Sorry but this whole 360 has more games than ps3 argument is totally flawed.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

So xbox 360 has been out for 21 months and the ps3 has been out for 9 months.So do you people claim ownage that your 21 month old console has more games than a 9 month old console.But what do we do?

Hmmm so the 360 was out a whole year early than the ps3.Why dont we see what sony's console was offering in that 1 year.Oh ya how many games did the ps2 have in that 1 year and then add it to the ps3 total and that will be a very fair comparasion.

It isnt ps3 vs 360,it's sony's consoles vs microsoft's consoles.The original xboxwas not getting anything after the 360 launch but obviously the ps2 was still getting plenty of games after the 360 launch.

The camparasion that we do between the ps3 and 360 is just illogical.360 has been out for 21 months and it obviously needed more games to keep those customers happy who bought their console at launch.As for the ps3 it obviously needed less games because it's been only 9 months since people have started buying the ps3.You need time to play games andalthough choice is better sometimes there are so many games that time and money become an issue.If ps3 decides to release 10 quality games every month(now i am not saying that sony can do it if they want to) in order to catch to 360,people will just not have the time and money to play those games.

And comon,isnt it about sony vs microsoft or playstation vs xbox.Yup the latter will do.So i think we should add the ps2 games between the 360 launch and ps3 launch to the playstation library whenever we want to compare the playstation with the 360.This only makes things fairer.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts
system wars...not company wars.
Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts

rant

Thinker_145

Sony wanted Blu-Ray...it delayed the system...MS knew it had to launch early...Sony was arrogant thought they would win on brand name alone...Cell is hard to program for and has little to no SDK support...360 has better games and thats all she wrote

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
system wars...not company wars.CaseyWegner
Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will seewhich brand still offers better gaming.
Avatar image for The_Caesar
The_Caesar

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 The_Caesar
Member since 2006 • 234 Posts
tripping the lead runner would make the race fairer, yes.
Avatar image for BigDaddyPOLO
BigDaddyPOLO

2251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BigDaddyPOLO
Member since 2005 • 2251 Posts
Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.Thinker_145
Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

no. it's the individual system against the other individual systems.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#8 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.Thinker_145
Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

It's a Next-Gen war no All-Gen wars.

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?BigDaddyPOLO
Obviously not.I think with the less than amazing sales and hardware issues i think it's pretty aparant that from a business point of view it was a disaster.

And from a gamer's point of view it was a disaster as well as more than 20 million gamers were left shocked as MS stopped making games for the original xbox.

Avatar image for e10mgs
e10mgs

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 e10mgs
Member since 2005 • 423 Posts
your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.
Avatar image for BigDaddyPOLO
BigDaddyPOLO

2251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BigDaddyPOLO
Member since 2005 • 2251 Posts

[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?Thinker_145

Obviously not.I think with the less than amazing sales and hardware issues i think it's pretty aparant that from a business point of view it was a disaster.

And from a gamer's point of view it was a disaster as well as more than 20 million gamers were left shocked as MS stopped making games for the original xbox.

Wow you are the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. Less than amazing sales? Looks like it's doing pretty good against PS3. And at least they do something ABOUT hardware issues like giving warranties, fixing the hardware.

Go graze in the pasture, cow.

Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts
If this is a xbox 360 vs PS3 debate shouldn't you keep it within the confines of this generation, and most times its arguements about xbox 360 have a superior lineup in the same given time frame as the ps3 ^_^
Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.CaseyWegner

Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

no. it's the individual system against the other individual systems.

Then respond to the 4th paragraph of my original post.I mean how the heck can we ignore that being a year late was actually a good thing for those were still playing their ps2's(there were many) as we got to enjoy more games on our investment.And we are in no hurry to get a 1000 quality games,we have only owned our ps3 for 9 months and not 21 months.
Avatar image for Dr_Corndog
Dr_Corndog

3245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 Dr_Corndog
Member since 2004 • 3245 Posts
I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#16 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?BigDaddyPOLO
It wasn't without it's drawbacks. Just look at how poorly made the 360 is...
Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts
Then respond to the 4th paragraph of my original post.I mean how the heck can we ignore that being a year late was actually a good thing for those were still playing their ps2's(there were many) as we got to enjoy more games on our investment.And we are in no hurry to get a 1000 quality games,we have only owned our ps3 for 9 months and not 21 months.Thinker_145
Then why even buy a PS3 if you are content with your PS2?
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.Thinker_145

Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

no. it's the individual system against the other individual systems.

Then respond to the 4th paragraph of my original post.I mean how the heck can we ignore that being a year late was actually a good thing for those were still playing their ps2's(there were many) as we got to enjoy more games on our investment.And we are in no hurry to get a 1000 quality games,we have only owned our ps3 for 9 months and not 21 months.

you're still trying to combine the systems.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#19 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.Thinker_145

Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

no. it's the individual system against the other individual systems.

