Sony: Competitors 'Continue peddling add-ons to keep up with the Jones''

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.

Blackbond

You don't get it.

Bluray isn't something additional. It's not something with a monthly fee. If you dont' want a PS3 that plays blurays you dont want a PS3 because thats the format the PS3 uses.

What if I want to play games but I don't want to pay for the DVD player in the 360? Thats the essentially the same thing. And just as ridiculous.

GOD, why did we have to switch from CDROMS to DVDs? I just care about the games!

Blu-Ray is something additoinal. Its an additional component not required to be included on a gaming machine that drives the price up. I wouldn't even own a Blu-Ray player if it wasn't for the PS3 and to be honest I have no intention of ever using it. The inclusion of the Blu-Ray player is a cost that the consumer has to absorb. DVD drives are not costing you an addtional upwards cost to your gaming machine like the Blu-Ray player does with the PS3. Hence why the PS3 is the most expensive console.

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.TheOrigin

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Chutebox

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Avatar image for Holyknight_CJ
Holyknight_CJ

1091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Holyknight_CJ
Member since 2006 • 1091 Posts
I'm suprised they only factored in one year of live, when they're trying to stress how expensive a 360 with closest to equal features as a PS3 would cost. I would multiply the live cost times five. Maybe they're trying to say the 360 experience doesn't last or something, but if that's what there saying, in addition to being untrue, it detracts from there main point. If I had a 360 I would get only get a 20GB hard drive, but would need x years of live, and a wireless adapter. 360 really should have a slot for an internal wireless card rather than have it stick out, well really they should have integrated since such a high percentage of people need it. Even the Wii has integrated wireless.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.Blackbond

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="TheOrigin"]

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

Chutebox

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

cartridges cost more. that's why they moved to optical media. what NEEDS to happen is everyone needs to go back to DVD, but not to have games run from the DVD drive. rather, include massive HDDs and let us install every game fully like we can now with NXE.

THAT is the best solution for gamers AND developers.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Blackbond

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Uncharted did something using BD that isn't possible with DVD (as far as I know). Isn't that expanding gaming?
Avatar image for f50p90
f50p90

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#108 f50p90
Member since 2008 • 3767 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Blackbond

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Your in the minority. Tell that two all the Wii consumers who are eating up a certain waggle feature. Or a certain handheld with a dual screen feature. Hell even online play is a feature Sony isn't forcing you to watch blu rays, but they are giving you the feature. You can still watch DVDs. Just because you are the only person in the world who doesn't like movies doesnt mean Sony is forcing things on everyone
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Chutebox

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Uncharted did something using BD that isn't possible with DVD (as far as I know). Isn't that expanding gaming?

it would have been possible with DVD nextGen if HDDs are standard along with installable games. :)
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Blackbond

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Bluray does expand games. Bigger file sizes. ._.; Duh.

Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts
[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.Blackbond

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

I see you don't understand. It's like blaming mercedes for adding features that the honda civic doesn't have and driving up the price. You may not want those features, but it's a useless argument to believe that no one else does. It's not a trap it's a preference. Your just forcing your opinion that every console should be more like the "civic". BTW I don't want this to turn into a honda>mercedes argument. I just wanted to point out that different products are for different people.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
anyone else thinks this is a clear sign that Sony is NOT dropping the price anytime soon?.....
Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts
[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.Blackbond

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]And if I want to play games on PS3 and not deal with the cost of Blu-Ray then what? Oh yeah you get yours off hand for $200 like I did thats right. Let them use you guys for their format war. I'm just in it for the games not the movies.Blackbond

Then the product may not be for you. Using the word "force" on a piece of hardware doesn't make any sense. If you wan't an HD product then the PS3 is going to be the best choice. Fanboys try to make sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in thier hardware just because it's not cheaper.

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

You should have quit before when you were ... "ahead." ._.;;

Let me explain this to you in terms you can understand.

It's not a trojan horse because it is the system. The system uses bluray for its format. It's not sneaky at all. It says it right on there. Its advertised as a bluray player.

Does MS advertise the fact that you get to help support microsoft by paying for online? No. And the fact of the matter is, they're not comparable.

Do you understand? They're not comparable.

Choice of format and internet fees are two entirely different things.

