Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?

  • 136 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#51 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts
@princeofshapeir said:

bloodborne

and uncharted 4 has great gameplay

Only good PS4 exclsuive

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

@FastRobby:

I love it when butthurt fanboys try to make it out like their "jaded" opinion hold just as much, if not more water that the professional reviews, especially speaking in terms of general opinion. LOL.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts

Bloodborne, Uncharted 4, TLOU to name but a few of the world class gaming experiences available on gen leading PS4.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us PS4 fans for titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as 1 of his examples of "amazing gameplay.

@Juub1990 said:

Let's hear em.

...

Xbox has some games that play pretty amazing and that often get lauded for their gameplay. Gears of War...

Gears of War gameplay summary.....

Loading Video...

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

............

lol THIS is his example of "amazing gameplay"!

Trying to pass off average MS games as something amazing to discredit Sony games is an old and tired xbot routine.

When Juub1990 thinks ^ Gears of War has "amazing" gameplay...

...is there anything left really to discuss with this clown on the subject of gameplay regarding (forget Sony) any game?

XBOT DISMISSED!

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@casharmy said:

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us for PS4 titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as having "amazing" gameplay.

Gears of War gameplay summary.....

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

............

lol THIS is his example of "amazing gameplay"!

Trying to pass off average MS games as something amazing to discredit Sony games is an old and tired xbot routine.

When Juub1990 thinks ^ Gears of War has "amazing" gameplay...

...is there anything left really to discuss with this clown on the subject of gameplay regarding (forget Sony) any game?

XBOT DISMISSED!

Do you see the hypocrisy there? You accused me of not having played TLOU yet I can prove I own and beat both that and GOW4. All you have is a biased review from a no-name guy on youtube.

Idiot. You've never played GOW4 and you have the nerves to say I never played TLOU.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#57 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@casharmy said:

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us PS4 fans for titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as 1 of his examples of "amazing gameplay.

@Juub1990 said:

Let's hear em.

...

Xbox has some games that play pretty amazing and that often get lauded for their gameplay. Gears of War...

Gears of War gameplay summary.....

Loading Video...

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

............

lol THIS is his example of "amazing gameplay"!

Trying to pass off average MS games as something amazing to discredit Sony games is an old and tired xbot routine.

When Juub1990 thinks ^ Gears of War has "amazing" gameplay...

...is there anything left really to discuss with this clown on the subject of gameplay regarding (forget Sony) any game?

XBOT DISMISSED!

What difficulty did you finish GOW4 on?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@kvally He never even played it yet he's talking shit about it and is bold enough to accuse people of not having played the game he defends when they did. Hypocrisy and complete idiocy. What a fool is @casharmy.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#59 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@casharmy said:

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us for PS4 titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as having "amazing" gameplay.

Gears of War gameplay summary.....

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

............

lol THIS is his example of "amazing gameplay"!

Trying to pass off average MS games as something amazing to discredit Sony games is an old and tired xbot routine.

When Juub1990 thinks ^ Gears of War has "amazing" gameplay...

...is there anything left really to discuss with this clown on the subject of gameplay regarding (forget Sony) any game?

XBOT DISMISSED!

Do you see the hypocrisy there? You accused me of not having played TLOU yet I can prove I own and beat both that and GOW4. All you have is a biased review from a no-name guy on youtube.

Idiot. You've never played GOW4 and you have the nerves to say I never played TLOU.

It's funny that he posts that, but when the game has a review from Level publication that says "Brutal action, addictive multiplayer, shredded bodies and stunning visuals. Developers from The Coalition showed that they belong among the leaders in this field. The fourth part of Gears of War can only be recommended. 100/100

or

Gears of War 4 delivers a solid entertainment experience. Supported by a great multiplayer and cooperative modes as well as an amazing campaign, the game only falls short on its script and character development. Horde 3.0 is awesome and deep, the new multiplayer modes are fun and the history feels like a 3D Contra game. Leaving other minor technical setbacks aside, Xbox One users can't go wrong with this one. 93/100

PS fans DISS-missed.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#60 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@kvally He never even played it yet he's talking shit about it and is bold enough to accuse people of not having played the game he defends when they did. Hypocrisy and complete idiocy. What a fool is @casharmy.

Wait, wut? He hasn't even played it? BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA

He needs to GTFO. That is fucking hilarious!

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

The gameplay is subjective. But Sony having exclusives isn't. Or is this some twilight zone level hyperbole?

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts
@sts106mat said:

and this coming from one such as yourself who bashes the witcher 3 lol.

Wait wait, he also bashes Witcher 3?

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#63 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:
@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

The gameplay is subjective. But Sony having exclusives isn't. Or is this some twilight zone level hyperbole?

Agreed, gameplay is subjective. Sony having exclusives isn't, I agree. Just like Microsoft having exclusives isn't subjective. However, PS fans say they don't, so I am just agreeing with them for the sake of making it easy to carry on discussions. So at this time, until the rules change apparently neither have exclusives (not my rule).

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

@kvally said:
@AdobeArtist said:
@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

The gameplay is subjective. But Sony having exclusives isn't. Or is this some twilight zone level hyperbole?

