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.

What with Diablo 3 and Guild Wars 2 on the horizon you'll be lucky if it gets RPG of the Year. You can quote me now, Mass Effect 3 will not be game of the year. Keep it in your sig if you want. Skyrim is a better game than Mass Effect 3 and the critics agree. Tough noodles.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.texasgoldrush

So? It shouldn't need fixing. Only websites as blind as IGN are going to nominate it.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#116 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] Quite a bit tbh. The enemy attack patterns, interior level design and interior technical framework of the engine, the wonky stealth system, the diluted 'hardcore' mode, the broken quest links, and of course - the horrendous introduction (be it from a writing or design angle). And I say that as someone who adored NV. It has a plethora of technical faults and design quirks, I can see why people love it and people loathed it.

Also in Skyrim...all the above apply to Skyrim as well, save for the hardcore mode which is anything but diluted.

Going by critical reception and personal experience of buying both games on release I'd have to say no in terms of technicals - however aye, Skyrim does have a horrendous introduction and some wonkiness. So?

No, the enemy and ally attack patterns are still a problem, especially when allies get in your way. The only difference is that its more telling with FDallout as it has guns. Interior level design is uninspired in Skyrim as well with copycat dungeon themes and lack of variance, and the wonky stalth system is as wonky as ever.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#117 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.ChubbyGuy40

So? It shouldn't need fixing. Only websites as blind as IGN are going to nominate it.

And Gamespot won't?...hell they defend the ending.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#118 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]God you are so mad. Look man ME3 wasn't everything it was cracked up to be time to move on.

I'm sure the next Bioware game will be great. In fact they already said Dragon Age 3 has been inspired by Skyrim. What an awful game, so awful that Bioware will look to it for inspiration.

You can talk about New Vegas all you want but there is no one on Earth who would agree it was a better and more stable game than Skyrim, which I would say is as close to wrong as you can get with an opinion.

Vaasman

Oops, some posters here other than me already have said than New Vegas is better than Skyrim...wooops. No, ME3 is what its cracked up to be, featuring some of the genre's best character writing and the best use of a save import feature in gaming. Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.

What with Diablo 3 and Guild Wars 2 on the horizon you'll be lucky if it gets RPG of the Year. You can quote me now, Mass Effect 3 will not be game of the year. Keep it in your sig if you want. Skyrim is a better game than Mass Effect 3 and the critics agree. Tough noodles.

Diablo III is more of the same, it will not win, just like Starcraft II. GW2 is just another MMO. ME3 will easily win RPG of the year, their is no real competition.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] I admitted the "blatant strengths" the atmosphere and the music. The moddabilty counts as well. However, its the same strengths as Oblivion. It basically IS oblivion. And games better than Skyrim has the same "blantant strengths"....New Vegas for example.

It plays to the same strengths Oblivion does - and that's delivering a complex open sandbox adventuring world, absolutely huge amounts of content and ways to interact as well as tons of detail and places to explore. Difference here is that Skyrim is a ton more coherent in how it goes about things, and the streamlining works to its powerfantasy advantage - Oblivion was a horribly mixed bag in this regard. Sure games like NV have more strengths in many regards, I don't disagree, however it's not nearly as polished and doesn't nearly push the open-world power fantasy aspect as Skyrim does; despite having a helluvalot more depth. And that's where you ask if things come down to taste, preference, and direction. I'll always rather NV, but I can see why many folks rather Skyrim - even the fantasy setting itself is divisive. I care more about the game design and writing, other people care about a coherent experience, empowered fantasy, and a game that won't implode in on itself. I can respect that for sure.

However, the problem with Skyrim is that its not very much more coherent in how it goes about things. It did not improve enough, the same flaws are still there. Thats the problem. And its leveling system is far from coherent.

In terms of delivering a big, emergent action-rpg sanbox for the player to go adventuring, exploring and killing monsters - it does it extremely coherently. If you try and equate it as a gripping character drive RPS, not so much, however that evidently isn't the games overarching direction or strength. As a I said - take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Also in Skyrim...all the above apply to Skyrim as well, save for the hardcore mode which is anything but diluted.

Going by critical reception and personal experience of buying both games on release I'd have to say no in terms of technicals - however aye, Skyrim does have a horrendous introduction and some wonkiness. So?

No, the enemy and ally attack patterns are still a problem, especially when allies get in your way. The only difference is that its more telling with FDallout as it has guns. Interior level design is uninspired in Skyrim as well with copycat dungeon themes and lack of variance, and the wonky stalth system is as wonky as ever.

Indeed, I can't disagree with attack patterns; however Dungeons are an absolutely monumental improvement and have some striking diversity in Skyrim, particularly in the aesthetic and architecture department. It's not Oblivions horrible repeating forts and dungeons thankfully. Otherwise the Stealth system is better. The most glaring omission as far as I can tell is the lack of disguises - though I could be wrong, however it is an improvement on NV in general respects. Nontheless this is all meaningless, Skyrim has its, as I said before it comes down to what is wanted from the game; and you ruling our your preferences as being the end all is digging yourself a hole in terms of any critical or perceptive legitimacy. If you want to, sure.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#121 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Oops, some posters here other than me already have said than New Vegas is better than Skyrim...wooops. No, ME3 is what its cracked up to be, featuring some of the genre's best character writing and the best use of a save import feature in gaming. Nevermind what could be its biggest flaw is getting fixed. And still, its a GOTY contender, easy.texasgoldrush

What with Diablo 3 and Guild Wars 2 on the horizon you'll be lucky if it gets RPG of the Year. You can quote me now, Mass Effect 3 will not be game of the year. Keep it in your sig if you want. Skyrim is a better game than Mass Effect 3 and the critics agree. Tough noodles.

Diablo III is more of the same, it will not win, just like Starcraft II. GW2 is just another MMO. ME3 will easily win RPG of the year, their is no real competition.

God damn mad hahaha. Intense butt devestation from Bioware's recent givings I assume. I'm sure one day you'll get over it. Gonna love it once Dragon Age 3 is released and you downplay the success of DA2 and ME3.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#122 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] It plays to the same strengths Oblivion does - and that's delivering a complex open sandbox adventuring world, absolutely huge amounts of content and ways to interact as well as tons of detail and places to explore. Difference here is that Skyrim is a ton more coherent in how it goes about things, and the streamlining works to its powerfantasy advantage - Oblivion was a horribly mixed bag in this regard. Sure games like NV have more strengths in many regards, I don't disagree, however it's not nearly as polished and doesn't nearly push the open-world power fantasy aspect as Skyrim does; despite having a helluvalot more depth. And that's where you ask if things come down to taste, preference, and direction. I'll always rather NV, but I can see why many folks rather Skyrim - even the fantasy setting itself is divisive. I care more about the game design and writing, other people care about a coherent experience, empowered fantasy, and a game that won't implode in on itself. I can respect that for sure.

However, the problem with Skyrim is that its not very much more coherent in how it goes about things. It did not improve enough, the same flaws are still there. Thats the problem. And its leveling system is far from coherent.

In terms of delivering a big, emergent action-rpg sanbox for the player to go adventuring, exploring and killing monsters - it does it extremely coherently. If you try and equate it as a gripping character drive RPS, not so much, however that evidently isn't the games overarching direction or strength. As a I said - take a step back and actually consider what people are saying that is positive; there's already a wealth of it out there.

Then you explore the same looking locations, kill the same looking enemies, and go on the same fetch quests...its not that coherent. Its tedious and boring. Nevermind there is nothing you cannot handle outside of giants because of the leveling. No tough dungeons out of your league. Hell there isn't even any tough boss monsters like the Legendary Deathclaw in Skyrim. There is no sense of exploration because the most you get is garbage items or gems that are a pain to sell. The only real treasure is the words of power. Fallout New Vegas did more than just story, it had a excellent leveling system and dangerous locations that do not scale to your level. The RPG elements crush Skyrims, not just by amount of elements or depth, thats meaningless, its the fact that in New Vegas, the RPG system works extremely well and is actually balanced. Nevermind that the XP system gives you incentive to do every quest possible. Skyrim once again is all choice but no consquence.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

however Dungeons are an absolutely monumental improvement and have some striking diversity in Skyrim, particularly in the aesthetic and architecture department.skrat_01

