So there have been 13 pokemon games in 15 years...

  • 160 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#101 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] So what are the "C" versions for then? Do they have all the Pokemon that were found in the A and B versions?starfox15

expansions, just like a crapton of other games. you don't need the original either, you know the expansion is coming, and if it bothers you so much, you can just wait and get it. i never bought any of them though, but have one copy of each gen. so to me, as with most normal people, there have been 5 pokemon games (7 counting the two remade gens).

I was gonna say, unless you're deeply troubled or spoiled, you don't buy EVERY copy of every generation of pokemon games. 

Yellow/Red/Blue/Firered/Leafgreen: Gen 1

Gold/Silver/Crystal/Heartgold/Soulsilver: Gen 2

Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald: Gen 3

Diamond/Pearl/Platinum: Gen 4

Black/White: Gen 5

(I'll even give you Black/White 2 as a separate count here): Gen 5.5

Unless you're damaged, you didn't buy every single copy of the games that were released. You either bought one of the original games or waited for the inevitable 3rd game to come out. 

The games within each generation are in my mind counted as a single game because they were identical aside from the remakes and the different pokemon present within the games. If you really want to count every canon title as a different, unique title and compare it to a series like COD I guess that's your prerogative. 

 

nope those are all separate games nad most brough one of the first two then brought the "Full" versions which is also usually the "Most" different game. So most WILL end up with two, and all 3 are different games.

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"][QUOTE="RyanShazam"] I WANT MOAR!!!Eddie-Murphy48

There's only 40 games there.

 

I said off the top of my head. There is of course, more.

Thank the Lord Almighty there is MOAR!!!
Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="Crossel777"]

Lol your average CoD has what?  5-7 maps in total?  Playing the same maps thousands of times over hardly amounts to more content.  But yeah, let's not forget overpriced DLC map packs..  That's totally not milking right?   Mindlessly grinding your prestige levels just so you can put your clan logo on the back of your gun?  Whoopied frikkin doo.  So very rewarding and fulfilling and not a waste of time at all.

el3m2tigre

COD has closer to 20 maps each game as well as Zombies/SpecOps and a Campaign with (gasp!) VOICE ACTING.

Call Of Duty may be milked, but at least they don't release two versions of the game at the same time.

And what's wrong with this, exactly?

Everything.

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

COD has closer to 20 maps each game as well as Zombies/SpecOps and a Campaign with (gasp!) VOICE ACTING.

Call Of Duty may be milked, but at least they don't release two versions of the game at the same time.

Obviously_Right

And what's wrong with this, exactly?

Everything.

You only need 1 version.

Avatar image for DropsofJupiter
DropsofJupiter

1449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105 DropsofJupiter
Member since 2013 • 1449 Posts

EDIT: Never mind, you explain this on the first page

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#106 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

Pokemon Red/Blue/Yellow Pokemon Gold/Silver/Crystal Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald Pokemon Diamond/Pearl/Platinum Pokemon Black/White Pokemon Black 2/White 2 I count six games. If we throw in the remakes, we get eight, with the ninth one coming in this year.DropsofJupiter

 

If you are not on medication you would count 14 or so, and would expect  another 40+ added to that.

Avatar image for DropsofJupiter
DropsofJupiter

1449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 DropsofJupiter
Member since 2013 • 1449 Posts
In this scenario, I will say at least Pokemon does enough to differentiate itself with each release. Other franchises like Madden and Call of Duty do not.
Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

COD has closer to 20 maps each game as well as Zombies/SpecOps and a Campaign with (gasp!) VOICE ACTING.

Call Of Duty may be milked, but at least they don't release two versions of the game at the same time.

Obviously_Right

And what's wrong with this, exactly?

Everything.

Feel free to elaborate.

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#110 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

In this scenario, I will say at least Pokemon does enough to differentiate itself with each release. Other franchises like Madden and Call of Duty do not.DropsofJupiter

 

all the mystery dungeon games are very similar.

 

you have 3 games that may be different fomr the last 3 games, but those 3 games paly nearly exactly the same.

 

Pokepark

 

Both pokemon stadium games play the same.

 

While there are a couple of differences, the gameplay in both XD and collosium is nealry the same exact thing.

