@Heirren said:
@TigerSuperman:
I can't agree. Nintendo brought videogames back to the limelight. Stores dedicated entire retail areas to the NES. The NES made videogames a viable product again. I'm not sure how this can be disputed.
Videogames never died, only think they did was industry value, which is important, but it's nowhere near this belief that video games themselves were dead, game releases and consoles releases during the "death' period is literally proof by itself. I mean, again, NES being more in some stores shelves doesn't mean anything. NES was popular, NES had games on lock, eventually a couple year in NES pretty much wiped out it's closest competitor, that's great, ti was popular, ok, but none of that equates to video games were dead before the NES, all it equates to is the NES was popular and eventually destroyed all that had a 2% chance of taking market share from them. Which wasn't even instant.
I can't see how you can disagree with facts like games STILL being sold, and consoles planning or releasing during the period of "DEAD" and still believe video games were not a thing until the NES it doesn't make sense. You also have to ignore this was a console only situation and pretend computers didn't exist as well.
Video games were never NOT a viable product (Example 1985 the year of the low Atari sold 1 million consoles with no advertising. How would this be possible if video games had no value?). This never happened. Ever. NES brought money to the industry's worth, that's the end of NES involvement. Think of the NES as a jump start for your car, the old jump start was going to work, but the new jump start got you moving faster.
Log in to comment