[QUOTE="sneekite"] [QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="peaceful_anger"]I was told by a cow that LBP was kiddy done right. This was when it was first revealed. I wish I could remember his name.BioShockOwnz
lol, i remember that. "kiddy done right". WTF does that even mean?I'm guessing that the person was comparing basic art styles rather than the intended audience. LBP is kiddy, it's got little characters and music that would appeal to kids, but the detailed graphics give the game a "realistic" art style. Games like Pokemon were never intended to look realistic, that art style is mimicing the cartoon and is therefore (in some people's opinions) less appealing to people who aren't kids.
So sock puppets are a little less kiddy if they have detailed textures?
Basically, yes. This isn't quite my point of view, but thinking from a consumer's standpoint: Looking at images of LBP one can see things like baskets and fruit and other objects that actually look real. Looking at images of Pokemon one can see a cartoon.
I'm sure there are many people (probably casuals) who do not want anything "kiddy," and automatically dismiss pokemon without actually trying its gameplay to find out if it's fun. Those same people might see the more realistic graphics of LBP and not have those same thoughts. That doesn't mean that the concept or gameplay of LBP is any less kiddy than Pokemon, I think they're both "kiddy." The art alone of LBP is less "kiddy" simply because it looks more like reality than a cartoon.
Log in to comment