 

everything else yeah.

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

In this scenario, I will say at least Pokemon does enough to differentiate itself with each release. Other franchises like Madden and Call of Duty do not.DropsofJupiter
Keep on fighting that good fight my friend!

fist-in-the-air.jpg

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="starfox15"]

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] expansions, just like a crapton of other games. you don't need the original either, you know the expansion is coming, and if it bothers you so much, you can just wait and get it. i never bought any of them though, but have one copy of each gen. so to me, as with most normal people, there have been 5 pokemon games (7 counting the two remade gens).Eddie-Murphy48

I was gonna say, unless you're deeply troubled or spoiled, you don't buy EVERY copy of every generation of pokemon games. 

Yellow/Red/Blue/Firered/Leafgreen: Gen 1

Gold/Silver/Crystal/Heartgold/Soulsilver: Gen 2

Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald: Gen 3

Diamond/Pearl/Platinum: Gen 4

Black/White: Gen 5

(I'll even give you Black/White 2 as a separate count here): Gen 5.5

Unless you're damaged, you didn't buy every single copy of the games that were released. You either bought one of the original games or waited for the inevitable 3rd game to come out. 

The games within each generation are in my mind counted as a single game because they were identical aside from the remakes and the different pokemon present within the games. If you really want to count every canon title as a different, unique title and compare it to a series like COD I guess that's your prerogative. 

 

nope those are all separate games nad most brough one of the first two then brought the "Full" versions which is also usually the "Most" different game. So most WILL end up with two, and all 3 are different games.

Wut?

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#113 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

And what's wrong with this, exactly?

el3m2tigre

Everything.

Feel free to elaborate.

It kills hype for the franchise. Look a SFII and look at SFIII which was barely exitent because of it., SFII made ritself big and Cpacom though they could slap the name on everything, that backfired and eneded up hurting the third game in their series, and started hurting some of their other SF games as well all the way until 4 came out,.

Avatar image for the9thinning
the9thinning

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 the9thinning
Member since 2011 • 662 Posts
A LOT of Nintendo hate on these forums lately...
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

In this scenario, I will say at least Pokemon does enough to differentiate itself with each release. Other franchises like Madden and Call of Duty do not.DropsofJupiter
Sure it does. 

:roll:

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts
A LOT of Nintendo hate on these forums lately...the9thinning
That's because the only news we hear about the Wii U is bad news.
Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts

You call it milking, I call it giving fans what they want.

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#118 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

You call it milking, I call it giving fans what they want.

Pete-B

 

Hald that 40+ games milk doesn't even sell.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Everything.

Eddie-Murphy48

Feel free to elaborate.

It kills hype for the franchise. Look a SFII and look at SFIII which was barely exitent because of it., SFII made ritself big and Cpacom though they could slap the name on everything, that backfired and eneded up hurting the third game in their series, and started hurting some of their other SF games as well all the way until 4 came out,.

Clearly it's an entirely different scenario for pokemon.

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

Nintendo gets a "free pass"

Pokemon Platinum - 8.0 / Modern Warfare 2 - 9.0

Pokemon HGSS - 8.0 / Black Ops - 9.0

Pokemon BW - 7.5 / Modern Warfare 3 - 8.5

Pokemon BW2 - 6.5 / Black Ops 2 - 8.0

SfZZm.gif

Avatar image for Eddie-Murphy48
Eddie-Murphy48

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#121 Eddie-Murphy48
Member since 2013 • 939 Posts

[QUOTE="Eddie-Murphy48"]

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

Feel free to elaborate.

el3m2tigre

It kills hype for the franchise. Look a SFII and look at SFIII which was barely exitent because of it., SFII made ritself big and Cpacom though they could slap the name on everything, that backfired and eneded up hurting the third game in their series, and started hurting some of their other SF games as well all the way until 4 came out,.

Clearly it's an entirely different scenario for pokemon.

 

Not really, most pokemon games don't do well. Only usually the split version series does well.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="Eddie-Murphy48"]

It kills hype for the franchise. Look a SFII and look at SFIII which was barely exitent because of it., SFII made ritself big and Cpacom though they could slap the name on everything, that backfired and eneded up hurting the third game in their series, and started hurting some of their other SF games as well all the way until 4 came out,.