Then respond to the 4th paragraph of my original post.I mean how the heck can we ignore that being a year late was actually a good thing for those were still playing their ps2's(there were many) as we got to enjoy more games on our investment.And we are in no hurry to get a 1000 quality games,we have only owned our ps3 for 9 months and not 21 months.

PS2 has nothing to do with this gen. It's not 360 owners' fault that SONY didn't want to launch the PS3 early. MS thought ahead and here are the results. Don't like it?? Keep playing your PS2 simple as that.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#20 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.Dr_Corndog
No, but he gives a reason for why that's the case, and it's not because the 360 is the better console.
Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.e10mgs
How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#22 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="e10mgs"]your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.Thinker_145
How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.

You think this is Brand Wars. It's PS3 vs Xbox 360 get over it.

Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts
[QUOTE="e10mgs"]your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.Thinker_145
How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.

you are still combining gens :roll:
Avatar image for nowakawon
nowakawon

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 nowakawon
Member since 2006 • 436 Posts

[QUOTE="e10mgs"]your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.Thinker_145
How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.

That doesn't matter. This isn't brand wars. It's system wars.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#25 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="e10mgs"]your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.DeadMan1290

How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.

You think this is Brand Wars. It's PS3 vs Xbox 360 get over it.

The PS3 can play PS2 games...
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#26 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="Dr_Corndog"]I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.SolidSnake35
No, but he gives a reason for why that's the case, and it's not because the 360 is the better console.

But beacuse MS was stupid enough to launch a bad console with better games, right? And Sony launched a good console with no games and high price.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#27 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts
[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="e10mgs"]your argument is flawed, you can't just penalise the leader for being the leader. fact isright now the 360 does not only have more games it has better games.SolidSnake35

How can you say that when the competition was doing even better in the timeframe that 360 was in the market.Ps2 got FFXII,okami,DMC3:SE,MGS3:Subsistence and bully after the 360 launced so clearly the playstation brand was kicking the xbox's ***.

You think this is Brand Wars. It's PS3 vs Xbox 360 get over it.

The PS3 can play PS2 games...

360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#28 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Dr_Corndog"]I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.DeadMan1290

No, but he gives a reason for why that's the case, and it's not because the 360 is the better console.

But beacuse MS was stupid enough to launch a bad console with better games, right? And Sony launched a good console with no games and high price.

Yes, but you're exaggerating. The 360 didn't launch with many great games, and the PS3 still launched with some at least. The high price is justified anyway because of Bluray, and I'd have rather paid more for my 360 knowing that it wasn't going to break twice.
Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?BigDaddyPOLO

Obviously not.I think with the less than amazing sales and hardware issues i think it's pretty aparant that from a business point of view it was a disaster.

And from a gamer's point of view it was a disaster as well as more than 20 million gamers were left shocked as MS stopped making games for the original xbox.

Wow you are the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. Less than amazing sales? Looks like it's doing pretty good against PS3. And at least they do something ABOUT hardware issues like giving warranties, fixing the hardware.

Go graze in the pasture, cow.

Wow somebody is so blinded that he thinks the xbox 360has amazing worldwide sales.:shock::lol:

Did i say that the ps3 has amazing sales.I think not.And why did you not respond to the other part of my post.I see lemmings like to ignore the issue of the abysymal lifespan of the original xbox.:lol:

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts
[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Dr_Corndog"]I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.SolidSnake35

No, but he gives a reason for why that's the case, and it's not because the 360 is the better console.

But beacuse MS was stupid enough to launch a bad console with better games, right? And Sony launched a good console with no games and high price.

Yes, but you're exaggerating. The 360 didn't launch with many great games, and the PS3 still launched with some at least. The high price is justified anyway because of Bluray, and I'd have rather paid more for my 360 knowing that it wasn't going to break twice.

the ps3 has yet to catch up to what the 360 launched with.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#31 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?DeadMan1290
The PS2 had better games than the Xbox, but my point is that it's still PS3 vs 360.
Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts
[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Dr_Corndog"]I see your post, and I see nothing that changes the fact that the XBox 360 has a better library than the PS3.SolidSnake35

No, but he gives a reason for why that's the case, and it's not because the 360 is the better console.

But beacuse MS was stupid enough to launch a bad console with better games, right? And Sony launched a good console with no games and high price.

Yes, but you're exaggerating. The 360 didn't launch with many great games, and the PS3 still launched with some at least. The high price is justified anyway because of Bluray, and I'd have rather paid more for my 360 knowing that it wasn't going to break twice.

360 had a better launch lineup than PS3 :|
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#33 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts
[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?Thinker_145

Obviously not.I think with the less than amazing sales and hardware issues i think it's pretty aparant that from a business point of view it was a disaster.