The biggest issue with Skyrim's dungeons is that it sends you to so many, and after 30 or 40 hours, it's really wears down and becomes extremely dull and boring. Nord dungeons are cool at first, but never, ever change after that. They only have 3 puzzles as well, which never change in how you solve them. Dwemer dungeons are dull in general, and take forever to get through them. It felt like those are suited for dungeon crawlers, but it doesn't have the proper loot system to sustain interest.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#124 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"] Nontheless this is all meaningless, Skyrim has its, as I said before it comes down to what is wanted from the game; and you ruling our your preferences as being the end all is digging yourself a hole in terms of any critical or perceptive legitimacy. If you want to, sure.

Skrat, this texasgoldrush was obvious from the beginning. It's futile arguing with someone like that. Unless you're just flexing your argumentative muscle :P
Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#125 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]however Dungeons are an absolutely monumental improvement and have some striking diversity in Skyrim, particularly in the aesthetic and architecture department.ChubbyGuy40

The biggest issue with Skyrim's dungeons is that it sends you to so many, and after 30 or 40 hours, it's really wears down and becomes extremely dull and boring. Nord dungeons are cool at first, but never, ever change after that. Dwemer dungeons are dull in general, and take forever to get through them. It felt like those are suited for dungeon crawlers, but it doesn't have the proper loot system to sustain interest.

Yeah, that's the problem I have with the dungeon crawling. I really wanted unique reasons to go into them. There was enough diversity in the level design, but not enough in mission/reward variety.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#126 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] Going by critical reception and personal experience of buying both games on release I'd have to say no in terms of technicals - however aye, Skyrim does have a horrendous introduction and some wonkiness. So?

No, the enemy and ally attack patterns are still a problem, especially when allies get in your way. The only difference is that its more telling with FDallout as it has guns. Interior level design is uninspired in Skyrim as well with copycat dungeon themes and lack of variance, and the wonky stalth system is as wonky as ever.

Indeed, I can't disagree with attack patterns; however Dungeons are an absolutely monumental improvement and have some striking diversity in Skyrim, particularly in the aesthetic and architecture department. It's not Oblivions horrible repeating forts and dungeons thankfully. Otherwise the Stealth system is better. The most glaring omission as far as I can tell is the lack of disguises - though I could be wrong, however it is an improvement on NV in general respects. Nontheless this is all meaningless, Skyrim has its, as I said before it comes down to what is wanted from the game; and you ruling our your preferences as being the end all is digging yourself a hole in terms of any critical or perceptive legitimacy. If you want to, sure.

No, outside of a few notable dungeons, the dungeons repeat themselves...look at the Barrows. They are all the same...Dwarven ruins may have excellent diverse big rooms, but they still reapet like ayelid ruins of Oblivion. Forts as well. Has it improved? Yes...has it improved enough? No. Its still a problem. And I have explroed every dungeon in the game. Not much of an mprovement, its still OP once you have good stealth. I am not saying my preferences are end all, but for what it tries to do, Skyrim is flawed because of the horrific leveling system.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Well, first off.....oh, a texasgoldrush thread....*walks out laughing*

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#128 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]What with Diablo 3 and Guild Wars 2 on the horizon you'll be lucky if it gets RPG of the Year. You can quote me now, Mass Effect 3 will not be game of the year. Keep it in your sig if you want. Skyrim is a better game than Mass Effect 3 and the critics agree. Tough noodles.

Vaasman

Diablo III is more of the same, it will not win, just like Starcraft II. GW2 is just another MMO. ME3 will easily win RPG of the year, their is no real competition.

God damn mad hahaha. Intense butt devestation from Bioware's recent givings I assume. I'm sure one day you'll get over it. Gonna love it once Dragon Age 3 is released and you downplay the success of DA2 and ME3.