Eddie-Murphy48

Clearly it's an entirely different scenario for pokemon.

 

Not really, most pokemon games don't do well. Only usually the split version series does well.

The spin offs? Nintendo barely markets them as much as they do their main pokemon games.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#123 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] I haven't played Pokemon since the Red/Blue, but isn't the main premise still catching Pokemon, beating gyms, collecting badges, and beating the final four? BPoole96
yes, of course that's THE PREMISE. the core of the franchise. what makes it what it is. mario jumps, the prince does acrobatics, rico farts parachutes, lara raids tombs, and pokemon trainers catch pokemon.

Those mechanics can be implemented in a variety of ways though, and offer an element of surprise in each game. With Pokemon, I already know I am going to choose my starting Pokemon, train them by grinding, fight element based gym leaders, get more pokemon, and do the final four. I just seems like its the same game every time just with new Pokemon.

and with every first person shooter you buy, you know you'll be aligning your crosshairs at things and then pressing LMB (or RT or R1/2) for 10 hours. and in dungeon crawlers, you click on stuff until they die, then click on more stuff. your point?
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#124 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="timmy00"]

Nothing wrong with milk. :l

timmy00

Unless it's sour.>.>

Well it's rarely sour for me.

Though to be fair, I just don't feel franchise fatigue like most people here.

a DW fan would say that :P
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] yes, of course that's THE PREMISE. the core of the franchise. what makes it what it is. mario jumps, the prince does acrobatics, rico farts parachutes, lara raids tombs, and pokemon trainers catch pokemon.

Those mechanics can be implemented in a variety of ways though, and offer an element of surprise in each game. With Pokemon, I already know I am going to choose my starting Pokemon, train them by grinding, fight element based gym leaders, get more pokemon, and do the final four. I just seems like its the same game every time just with new Pokemon.

and with every first person shooter you buy, you know you'll be aligning your crosshairs at things and then pressing LMB (or RT or R1/2) for 10 hours. and in dungeon crawlers, you click on stuff until they die, then click on more stuff. your point?

That's from a gameplay only perspective. In Pokemon you already know both the gameplay and the story and how every event will unfold. I don't understand where all of this enjoyment is coming from when you know 95% of the Pokemon in each new game, several of the moves are the same just with a new animation, same elemental weaknesses (fire hurts ice and vice versa), you know the gym leaders, you know the end game, and so on. What is it about these games that has young adults in their 20s creaming themselves over this series when they already know nearly everything about the game before it even releases? I played Red/Blue for dozens of hours as an 8-9 year old and by the time Yellow came out I played that and knew I was done with the series.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#126 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] Those mechanics can be implemented in a variety of ways though, and offer an element of surprise in each game. With Pokemon, I already know I am going to choose my starting Pokemon, train them by grinding, fight element based gym leaders, get more pokemon, and do the final four. I just seems like its the same game every time just with new Pokemon.

and with every first person shooter you buy, you know you'll be aligning your crosshairs at things and then pressing LMB (or RT or R1/2) for 10 hours. and in dungeon crawlers, you click on stuff until they die, then click on more stuff. your point?

That's from a gameplay only perspective. In Pokemon you already know both the gameplay and the story and how every event will unfold. I don't understand where all of this enjoyment is coming from when you know 95% of the Pokemon in each new game, several of the moves are the same just with a new animation, same elemental weaknesses (fire hurts ice and vice versa), you know the gym leaders, you know the end game, and so on. What is it about these games that has young adults in their 20s creaming themselves over this series when they already know nearly everything about the game before it even releases? I played Red/Blue for dozens of hours as an 8-9 year old and by the time Yellow came out I played that and knew I was done with the series.