And from a gamer's point of view it was a disaster as well as more than 20 million gamers were left shocked as MS stopped making games for the original xbox.

Wow you are the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. Less than amazing sales? Looks like it's doing pretty good against PS3. And at least they do something ABOUT hardware issues like giving warranties, fixing the hardware.

Go graze in the pasture, cow.

Wow somebody is so blinded that he thinks the xbox 360has amazing worldwide sales.:shock::lol:

Did i say that the ps3 has amazing sales.I think not.And why did you not respond to the other part of my post.I see lemmings like to ignore the issue of the abysymal lifespan of the original xbox.:lol:

Fanboyism at it's finest. And cows ignore the fact that PS3 has no games:shock: Shocking isn't it??

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#34 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
360 had a better launch lineup than PS3 :|Medjai
Underline where I said it didn't. ^_^
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

There is some logic to what this guys saying. In the months right before and the almost 10 months since ps3 was launched, Sony has continued to release ps2 games. These games are playable on the PS3. Some of these games, although lacking in HD graphics are as good or better than many 360 or ps3 games. God of War 2 seemed to be well liked critically and commercialy, for instance. If I never had a ps2, but have a ps3, why shouldn't these games be considered part of ps3's lineup?

Backwards compatibility (that is, BC that actually works since day 1 of the systems launch, unlike some systems that claimed it and failed) is a feature of the system, and when comparing systems, what is there to compare other than its features and its games? How is it anything other than good business for Sony to not concentrate only on PS3 games when theres over 100 million ps2s sitting out there. They can put out a quality ps2 game and ps2 AND ps3 owners can buy it.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#36 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?SolidSnake35
The PS2 had better games than the Xbox, but my point is that it's still PS3 vs 360.

That's what I've been trying to say all this time. The TC keeps mixing the gens.

Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts
Wow somebody is so blinded that he thinks the xbox 360has amazing worldwide sales.:shock::lol:

Did i say that the ps3 has amazing sales.I think not.And why did you not respond to the other part of my post.I see lemmings like to ignore the issue of the abysymal lifespan of the original xbox.:lol:

Thinker_145
I was done with my xbox1 and was ready for a new system when 360 launched
Avatar image for LTomlinson21
LTomlinson21

24423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#38 LTomlinson21
Member since 2004 • 24423 Posts

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?SolidSnake35
The PS2 had better games than the Xbox, but my point is that it's still PS3 vs 360.

The game wasn't developed for the PS3, thus being part of last gen. It doesn't matter if it can be played on the PS3. Then we would be comparing God of War 2 to games that came out on the 360 and Wii.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#39 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?DeadMan1290

The PS2 had better games than the Xbox, but my point is that it's still PS3 vs 360.

That's what I've been trying to say all this time. The TC keeps mixing the gens.

That's okay to an extent. I still want to play Okami and GOW2 at some point, and I'll do so on my PS3.
Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
If this is a xbox 360 vs PS3 debate shouldn't you keep it within the confines of this generation, and most times its arguements about xbox 360 have a superior lineup in the same given time frame as the ps3 ^_^ Zenkuso
Oh really,how many AA+ games has the 360 got since the ps3 launched
Avatar image for Medjai
Medjai

3839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Medjai
Member since 2003 • 3839 Posts
[QUOTE="Medjai"]360 had a better launch lineup than PS3 :|SolidSnake35
Underline where I said it didn't. ^_^

I think any reasonable human being would infer from this sentence: 'The 360 didn't launch with many great games, and the PS3 still launched with some at least.' that you were saying the PS3 launched with better games
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#42 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]If this is a xbox 360 vs PS3 debate shouldn't you keep it within the confines of this generation, and most times its arguements about xbox 360 have a superior lineup in the same given time frame as the ps3 ^_^ Thinker_145
Oh really,how many AA+ games has the 360 got since the ps3 launched

I don't think he meant what your logical brainthinks

Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts

Man the blind sony side fanboyism in this thread is freakin great.

You judge a system war via a generation and within the confines of that generation, you don't bring up its ancestor to provide ownage, that just proves the console isn't worth a slice of jack.

Your having to rely on the ps2 having good games to prove the ps3 is worth something? why buy a 600$ + console when you can walk out and buy a ps2 for 150$ in a bundle with two games, mem card and extra controller?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#44 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="DeadMan1290"]360 is BC with Xbox games:shock: point is?LTomlinson21

The PS2 had better games than the Xbox, but my point is that it's still PS3 vs 360.

The game wasn't developed for the PS3, thus being part of last gen. It doesn't matter if it can be played on the PS3. Then we would be comparing God of War 2 to games that came out on the 360 and Wii.