Then what is ME3's competition than?...Bioshock infinite is moved out of 2012. Really the only competition is ACIII. A well constructed extended cut only will improve its chances. Nevermind Bioshock won the most GOTY awards in 2007 with its questionable ending. And no I won't downplay the sucess of ME3 when DA3 is released, especially if they go back to repeating DAO flaws because the fans complain, especially with characters (at least they WILL bring back the talking protagonist and the rivalry/friendship system).
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#129 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Diablo III is more of the same, it will not win, just like Starcraft II. GW2 is just another MMO. ME3 will easily win RPG of the year, their is no real competition.texasgoldrush

God damn mad hahaha. Intense butt devestation from Bioware's recent givings I assume. I'm sure one day you'll get over it. Gonna love it once Dragon Age 3 is released and you downplay the success of DA2 and ME3.

Then what is ME3's competition than?...Bioshock infinite is moved out of 2012. Really the only competition is ACIII. A well constructed extended cut only will improve its chances. Nevermind Bioshock won the most GOTY awards in 2007 with its questionable ending. And no I won't downplay the sucess of ME3 when DA3 is released, especially if they go back to repeating DAO flaws because the fans complain, especially with characters (at least they WILL bring back the talking protagonist and the rivalry/friendship system).

Like I said. Quote me if you want.

Mass Effect 3 is not going to be game of the year.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#130 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]however Dungeons are an absolutely monumental improvement and have some striking diversity in Skyrim, particularly in the aesthetic and architecture department.FrozenLiquid

The biggest issue with Skyrim's dungeons is that it sends you to so many, and after 30 or 40 hours, it's really wears down and becomes extremely dull and boring. Nord dungeons are cool at first, but never, ever change after that. Dwemer dungeons are dull in general, and take forever to get through them. It felt like those are suited for dungeon crawlers, but it doesn't have the proper loot system to sustain interest.

Yeah, that's the problem I have with the dungeon crawling. I really wanted unique reasons to go into them. There was enough diversity in the level design, but not enough in mission/reward variety.

Because once again, the poor leveling system...which insures you not so good gear and weak gold rewards.....nevermind that it doesn't level you up in itself unlike Fallout games.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#131 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]God damn mad hahaha. Intense butt devestation from Bioware's recent givings I assume. I'm sure one day you'll get over it. Gonna love it once Dragon Age 3 is released and you downplay the success of DA2 and ME3.

Vaasman

Then what is ME3's competition than?...Bioshock infinite is moved out of 2012. Really the only competition is ACIII. A well constructed extended cut only will improve its chances. Nevermind Bioshock won the most GOTY awards in 2007 with its questionable ending. And no I won't downplay the sucess of ME3 when DA3 is released, especially if they go back to repeating DAO flaws because the fans complain, especially with characters (at least they WILL bring back the talking protagonist and the rivalry/friendship system).

Like I said. Quote me if you want.

Mass Effect 3 is not going to be game of the year.

Then what will? Really the only thing that will keep ME3 from a great chance is that either a big suprise comes out or the extended cut isn't good.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Yeah, that's the problem I have with the dungeon crawling. I really wanted unique reasons to go into them. There was enough diversity in the level design, but not enough in mission/reward variety.FrozenLiquid

Only uniqueness that the dungeons had were at the very end, which took forever to get to. Not even 40 hours in and I had the best gear I could get. For the 80 or so hours after that, I used nothing else. There wasn't any reason to go to dungeons for quests except to see what happened next. Gold and items were useless since...what was I going to do with it at that point?

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#133 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] Yeah, that's the problem I have with the dungeon crawling. I really wanted unique reasons to go into them. There was enough diversity in the level design, but not enough in mission/reward variety.ChubbyGuy40

Only uniqueness that the dungeons had were at the very end, which took forever to get to. Not even 40 hours in and I had the best gear I could get. For the 80 or so hours after that, I used nothing else. There wasn't any reason to go to dungeons for quests except to see what happened next. Gold and items were useless since...what was I going to do with it at that point?