you don't really know the gym leaders, or the entire world for that matter. there are new pokemon, with new moves, new abilities, new rules, and new places to explore. new teams to form up, new strategies to use, and a lot to learn. each new game is essentially like an adventure. you set out only with the knowledge you acquired from previous games, and then you have to learn all this new stuff. of course, you are treating yellow like some kind of sequel. you played essentially the same game a second time, thinking it was a new one, and then assumed that the pattern repeated for every game. you seem to have an extremely limited, and wrong, view of what the pokemon games are. "i played the first one, therefore i assume they're all copies, because when i played the expansion, surprise surprise, it was the same game with some added sh!t rather than a brand new game". that's like holding fault for super street fighter IV being like SF4 vanilla. or actually, that's like complaining the street fighter series is all the same, because you still do quarter circles to pull hadoukens, and a lot of the cast is repeated, and the objective is still the same. now that i think about it, you must really hate fighting games... or any game with a sequel.
Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#127 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

Nintendo gets a "free pass"

Pokemon Platinum - 8.0 / Modern Warfare 2 - 9.0

Pokemon HGSS - 8.0 / Black Ops - 9.0

Pokemon BW - 7.5 / Modern Warfare 3 - 8.5

Pokemon BW2 - 6.5 / Black Ops 2 - 8.0

SfZZm.gif

metroidfood

Good job comparing a stagnant franchise that's been going on for the past 15 years to a franchise that got its Modern setting mojo in 2007. :lol:

Sheep gonna sheep!! #ChooChoo 

I'm glad someone is kicking Pokemon off of its high horse. Gets too much of a free pass... Then again, so does Nintendo as a whole. Brilliant to see them being hit like this. Hopefully we might actually see change now.... Who am I kidding. :lol:

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#128 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

Pokemon games last longer than those copy and paste FPSs you like TC.

Avatar image for 6_Shooter_25
6_Shooter_25

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 6_Shooter_25
Member since 2013 • 219 Posts

Pokemon games last longer than those copy and paste FPSs you like TC.

HaloPimp978

Good thing only a select few titles in the series are actually unique games and not just the same thing with a different color or letter assigned to it. 

Avatar image for zassimick
zassimick

10471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 2

#130 zassimick  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 10471 Posts

I'll ask the same question fans of Call of Duty or fans of other 'milked' games get when their franchise is called out for being milked: 

Why does it matter? More importantly, why does it matter to people who don't play the games? :|

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#131 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
I think the gimmicky forced trading to have two different versions is ridiculous. But yeah Pokemon is long overdue for some overhaul.
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#132 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts

I'd say theres a lot more effort put into an 80+ hour JRPG with huge amounts of depth than another 5 hour generic copy/paste FPS with multiplayer.  So on that note, it's justifiable.

Crossel777
One could argue that Pokemon has been the same for awhile with its rpg elements. I still buy it knowing I'll get the same experience as the last even though I know it is completely stupid.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#133 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] and with every first person shooter you buy, you know you'll be aligning your crosshairs at things and then pressing LMB (or RT or R1/2) for 10 hours. and in dungeon crawlers, you click on stuff until they die, then click on more stuff. your point?BrunoBRS
That's from a gameplay only perspective. In Pokemon you already know both the gameplay and the story and how every event will unfold. I don't understand where all of this enjoyment is coming from when you know 95% of the Pokemon in each new game, several of the moves are the same just with a new animation, same elemental weaknesses (fire hurts ice and vice versa), you know the gym leaders, you know the end game, and so on. What is it about these games that has young adults in their 20s creaming themselves over this series when they already know nearly everything about the game before it even releases? I played Red/Blue for dozens of hours as an 8-9 year old and by the time Yellow came out I played that and knew I was done with the series.

you don't really know the gym leaders, or the entire world for that matter. there are new pokemon, with new moves, new abilities, new rules, and new places to explore. new teams to form up, new strategies to use, and a lot to learn. each new game is essentially like an adventure. you set out only with the knowledge you acquired from previous games, and then you have to learn all this new stuff. of course, you are treating yellow like some kind of sequel. you played essentially the same game a second time, thinking it was a new one, and then assumed that the pattern repeated for every game. you seem to have an extremely limited, and wrong, view of what the pokemon games are. "i played the first one, therefore i assume they're all copies, because when i played the expansion, surprise surprise, it was the same game with some added sh!t rather than a brand new game". that's like holding fault for super street fighter IV being like SF4 vanilla. or actually, that's like complaining the street fighter series is all the same, because you still do quarter circles to pull hadoukens, and a lot of the cast is repeated, and the objective is still the same. now that i think about it, you must really hate fighting games... or any game with a sequel.