I think you could quite easily compare PS2 games to the Wii, and I know I'd choose the best for the PS2 over the best for the Wii. That being said, it would be unfair because of how long the PS2 has been out. Of course, if we're saying the 360 is better than the PS3 at the moment, then maybe it isn't so unfair after all.
Avatar image for swanlee
swanlee

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 swanlee
Member since 2002 • 248 Posts
The 360 had a better launch lineup than both th PS3 and the WII "13. It took a year for the 360 to get its first good game. -no. statistically, the 360's launch games were better than both the Wii's and PS3's current lineup. the 360 launched with one AAA and three AAs. the PS3 currently has two AAs. The Wii currently has one AAA and two AAs. Even if you toss out PDZ (if you want to change the rules), GRAW came out before gears of war so there's still a AAA right there...before the one year mark. want to say that the 360's AAs are junk? Take a look at how that would leave the PS3's and Wii's lineup."
Avatar image for LTomlinson21
LTomlinson21

24423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#46 LTomlinson21
Member since 2004 • 24423 Posts

Man the blind sony side fanboyism in this thread is freakin great.

You judge a system war via a generation and within the confines of that generation, you don't bring up its ancestor to provide ownage, that just proves the console isn't worth a slice of jack.

Your having to rely on the ps2 having good games to prove the ps3 is worth something? why buy a 600$ + console when you can walk out and buy a ps2 for 150$ in a bundle with two games, mem card and extra controller?

Zenkuso

There we go. Someone was able to say it.:)

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.CaseyWegner

Ya it's probably not sony vs microsoft.But it is the playstation brand of consoles vs xbox brand of consoles.By saying that the 360 has far more games that the ps3,u cannot say that thus xbox>playstation.You gotta compare them in a set timeframe.Go ahead and compare the original xbox and xbox 360 lineup of the last 2 years with that of the ps2 and ps3 and you will which brand still offers better gaming.

no. it's the individual system against the other individual systems.

Then respond to the 4th paragraph of my original post.I mean how the heck can we ignore that being a year late was actually a good thing for those were still playing their ps2's(there were many) as we got to enjoy more games on our investment.And we are in no hurry to get a 1000 quality games,we have only owned our ps3 for 9 months and not 21 months.

you're still trying to combine the systems.

Well what is wrong with that.Do you seriously think that the GBA has nothing to do with the DS thrashing the psp in sales.The DS has the advantage of the GBA library whereas the PSP doesnt have any such thing.Point is that the real world platform war is not decided just by the way you are saying.The psp and ds library are almost equal but when u factor in the GBA then it's no competition just like there is no competition in the sales of psp and DS.

So when these things have an impact in real world why are we so close minded.Because the 360 will lose of it's greatness of a sudden.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#48 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Medjai"]360 had a better launch lineup than PS3 :|Medjai
Underline where I said it didn't. ^_^

I think any reasonable human being would infer from this sentence: 'The 360 didn't launch with many great games, and the PS3 still launched with some at least.' that you were saying the PS3 launched with better games

"Some at least"... That's pretty key here. Anyway, if you take my post away from the one I was quoting, it takes it out of context. Looking at it now, I should have said "the 360 didn't launch with that many great games.
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#49 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts
So basically your whole post "but the 360 has been out longer." So what you're saying to 360 fanboys is that it's unfair that they enjoy more games than PS3 fanboys because the 360 has been out longer? So they should decrease their enjoyment of said games accordingly?
Avatar image for BigDaddyPOLO
BigDaddyPOLO

2251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 BigDaddyPOLO
Member since 2005 • 2251 Posts
[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?Thinker_145

Obviously not.I think with the less than amazing sales and hardware issues i think it's pretty aparant that from a business point of view it was a disaster.

And from a gamer's point of view it was a disaster as well as more than 20 million gamers were left shocked as MS stopped making games for the original xbox.

Wow you are the biggest hypocrite I have ever seen. Less than amazing sales? Looks like it's doing pretty good against PS3. And at least they do something ABOUT hardware issues like giving warranties, fixing the hardware.

Go graze in the pasture, cow.

Wow somebody is so blinded that he thinks the xbox 360has amazing worldwide sales.:shock::lol:

Did i say that the ps3 has amazing sales.I think not.And why did you not respond to the other part of my post.I see lemmings like to ignore the issue of the abysymal lifespan of the original xbox.:lol:

Ok, well how about this: I think most gamers weren't shocked by the fact that MS moved on and started releasing next gen games, at least they have some good ones. Unlike Sony MS doesn't have to cling onto pass success to sell their console. Oh look and look at your response: "amazing worldwide sales". Did I SAY anything about amazing worldwide sales? No. I said it's beating the crap out of PS3, and it is; your thread is made of fail and it's a bad excuse for damage control, and you can't do anything but make wierd conclusions and spam smilies.