Agreed, gameplay is subjective. Sony having exclusives isn't, I agree. Just like Microsoft having exclusives isn't subjective. However, PS fans say they don't, so I am just agreeing with them for the sake of making it easy to carry on discussions. So at this time, until the rules change apparently neither have exclusives (not my rule).

Ahhh, so fighting fire with fire then. Well done ;)

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@Juub1990:

lol you praised Gears of War for gameplay but said TLOU has shit gameplay that 's all I need. NO CREDIBILITY CONFIRMED.

Even if you did play TLOU then that makes you a pathetic lying fanboy desperate to downplay games that aren't on your preferred gaming platform.

ALSO...

The person who did that review is a PC GAMER!

Not a Sony fanboy rodent brain. He has 0 loyalties to Sony and would actually lean more toward MS than anytihng...You just hate he didn't spill the same nonsense you did.

Don't get butthurt and mad because he didn't regurgitate your idiotic xbot monologue. He gave and honest objective opinion on a game he played that you tired to praise for gameplay as amazing, and he pretty much said it's shit and if you're an absolute moron who has 0 gaming ability you will love it...well that actually describes you perfectly.

That guy doesn't jive with either console and gave it to us straight, you're the one sitting on SYSTEM WARS trying to hype up average scoring MS games as having AMAZING GAMEPLAYZ haha.

FOH!

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@casharmy said:

@Juub1990:

lol you praised Gears of War for gameplay but said TLOU has shit gameplay that 's all I need. NO CREDIBILITY.

Even if you did play TLOU then that makes you a pathetic lying fanboy desperate to downplay games that aren't on your preferred gaming platform.

ALSO...

The person who did that review is a PC GAMER!

Not a Sony fanboy you dumbass imbecile. He has 0 loyalties to Sony and would actually lean more toward MS than anytihng...You just hate he didn't spill the same nonsense you did.

Don't get butthurt and mad because he didn't regurgitate your idiotic xbot monologue. He gave and honest objective opinion on a game he played that you tired to praise for gameplay as amazing, and he pretty much told us if you're an idiot who has 0 gaming ability you will love it...well that actually describes you perfectly.

That guy doesn't jive with either console and gave it to us straight, you're the one sitting on SYSTEM WARS trying to hype up average scoring MS games as having AMAZING GAMEPLAYZ haha.

FOH!

And I stand by what I said. The controls in Gears are tighter, the aiming system is better, the weapons are more original and more viable and it's actually worth a lick competitively. The fact that there are major tournaments for it speaks volume about the quality of its gameplay. The balance, the maps, the guns, the intricacy. TLOU doesn't come close to that. That's why you'll never or almost never see it sponsored in major gaming tournaments. Its gameplay blows.

Yes so he is a PC gamer so he can't be biased lol? If at least he was an Xbox gamer you'd have a point.

"Honest and objective opinion" yeah that's probably why Gears scored an 85 across the board and he's saying it ain't worth your time. His review is extremely biased and lazy.

But why are we talking? I played both games so I have the right to talk about how they compare to one another. You're a Sony fanboy who selectively picks reviews. How about the hundreds of other reviews that praise the gameplay of Gears of War? Are you gonna ignore them in favor of a single youtube guy? Kvally just posted the summary of a review from another more reputable website. Why not rely on it instead?

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#67 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@casharmy said:

@Juub1990:

lol you praised Gears of War for gameplay but said TLOU has shit gameplay that 's all I need. NO CREDIBILITY CONFIRMED.

Even if you did play TLOU then that makes you a pathetic lying fanboy desperate to downplay games that aren't on your preferred gaming platform.

ALSO...

The person who did that review is a PC GAMER!

Not a Sony fanboy rodent brain. He has 0 loyalties to Sony and would actually lean more toward MS than anytihng...You just hate he didn't spill the same nonsense you did.

Don't get butthurt and mad because he didn't regurgitate your idiotic xbot monologue. He gave and honest objective opinion on a game he played that you tired to praise for gameplay as amazing, and he pretty much said it's shit and if you're an absolute moron who has 0 gaming ability you will love it...well that actually describes you perfectly.

That guy doesn't jive with either console and gave it to us straight, you're the one sitting on SYSTEM WARS trying to hype up average scoring MS games as having AMAZING GAMEPLAYZ haha.

FOH!

What difficulty did you please GOW4 at?

Avatar image for pdogg93
pdogg93

1849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68  Edited By pdogg93
Member since 2015 • 1849 Posts

@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

What is wrong with you? Can you not contribute without lying all the time? Sony doesn't have exclusives??? Jesus Christ CucKvally.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#69  Edited By kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@pdogg93 said:
@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

What is wrong with you? Can you not contribute without lying all the time? Sony doesn't have exclusives??? Jesus Christ man.

Calm down son, don't be mad.

Avatar image for dakur
Dakur

3275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 Dakur
Member since 2014 • 3275 Posts

@kvally said:
@AdobeArtist said:
@kvally said:

"Sony exclusives with compelling gameplay?"

Let's look at that title for a second...and let it sink in. How can you start a thread about Sony exclusives (which they don't have) with compelling gameplay (which they don't have) and then expect a decent conversation?