So the gym leaders don't consist of a fire based one, a water based, one, an electric based one, etc? I mean it doesn't really matter who they are since all the pre battle dialogue consists of "I will crush you! HA HA HA!"

Why does Yellow exist then if it is essentially the same game? Iirc the only ifference between the Yellow and Red/Blue was that you started with Pikachu in the beginning. That is a prime example of milking, and to a 8-9 year old at the time, how the hell was I supposed to know it was a rehash and not an actual sequel?

In regard to fighting games, they have never really been my thing, and any game that get yearly releases with little improvements such as CoD, Guitar Hero, Assassin's Creed, Madden, etc quickly lose my interest and I move onto more interesting games.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#135 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] That's from a gameplay only perspective. In Pokemon you already know both the gameplay and the story and how every event will unfold. I don't understand where all of this enjoyment is coming from when you know 95% of the Pokemon in each new game, several of the moves are the same just with a new animation, same elemental weaknesses (fire hurts ice and vice versa), you know the gym leaders, you know the end game, and so on. What is it about these games that has young adults in their 20s creaming themselves over this series when they already know nearly everything about the game before it even releases? I played Red/Blue for dozens of hours as an 8-9 year old and by the time Yellow came out I played that and knew I was done with the series. BPoole96

you don't really know the gym leaders, or the entire world for that matter. there are new pokemon, with new moves, new abilities, new rules, and new places to explore. new teams to form up, new strategies to use, and a lot to learn. each new game is essentially like an adventure. you set out only with the knowledge you acquired from previous games, and then you have to learn all this new stuff. of course, you are treating yellow like some kind of sequel. you played essentially the same game a second time, thinking it was a new one, and then assumed that the pattern repeated for every game. you seem to have an extremely limited, and wrong, view of what the pokemon games are. "i played the first one, therefore i assume they're all copies, because when i played the expansion, surprise surprise, it was the same game with some added sh!t rather than a brand new game". that's like holding fault for super street fighter IV being like SF4 vanilla. or actually, that's like complaining the street fighter series is all the same, because you still do quarter circles to pull hadoukens, and a lot of the cast is repeated, and the objective is still the same. now that i think about it, you must really hate fighting games... or any game with a sequel.

So the gym leaders don't consist of a fire based one, a water based, one, an electric based one, etc? I mean it doesn't really matter who they are since all the pre battle dialogue consists of "I will crush you! HA HA HA!"

Why does Yellow exist then if it is essentially the same game? Iirc the only ifference between the Yellow and Red/Blue was that you started with Pikachu in the beginning. That is a prime example of milking, and to a 8-9 year old at the time, how the hell was I supposed to know it was a rehash and not an actual sequel?

In regard to fighting games, they have never really been my thing, and any game that get yearly releases with little improvements such as CoD, Guitar Hero, Assassin's Creed, Madden, etc quickly lose my interest and I move onto more interesting games.

they always focus on a single type, yes, but there are more than 8 types, you know. and the order being shuffled up (as well as new systems, pokemons, and even rules, like double battles) means that you can have a tough time with a gym leader of a certain time, when you had no trouble fighting a gym leader of the same type in another gen. point is, they're different trainers with different pokemons, and being set in different gens can mean a lot of things. as explained, it was an expansion of the originals, not a new one. i was f*cking 6 when i played pokemon and i never had any trouble understanding that you picked one of the 3 versions and stuck to it, and if you wanted a pokemon you couldn't catch, you just trade with someone else. seriously, everyone clearly understands it works like this, don't try to make it sound like people buying all versions thinking they are different is a thing.
Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#136 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

That's from a gameplay only perspective. In Pokemon you already know both the gameplay and the story and how every event will unfold. I don't understand where all of this enjoyment is coming from when you know 95% of the Pokemon in each new game, several of the moves are the same just with a new animation, same elemental weaknesses (fire hurts ice and vice versa), you know the gym leaders, you know the end game, and so on. What is it about these games that has young adults in their 20s creaming themselves over this series when they already know nearly everything about the game before it even releases? I played Red/Blue for dozens of hours as an 8-9 year old and by the time Yellow came out I played that and knew I was done with the series. BPoole96
Each new generation has introduced at least 100 pokemon. And every generation makes big changes to the gameplay, you obviously don't do much beyond the main series if you think they're all basically the same.

2: 2 new types, held items
3: abilities, double battles
4: moves are physical/special based on move, not type, online battling/trading
5: triple battles, rotation battles

Really gen 5 is the only thing that didn't make a huge change to the gameplay.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#137 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] you don't really know the gym leaders, or the entire world for that matter. there are new pokemon, with new moves, new abilities, new rules, and new places to explore. new teams to form up, new strategies to use, and a lot to learn. each new game is essentially like an adventure. you set out only with the knowledge you acquired from previous games, and then you have to learn all this new stuff. of course, you are treating yellow like some kind of sequel. you played essentially the same game a second time, thinking it was a new one, and then assumed that the pattern repeated for every game. you seem to have an extremely limited, and wrong, view of what the pokemon games are. "i played the first one, therefore i assume they're all copies, because when i played the expansion, surprise surprise, it was the same game with some added sh!t rather than a brand new game". that's like holding fault for super street fighter IV being like SF4 vanilla. or actually, that's like complaining the street fighter series is all the same, because you still do quarter circles to pull hadoukens, and a lot of the cast is repeated, and the objective is still the same. now that i think about it, you must really hate fighting games... or any game with a sequel.BrunoBRS

So the gym leaders don't consist of a fire based one, a water based, one, an electric based one, etc? I mean it doesn't really matter who they are since all the pre battle dialogue consists of "I will crush you! HA HA HA!"

Why does Yellow exist then if it is essentially the same game? Iirc the only ifference between the Yellow and Red/Blue was that you started with Pikachu in the beginning. That is a prime example of milking, and to a 8-9 year old at the time, how the hell was I supposed to know it was a rehash and not an actual sequel?

In regard to fighting games, they have never really been my thing, and any game that get yearly releases with little improvements such as CoD, Guitar Hero, Assassin's Creed, Madden, etc quickly lose my interest and I move onto more interesting games.

they always focus on a single type, yes, but there are more than 8 types, you know. and the order being shuffled up (as well as new systems, pokemons, and even rules, like double battles) means that you can have a tough time with a gym leader of a certain time, when you had no trouble fighting a gym leader of the same type in another gen. point is, they're different trainers with different pokemons, and being set in different gens can mean a lot of things. as explained, it was an expansion of the originals, not a new one. i was f*cking 6 when i played pokemon and i never had any trouble understanding that you picked one of the 3 versions and stuck to it, and if you wanted a pokemon you couldn't catch, you just trade with someone else. seriously, everyone clearly understands it works like this, don't try to make it sound like people buying all versions thinking they are different is a thing.

Yellow came out after Red/Blue so my 8 year old self figured it would be a new game with new content, not the same game with Pikachu as a starter.

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

Good job comparing a stagnant franchise that's been going on for the past 15 years to a franchise that got its Modern setting mojo in 2007. :lol:

Sheep gonna sheep!! #ChooChoo 

I'm glad someone is kicking Pokemon off of its high horse. Gets too much of a free pass... Then again, so does Nintendo as a whole. Brilliant to see them being hit like this. Hopefully we might actually see change now.... Who am I kidding. :lol:

sanim02

So a 6.5 is what's considered a free pass around here? #swag #YOLO

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60831 Posts
I have never played one and dont feel bad for saying that.
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Pokemon games last longer than those copy and paste FPSs you like TC.

HaloPimp978

Who said I like those "copy and paste" FPS? (Oh the irony when trying to defend pokemon).