You cannot compare them.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

I already own the product. And by buying that product I was forced to invest in Sony's trojan horse in Blu-Ray. How does the word force not make any sense? If I want an HD product then the PS3 is the best choice? Yay good for HD but I game in SD.

Fanboys try to make Sony seem so terrible for trying to offer great features in their hardware because its not cheaper. Yes just like the fanboys that try to make MS seem so terrible for offering an online gaming service with great features just because its not cheaper.

You both have been had and walked right into it. Thanks for playing

Dreams-Visions

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

cartridges cost more. that's why they moved to optical media. what NEEDS to happen is everyone needs to go back to DVD, but not to have games run from the DVD drive. rather, include massive HDDs and let us install every game fully like we can now with NXE.

THAT is the best solution for gamers AND developers.

I'd have no problem with that. But I like the BD drive because I love BD movies... But I have no problem installing games.
Avatar image for jakarai
jakarai

4289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#116 jakarai
Member since 2008 • 4289 Posts

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

Chutebox

Why do we need any format at all. Why don't we just download the 30gb games directly to our HDDs. :roll:

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?dark-warmachine

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again with this? DVD isn't required for gaming, CDs aren't required for gaming. Where do we draw the line? It's called expanding and adding new features. If you don't like BD that's fine and dandy, but that doesn't mean they are forcing it upon us.

Blackbond

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

More like a DVD equipped machine vs. a Bluray + DVD equipped machine.

Besides, can anyone provide proof that Bluray cannot potentially enhance gaming? Last time I checked, MGS4 was pretty big :|

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?dark-warmachine
kind of an odd question, don't you think? that's like asking why I bought my BMW if it meant I had to accept the DVD navigation system. is a DVD nav going to break my purchase? no...it's still a BMW. there are other things that outweigh the things that I might not want but will have to pay for as part of the deal. In the same way, sometimes you buy a console that has features you don't necessarially feel like you should have to pay extra for...but you do because there are other things that outweigh that cost that still make it worthwhile. get it?
Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts
anyone else thinks this is a clear sign that Sony is NOT dropping the price anytime soon?.....Dreams-Visions
lol yup. There's no way it's gonna happen soon :)
Avatar image for one_on_one
one_on_one

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 208

User Lists: 0

#121 one_on_one
Member since 2008 • 2368 Posts
Everyone knows that blu ray was a trojan horse. Blu ray benefit movies more than games. This is why we have multiplats on DVD and blu ray and most of the time the blu ray version needs to be installed. And speaking about benefits, to really benefit from blu ray you will need to upgrade to an HDTV. Add that to the hidden cost of the PS3.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

The cost of a DVD equipped gaming machine is cheaper then a Blu-Ray equipped gaming machine. Who cares about expanding new features. Expand new games please. And that goes for all platforms and devs.

Dreams-Visions
Uncharted did something using BD that isn't possible with DVD (as far as I know). Isn't that expanding gaming?

it would have been possible with DVD nextGen if HDDs are standard along with installable games. :)

Oh no you don't! Answer the question(ish)!
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

I see you don't understand. It's like blaming mercedes for adding features that the honda civic doesn't have and driving up the price. You may not want those features, but it's a useless argument to believe that no one else does. It's not a trap it's a preference. Your just forcing your opinion that every console should be more like the "civic". BTW I don't want this to turn into a honda>mercedes argument. I just wanted to point out that different products are for different people. TheOrigin

Car analogies don't ever work in SW we've gone over that in the 20+ page thread and I don't understand why people still use them.

I could have those features removed from the mercedes, buy it at a cheaper price and guess what. Its still going to do what it was built to do. And that's drive around.

Oh now we're going into I may not want those features but others may, that its preference. Yeah um well did you guys ever take the time to think that people opting to pay for XBL is also their choice and their preference?

I'm not forcing my opinion on anyone. If you guys are going to go on about XBL you might as well come to grips with Blu-Ray. That is the point and I'm sitting in the gufu irc wondering why you guys haven't realized that yet.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

Chutebox

cartridges cost more. that's why they moved to optical media. what NEEDS to happen is everyone needs to go back to DVD, but not to have games run from the DVD drive. rather, include massive HDDs and let us install every game fully like we can now with NXE.

THAT is the best solution for gamers AND developers.

I'd have no problem with that. But I like the BD drive because I love BD movies... But I have no problem installing games.