The gameplay is subjective. But Sony having exclusives isn't. Or is this some twilight zone level hyperbole?

Agreed, gameplay is subjective. Sony having exclusives isn't, I agree. Just like Microsoft having exclusives isn't subjective. However, PS fans say they don't, so I am just agreeing with them for the sake of making it easy to carry on discussions. So at this time, until the rules change apparently neither have exclusives (not my rule).

But xbone not having exclusives is not subjective, unlike the PS4 not having exclusives, since all xbone so called exclusives are going to PC. TLHBO

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

... TLOU doesn't come close to that. That's why you'll never or almost never see it sponsored in major gaming tournaments. Its gameplay blows.

....

"Honest and objective opinion" yeah that's probably why Gears scored an 85 across the board and he's saying it ain't worth your time. His review is extremely biased and lazy.

But why are we talking? ...

LMAO...YOU ARE SELF OWNED! Is anyone else reading this shit?

Really dude?

let's take you own words throw them back at you and prove you're a complete biased hypocrite and raging MS fanboy.

Lets just examine what you said kiddo...

So first you go from....

"Honest and objective opinion" yeah that's probably why Gears scored an *85 across the board* and he's saying it ain't worth your time. His review is extremely *biased* and lazy."

then we go to YOU saying....

"... TLOU doesn't come close to that. .... Its gameplay blows."

wait what?

You do know TLOU is rated 95 across the board and take shit dumps on Gears of War's 85 on all levels of critical acclaim with gameplay being no exception...but YOU said it's gameplay was shit?

Some funny stuff, after defending Gears with critical review scores and saying the PC gamers review was biased (based on NOTHING) in the same breath YOU'RE also telling us..The Last of Us gameplay blows/is shit...but you're not biased? WOWOWOWOWO lmao. FANBOY HYPOCRISY OVERLOAD!!!!!

FACT CHECK IDIOT

The Last of Us has an overall...95% rating across the board!

Lets input the last of us into your quote instead of gears and see how that plays out with your bashing...

"..yeah that's probably why TLOU scored an 95 across the board and juub1990 saying it ain't blows and shit. His review is extremely biased and lazy."

There I put your criticisms of that reviewer in the context of what YOU are doing with TLOU and it's pretty damn funny.

Speaking of bias and critical reception......

Top 5 Most Awarded Video Games of All Time

THE LAST OF US

"The game went on to receiving 195 nominations across various publications and award cremonies. Of that 195, Naught Dog walked home with 122 awards, including being nominated for seven awards at the Spike VGX 2013, where the game took home four of the prizes. The Last of Us still stands as the most awarded game in history."

http://n4g.com/news/1885295/top-5-most-awarded-video-games-of-all-time

So the question is...who the **** are YOU!

A biased xbot fanboy posting his delusional opinions on System Wars...SYSETM WARS! You are an authority on NOTHING! Your opinion is credible for peanuts.

just Shut the hell up. Your hypocritical posts and stupidity is reaching beyond system wars fanboy levels now.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#73 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@dakur: But ps4 not having exclusives is not subjective, unlike the xbox not having exclusives, since all ps4 so called exclusives are going to PS Pro. REKT

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@casharmy said:

LMAO...YOU ARE SELF OWNED! Is anyone else reading this shit?

Really dude?

let's take you own words throw them back at you and prove you're a complete biased hypocrite and raging MS fanboy.

Lets just examine what you said kiddo...

So first you go from....

"Honest and objective opinion" yeah that's probably why Gears scored an *85 across the board* and he's saying it ain't worth your time. His review is extremely *biased* and lazy."

then and go to YOU saying....

"... TLOU doesn't come close to that. .... Its gameplay blows."

wait what?

But after defending Gears with critical review scores and saying the PC gamers review was biased (based on NOTHING) in the same breath YOU'RE also telling us..The Last of Us gameplay blows/is shit...but you're not biased? WOWOWOWOWO lmao. FANBOY HYPOCRISY OVERLOAD!!!!!

FACT CHECK IDIOT

The Last of Us has an overall...95% rating across the board!

Lets input the last of us into your quote instead of gears and see how that plays out with your bashing...

"..yeah that's probably why TLOU scored an 95 across the board and juub1990 saying it ain't blows and shit. His review is extremely biased and lazy."

There I put your criticisms of that reviewer in the context of what YOU are doing with TLOU and it's pretty damn funny.

Speaking of bias and critical reception......

Top 5 Most Awarded Video Games of All Time

THE LAST OF US

"The game went on to receiving 195 nominations across various publications and award cremonies. Of that 195, Naught Dog walked home with 122 awards, including being nominated for seven awards at the Spike VGX 2013, where the game took home four of the prizes. The Last of Us still stands as the most awarded game in history."

http://n4g.com/news/1885295/top-5-most-awarded-video-games-of-all-time

So the question is...who the **** are YOU!

A biased xbot fanboy posting his delusional opinions on System Wars...SYSETM WARS! You are an authority on NOTHING! Your opinion is credible for

just Shut the hell up. Your hypocritical posts and stupidity is reaching beyond system wars fanboy levels now.