Really I had the mace of molag bal equipped nearly the entire game. I found nothing better for a long time.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Then what will? Really the only thing that will keep ME3 from a great chance is that either a big suprise comes out or the extended cut isn't good.texasgoldrush

Diablo 3

The Last of Us

Guild Wars 2

Dota 2

Counter Strike: GO

Many unannounced Wii-U games

Hell maybe even Resident Evil 6.

There are so many games that are and will be better than ME3 this year. I don't even feel like listing them all. Hell even Dear Esther has a better chance.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Really I had the mace of molag bal equipped nearly the entire game. I found nothing better for a long time.texasgoldrush

That's either because you found it early and then went straight to the main quest and nothing else, or found it at the end.

EDIT: oh wait, I don't think it was one of the level scaling weapons, was it? I can't remember.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#136 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]Then what will? Really the only thing that will keep ME3 from a great chance is that either a big suprise comes out or the extended cut isn't good.ChubbyGuy40

Diablo 3

The Last of Us

Guild Wars 2

Dota 2

Counter Strike: GO

Many unannounced Wii-U games

Hell maybe even Resident Evil 6.

There are so many games that are and will be better than ME3 this year. I don't even feel like listing them all. Hell even Dear Esther has a better chance.

No, more of the same. Maybe has a chance. No No I love CS, but no chance in hell RE6....ummm no, especially if its another RE5. The closest competitor is Assassin;s Creed III.
Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#137 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]Really I had the mace of molag bal equipped nearly the entire game. I found nothing better for a long time.ChubbyGuy40

That's either because you found it early and then went straight to the main quest and nothing else, or found it at the end.

No I found it 25% through my playthrough and kept it for a long time until deadric swords.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

No, more of the same.

Maybe has a chance.

No

No

I love CS, but no chance in hell

RE6....ummm no, especially if its another RE5.

The closest competitor is Assassin;s Creed III.

texasgoldrush

More of the same? Please enlighten us how it's more of Diablo 1 and 2 when those fans won't stop complaining about how much it's changed.

Critics eat up Naughty God's games. It has a much better chance. It could even had a crappy ending and still be more eligible.

Better story, better graphics, better music, better gameplay. Another game with a far better chance.

More popular than all of Valve's titles and it's still in beta. Ohohohohoho it has a very high chance.

Only thing stopping this is if the reviewers are CS1.6 fanboys.

Assassin's Creed 3 will be good, no doubt. Only thing stopping it is if Ubisoft set it's goals too high and can't meet it.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#139 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]

No, more of the same.

Maybe has a chance.

No

No

I love CS, but no chance in hell

RE6....ummm no, especially if its another RE5.

The closest competitor is Assassin;s Creed III.

ChubbyGuy40

More of the same? Please enlighten us how it's more of Diablo 1 and 2 when those fans won't stop complaining about how much it's changed.

Critics eat up Naughty God's games. It has a much better chance. It could even had a crappy ending and still be more eligible.

Better story, better graphics, better music, better gameplay. Another game with a far better chance.

More popular than all of Valve's titles and it's still in beta. Ohohohohoho it has a very high chance.

Only thing stopping this is if the reviewers are CS1.6 fanboys.

Assassin's Creed 3 will be good, no doubt. Only thing stopping it is if Ubisoft set it's goals too high and can't meet it.

But still is just another dungeon hack and slash, the series was more inventive before but it will not establsih or innovate anything now. They didn;t gove Uncharted 3 too many gOTY awards. Perhaps its more of the same. Guild Wars 2 has no chance, sorry. Just because DOTA 2 is popular doesn't mean it'll win. Or the fact that CS GO is just an update And you forget why ME3 may win, because its a very emotional game with very strong characters, nevermind the effect of ending a series. And from some of these same reasons, ACIII has a big chance as well, more than almost anyone else. its the end of a series too. Bioshock Infinite, which I though WAS the favorite, moved out.
Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#140 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Signs of a stupid topic and a stupid opinion

  • Topic made by texasgoldrush
  • saying oblivion was better than skyrim (lol hell no)
  • saying failout 3 bugvegas is better than skyrim

Skyrim had it's issues like bugs and the ps3 version was just bad, it was still a fun game, hell I put over 100 hours into it and I've yet to beat it, hell I've actually owned the ps3,pc and 360 versions.

