Sorry but this whole 360 has more games than ps3 argument is totally flawed.

[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

In conclusion the playstation brand of consoles have consistently sold more and have produced better games than the xbox brandfor the last 2 years.

/thread.

Thinker_145

Funny, I've seen you contredict yourself, ignore certain arguments, make up statistics, and go off on rants that disregard all logic.

And you still havn't answered: Can't I buy a 360 for $350, a PS2 for $120, and still be much cheaper than a PS3?

Let's see,$350+$120+$150(three years of live)+$20(controller charger)+$10$(ps2 mem card)=$650

Ps3=$500+$30(HDMI cable if u need one)=$530

Much cheaper????U lose all credibility my friend.

$550 (360) + $200 (PS2) + $240 (Live 3 Yrs) + $30 (Charger) + $20 (PS2 Card) = $1040

$1000 (PS3) + $50 (HBMI Cable) = $1050.

Not much cheaper but it is nonetheless cheaper, and you have an over-abundance of games (since PS3 not backwards capatable)

* All in Aust. dollars *

Totally agree with TC. Except that the 360 has more games than the PS3. Oh and its not an argument its a stone cold fact.

[QUOTE="Thinker_145"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

In conclusion the playstation brand of consoles have consistently sold more and have produced better games than the xbox brandfor the last 2 years.

/thread.

daqua_99

Funny, I've seen you contredict yourself, ignore certain arguments, make up statistics, and go off on rants that disregard all logic.

And you still havn't answered: Can't I buy a 360 for $350, a PS2 for $120, and still be much cheaper than a PS3?

Let's see,$350+$120+$150(three years of live)+$20(controller charger)+$10$(ps2 mem card)=$650

Ps3=$500+$30(HDMI cable if u need one)=$530

Much cheaper????U lose all credibility my friend.

$550 (360) + $200 (PS2) + $240 (Live 3 Yrs) + $30 (Charger) + $20 (PS2 Card) = $1040

$1000 (PS3) + $50 (HBMI Cable) = $1050.

Not much cheaper but it is nonetheless cheaper, and you have an over-abundance of games (since PS3 not backwards capatable)

* All in Aust. dollars *

PS3 ain't backwards compatible in Aussie??

[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="Thinker_145"]

In conclusion the playstation brand of consoles have consistently sold more and have produced better games than the xbox brandfor the last 2 years.

/thread.

Thinker_145

Funny, I've seen you contredict yourself, ignore certain arguments, make up statistics, and go off on rants that disregard all logic.

And you still havn't answered: Can't I buy a 360 for $350, a PS2 for $120, and still be much cheaper than a PS3?

Let's see,$350+$120+$150(three years of live)+$20(controller charger)+$10$(ps2 mem card)=$650

Ps3=$500+$30(HDMI cable if u need one)=$530

Much cheaper????U lose all credibility my friend.

So ironic it hurts.

system wars...not company wars.CaseyWegner

Don't know what you're smoking but this is a valid system wars arguement since game library is always brought up.

[QUOTE="rdo"]lol in july when sony announced a closeout/discontinued/ mass floppage sale as a $100 price cut and before halo3 the ps3 still couldn't sell as much. july was the best chance the ps3 was ever going to have of claiming a single month, forget the gen, a single month and they failed.360 will sell more units in nov and dec than the ps3 does all year. the 360 killed the ps3 with the earlier undelayed release and great games, but the games of fall 2007 are when we throw the dirt on sony and bury them for good.jimm895

The clearence sale was just in NA and not the rest of the world where the PS3 out sold the 360. And there have been some main stream developers dropping the 360 and developing on the PS3 (GTA5) will be on the PS3 along with more to come. It may lead to other games going to the PS3 (even the ones slated for the 360 already).

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.jliebel

Don't know what you're smoking but this is a valid system wars arguement since game library is always brought up.

Only if you are a desperate cow

[QUOTE="jliebel"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]system wars...not company wars.DoctorBunny

Don't know what you're smoking but this is a valid system wars arguement since game library is always brought up.

Only if you are a desperate cow

:lol::lol:

TC is correct in ways. Its like comparing two different people who started a race at different times! No, it's not fair. PS3 shouldn't be compared against 360, and I'm a sheep!groudyogre

Hmmm, two different people who started a race at different times? Have you watched any such event. Because generally they will break down the times at certain checkpoints to show how far behind, or infront the nearest rival is. Good example!

Guess MS was pretty smart to realease before the other two, huh?BigDaddyPOLO

No. If they were smart, they would have released a console that had a low rate of failure, later than they did. M$ lose.

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]TC is correct in ways. Its like comparing two different people who started a race at different times! No, it's not fair. PS3 shouldn't be compared against 360, and I'm a sheep!deviates1080

Hmmm, two different people who started a race at different times? Have you watched any such event. Because generally they will break down the times at certain checkpoints to show how far behind, or infront the nearest rival is. Good example!

Sort of like how the 360 launched with an exclusive AAA and 3 AA titles... and the ps3 has 0 AAAE titles to date