I hear you and agree. However, HDD installed games are better for both gamers and developers. HDD offers much faster read times than a BD drive or DVD drive, meaning faster loads. meaning devs can stream more things and do many more things with a game since it won't be limited by the disc media. and of course, we don't have to hear the drive spinning and everything can happen faster. I really, really hope MS or Sony moves to this solution nextGen. it really is the best direction to go in. I think MS is most likely, since NXE already does this...but I hope Sony does the same. It's the best scenario for us...and considering how cheap massive HDDs are now, it only makes sense.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Uncharted did something using BD that isn't possible with DVD (as far as I know). Isn't that expanding gaming?Chutebox
it would have been possible with DVD nextGen if HDDs are standard along with installable games. :)

Oh no you don't! Answer the question(ish)!

to answer the question: Idunno. :) I'd have to see the disc data. I remember when they announced Resistance 1 was like...16GB. then we found out that most of that was uncompressed Linear PCM sound. and and audio for 20 languages. If we took Uncharted as is, removed the junk code just sitting on the disc, and re-encoded the audio to a lossy format, could it fit on a DVD-9? I really don't know the answer to that. do you?
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts

[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?Blackbond

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]anyone else thinks this is a clear sign that Sony is NOT dropping the price anytime soon?.....anshul89
lol yup. There's no way it's gonna happen soon :)

it's almost a subtle not-so-subtle acknowledgment that the price is staying right at $399...and they're setting up a fort to defend the castle.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

You should have quit before when you were ... "ahead." ._.;;

Let me explain this to you in terms you can understand.

It's not a trojan horse because it is the system. The system uses bluray for its format. It's not sneaky at all. It says it right on there. Its advertised as a bluray player.

Does MS advertise the fact that you get to help support microsoft by paying for online? No. And the fact of the matter is, they're not comparable.

Do you understand? They're not comparable.

Choice of format and internet fees are two entirely different things.

You cannot compare them.

hakanakumono

I've been ahead, I'm always ahead, you aren't even out of the gate.

How is it not a trojan horse? Its a trojan horse implemented in every system so that Sony could win the format war. Its not sneaky at all? You don't think it was sneaky for Sony to straight gamble away their gaming division in hopes of winning the format war. Yeah okay man.

Does MS advertise the fact that you get to help support mS by paying for online? Why the hell would they need to? Any product you buy off of any company helps support them lol.

They are comparable. You complain about the price of XBL. I complain about the price of the inclusion of Blu-Ray. Hell I could complain about the price of the inclusion of Wifi too while I'm at it.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Again, the $50 is extra. BD is included in the system. Whether it's worth it or not doesn't matter since that's all opinion...

You know what, this is just stupid lol. Let's all go back to cartridges to make everyone happy for not being forced to buy into a new format for gaming.

jakarai

Why do we need any format at all. Why don't we just download the 30gb games directly to our HDDs. :roll:

Or we could have gotten the PS3 at $100 less with a DVD drive and install the games onto the HDD like we are doing anyways already :roll:

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"] cartridges cost more. that's why they moved to optical media. what NEEDS to happen is everyone needs to go back to DVD, but not to have games run from the DVD drive. rather, include massive HDDs and let us install every game fully like we can now with NXE.

THAT is the best solution for gamers AND developers.

Dreams-Visions
I'd have no problem with that. But I like the BD drive because I love BD movies... But I have no problem installing games.

I hear you and agree. However, HDD installed games are better for both gamers and developers. HDD offers much faster read times than a BD drive or DVD drive, meaning faster loads. meaning devs can stream more things and do many more things with a game since it won't be limited by the disc media. and of course, we don't have to hear the drive spinning and everything can happen faster. I really, really hope MS or Sony moves to this solution nextGen. it really is the best direction to go in. I think MS is most likely, since NXE already does this...but I hope Sony does the same. It's the best scenario for us...and considering how cheap massive HDDs are now, it only makes sense.

Seems that would really help the life of the laser in the systems too...Something Ps2 would have really benefited from!
Avatar image for f50p90
f50p90

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#131 f50p90
Member since 2008 • 3767 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?Chutebox

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation.

Agreed. dropped $600 way back when. That was $600 well spent.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?Chutebox

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation.

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts

sure guys, blame Sony for forcing Bluray upon us...

All MS did is sell you a machine with a 'forced upon' 35% failure rate, right? I mean, what's the hidden cost in that? :|

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"] it would have been possible with DVD nextGen if HDDs are standard along with installable games. :) Dreams-Visions
Oh no you don't! Answer the question(ish)!

to answer the question: Idunno. :) I'd have to see the disc data. I remember when they announced Resistance 1 was like...16GB. then we found out that most of that was uncompressed Linear PCM sound. and and audio for 20 languages. If we took Uncharted as is, removed the junk code just sitting on the disc, and re-encoded the audio to a lossy format, could it fit on a DVD-9? I really don't know the answer to that. do you?

I'm mainly referring to the constant streaming from the disc to eliminate all loading times, besides when you first start up the game of course.
Avatar image for f50p90
f50p90

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#135 f50p90
Member since 2008 • 3767 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

Blackbond

I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation.

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

Except for the fact that no one is agreeing with you and you seem to be the only person on the planet that has a personal vendetta against blu ray. If you were as true a gamer as you say you wouldn't let it bug you.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

Blackbond

I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation.

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

1. It's not a hidden cost, that's just silly. But it IS an added cost to the system. 2. You're beating nothing, and telling yourself that means nothing. You trying to decide what all gamers want is just laughable.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] I'd have no problem with that. But I like the BD drive because I love BD movies... But I have no problem installing games.Chutebox
I hear you and agree. However, HDD installed games are better for both gamers and developers. HDD offers much faster read times than a BD drive or DVD drive, meaning faster loads. meaning devs can stream more things and do many more things with a game since it won't be limited by the disc media. and of course, we don't have to hear the drive spinning and everything can happen faster. I really, really hope MS or Sony moves to this solution nextGen. it really is the best direction to go in. I think MS is most likely, since NXE already does this...but I hope Sony does the same. It's the best scenario for us...and considering how cheap massive HDDs are now, it only makes sense.

Seems that would really help the life of the laser in the systems too...Something Ps2 would have really benefited from!

it would. it's full of win. and with 1TB HDDs now at or less than $100, it only makes sense that nextGen will see the rise of HDD-installed games. ...and I can't wait for that.
Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?Blackbond

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

$200? Where did you get yours from and which version is it? And I thought I was lucky, I got the 60gig with BC a for almost $400 when originally it was $599.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Oh no you don't! Answer the question(ish)!Chutebox
to answer the question: Idunno. :) I'd have to see the disc data. I remember when they announced Resistance 1 was like...16GB. then we found out that most of that was uncompressed Linear PCM sound. and and audio for 20 languages. If we took Uncharted as is, removed the junk code just sitting on the disc, and re-encoded the audio to a lossy format, could it fit on a DVD-9? I really don't know the answer to that. do you?

I'm mainly referring to the constant streaming from the disc to eliminate all loading times, besides when you first start up the game of course.

oh! I'm not qualified to make that judgment. if you say only Blu-ray can do that, I'll just have to take your word for it.
Avatar image for TheOrigin
TheOrigin

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 TheOrigin
Member since 2004 • 2006 Posts

[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]I see you don't understand. It's like blaming mercedes for adding features that the honda civic doesn't have and driving up the price. You may not want those features, but it's a useless argument to believe that no one else does. It's not a trap it's a preference. Your just forcing your opinion that every console should be more like the "civic". BTW I don't want this to turn into a honda>mercedes argument. I just wanted to point out that different products are for different people. Blackbond

Car analogies don't ever work in SW we've gone over that in the 20+ page thread and I don't understand why people still use them.

I could have those features removed from the mercedes, buy it at a cheaper price and guess what. Its still going to do what it was built to do. And that's drive around.

Oh now we're going into I may not want those features but others may, that its preference. Yeah um well did you guys ever take the time to think that people opting to pay for XBL is also their choice and their preference?

I'm not forcing my opinion on anyone. If you guys are going to go on about XBL you might as well come to grips with Blu-Ray. That is the point and I'm sitting in the gufu irc wondering why you guys haven't realized that yet.