Avatar image for l-lord
l-lord

853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 l-lord
Member since 2009 • 853 Posts

Bethesda are too busy counting their money. You think they will listen to you? The only thing you're probably annoyed with like every other rant is the lack of prop variety and environmental diversity. Bethesda got their ass bent over and handed to rich publishers. They've learned a much quicker and easier method to get money. You should've knew it.

It is to spend most of the money on ads,cinematics,orchestra soundtracks,sponsors to overhype the console kiddies. You will always will get a limited number of sales if you're expecting them from mentally stable and developed grown humans who look up for their next upcoming games carefully.

PC gaming is dying with entire gaming itself. Get used to it and stop being condescending

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#142 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15875 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"]

No, more of the same.

Maybe has a chance.

No

No

I love CS, but no chance in hell

RE6....ummm no, especially if its another RE5.

The closest competitor is Assassin;s Creed III.

texasgoldrush

More of the same? Please enlighten us how it's more of Diablo 1 and 2 when those fans won't stop complaining about how much it's changed.

Critics eat up Naughty God's games. It has a much better chance. It could even had a crappy ending and still be more eligible.

Better story, better graphics, better music, better gameplay. Another game with a far better chance.

More popular than all of Valve's titles and it's still in beta. Ohohohohoho it has a very high chance.

Only thing stopping this is if the reviewers are CS1.6 fanboys.

Assassin's Creed 3 will be good, no doubt. Only thing stopping it is if Ubisoft set it's goals too high and can't meet it.

But still is just another dungeon hack and slash, the series was more inventive before but it will not establsih or innovate anything now. They didn;t gove Uncharted 3 too many gOTY awards. Perhaps its more of the same. Guild Wars 2 has no chance, sorry. Just because DOTA 2 is popular doesn't mean it'll win. Or the fact that CS GO is just an update And you forget why ME3 may win, because its a very emotional game with very strong characters, nevermind the effect of ending a series. And from some of these same reasons, ACIII has a big chance as well, more than almost anyone else. its the end of a series too. Bioshock Infinite, which I though WAS the favorite, moved out.

You can talk as much **** as you want those all have a good chance, more than ME3 I would say in some cases.

And if you had been in the GW2 beta you would know it's not just another MMO and has a very solid chance at game of the year.

Avatar image for Goyoshi12
Goyoshi12

9687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#143 Goyoshi12
Member since 2009 • 9687 Posts

Some say it's one of if not THE best game of 2011 and not just fanboys and other lot saying it.

Others say what you said.

In the end, that's just, like your opinion, man.

Avatar image for CTR360
CTR360

9217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#145 CTR360
Member since 2007 • 9217 Posts
Skyrim is fantastic. One of my favorite games ever. KC_Hokie
same here
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="texasgoldrush"] Then you explore the same looking locations, kill the same looking enemies, and go on the same fetch quests...its not that coherent. Its tedious and boring. Nevermind there is nothing you cannot handle outside of giants because of the leveling. No tough dungeons out of your league. Hell there isn't even any tough boss monsters like the Legendary Deathclaw in Skyrim. There is no sense of exploration because the most you get is garbage items or gems that are a pain to sell. The only real treasure is the words of power. Fallout New Vegas did more than just story, it had a excellent leveling system and dangerous locations that do not scale to your level. The RPG elements crush Skyrims, not just by amount of elements or depth, thats meaningless, its the fact that in New Vegas, the RPG system works extremely well and is actually balanced. Nevermind that the XP system gives you incentive to do every quest possible. Skyrim once again is all choice but no consquence.