Never said TLOU was a bad game. I said the gameplay is bad. Learn to read. The story, atmosphere, graphics, acting and presentation are top notch. It's still overall a very good experience. Gears of War 4 has a mediocre story, decent enough graphics, corny characters so how did it score an 85? Solely because of its gameplay. The entire game's merit rests on its gameplay. The same cannot be said for TLOU which has a forgettable gameplay at best.

Why do you think MLG organizes tournaments for GOW4 with prize pools in the tens of thousands of dollars? Because it is a viable competitive game and for that you need a strong gameplay backed by a strong community. If a game has poor gameplay, is unbalanced or simply not viable, the community will not back it up and it'll never fare well competitively. Gears of War 4 is widely considered one of the best action third person shooters when it comes to multiplayer, solely because of its gameplay. The same cannot be said for TLOU. It has lots of quality but gameplay isn't its strong suit and it doesn't come close to Gears of War as demonstrated by what game stays relevant for longer and is more played online and in tournaments.

I mean why am I arguing? You're uneducated when it comes to Gears so what are you talking about lol? You admitted you haven't played it so why are you talking about it?

Avatar image for thepclovingguy
thepclovingguy

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 thepclovingguy
Member since 2016 • 2059 Posts

PS4 fanboys can't tell the difference between gameplay and cutscenes.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

8126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By judaspete
Member since 2005 • 8126 Posts

I like Motorstorm, Starhawk, and Twisted Metal quite a bit.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@Juub1990:

Just shut the **** up.

Saying the gameplay of 95 TLOU is bad while trying defend Gears gameply in the same breath because of it's 85 rating, man what a hypocritical idiot you are.

I got no paitencts to listen to your stupidty. You can't even keep your damned argument points in check. You all over the place.

Again, who the hell are you but an idiot xbot posting on SYSTEM WARS to claim The Last of Us (one of the top 5 most awared games of ALL TIME) has gameplay that is and I quote, "blows" "is shit"?

GTFOH

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#78 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@casharmy: What difficulty did you please GOW4 at?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@casharmy said:

@Juub1990:

Just shut the **** up.

Saying the gameplay of TLOU is bad while trying defend Gears gameply in the same breath because of it's 85 rating, man what a hypocritical idiot.

I got no paitencts to listen to your stupidty. You can't even keep your damned argument points in check.

Again, who the hell are you but an idiot xbot posting on SYSTEM WARS to claim The Last of Us (one of the top 5 most awared games of ALL TIME) has gameplay that is and I quote, "blows" "is shit"?

GTFOH

Someone who has played unlike you who hasn't played Gears of War as he admitted. One of us is clearly educated and the other one is a complete fool whose entire argument rests on a single video of a biased no name youtuber.

Arguing a score in a vacuum is pointless you witless fool. The Witcher 3's gameplay is pretty rad yet it is critically acclaimed. Its strength lies in its content, narrative, graphics, exploration and quests. The combat is average to poor. The RPG mechanics are bare-bones. For its gameplay alone it simply isn't very good. Same for TLOU. I played both TLOU and Gears of War 4. I know where both games shine and come up short.

My claim that Gears of War has stronger gameplay is backed by its competitive popularity. Creating a good metagame that stays relevant for years is extremely difficult and the fact that the community plays Gears competitively is a testament to the quality of its gameplay. That's more telling than any review score from a bunch of people which is frankly laziness on your part. You simply point to Metacritic and biased youtubers and cannot form an opinion of your own that is backed up by anything relevant. You just point to reviews and say "see I am right". Weren't you a big fan of fighting games? If so then you should know what I'm talking about when it comes to Gears vs TLOU. If the gameplay was better than Gears of War, where is the community? Where are the tournaments? Where is the metagame? Where are the pros who have in-depth strategies? None of that can be found simply because its shallow gameplay doesn't compare to Gears. It sold 7M, is one of the most awarded games ever yet it cannot be found in credible tournaments? Why is that? Perhaps because it is not viable competitively due to its...gameplay?!?!

Don't be ignorant on purpose. The worst isn't that you're ignorant. It's that you are convinced you are right and refuse to listen those more educated than you when it comes to what we are discussing.

Stay mad. Idiot.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@kvally said:

@casharmy: What difficulty did you please GOW4 at?

For the last time he's never played it. That's why he's been dodging the question lol. He doesn't know what he is talking about.

Avatar image for jasonredemption
jasonredemption

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 17

#81 jasonredemption
Member since 2010 • 691 Posts

Well as someone who has both a PS4 and an Xbox One I would say in the gameplay department:

Motorstorm Series (controls might feel a little loose but it nails that off-roading-racing feel)

Modnation Racers (more strategic and deep than any Mario Kart)

inFamous Series (good stories but better gameplay)

Sly Cooper Series (funny games and great gameplay)

The Last of Us (better gameplay loop than any of the Uncharted games)

Uncharted 4 (best feeling gameplay loop out of the Uncharted games)

Resogun / Superstardust (great gameplay with NO story)

Ratchet and Clank / Jack and Daxter (not my cup of tea but I know plenty of people love them)

Resistance 3 (good story but perfected FPS gameplay)

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#82 pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 9525 Posts

Ah I love SW. Where opinions are facts and facts are subjective.

@thepclovingguy said:

PS4 fanboys can't tell the difference between gameplay and cutscenes.

lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#83  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

Infamous games have great gameplay especially Second Son, Uncharted 4 has great gameplay (people who say its just QTE and cinematic flash over substance or never actually played it or its bullshitting), Demon's Souls STARTED all the souls games and was co-developed by Sony Japan, Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, The Last of Us has good gameplay, Gran Turismo has great gameplay, etc, etc, etc...

All this "Sony games are all flash and no substance" is bullsh*t of the highest grade...

I wonder, was this thread made over the butthurt The Last Guardian is getting well received? I'm gonna say yes

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#84  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@Pray_to_me said:

The best part about PS4 is how it serves Lemming buttmeat medium rare every day.

lol nice

The butthurt over TLG 9/10 is real ;D

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#85 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@thepclovingguy said:

PS4 fanboys can't tell the difference between gameplay and cutscenes.

lol nice

Avatar image for thepclovingguy
thepclovingguy

2059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 thepclovingguy
Member since 2016 • 2059 Posts

@kvally said:
@thepclovingguy said:

PS4 fanboys can't tell the difference between gameplay and cutscenes.

lol nice

For them a quicktime event is considered gameplay.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@grungeman91 said:

The Last of Us: Remastered, Uncharted 4, Until Dawn, Resogun, Bloodborne and The Last Guardian.

After watching the 2016 Playstation Experience the other day. 2017 and the future is shaping up to be even brighter for exclusives.

I said gameplay. Do you know what that is?

It actually seems you dont if you think TLOU and U4 dont have compelling gameplay. I've played and beat heavy gameplay based games (DMC, Vanquish, Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden, DOOM, Souls games, etc, etc), some on their respective highest difficulties so I'm safe to say I know what gameplay is. Both TLOU and U4 have good gameplay. Who says otherwise hasnt really played the games and is just jumping on the bandwaggon of stupid fanboys who say these games are "movies and not games" just because they're cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Being cinematic does not mean the gameplay isnt there. Rise of the Tomb raider is cinematic but I can bet xbox fanboys didnt called it a movie when it was an exclusive... hypocrisy at its finest

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#88 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@thepclovingguy said:
@kvally said:
@thepclovingguy said:

PS4 fanboys can't tell the difference between gameplay and cutscenes.

lol nice

For them a quicktime event is considered gameplay.

Avatar image for deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d
deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d
Member since 2015 • 745 Posts
@casharmy said:

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us PS4 fans for titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as 1 of his examples of "amazing gameplay.

@Juub1990 said:

Let's hear em.

...

Xbox has some games that play pretty amazing and that often get lauded for their gameplay. Gears of War...

Loading Video...

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

Damn, that review is so spot on. Gears was always trash and that they still stick to that shit formula in 2016 is so baffling to me. Good thing that Trash 4 flopped commercially and critically.

Also lol @Juub1990 for still trying to push his shitty taste.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

Uncharted 4 has pretty great gunplay, it's a shame it feels like half the game is walking/climbing.

TLOU gameplay compliments the game quite well. It's not the tightest third person gunplay around but that's not what it's aiming for.

Bloodborne has tight mechanics and the fast paced nature serves it well.

Other than that this gen I'm not really a fan of a lot of their output. KZ was a major step down from last generation, drive club was simply serviceable rather than being actually good and their other released games either don't interest me or I haven't gotten around to playing them yet.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@Vatusus said:

It actually seems you dont if you think TLOU and U4 dont have compelling gameplay. I've played and beat heavy gameplay based games (DMC, Vanquish, Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden, DOOM, Souls games, etc, etc), some on their respective highest difficulties so I'm safe to say I know what gameplay is. Both TLOU and U4 have good gameplay. Who says otherwise hasnt really played the games and is just jumping on the bandwaggon of stupid fanboys who say these games are "movies and not games" just because they're cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Being cinematic does not mean the gameplay isnt there. Rise of the Tomb raider is cinematic but I can bet xbox fanboys didnt called it a movie when it was an exclusive... hypocrisy at its finest

Their gameplay is at best functional. Nothing good about it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#92  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@casharmy said:

Hey guys...Juub1990 is here telling us TLOU has "shit gameplay" when people posted that as a reply to his therad, but in his OP was asking us for PS4 titles that have compelling gameplay and listed Gear of War as having "amazing" gameplay.

Gears of War gameplay summary.....

"It is the ULTIMATE in moronic gameplay!

"It is Perfect, if you are a fucking moron incapable of dodging, incapable of aiming, incapable of getting out of the way, incapable of tactics, incapable of anything...if you need a game to just take a hold you by the hand and say "hide behind there, pull this, push that, shoot that...this is the game for you"

............

lol THIS is his example of "amazing gameplay"!

Trying to pass off average MS games as something amazing to discredit Sony games is an old and tired xbot routine.

When Juub1990 thinks ^ Gears of War has "amazing" gameplay...

...is there anything left really to discuss with this clown on the subject of gameplay regarding (forget Sony) any game?

XBOT DISMISSED!

Do you see the hypocrisy there? You accused me of not having played TLOU yet I can prove I own and beat both that and GOW4. All you have is a biased review from a no-name guy on youtube.

