splinter cell on ps3, looks like it's running on n64, and 360 looks like highend

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

Freakin' quality. 

Who cares about this game, or SC in general?Endfinal

you clearly know nothingblazinpuertoroc

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

gfhgfhtutyutyut

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality. 

TekkenMaster606

What dont you understand, ubisoft did not lazy port splinter cell, because sony engineers helped them , so not a lazy/sloppy port, sony helped to get max out of ps3, ps3 simply didnt have memory avalible or powerful gpu to handle graphics 360 had.

it's ps3's hardware's fault not ubisoft, ps3 couldnt handle the game.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality.

gfhgfhtutyutyut

What dont you understand, ubisoft did not lazy port splinter cell, because sony engineers helped them , so not a lazy/sloppy port, sony helped to get max out of ps3, ps3 simply didnt have memory avalible or powerful gpu to handle graphics 360 had.

it's ps3's hardware's fault not ubisoft, ps3 couldnt handle the game.

Got a link that shows Sony spent lots of time helping them out on this specific game? 

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

I hate the Ubisoft excuse....all ports have been better on the 360 so far from all devs....not just Ubichikenfriedrice

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]I hate the Ubisoft excuse....all ports have been better on the 360 so far from all devs....not just Ubi111v

I personally don't care if Ubi sucks at porting because as a 360 owner I get the game tha way it's supposed to be

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality.

TekkenMaster606

What dont you understand, ubisoft did not lazy port splinter cell, because sony engineers helped them , so not a lazy/sloppy port, sony helped to get max out of ps3, ps3 simply didnt have memory avalible or powerful gpu to handle graphics 360 had.

it's ps3's hardware's fault not ubisoft, ps3 couldnt handle the game.

Got a link that shows Sony spent lots of time helping them out on this specific game? 

LOL, yea real lazy port when sony helped ubisoft  LAZY PORT=BS, ps3 hardware=at fault not ubisoft.

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3156707&sec=PREVIEWS

"The game's low-level graphic engine has been completely re-written to take advantage of the PS3 hardware," says Hector. "Sony engineers have also helped our team to optimize the rendering pipeline. Overall, you can expect the same visuals as the 360 version.

[QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingronniemoisture

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

splinter cell has better graphics than oblivion, more hardware stressfull game, uses higher res textures, better lighting, more shaders etc.

splinter cell on pc, is more stressfull on the hardware than oblivion.

omg! omg!

all ps3 games are going to look like sc now.

run, run, run for cover.

PS3 Oblivion says hello:)miss_kitt3n

one more year development time says hello.

splinter cell has better graphics than oblivion, more hardware stressfull game, uses higher res textures, better lighting, more shaders etc.

splinter cell on pc, is more stressfull on the hardware than oblivion.

gfhgfhtutyutyut

Is that you Thug_pikachu? 

[QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

splinter cell has better graphics than oblivion, more hardware stressfull game, uses higher res textures, better lighting, more shaders etc.

splinter cell on pc, is more stressfull on the hardware than oblivion.

miss_kitt3n

Is that you Thug_pikachu? 

Dude oblivion devs said ps3 version is better simply because of more development time, NOT BECAUSE OF PS3 HARDWARE

im trying to find link right now and own everybody.

PS3 Oblivion says hello:)miss_kitt3n

how could it say hello if it's not released yet...is it released yet?:P

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothing111v

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

the ps3 version of oblivion is actually worse, lower framerate, lower resolution textures no anti aliasing, only improvements, loads times, and character model textures, the world textures are downgraded, and even shaders.

ALL SONY FANBOYS OWNED, YOU CANNOT EVER USE OBLIVION AS OWNAGE.

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others can't, it's actually something we were considering doing for the other platforms as well. We specifically did it here because we had some time and one of our graphics programmers said he could do it. Things like that are in the PS3 version, but everything else is just things that make the game load faster and run faster, so it runs as well if not better than the PC or 360 version. That was our goal all along. We felt like we were going to take however long it took until the PS3 version looked and played as well as it could.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

the ps3 version of oblivion is actually worse, lower framerate, lower resolution textures no anti aliasing, only improvements, loads times, and character model textures, the world textures are downgraded, and even shaders.

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality.

TekkenMaster606

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothing111v

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

the ps3 version of oblivion is actually worse, lower framerate, lower resolution textures no anti aliasing, only improvements, loads times, and character model textures, the world textures are downgraded, and even shaders.

review sites didnt compare both, and oblivion on 360 looks better sorry

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality.

gfhgfhtutyutyut

What dont you understand, ubisoft did not lazy port splinter cell, because sony engineers helped them , so not a lazy/sloppy port, sony helped to get max out of ps3, ps3 simply didnt have memory avalible or powerful gpu to handle graphics 360 had.

it's ps3's hardware's fault not ubisoft, ps3 couldnt handle the game.