No, there's diversity there, and as I said - this is game about the power-fantasy within the sandbox role playing world. There's tons of exploration, and this is a game bent on it, items, quest chains etc. There's a wealth of content on display ad its easy to see why it has so much appeal. Indeed, I don't disagree in that respect of NV; however I wouldn't say its balanced at all. It scales aggressively at times, and it's possible to be an absolute monster of the wasteland well before completion. Nonetheless this is a game less bent on being a powerfantasy; and I don't disagree, it's a richer role playing game by a huge margin, however it is not a high-fantasy epic that Skyrim is, nor is it as coherent in its blending of systems - Skryim is very much about the journey and whacking things with a sword, NV blends the bethesda template of design with Fallout sensibilities. I will say that its far richer though, and deeper - as far as I'm concerned. Will that appeal to more people, and overrides Skyrims merits? No. Skyrim isn't even all choice; if anything its a game about freeform gameplay, and I'd say a lack of choice in this respect. This is a game where problem solving in verbs boils down to hitting things.
I am not saying my preferences are end all, but for what it tries to do, Skyrim is flawed because of the horrific leveling system.texasgoldrush
No you're citing preferences. Skyrim does a lot right, as well as plenty wrong. No one is saying it is without faults, however you focusing entirely on those and failing to see its strengths is a massive failure on your behalf. Which says more about your perception and values then the actual game.Your preference isn't the rule.

The biggest issue with Skyrim's dungeons is that it sends you to so many, and after 30 or 40 hours, it's really wears down and becomes extremely dull and boring. Nord dungeons are cool at first, but never, ever change after that. They only have 3 puzzles as well, which never change in how you solve them. Dwemer dungeons are dull in general, and take forever to get through them. It felt like those are suited for dungeon crawlers, but it doesn't have the proper loot system to sustain interest.

ChubbyGuy40
Indeed there is content burn out as far as I'm concerned in terms of level design - honestly I can understand why. Designing 40+ hours of dungeon content, keeping it original and able for players to stumble upon at any given time is absurdly difficult. Far from perfect indeed, but there's a wealth of good stuff on display.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"] Skrat, this texasgoldrush was obvious from the beginning. It's futile arguing with someone like that. Unless you're just flexing your argumentative muscle :P

Unfortunately, pretty much. I like to think we can actually get a proper discussion going or debate, but predictably it devolved into 'this is what texas thinks, texas likes the sound of their own voice rule' adolescent nonsense and circular logic that it usually is. Which is a real shame, because hell - wouldn't it be fun having a discussion about RPGs and Skryim - a nice video games debate - on SW of all places. Bah.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

But still is just another dungeon hack and slash, the series was more inventive before but it will not establsih or innovate anything now.

They didn;t gove Uncharted 3 too many gOTY awards. Perhaps its more of the same.

Guild Wars 2 has no chance, sorry.

Just because DOTA 2 is popular doesn't mean it'll win.

Or the fact that CS GO is just an update

And you forget why ME3 may win, because its a very emotional game with very strong characters, nevermind the effect of ending a series. And from some of these same reasons, ACIII has a big chance as well, more than almost anyone else. its the end of a series too.

texasgoldrush

Please continue to try and talk it down. Not just another hack and slash. This isn't Dungeon Siege 3.

Because TLoU is Uncharted 4, correct?

Has the best chance of any RPG this year since GS doesn't appear to enjoy WoW anymore. Wanna tell us how it's just another MMO now?

Not just popular, but leagues better than the other F2P MOBA games and it's still just in beta.

No, seriously, shut the hell up and quit talking.

Very dull game, no life in it's characters, one of the worst endings in recent years, choices don't matter, previous saves don't matter. Combat is terrible and so is the multiplayer.

Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#149 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
Maybe it's the nostalgia speaking, but I honestly found Oblivion to be much more fun and interesting than Skyrim. Skyrim is just so... grey.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Maybe it's the nostalgia speaking, but I honestly found Oblivion to be much more fun and interesting than Skyrim. Skyrim is just so... grey.001011000101101

IMO, anything that lets the rats at the very beginning of the game scale with your level is terrible and will never get any better. Nevermind the immense technicaly difficulties the game had.