Idiot. You've never played GOW4 and you have the nerves to say I never played TLOU.

Just because you played both does not mean you know what good gameplay is. I played Gears 1 on PC, even have a review of it from many years ago see http://www.gamespot.com/gears-of-war/user-reviews/2200-129870/

you can see the date in it to know I'm not bullshitting. No sane person would ever think Gears has better gameplay than TLOU. Gears is just your run of the mill 3rd person shooter with cover based mechanics. It was new at the time but the gameplay has been proven to be flawed by dmenading you to be constantly in cover. Now put that basic as all hell concept against U4 and TLOU:

In both U4 and TLOU you can aproach a situation both stealthly or guns blazzing. In gears you can only guns blazzing.

In both U4 and TLOU you have some wide open areas that let you tackle your aproach from multiple angles. In gears you have linear levels after linear levels. Walk, kill bad guys rinse and repeat ad nauseam

In Uncharted games you have verticality. In Gears you dont.

In Gears you are forced to find cover and enemies often do the same. That makes its gameplay some kind of wack-a-mole thingy, i.e. wait for enemies to stop hiding from cover and shoot. Again, rinse and repeat ad nauseam. In U4 enemies come to you, grenades fly all over the place, the game literally demands you to be constantly moving.

I think its obvious who actually has the better gameplay out of these...

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#93  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Vatusus said:

It actually seems you dont if you think TLOU and U4 dont have compelling gameplay. I've played and beat heavy gameplay based games (DMC, Vanquish, Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden, DOOM, Souls games, etc, etc), some on their respective highest difficulties so I'm safe to say I know what gameplay is. Both TLOU and U4 have good gameplay. Who says otherwise hasnt really played the games and is just jumping on the bandwaggon of stupid fanboys who say these games are "movies and not games" just because they're cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Being cinematic does not mean the gameplay isnt there. Rise of the Tomb raider is cinematic but I can bet xbox fanboys didnt called it a movie when it was an exclusive... hypocrisy at its finest

Their gameplay is at best functional. Nothing good about it.

No, its good.

see above for why ^^^

Avatar image for deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d
deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By deactivated-60cd6c3d31f6d
Member since 2015 • 745 Posts
@soulitane said:

Uncharted 4 has pretty great gunplay, it's a shame it feels like half the game is walking/climbing.

Yeah, I really like the gameplay of U4 with the quick paced action and stealth. I would be really cool if ND would release an expansion like the VR missions of MGS. Just pack of singleplayer maps with different challenges.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@Vatusus said:

Just because you played both does not mean you know what good gameplay is. I played Gears 1 on PC, even have a review of it from many years ago see http://www.gamespot.com/gears-of-war/user-reviews/2200-129870/

you can see the date in it to know I'm not bullshitting. No sane person would ever think Gears has better gameplay than TLOU. Gears is just your run of the mill 3rd person shooter with cover based mechanics. It was new at the time but the gameplay has been proven to be flawed by dmenading you to be constantly in cover. Now put that basic as all hell concept against U4 and TLOU:

In both U4 and TLOU you can aproach a situation both stealthly or guns blazzing. In gears you can only guns blazzing.

In both U4 and TLOU you have some wide open areas that let you tackle your aproach from multiple angles. In gears you have linear levels after linear levels. Walk, kill bad guys rinse and repeat ad nauseam

In Uncharted games you have verticality. In Gears you dont.

In Gears you are forced to find cover and enemies often do the same. That makes its gameplay some kind of wack-a-mole thingy, i.e. wait for enemies to stop hiding from cover and shooter. Again, rinse and repeat ad nauseam. In U4 enemies come to you, grenades fly all over the place, the game literally demands you to be constantly moving.

I think its obvious who actually have the better gameplay out of these...

I obviously know more than you do with your flawed analysis.

You actually have to move around in Gears in the higher difficulty levels. Enemies flank you and have plenty of ways to keep you on your toes. You got clickers who are made specifically for campy players. They go around cover and blow you up. In GOW4 plenty of robots who don't care about cover simply march forward and force you to relocate and to be constantly on the move.

And the stealth outright sucks and could be done without in TLOU. I mean this ain't Thief or Splinter Cell we're talking about there. Enemies are still brain-dead and taking them down is laughable. The barebones stealth not done well doesn't give it any points. I mean hell, in the auction house in Uncharted 4, I was hiding in tall grass 2 feet away from that mercenary and he couldn't even see me. The stealth is at its most basic and is made of so little I wonder why they even bothered with it.

You have some nerves to say that about Gears lol. Uncharted 4 is basically long walking sections, boring climbing and then shootouts with bad guys. Rinse and repeat. Still the same old boring weapons. Shotguns, SMG's, AK's etc. Gears has a crapton of different weapons, different types of grenades the enemies are A LOT more varied and actually work together to take the player out. Kantus in Gears 2 would wake up fallen allies and draw fire, bloodmounts would go around cover, wretches would have the player on the run etc. None of that in Uncharted 4. Only a handful of different enemies. At least TLOU is better in that area and the infected work better as a team.

