[QUOTE="Heil68"]ODST is when. balfe1990
ODST is bad?
:lol: ...You cant be seriousThis topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]It's actually quite easy to point out some glaringly bad aspects of its sequel and third title - and the first has some glaring faults here and there. Same goes with certain 'design elements' which weren't thought through at all on implementation (four player cooperative in the third), to others that are extremely meaningful. I wouldn't say there's a standard of 'Nintendo level of game design' as that's a company with a hugely different ethic, as to Bungie; and a company with its own issues for that matter. Is it bad however? Hell no.Total bias. Anybody that says halo is bad is just wrong. You can say you don't personally like it, but it is a ver very polished game. Each design element is looked at thoroughly, and performed by talented individuals. It is one of the few franchises that reaches Nintendo level of game design. Saying it is bad is saying you don't support proper game releases/good game design.
skrat_01
I have a hard time agreeing with that, or perhaps need you to elaborate a bit on what you are trying to get across.:)
What I will say is that the quality/structure of the storytelling has dropped somewhat. This is where the first game remains king.
Made FPS mainstream? So what were CS, Half-Life, Doom, etc before this period?! Please enlighten us oh wise one![QUOTE="biggest_loser"][QUOTE="VanDammFan"]
sorry bro..but im not wrong. AND its not opinion. Ive seen plenty of interviews with people on tv and online over the years that back up my comments. HALO CE made fps mainstream 100% AND its looked at as the one game that turned many PC gamers over to consoles.
VanDammFan
go back...look up information...watch some G4tv interviews...read some thoughts on the subject...HALO CE brought more people into playing fps then any of those other games listed BECAUSE not only consolers played it...BUT many PC gamers came over to it. I am wise thanks...You want proof go search the web..its more wise then even me.
OH and I never knew but about 2 people that even played those pc games back then..BUT everyone played and knew of HALO..yes im generalizing facts from my everyday life..
All halo did was make fps more frequent on consoles thats about it. The title of grandaddy fps or watever you want to call it doesint go to it.
I don't doubt how influential the game was, but I never fell in love with it. I don't think I even played Halo until a year after its release & by that time I was hooked on TimeSplitters 2 which in my opinion is a vastly superior game & TimeSplitters is easily the better FPS franchise overall.
[QUOTE="balfe1990"]:lol: ...You cant be seriousODST is bad?
kris9031998
No, I'm dead serious :|.
Pacman on the Atari is bad. Leisure Suit Larry is bad.
bad
1.
not good in any manner or degree.
2.
having a wicked or evil character; morally reprehensible
3.
of poor or inferior quality; defective; deficient
4.
inadequate or below standard; not satisfactory for use
5.
inaccurate, incorrect, or faulty
Hmmm, nope. ODST doesn't tick any of those boxes, we obviously have different definition of the word. You seem to apply it to anything that isn't absolutely amazing.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment