So Gears of War cant be done on PS3?

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="lesner87"]

TC you should try doing some research before putting up such a topic.I dont see any reason that GOW cant be ported to the PS.That article is so BS.That its talking of 256mb of difference between RSx and 360s GPU :D.Did you even know that 360 shares its memory.That means its NEVER even getting above 400mb of ram ! Hell its running even below that.No wonder so far the games which require a kick out of the system lag on the 360 example GTA IV.

lesner87

Typical Xbox fan.You got it the other way around.The PS3 version has much more noticeable AA than the 360 version.About the resolution,people can tell the difference from 10 feet away.So it really doesnt matter :).

textures and character models couldn't be done. yes uncharted has great textures but it is lacking technically.

in before the powah of the cell

mephisto_11

just like how the 360 can't do quake 4 ultra settings textures. quake 4 smokes gears textures

Typical fanboy talking nonsenses there isn't even AA on the ps3 version :lol: the low resolution and post processing effect gives the ilussion of AA which is not existent there,do your researches before claiming nonsenses and i have proof to back up my claims ;).
MojondeVACA

Thats what i meant when i said NOTICEABLE AA.Anyways Pros have confirmed much better looking effects on PS3.Face it.I dont need to prove anything to you.

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]
Typical fanboy talking nonsenses there isn't even AA on the ps3 version :lol: the low resolution and post processing effect gives the ilussion of AA which is not existent there,do your researches before claiming nonsenses and i have proof to back up my claims ;).
lesner87

Thats what i meant when i said NOTICEABLE AA.Anyways Pros have confirmed much better looking effects on PS3.Face it.I dont need to prove anything to you.

Um, the devs said UT3 looks better than gears 1, and UT3 is out on PS3 so...Roushrsh

Of course they did. They were trying to sell copies of their most recent game.

Any game can be done on either console. Thats not to say that the game wont have to be reworked to take fit the different architecture. The same goes for MGS4 or any other game.

well your in gamespot now....and if you knw well enough we go by the SCORE of this website not others which actually makes sense, if you wanna brag go elsewhereBlanco98

Not calling YOU a cow, but it's funny how cows say "only gamespot scores count here!!!"....... until the next time gamerankings rates a game higher than gamespot (e.g. Uncharted). It's the fanboy "circle of life."

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]
Typical fanboy talking nonsenses there isn't even AA on the ps3 version :lol: the low resolution and post processing effect gives the ilussion of AA which is not existent there,do your researches before claiming nonsenses and i have proof to back up my claims ;).
lesner87

Thats what i meant when i said NOTICEABLE AA.Anyways Pros have confirmed much better looking effects on PS3.Face it.I dont need to prove anything to you.

Pros? What pros?

I can see this being true to some extent because of the way the ram is on the PS3. http://www.howardforums.com/archive/topic/1066963-1.html Have fun:)vaderhater

meh. i call BS. gears can be done on the PS3, just like MGS4 can be done on the 360.

Gears can't be done the same way on PS3, simply because of the architecture. Unreal Tourney 3 on PS3 clearly looks better than Gears of War, so their isn't even arguement about graphics.

Plus MEtal GEar SOlid 4 destroys any 360 game graphically that has been released. In-game to cinematic transition....simply amazing. And this game could definately not be done on 360, simply because of the hardware requirements(Blu-ray, HDD,etc).
Adrian_Cloud

[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Gears can't be done the same way on PS3, simply because of the architecture. Unreal Tourney 3 on PS3 clearly looks better than Gears of War, so their isn't even arguement about graphics.

Plus MEtal GEar SOlid 4 destroys any 360 game graphically that has been released. In-game to cinematic transition....simply amazing. And this game could definately not be done on 360, simply because of the hardware requirements(Blu-ray, HDD,etc).
clone01

Increased video Resolution : The Blu-Ray disk offers 480p, 720p and 1080i resolutions.

Better video codec support : MPEG-4 AVC High Profile and VC-1 will be supported, in additional to the MPEG-2 format used by current DVDs.

Enhanced graphics : More than one graphics plane - one plane could be used to display closed captioning, while the other can still show a user menu.

Simultaneous video and graphics : In a DVD, if you select the root menu while playing video, the video stops to show the menu. The Blu-Ray disk can continue to play the video while you browse through the menu options.

Interactivity : With Java included in the Blu-Ray player, interactive applications and content (such as games) may be played from the disk.

Network connectivity: This may be used to get disk content related additional material from the web, directly from the player. For instance, the disk can link to updated material on the network after the disk is released. This gives a richer user experience while watching a movie, for downloading movie extras, reviews and games.

...e.t.c

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"]Gears can't be done the same way on PS3, simply because of the architecture. Unreal Tourney 3 on PS3 clearly looks better than Gears of War, so their isn't even arguement about graphics.

