So according to Gamespot DOA4>VF5

So according to your cow logic:

THPS3 > Every game reviewed on GS
aDDiKt24

Somethings seriously wrong here.
gsx1100

indeed, what's wrong with them?

even DoA is create base on VF's technology (SEGA was tech supporting Tecmo when they create DoA)

DoA4 is beautiful, but VF5 clearly is sharper and should at least score 9 or above for its graphic, and score at least 8.8 overally

stop crying...

Jeez that some people actually thought GS was a good review site after 2006...

Amazing for believing in these failure reviewers yet again -_-'

[QUOTE="bluebrad1974"]DOA has more content than VF5. VF5 is lucky it got what it did.Ghetto_Kid

i like how the reviewer says that VF5 builds upon VF4 with new moves and characters, making for a great sequel, but vf4 got a 9.3.

so vf5 is an improvement from vf4, but it gets a lower score? wtf:?

flipknoc

i like how the reviewer says that VF5 builds upon VF4 with new moves and characters, making for a great sequel, but vf4 got a 9.3.

so vf5 is an improvement from vf4, but it gets a lower score? wtf:?

flipknoc

[QUOTE="flipknoc"]i like how the reviewer says that VF5 builds upon VF4 with new moves and characters, making for a great sequel, but vf4 got a 9.3.

so vf5 is an improvement from vf4, but it gets a lower score? wtf:?

ps3-nikita

He was generous with the score.

Lack of single player variety and no online play pretty much should have brought the value down to a 6 at best. Yet he gave it a 7.
FearlessSpirit

[QUOTE="danneswegman"]no, Vf5 wasn't there when DOA4 came out. you must concider the time factor too... if they were released in the same time, the score might have been different.ps3-nikita

I don't know what you're talking about. VF5 looks amazing. Especially considering it is basically a launch game. You cannot compare 360 and PS3 at this point. Too ealry in the PS3's life to judge it. Also, way too much emphasis is being placed on online play. Online should be an added feature, not the main attraction.

Game scores are one persons OPINION. You should take them with a grain of salt and form your own opinion AFTER you play the game.

So according to your cow logic:

THPS3 > Every game reviewed on GS
aDDiKt24

[QUOTE="aDDiKt24"]So according to your cow logic:

THPS3 > Every game reviewed on GS
shungokustasu

This is just plain moronic. I am starting to loose faith in Jeff. Sheep, I finally understand why you hated him so much when he flopped Zelda TP. The man truly is a black sheep, rogue missile, or whatever you want to call him.Timstuff

[QUOTE="ps3-nikita"][QUOTE="danneswegman"]no, Vf5 wasn't there when DOA4 came out. you must concider the time factor too... if they were released in the same time, the score might have been different.mazdero

I don't know what you're talking about. VF5 looks amazing. Especially considering it is basically a launch game. You cannot compare 360 and PS3 at this point. Too ealry in the PS3's life to judge it. Also, way too much emphasis is being placed on online play. Online should be an added feature, not the main attraction.

Game scores are one persons OPINION. You should take them with a grain of salt and form your own opinion AFTER you play the game.

The PS3 should be compared to the 360 after all Sony was bragging how much more powerful of a machine that it is. Remember when the original Xbox launched it was more powerful and it proved it from day 1 against the PS2.

Also about the online, any fighting game that is released this Gen. should have online. People don't have strangers coming over to their house to play games and the best part of fighting games is taking on a variety of compation 

kameo,pgr3,doa4>>>>>>>>98% of ps3 games according to gamespotwiistation360

8.1 seemed generous to me.

No online play for a next-gen multiplayer game would have killed the score for me.

[QUOTE="mazdero"]

[QUOTE="ps3-nikita"][QUOTE="danneswegman"]no, Vf5 wasn't there when DOA4 came out. you must concider the time factor too... if they were released in the same time, the score might have been different.-Super-Fly-

I don't know what you're talking about. VF5 looks amazing. Especially considering it is basically a launch game. You cannot compare 360 and PS3 at this point. Too ealry in the PS3's life to judge it. Also, way too much emphasis is being placed on online play. Online should be an added feature, not the main attraction.

Game scores are one persons OPINION. You should take them with a grain of salt and form your own opinion AFTER you play the game.

The PS3 should be compared to the 360 after all Sony was bragging how much more powerful of a machine that it is. Remember when the original Xbox launched it was more powerful and it proved it from day 1 against the PS2.

Also about the online, any fighting game that is released this Gen. should have online. People don't have strangers coming over to their house to play games and the best part of fighting games is taking on a variety of compation

Jeff gave DOA4 a better score because it has bouncy hentai chicks, and VF4 doesn't. End of story.Timstuff

[QUOTE="wiistation360"]kameo,pgr3,doa4>>>>>>>>98% of ps3 games according to gamespotpins_basic

[QUOTE="bluebrad1974"]DOA has more content than VF5. VF5 is lucky it got what it did.Ghetto_Kid

This is just plain moronic. I am starting to loose faith in Jeff. Sheep, I finally understand why you hated him so much when he flopped Zelda TP. The man truly is a black sheep, rogue missile, or whatever you want to call him.Timstuff

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]This is just plain moronic. I am starting to loose faith in Jeff. Sheep, I finally understand why you hated him so much when he flopped Zelda TP. The man truly is a black sheep, rogue missile, or whatever you want to call him.Blackbond

It's obvious that the review had his ass handed to him by the A.I. and took it out on the score.guch20