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

Good job comparing a stagnant franchise that's been going on for the past 15 years to a franchise that got its Modern setting mojo in 2007. :lol:

Sheep gonna sheep!! #ChooChoo 

I'm glad someone is kicking Pokemon off of its high horse. Gets too much of a free pass... Then again, so does Nintendo as a whole. Brilliant to see them being hit like this. Hopefully we might actually see change now.... Who am I kidding. :lol:

metroidfood

So a 6.5 is what's considered a free pass around here? #swag #YOLO

Ignoring that score it sits at 80 on meta.. so yes they get a free pass.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
there has actually been more than 13 pokemon games, much more.
Avatar image for LittleMac19
LittleMac19

1638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#143 LittleMac19
Member since 2009 • 1638 Posts
I wonder if they'll let me make my own choices on how I want to approach the story in Pokemon X/Y? *laughs* nah.
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloPimp978"]

Pokemon games last longer than those copy and paste FPSs you like TC.

GD1551

Who said I like those "copy and paste" FPS? (Oh the irony when trying to defend pokemon).

Bro dat depth bro.

Pokemon is full of it!

Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#145 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
there has actually been more than 13 pokemon games, much more.campzor
Yeah I thought that was the case.
Avatar image for Agent-Tojed
Agent-Tojed

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Agent-Tojed
Member since 2012 • 160 Posts

13 Pokemon games, and not a single one on consoles that was a full-fledged journey. I know the reason why, but you would think Nintendo would give it a chance.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#147 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45473 Posts
it just seems like there's more games than there really are...
GAMEBOY 1996 - Pokemon Red and Blue GAMEBOY COLOR 1998 - Pokemon Yellow: Special Pikachu Edition (remake of Pokemon Red and Blue) 1999 - Pokemon Gold and Silver 2000 - Pokemon Crystal (remake of Gold and Silver) GAMEBOY ADVANCED 2002 - Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire 2004 - Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen (remake of Pokemon Red and Blue) 2004 - Pokemon Emerald (remake of Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire) NINTENDO DS 2006 - Pokemon Diamond and Pearl 2008 - Pokemon Platinum (remake of Pokemon Diamond and Pearl) 2009 - Pokemon HeartGold and SoulSilver (remake of Pokemon Gold Silver) 2010 - Pokemon Black and White 2012 - Pokemon Black 2 and White 2 NINTENDO 3DS 2013 - Pokemon X and Y
yeah it's confusing, on just handhelds there's 22 different products, spanning 5 different handhelds, over 17 years, but really it's just 7 unique games accounting for 14 different products, 8 products are remakes of only 4 games, two games got remade twice according to something I read on the internet, starting with Blue and Red neither game has full access to all the Pokemon, so linking with another handheld is essential toward completing your "Pokedex", both Pokemon Red and Blue released with the phrase "gotta catch 'em all!" on the box
Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts
That's not even counting the spin offs... Damn. Still buying Pokemon Y though.
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#149 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
[QUOTE="lamprey263"]it just seems like there's more games than there really are...
GAMEBOY 1996 - Pokemon Red and Blue GAMEBOY COLOR 1998 - Pokemon Yellow: Special Pikachu Edition (remake of Pokemon Red and Blue) 1999 - Pokemon Gold and Silver 2000 - Pokemon Crystal (remake of Gold and Silver) GAMEBOY ADVANCED 2002 - Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire 2004 - Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen (remake of Pokemon Red and Blue) 2004 - Pokemon Emerald (remake of Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire) NINTENDO DS 2006 - Pokemon Diamond and Pearl 2008 - Pokemon Platinum (remake of Pokemon Diamond and Pearl) 2009 - Pokemon HeartGold and SoulSilver (remake of Pokemon Gold Silver) 2010 - Pokemon Black and White 2012 - Pokemon Black 2 and White 2 NINTENDO 3DS 2013 - Pokemon X and Y
yeah it's confusing, on just handhelds there's 22 different products, spanning 5 different handhelds, over 17 years, but really it's just 7 unique games accounting for 14 different products, 8 products are remakes of only 4 games, two games got remade twice according to something I read on the internet, starting with Blue and Red neither game has full access to all the Pokemon, so linking with another handheld is essential toward completing your "Pokedex", both Pokemon Red and Blue released with the phrase "gotta catch 'em all!" on the box

That's not even counting the spin offs... Damn. Still buying Pokemon Y though.Ghost120x
Mainly what I was talking about with the spin offs when I said definitely more than 13.
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Maroxad  Online
Member since 2007 • 25348 Posts

Nintendo milks their franchises.

But so far they do not milk their games.