So... Playstation 4 has better GRAPHIC than PC games..

So poll in gamespot shows that people think that Killzone Shadow Fall on PS4 looks better than all PC games ever made(like Crysis 3, ARMA 3, Metro, Battlefield 4) and also shows that Battlefield 4 is better on PS4 than on PC.

When PS4 became stronger and more powerful than PC gaming machine? and when PS4 multiplatform games looks better than PC multiplatform games?
Where have we reached? Is this some kind fanboynism, brainwash, blindness or something else? What is it???

It doesn't.

Cows think it does,that's what it means

That is subjective rather than objective and i mean that on both sides of the fence. PC douches will think because their machine has high potential means every PC software > Console software while Console douches will think their new upgraded optimized software means Console games > PC games. None of both is better than the other if you consider several factors and it the end, it all boils down to personal opinions, opinions which is suspect a lot of people want to impose on others

Actually the poll shows that only 30% of people think that Killzone Shadow Fall on PS4 looks better than PC game.

The majority (70%) think that PC games look better because you know 70% > 30%.

I mean what did you expect ?

You put 4 PC games and 1 PS4 game, so most votes have got distributed between PC games, while all consolite fanboys voted the only choice available to them, Killzone.

Got a link to this $400.00 PC please.

Fail thread

No, PCs are more powerful and can produce better graphics. A video game's graphics are a combination of technical fidelity (more detail through, lighting, better shading, shadows, materials, textures, polygons, etc.) and aesthetically pleasing art direction (use of colors, art style, use of shading and other effects). Overall the latter almost always trumps the former but the former allows the latter to impress even more.

Technically from what I've seen this year Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 on the PC while rendered at some crazy resolution with all of the bells and whistles are the best showcase of raw technical graphical fidelity. These two games have the best lighting, textures, shading, and highest polygons counts I've ever seen. Battlefield 4 is especially impressive through a large variety of particle effects, animation, and destruction. Crysis 3 wins on the pure amount of lights and detail they throw into each environment.

However this isn't enough to call them the best looking games out there. While I believe Battlefield 4 is actually the best looking game of the year through both technical and aesthetically pleasing visuals, Killzone Shadow Fall is pretty impressive itself. It has pretty high fidelity graphic rendering a lot of effects combined with a surprisingly great artstyle that gives the game a distinct look and is very pleasing to the eye. I can see why a lot of people picked it over Crysis 3 and Battlefield 4. The end product is a damn good looking game.

Perfect mixture of art and graphics

*yawn* move along people nothing to see here

agreed, very boring thread

Sure it does lol.

Adding so at the start of your sentence makes it confirmed.

Why are you crying OP? Can't handle other people's opinions on a random internet forum poll?

Stupid people are everywhere.

Just one better graphic? Damn.

I don't think any Playstation gamer actually believes this. Most of the commentary to that effect is more likely from fakeboys just trying to make the PS camp look foolish.

So I can play AC4 on Linux then?

Fanboyism

You need to re-read that poll

What a load of shit

PC will always be the the most powerful

Wat. Metro is not a next gen game you plank.

It's pretty widely known that the ps4 pumps out better graphics than modern pcs.

So that's just a really long winded way of saying you can't.

Post detals of a $400 PC that plays BF4 at 900p, high settings and 55-60 FPS or stop posting lies.

Listen you spanner. First off all, I have a 780Ti so I'll thrash you on hardware already. Second, you stated you did not need Windows, to which I asked you if you can play AC4 on Linux so you can not meaning you will need to buy a copy of Windows which can run you about $100 so that already ruins your $400 PC argument. Then you proceed to move the goalposts again by using M:LL as an example when its not available on the PS4, yes it may run on Linux but it was designed for the 7th consoles so that makes it a last gen game.

And thats even before we start breaking down that $400 PC which also needs a monitor, keyboard and mouse as well as a set of headphones.

Keep spinning this though friend, its amusing to see you flop about.

Its a well known fact that the PS4 is more powerful than 99% of PCs in peoples homes right now.

The most technically advanced graphics will always be on pc. People who think Killzone SF looks better than Crysis 3 just like the art style better in Killzone SF. Killzone SF looks great but Crysis 3 has much higher resolution textures, better draw distance and overall more detailed graphics. One can prefer the look of one game over another game because of the art style even though the other game has more advanced graphics.

Uh what?

my PC certainly isn't, so not always.

because all these people voting are idiots and haven't touch a gaming PC in their dweller lives lol.

This. When idiots vote massively to say the Earth is flat, that doesn't mean you should believe them.

...uh duh, but why would you compare the PS4 to non-gaming PCs

I didn't specify anyone's PC in general, but when looking at multi plat games, the PC version is the better version. Doesn't matter if your PC cant do it. So yes, always.

Crysis 3 is still the best looking game, graphically.

Consolites forgetting to take their Ritalin again.

It looks better than most, but that's because PC is mostly tech demos like project Offset and 3Dmark benchmark tool or indie games that will never come out like star citizen.

Cow walks in, looks at poll, "nope i haven't played anything on PC, gonna choose Playstation" ... now poll is tainted.

What operating system are you using? Does BF4 require windows?

It does, so thats another $100.

You still need software to run games you tool.

Yeah it is...... Can you make a $400 PC to run BF4 at max settings at 1920 x 1080 and run at 60 solid frames a second?

I paid $16 USD for my copy of Windows 8, which is now 8.1 for free, so an operating system doesn't always cost $100+, plus most students can get all Microsoft software for free, Windows, Works. Everyone knows this place is Cowspot so of course a poll with a ps game in it would win the votes.