The verticality is freaking climbing. Don't give me that. It's basically pushing a button and Nate will jump without fail. It's not even proper platforming. You don't need to evaluate the distance, length and height of your jumps like in actual platformer. The most you do is time them.

Yeah enemies find cover in Gears except you seem to ignore the plentiful variety of enemies and many of them don't even bother with cover. Uncharted 4 is composed of human enemies. You got the generic mercenary, the armored guy, some heavy's and the occasional snipers. I can probably count the enemy types on one hand and none of the weapons are original like in Gears. A power weapon in the hands of a skilled player can turn around a game in Gears of War.

Yeah it's obvious Gears has the better gameplay. People actually bother organizing tournaments around it because the metagame has enough depth to be playable for years. Uncharted and TLOU are fun for a short while but quickly get boring. Gears of War is a cover based SHOOTING game. 80% of the game is shooting things. It's dumb to say it's repetitive for that reason. With that logic platformers are repetitive because all you do is jump. Fighting games are repetitve because all you do is fight rinse and repeat. See how little sense that makes?

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@Vatusus said:
@Juub1990 said:
@Vatusus said:

It actually seems you dont if you think TLOU and U4 dont have compelling gameplay. I've played and beat heavy gameplay based games (DMC, Vanquish, Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden, DOOM, Souls games, etc, etc), some on their respective highest difficulties so I'm safe to say I know what gameplay is. Both TLOU and U4 have good gameplay. Who says otherwise hasnt really played the games and is just jumping on the bandwaggon of stupid fanboys who say these games are "movies and not games" just because they're cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Being cinematic does not mean the gameplay isnt there. Rise of the Tomb raider is cinematic but I can bet xbox fanboys didnt called it a movie when it was an exclusive... hypocrisy at its finest

Their gameplay is at best functional. Nothing good about it.

No, its good.

I stopped arguing with that moron for a reason, this..

Loading Video...

review is all that's needed to prove the TC is full of shit while trying to downplay every Sony game people name.

And the fact that Juub1990 actually thinks Gears of War's 85 critical score invalidates that reviewers opinion on Gears gameplay while trying to use his own opinion to trash a game with an over all critical score of 95 shows the dumbass can't even be consistent with his own argument points!

The cretin says TLOU gameplay is somehow "shit" as if the gameplay had absolutely nothing to do with the games 95 critical reception...but somehow gameplay was a factor with Gears of War 4's 85.

lol it's not even a conversation interacting with an idiot who makes arguments like that, you'll lose brain cells tying to give realistic and objective responses to a clown who's going to just spin and shit out some self-proclaimed fanboy BS to downplay or hype up whatever suits his agenda.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@casharmy said:

I stopped arguing with that moron for a reason, this..

review is all that's needed to prove the TC is full of shit while trying to downplay every Sony game people name.

And the fact that Juub1990 actually thinks Gears of War's 85 critical score invalidates that reviewers opinion on Gears gameplay while trying to use his own opinion to trash a game with an over all critical score of 95! The cretin says TLOU gameplay is somehow "shit" as if the gameplay had absolutely nothing to do with the games 95 critical reception.

lol it's not even a conversation interacting with an idiot who makes arguments like that, you'll lose brain cells tying to give realistic and objective responses to a clown who's going to just spit out some self-proclaimed fanboy BS to downplay or hype up whatever suits his agenda.

Run along boy. Adults are discussing.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#98  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Vatusus said:

Just because you played both does not mean you know what good gameplay is. I played Gears 1 on PC, even have a review of it from many years ago see http://www.gamespot.com/gears-of-war/user-reviews/2200-129870/

you can see the date in it to know I'm not bullshitting. No sane person would ever think Gears has better gameplay than TLOU. Gears is just your run of the mill 3rd person shooter with cover based mechanics. It was new at the time but the gameplay has been proven to be flawed by dmenading you to be constantly in cover. Now put that basic as all hell concept against U4 and TLOU:

In both U4 and TLOU you can aproach a situation both stealthly or guns blazzing. In gears you can only guns blazzing.

In both U4 and TLOU you have some wide open areas that let you tackle your aproach from multiple angles. In gears you have linear levels after linear levels. Walk, kill bad guys rinse and repeat ad nauseam

In Uncharted games you have verticality. In Gears you dont.

In Gears you are forced to find cover and enemies often do the same. That makes its gameplay some kind of wack-a-mole thingy, i.e. wait for enemies to stop hiding from cover and shooter. Again, rinse and repeat ad nauseam. In U4 enemies come to you, grenades fly all over the place, the game literally demands you to be constantly moving.

I think its obvious who actually have the better gameplay out of these...

I obviously know more than you do with your flawed analysis.

No, you obviously dont.

You actually have to move around in Gears in the higher difficulty levels. Enemies flank you and have plenty of ways to keep you on your toes. You got clickers who are made specifically for campy players. They go around cover and blow you up. In GOW4 plenty of robots who don't care about cover simply march forward and force you to relocate and to be constantly on the move.

Oh, so what your saying is that, in order for Gears to have good gameplay you have to play it on harder difficulties... thats a flawed argument right there. A game should be good at any difficulty.