They may not work in SW but it still puts it in perspective. It doesn't matter it could have been any 2 products as an analogy. I also wasn't arguing about what you "COULD" do with a mercedes. I was pointing out that it's 2 serperate product that we are comparing. Extra features aren't trojan horses, they are just that features. Blu-ray comes with the PS3.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]Then why did you buy a ps3 if you feel so strongly about blu ray being included? That's pretty stupid if you ask me. You weren't forced to buy it or were you?:?dark-warmachine

Because I'm a gamer. Look at my webcasts and look at my multitudes of consoles and games. I spent $200 for my PS3. I feel badly for those of you who had to put up with the trojan horse blu-ray cost. A cost us gamers should have never had to pay in the first place.

$200? Where did you get yours from and which version is it? And I thought I was lucky, I got the 60gig with BC a for almost $400 when originally it was $599.

I got my 60GB at launch. :( but I could resell it anytime at the same price I paid since people are desperate for full b/c. and I don't blame them.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation. f50p90

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

Except for the fact that no one is agreeing with you and you seem to be the only person on the planet that has a personal vendetta against blu ray. If you were as true a gamer as you say you wouldn't let it bug you.

So do you want me to call all of GUFU in here to show you that people agree with me? Would that make you happy? I'm in the GUFU IRC right now. If you're only argument is that a bunch of pro-Sony posters preaching to me about Blu-Ray while getting on XBL claiming nobody is agreeing with me is your only defense then I shall gladly tear through it like tissue paper.

I'm in the GUFU IRC. The boys are only a message away.

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

You should have quit before when you were ... "ahead." ._.;;

Let me explain this to you in terms you can understand.

It's not a trojan horse because it is the system. The system uses bluray for its format. It's not sneaky at all. It says it right on there. Its advertised as a bluray player.

Does MS advertise the fact that you get to help support microsoft by paying for online? No. And the fact of the matter is, they're not comparable.

Do you understand? They're not comparable.

Choice of format and internet fees are two entirely different things.

You cannot compare them.

Blackbond

I've been ahead, I'm always ahead, you aren't even out of the gate.

How is it not a trojan horse? Its a trojan horse implemented in every system so that Sony could win the format war. Its not sneaky at all? You don't think it was sneaky for Sony to straight gamble away their gaming division in hopes of winning the format war. Yeah okay man.

Does MS advertise the fact that you get to help support mS by paying for online? Why the hell would they need to? Any product you buy off of any company helps support them lol.

They are comparable. You complain about the price of XBL. I complain about the price of the inclusion of Blu-Ray. Hell I could complain about the price of the inclusion of Wifi too while I'm at it.

Mhmmm. :roll: Of course you are. Meanwhile everyone else tries to explain to you ...

Its not a trojan horse because they weren't sneaky about it. They advertised the fact that it uses bluray. ._.;

Yes they pushed for bluray with it. But they weren't sneaky about it. They were pretty blatant about the PS3 and bluray going hand in hand it to the future sony would be making.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

sure guys, blame Sony for forcing Bluray upon us...

All MS did is sell you a machine with a 'forced upon' 35% failure rate, right? I mean, what's the hidden cost in that? :|

leadernator

Well it costs MS a couple billion I believe.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="TheOrigin"]I see you don't understand. It's like blaming mercedes for adding features that the honda civic doesn't have and driving up the price. You may not want those features, but it's a useless argument to believe that no one else does. It's not a trap it's a preference. Your just forcing your opinion that every console should be more like the "civic". BTW I don't want this to turn into a honda>mercedes argument. I just wanted to point out that different products are for different people. TheOrigin

Car analogies don't ever work in SW we've gone over that in the 20+ page thread and I don't understand why people still use them.

I could have those features removed from the mercedes, buy it at a cheaper price and guess what. Its still going to do what it was built to do. And that's drive around.

Oh now we're going into I may not want those features but others may, that its preference. Yeah um well did you guys ever take the time to think that people opting to pay for XBL is also their choice and their preference?

I'm not forcing my opinion on anyone. If you guys are going to go on about XBL you might as well come to grips with Blu-Ray. That is the point and I'm sitting in the gufu irc wondering why you guys haven't realized that yet.