Plus MEtal GEar SOlid 4 destroys any 360 game graphically that has been released. In-game to cinematic transition....simply amazing. And this game could definately not be done on 360, simply because of the hardware requirements(Blu-ray, HDD,etc).
Adrian_Cloud

Increased video Resolution : The Blu-Ray disk offers 480p, 720p and 1080i resolutions.

Better video codec support : MPEG-4 AVC High Profile and VC-1 will be supported, in additional to the MPEG-2 format used by current DVDs.

Enhanced graphics : More than one graphics plane - one plane could be used to display closed captioning, while the other can still show a user menu.

Simultaneous video and graphics : In a DVD, if you select the root menu while playing video, the video stops to show the menu. The Blu-Ray disk can continue to play the video while you browse through the menu options.

Interactivity : With Java included in the Blu-Ray player, interactive applications and content (such as games) may be played from the disk.

Network connectivity: This may be used to get disk content related additional material from the web, directly from the player. For instance, the disk can link to updated material on the network after the disk is released. This gives a richer user experience while watching a movie, for downloading movie extras, reviews and games.

...e.t.c

All this at an incredible 2x read speed!!! Stay tuned for more awesome adventures!

Interesting Read.

But I 100% believe Gears can be done on Ps3.

Interesting Read.

But I 100% believe Gears can be done on Ps3.

angelkimne

agreed. i always find it funny when a dev says something like "my game can't be done on console x because of technical limitations" when its obvious that console y is signing the paycheck (i'm looking directly at you, CliffyB and Hideo).

For a person who owns BOTH the 360 and PS3 (well owned a 360, but swaped it for a ps3), I can tell you that gears can easily be done on the PS3 technically. But it aint possible since the rights are owned by Microsoft.

MGS4 looks better, and anyone denying this.. needs... well...an eye check?

And let's not even talk about Killzone 2.

Personally I prefer the ps3 more, quieter, cooler, no immense powerbrick, no hangups or crashes etc.

Just my two cents.

[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

yeah only on gamespot but on gr and metacritic which tallies every site: gears 1, halo 3, smg > mgs4

mgs 4 didnt even make the top50.

imapieceofwood

well here it the gamespot forums. so MGS4>halo 3,smg and gears

ok then tony hawk 3 > mgs4, perfect 10 > prime 10

good to hear that you think the same thing as gs

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="lesner87"]

TC you should try doing some research before putting up such a topic.I dont see any reason that GOW cant be ported to the PS.That article is so BS.That its talking of 256mb of difference between RSx and 360s GPU :D.Did you even know that 360 shares its memory.That means its NEVER even getting above 400mb of ram ! Hell its running even below that.No wonder so far the games which require a kick out of the system lag on the 360 example GTA IV.

MojondeVACA

Typical Xbox fan.You got it the other way around.The PS3 version has much more noticeable AA than the 360 version.About the resolution,people can tell the difference from 10 feet away.So it really doesnt matter :).

I agree - this is Gamespot but I think you need to look at the big picture to get an accurate score on a game. You can't judge a game on one review. How many people here disagree with GTA IV getting a 10?

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

lol ok live in your fantasy gamespot forum.

mephisto_11

Its not really a fantasy. Its a real forum. We are all posting on it right now, so unless we are all part of the same fantasy, I would argue its pretty real.

anyone who only takes 1 reviewers opinion on a games is, no offense, quite stupid. yeah these board has these little "rules" but i honestly dont care. i dont judge games by 1 review. lair got 9's, pdz got 9, zelda tp scored less than assassin's creed. so yeah you can claim "ownage " all day i dont care. and i've already played mgs4, worst purchase i ever made.

I agree - this is Gamespot but I think you need to look at the big picture to get an accurate score on a game. You can't judge a game on one review. How many people here disagree with GTA IV getting a 10?

[QUOTE="mephisto_11"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]

lol ok live in your fantasy gamespot forum.

tm0054

Its not really a fantasy. Its a real forum. We are all posting on it right now, so unless we are all part of the same fantasy, I would argue its pretty real.

anyone who only takes 1 reviewers opinion on a games is, no offense, quite stupid. yeah these board has these little "rules" but i honestly dont care. i dont judge games by 1 review. lair got 9's, pdz got 9, zelda tp scored less than assassin's creed. so yeah you can claim "ownage " all day i dont care. and i've already played mgs4, worst purchase i ever made.

exactly this "only gs counts" rule ignores reality. gs isn't the only publication that reviews games. you cant declare a game "the best game of all time" or get accurate scores from a single review. I don't live in this fantasy gamespot land where assassin's creed, warrio land shake it, and perfect dark zero are better games than zelda twilight princess.

and we have professional reviews that back up ours. Sorry but reviewers>>>>>>notes stating that GTA4 runs at a better resolution on the 360 vs the pse (like who'll be able to tell the difference?)ermacness