[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="NeonNinja"]
I want some of whatever you're smoking, because it sounds awesome.
The Witcher 2 > All RPGs this gen. TRUE STORY BRO!
NeonNinja
Nah, the combat was weak and lacked variety. Geralt is an aweful protagonist. The other characters are so much better and I wish you could play as one of them instead. Its not really an open world, its more like a few different slightly open levels. It just doesnt have the exploration and variety that Skyrim has. Witcher 2 was a good game but Godrim completely demolishes it. Excuse me? Who said The Witcher 2 was open-world? It's a linear, story-based game that focuses on choice. Anyone that put the idea in your head that it was open-world needs to be beaten with a yardstick.
As for The Elder Scrolls V: Boredom, it has the gameplay depth a puddle. So what if you can go whereever you want, you're still stuck with pathetic quest design, terrible writing and lame RPG mechanics.
I never said anyone said The Witcher 2 was open world. I was just pointing out that there is more to do in Skyrim.Gameplay wasn't much better in the Witcher 2. Shield spell, Swing, Roll, repeat. At least Skyrim has multiple combat varieties, each with its own perk tree. It had more RPG elements that The Witcher 2 did. You could completely ignore one of the main perk trees in the witcher 2 and there wasn't nearly as much variety in the weapons and armor you could use.
The story in the Witcher 2 wasn't all that great either. The best part of that game was the characters, not the actual story. Thats not a good thing in a story driven game. The boss battles were pretty boring for the most part too. Too many QTEs.
Log in to comment