They may not work in SW but it still puts it in perspective. It doesn't matter it could have been any 2 products as an analogy. I also wasn't arguing about what you "COULD" do with a mercedes. I was pointing out that it's 2 serperate product that we are comparing. Extra features aren't trojan horses, they are just that features. Blu-ray comes with the PS3.

no, blu-ray was a trojan horse. A trojan horse specifically tasked with the goal of helping Sony win the format war. believing they put blu-ray in consoles for the benefit of GAMERS is folly. They sold it to gamers as an advantage for games, but the truth is that it was all about the movie war and Sony's desire to win it, creating a cash cow (royalties) that could last them a decade.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51577 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"] I hear you and agree. However, HDD installed games are better for both gamers and developers. HDD offers much faster read times than a BD drive or DVD drive, meaning faster loads. meaning devs can stream more things and do many more things with a game since it won't be limited by the disc media. and of course, we don't have to hear the drive spinning and everything can happen faster. I really, really hope MS or Sony moves to this solution nextGen. it really is the best direction to go in. I think MS is most likely, since NXE already does this...but I hope Sony does the same. It's the best scenario for us...and considering how cheap massive HDDs are now, it only makes sense.Dreams-Visions
Seems that would really help the life of the laser in the systems too...Something Ps2 would have really benefited from!

it would. it's full of win. and with 1TB HDDs now at or less than $100, it only makes sense that nextGen will see the rise of HDD-installed games. ...and I can't wait for that.

Yea, that would be completely awesome. But I still want BD in it damnit! Shouldn't be a problem though, cost is really dropping for it.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="f50p90"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

Blackbond

Except for the fact that no one is agreeing with you and you seem to be the only person on the planet that has a personal vendetta against blu ray. If you were as true a gamer as you say you wouldn't let it bug you.

So do you want me to call all of GUFU in here to show you that people agree with me? Would that make you happy? I'm in the GUFU IRC right now. If you're only argument is that a bunch of pro-Sony posters preaching to me about Blu-Ray while getting on XBL claiming nobody is agreeing with me is your only defense then I shall gladly tear through it like tissue paper.

I'm in the GUFU IRC. The boys are only a message away.

If these people at GUFU IRC actually use logic and comprehend such things as logical comparisons then you're free to bring up logical points.

Everyone may agree with you on that IRC, but your logic falls short in front of people who can see through it.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="leadernator"]

sure guys, blame Sony for forcing Bluray upon us...

All MS did is sell you a machine with a 'forced upon' 35% failure rate, right? I mean, what's the hidden cost in that? :|

Blackbond

Well it costs MS a couple billion I believe.

correct. and leadernator, that was rather intellectually dishonest of you to suppose that they planned to have a high failure rate. and your failure rate % makes you look desperate. If you can't see the difference between RROD (unintended) and blu-ray (plotted and planned), I don't know what else there is to talk about.
Avatar image for SeanBond
SeanBond

2136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 SeanBond
Member since 2003 • 2136 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] I'm sorry dude but get off your high horse. Since when do you decide what's good for "us gamers"? I bought the 60GB right away and would do so again in a heart beat given the same situation. f50p90

Since when do you guys decided that XBL is a hidden cost ect? Yeah get off my high horse? I'm just beating you guys at your own game and enjoying it.

Except for the fact that no one is agreeing with you and you seem to be the only person on the planet that has a personal vendetta against blu ray. If you were as true a gamer as you say you wouldn't let it bug you.

..Well, I happen to love blu-ray, but I do agree that from a gaming perspective it was sleazy of Sony to throw it in their machine. They had to know it wasn't particularly beneficial to gaming at the moment (yessssss uncompressed 7.1 lossless HD audio!), but they put it in, ran into production issues and jacked up the price of their console, all for blu-ray. They didn't do this in part to win the format war? I highly doubt that. I bought a PS3 as a blu-ray player, and I hardly play games on it at all (I mostly play my 360 if it comes to that); if I bought the system for $600 WITHOUT the intent to use it as a blu-ray player, I'd be fairly annoyed at how much I was paying to get a similar experience to what those gaming on the 360 are getting for cheaper. But that's just me.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] Seems that would really help the life of the laser in the systems too...Something Ps2 would have really benefited from!Chutebox
it would. it's full of win. and with 1TB HDDs now at or less than $100, it only makes sense that nextGen will see the rise of HDD-installed games. ...and I can't wait for that.

Yea, that would be completely awesome. But I still want BD in it damnit! Shouldn't be a problem though, cost is really dropping for it.

I have no doubt Sony would support both. installable games from BD discs. that will be awesome too, because as you said, it would preserve the life of the BD laser...which always worries me with my PS3.