Got a link that shows Sony spent lots of time helping them out on this specific game?

LOL, yea real lazy port when sony helped ubisoft LAZY PORT=BS, ps3 hardware=at fault not ubisoft.

http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3156707&sec=PREVIEWS

"The game's low-level graphic engine has been completely re-written to take advantage of the PS3 hardware," says Hector. "Sony engineers have also helped our team to optimize the rendering pipeline. Overall, you can expect the same visuals as the 360 version.

That's a simple quote from one person. Sony's engineers could have helped that rag-tag team through e-mail or conference calls. You need to show me that Sony actually sent people to work with them in office to optimize that version for the Playstation 3. Because I'm not seeing anything that shows actual dedicated time spent towards the entire game.

Not to mention this is coming from Ubisoft. Who said that Red Steel would also take advantage of the Wii. Which it did. :roll:

[QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

Shack: Can you speak on those at all?

Pete Hines: The main thing that we've done in terms of something that you'd actually notice is that we did a special shader. On the Xbox 360 version of the game--and the PC, but it's more noticeable on 360 because PC is more scalable--there's a thing where the lower-res textures designed to be seen at a great distance appear closer to the player and they're a little blurry and muddy and you notice that. You go from this point where it's really high-res and then it goes to really low-res. It has to do with the LOD and how high-res the textures are. So what we did is write a shader package that blends the high-res one with the low-res one, so there's no point while playing on the PS3 that you'll notice that effect anymore. It will look natural. It's not really something that's noticeable unless you've played the other versions; it's designed not to be noticeable, but to look realistic

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others can't, it's actually something we were considering doing for the other platforms as well. We specifically did it here because we had some time and one of our graphics programmers said he could do it. Things like that are in the PS3 version, but everything else is just things that make the game load faster and run faster, so it runs as well if not better than the PC or 360 version. That was our goal all along. We felt like we were going to take however long it took until the PS3 version looked and played as well as it could.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

LOL, CPU ADVANTAGE IS LESS ADVANTAGE THAN MORE SYSTEM MEMORY AND 10 MB EDRAM AND MORE POWERFUL GPU.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

splinter cell has better graphics than oblivion, more hardware stressfull game, uses higher res textures, better lighting, more shaders etc.

splinter cell on pc, is more stressfull on the hardware than oblivion.

miss_kitt3n

Is that you Thug_pikachu?

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

the ps3 version of oblivion is actually worse, lower framerate, lower resolution textures no anti aliasing, only improvements, loads times, and character model textures, the world textures are downgraded, and even shaders.

review sites didnt compare both, and oblivion on 360 looks better sorry

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

gfhgfhtutyutyut

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothing111v

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

the ps3 version of oblivion is actually worse, lower framerate, lower resolution textures no anti aliasing, only improvements, loads times, and character model textures, the world textures are downgraded, and even shaders.

review sites didnt compare both, and oblivion on 360 looks better sorry

IGN=JOKE

gametrailers compared ps3 and xbox360 oblivion, xbox360 won even without level of detail patch. LOL

[QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

If that 10MB of EDRAM was so great, why does Virtua Tennis 3 look better in 1080p on the PS3?

Without extra development time... 

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

2largeadults

lol, why do i want to spend 500$ to wait 1 year for downgraded ps3 games?

xbox360 is the real gaming console, more powerful sorry.

no ps3 games appeal to me.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothing111v

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

lol, which games?

If that 10MB of EDRAM was so great, why does Virtua Tennis 3 look better in 1080p on the PS3?

 

Without extra development time... 

TekkenMaster606

If that 10MB of EDRAM was so great, why does Virtua Tennis 3 look better in 1080p on the PS3?

 

Without extra development time... 

TekkenMaster606

Actually 1080p on xbox360 looks better because it has x2 anti aliasing.

ps3 version has jaggies, plus a tennis game is less graphically demanding as splinter cell.

the only thing that looked better on ps3 was the crowds were not all same cloths, while on 360 people had same cloths.

[QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

gfhgfhtutyutyut

lol, why do i want to spend 500$ to wait 1 year for downgraded ps3 games?

xbox360 is the real gaming console, more powerful sorry.

no ps3 games appeal to me.

[QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

2largeadults

lol, why do i want to spend 500$ to wait 1 year for downgraded ps3 games?

xbox360 is the real gaming console, more powerful sorry.

no ps3 games appeal to me.

jealously of what? i dont have inferior version of games? LOL

having no good games?

no custom soundtracks?

what?

100$  i dont have?to spend?