So Its Been 10 Years...

  • 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#101 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

[QUOTE="Heil68"]ODST is when. balfe1990

ODST is bad?

:lol: ...You cant be serious
Avatar image for bad_fur_day
bad_fur_day

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#102 bad_fur_day
Member since 2008 • 1988 Posts

FPS come and go, Grand Theft Auto will remain.

...Thats my yoda like comment for today.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Total bias. Anybody that says halo is bad is just wrong. You can say you don't personally like it, but it is a ver very polished game. Each design element is looked at thoroughly, and performed by talented individuals. It is one of the few franchises that reaches Nintendo level of game design. Saying it is bad is saying you don't support proper game releases/good game design.

skrat_01

It's actually quite easy to point out some glaringly bad aspects of its sequel and third title - and the first has some glaring faults here and there. Same goes with certain 'design elements' which weren't thought through at all on implementation (four player cooperative in the third), to others that are extremely meaningful. I wouldn't say there's a standard of 'Nintendo level of game design' as that's a company with a hugely different ethic, as to Bungie; and a company with its own issues for that matter. Is it bad however? Hell no.

I have a hard time agreeing with that, or perhaps need you to elaborate a bit on what you are trying to get across.:)

What I will say is that the quality/structure of the storytelling has dropped somewhat. This is where the first game remains king.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

sorry bro..but im not wrong. AND its not opinion. Ive seen plenty of interviews with people on tv and online over the years that back up my comments. HALO CE made fps mainstream 100% AND its looked at as the one game that turned many PC gamers over to consoles.

VanDammFan

Made FPS mainstream? So what were CS, Half-Life, Doom, etc before this period?! Please enlighten us oh wise one!

go back...look up information...watch some G4tv interviews...read some thoughts on the subject...HALO CE brought more people into playing fps then any of those other games listed BECAUSE not only consolers played it...BUT many PC gamers came over to it. I am wise thanks...You want proof go search the web..its more wise then even me.

OH and I never knew but about 2 people that even played those pc games back then..BUT everyone played and knew of HALO..yes im generalizing facts from my everyday life..

All halo did was make fps more frequent on consoles thats about it. The title of grandaddy fps or watever you want to call it doesint go to it.

Avatar image for JakeMeltzer
JakeMeltzer

243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 JakeMeltzer
Member since 2011 • 243 Posts

I don't doubt how influential the game was, but I never fell in love with it. I don't think I even played Halo until a year after its release & by that time I was hooked on TimeSplitters 2 which in my opinion is a vastly superior game & TimeSplitters is easily the better FPS franchise overall.

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

[QUOTE="balfe1990"]

ODST is bad?

kris9031998

:lol: ...You cant be serious

No, I'm dead serious :|.

Pacman on the Atari is bad. Leisure Suit Larry is bad.

bad

1.

not good in any manner or degree.

2.

having a wicked or evil character; morally reprehensible

3.

of poor or inferior quality; defective; deficient

4.

inadequate or below standard; not satisfactory for use

5.

inaccurate, incorrect, or faulty

Hmmm, nope. ODST doesn't tick any of those boxes, we obviously have different definition of the word. You seem to apply it to anything that isn't absolutely amazing.