And the stealth outright sucks and could be done without in TLOU. I mean this ain't Thief or Splinter Cell we're talking about there. Enemies are still brain-dead and taking them down is laughable. The barebones stealth not done well doesn't give it any points.

No, it does not suck. It isnt amazing by any means, after all it isnt a stealth game, but its an option. And its there. And its good enough for letting you play in other way other then shooting bad guys, contrary to gears.

You have some nerves to say that about Gears lol. Uncharted 4 is basically long walking sections, boring climbing and then shootouts with bad guys. Rinse and repeat. Still the same old boring weapons. Shotguns, SMG's, AK's etc. Gears has a crapton of different weapons, different types of grenades the enemies are A LOT more varied and actually work together to take the player out. Kantus in Gears 2 would wake up fallen allies and draw fire, bloodmounts would go around cover, wretches would have the player on the run etc. None of that in Uncharted 4. Only a handful of different enemies. At least TLOU is better in that area and the infected work better as a team.

The difference is: Gears is a full blown TPS. Uncharted 4 isnt. Its an adventure game with TPS mechanics. Of course it wouldnt use exotic weaponry like in most TPS, it would be stupid. But it has more gameplay variety. Traversal and puzzle solving help break the repetitiveness of the game. In gears all you do is cover, shoot, cover, shoot, cover, shoot. I dont have to say more than the "worth a buy" video already posted here, hasnt said already. Its boring gameplay is clearly evident.

The verticality is freaking climbing. Don't give me that. It's basically pushing a button and Nate will jump without fail. It's not even proper platforming. You don't need to evaluate the distance, length and height of your jumps like in actual platformer. The most you do is time them.

No, its not platforming. Its called traversal. Look on google. When I'm speaking about vertically I'm not talking about traversal but actually an option available when it comes to combat situations. You can aproach enemies from above and vice-versa.

Yeah enemies find cover in Gears except you seem to ignore the plentiful variety of enemies and many of them don't even bother with cover. Uncharted 4 is composed of human enemies. You got the generic mercenary, the armored guy, some heavy's and the occasional snipers. I can probably count the enemy type on one hand and none of the weapons are original like in Gears. A power weapon in the hands of a skilled player can turn around a game in Gears of War.

Again, TPS vs Action adventure. Enemie variety means shit when most act the same. When playing through gears 1 I only remember the Berserk guys being different then the others and even that one was a boss fight, so of course it had to be different. And btw, in U1, U2 and U3 you didnt had "only" human beings. U1 had the cursed, in U2 you had the guardians and in U3 you had the djinn. They behaved very differently then the common humans.

Yeah it's obvious Gears as the better gameplay. People actually bother organizing tournaments around it because the metagame has enough depth to be playable for years. Uncharted and TLOU are fun for a short while but quickly get boring.

Nope, its obvious Gears actually has the weakest gameplay mechanics out of these. Call of Duty is also in tournaments, DOOM isnt. Now you gonna tell me CoD has better gameplay than DOOM? Flawed argument is flawed. Tornaments has more to do with branding than actual quality per se.

Answears in Bold ^^^

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#99 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14491 Posts

@silversix_ said:

TLG does better platforming than any WiiU titles

BB has a better combat system and world than any WiiU games

UC4 has the best third person adventure than anything on the WiiU

Ratchet crushes any colorful cutesy titles on the WiiU and shows em how its done in 2016.

Compelling gameplay is not what's missing on the console. If UC4 is too cinematic then Pokemon is too kiddy.

Good joke. I got a good laugh from this.

Avatar image for kvally
kvally

8445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 9

#100 kvally
Member since 2014 • 8445 Posts

@casharmy said:
@Vatusus said:
@Juub1990 said:
@Vatusus said:

It actually seems you dont if you think TLOU and U4 dont have compelling gameplay. I've played and beat heavy gameplay based games (DMC, Vanquish, Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden, DOOM, Souls games, etc, etc), some on their respective highest difficulties so I'm safe to say I know what gameplay is. Both TLOU and U4 have good gameplay. Who says otherwise hasnt really played the games and is just jumping on the bandwaggon of stupid fanboys who say these games are "movies and not games" just because they're cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Being cinematic does not mean the gameplay isnt there. Rise of the Tomb raider is cinematic but I can bet xbox fanboys didnt called it a movie when it was an exclusive... hypocrisy at its finest

Their gameplay is at best functional. Nothing good about it.

No, its good.

I stopped arguing with that moron for a reason, this..

Loading Video...

review is all that's needed to prove the TC is full of shit while trying to downplay every Sony game people name.

And the fact that Juub1990 actually thinks Gears of War's 85 critical score invalidates that reviewers opinion on Gears gameplay while trying to use his own opinion to trash a game with an over all critical score of 95 shows the dumbass can't even be consistent with his own argument points!

The cretin says TLOU gameplay is somehow "shit" as if the gameplay had absolutely nothing to do with the games 95 critical reception...but somehow gameplay was a factor with Gears of War 4's 85.

lol it's not even a conversation interacting with an idiot who makes arguments like that, you'll lose brain cells tying to give realistic and objective responses to a clown who's going to just spin and shit out some self-proclaimed fanboy BS to downplay or hype up whatever suits his agenda.

What difficulty did you play Gears of War 4 on?