This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="i_am_interested"] of course you dont find it half baked, they took that thing out right after E3 where claimed it was going to be in there fake videos, lag, missing processors, whats next?IronBassWell, we have to see after it's released don't we? It's not like a processor less means something to us, people who have no idea about how this tech actually works or what every processor does.
actually no, some of us do have some understanding of how the tech works, while youve been touting presentations the whole time, ive been touting tech
actually no, some of us do have some understanding of how the tech works, while youve been touting presentations the whole time, ive been touting techi_am_interestedGood for you! :o But tbh, I couldn't care less, since I would never trust somebody I don't on SW to talk about this tech. In other words, the removal of the processor is, at this point at least, irrelevant.
comparing it to the frequency of RROD).asdasdrgrI've never compared it to the frequency of RRoD, so that would not be relevant to this discussion.
The RRoD is quite a huge problems, but hardly an indicator of what MS can do hardware-wise. The PS2 was also very unreliable (and we could find more examples for Sony), but that didn't stop the PS3 from being quite a well-built system.IronBass
I spot a comparison.
[QUOTE="IronBass"]The RRoD is quite a huge problems, but hardly an indicator of what MS can do hardware-wise. The PS2 was also very unreliable (and we could find more examples for Sony), but that didn't stop the PS3 from being quite a well-built system.asdasdrgr
I spot a comparison.
Look again. :)
I said the PS2 was also very unreliable, something we all know.
I didn't compare its failure rate with the 360's, though.
I simply said it was unreliable, too, not that it was more, equally, or less reliable than the 360.
[QUOTE="i_am_interested"]actually no, some of us do have some understanding of how the tech works, while youve been touting presentations the whole time, ive been touting techIronBassGood for you!
of course not, theyll just put out another fake video for you to eat upi_am_interestedOh, but we can't know that at this point. Gotta wait. :)
[QUOTE="asdasdrgr"]
[QUOTE="IronBass"]The RRoD is quite a huge problems, but hardly an indicator of what MS can do hardware-wise. The PS2 was also very unreliable (and we could find more examples for Sony), but that didn't stop the PS3 from being quite a well-built system.IronBass
I spot a comparison.
Look again. :)
I said the PS2 was also very unreliable, something we all know.
I didn't compare its failure rate with the 360's, though.
I simply said it was unreliable, too, not that it was more, equally, or less reliable than the 360.
Ok,but can i have another cookie? Yesterday,you gave me one,but you had a taste :(Oh and to finalize before i go sleep, i just hope both are Perfect we as consumers would win by that.
Ok,but can i have another cookie? Yesterday,you gave me one,but you had a taste :(Oh and to finalize before i go sleep, i just hope both are Perfect we as consumers would win by that.
asdasdrgr
FINE.
But since too many cookies can be dangerous for your health, you get dietcookies. :twisted:
On a side note, I also hope both deliver, but I have the feeling both will fail. They are trying to gather a market dominated by the Wii, and it may be too late.
Sony's and MS' consoles should keep doing what they do better, tradional non-motion-controlled games.
But gotta wait and see.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment