Square Enix putting their name on Deus Ex made me almost hurl.

They own Edios right? They were going into he crapper... so really you should be thanking Square Enix for buying them and allowing them to live.

They own them and deserve to have their name on it

[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]They'll screw it up as much as they screwed up Arkham Asylum and as much as Capcom screwed up Bionic Commando ReArmed...travisstaggs

They published it.

I'm fairly sure this new Deus Ex will just be the same as IW, only with better graphics.

Fact is consoles dumb down games. the console audience like more action orientated stuff. They don't like heavy text based games at all. And the controller gives a lot of limitations in terms of user interface. lack of lean and prone in many games is down to the devs wanting to streamline the controls of the game. And the same for many other game mechanics/gadgets can mostly all be blamed on the joypad not having enough buttons like a pc.

Lack of rectangle sway on weapon. Is also a console thing as it's more difficult to aim with a analogue stick. In DE1 the weapons could not aim properly until you leveled up. I doubt this will be seen in DE3. This was removed in ME2 also with the sniper sway.

I'm not expecting much. But if the story is good then at least that's something I guess.

[QUOTE="travisstaggs"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]They'll screw it up as much as they screwed up Arkham Asylum and as much as Capcom screwed up Bionic Commando ReArmed...JLF1

They published it.

After Invisible War ..anything DX3 is will count as improvement

But they had no say in the development and they only published it in Japan and maybe one other area I think, in the US Eidos and Warner Bros. published it. Like in Japan for example Square published Modern Warfare 2 but of course did not make the game in any actual way.

travisstaggs

No they published it worldwide.

They bought all of Eidos 6 months before the game launched. The brand of Eidos might be on the box but that brand belongs to S-E.

I do agree with the you that that didn't change anything about the game, I mean, why would they? There is a reason why they bought Eidos and that was because they wanted in on the western games design development and I think they are smart enough to let it stay the way it is.

No they published it worldwide.

They bought all of Eidos 6 months before the game launched. The brand of Eidos might be on the box but that brand belongs to S-E.

I do agree with the you that that didn't change anything about the game, I mean, why would they? There is a reason why they bought Eidos and that was because they wanted in on the western games design development and I think they are smart enough to let it stay the way it is.

JLF1

Anything would be better than the load of crap called Invisible Wars.

Well,as long as they don´t touch the contents of the game I´m alrigth with it.

Yea... this game actually might have some life in its charcters now.... oh wait.... WRPG fans only like lifeless husks.Birdy09

Anything would be better than the load of crap called Invisible Wars.

Vesica_Prime

[QUOTE="travisstaggs"]

But they had no say in the development and they only published it in Japan and maybe one other area I think, in the US Eidos and Warner Bros. published it. Like in Japan for example Square published Modern Warfare 2 but of course did not make the game in any actual way.

JLF1

No they published it worldwide.

They bought all of Eidos 6 months before the game launched. The brand of Eidos might be on the box but that brand belongs to S-E.

I do agree with the you that that didn't change anything about the game, I mean, why would they? There is a reason why they bought Eidos and that was because they wanted in on the western games design development and I think they are smart enough to let it stay the way it is.

[QUOTE="travisstaggs"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]They'll screw it up as much as they screwed up Arkham Asylum and as much as Capcom screwed up Bionic Commando ReArmed...JLF1

They published it.

They'll screw it up as much as they screwed up Arkham Asylum and as much as Capcom screwed up Bionic Commando ReArmed...Senor_Kami

You should read this as:

They'll screw it up as much as they screwed up a game that is rated 90+ on metacritic, got AAA on almost every major gaming site and was a strong contender for Game of the Year. Obviously a game with that much critical praise hasn't been screwed up by anyone. You should take this as a sign for how much Square is looking to impact games that they don't do anything but publish.

I thought people would catch the sarcasm but apparently I give the internet too much credit...*

*that "..." isn't sarcasm

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yea... this game actually might have some life in its charcters now.... oh wait.... WRPG fans only like lifeless husks.texasgoldrush

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yea... this game actually might have some life in its charcters now.... oh wait.... WRPG fans only like lifeless husks.jasonharris48

Yup, coz real RPGs are about conversations and choices right? .Birdy09

We should make a name for the current trend of JRPG haters on here most of you havent even played one. Why do poeple have to always hate on things they dont understand!

I hope Deus flops just to spite some people to be honest its really pathetic how TC and others go ape over Square Enix getting in on the job. Square make great games get a clue. On a side note they probably wont directly effect the game to much anyhow i should imagine they will leave it mainly upto the Devs remember this is an RPG/FPS i should imagine. Japan is not a fan of FPS games.

I think you're overreacting.siLVURcross

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"]I think you're overreacting.AdrianWerner

If it sucks, it won't be SE's fault.mo0ksi

As long as the game isn't plagued with girly men, and other Square Enix traits, I think I'll be fine with it. Oh, and I hope that it doesn't have the traits of IW either...

Deus Ex died a long time ago. I have little faith that it will ever be able to return to the epic nature of the first one.

As long as the game isn't plagued with girly men, and other Square Enix traits, I think I'll be fine with it. Oh, and I hope that it doesn't have the traits of IW either...

smokeydabear076

Hello Xenophobia.

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

As long as the game isn't plagued with girly men, and other Square Enix traits, I think I'll be fine with it. Oh, and I hope that it doesn't have the traits of IW either...

sonicare

If we all went by that logic, then games like Battlefield 2 should suck because it has an EA label on it :P.

I dunno, I'm just happy there is a Deus Ex 3 ( H.E. ) in the works. :P

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

As long as the game isn't plagued with girly men, and other Square Enix traits, I think I'll be fine with it. Oh, and I hope that it doesn't have the traits of IW either...

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

As long as the game isn't plagued with girly men, and other Square Enix traits, I think I'll be fine with it. Oh, and I hope that it doesn't have the traits of IW either...

smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"] If I see JC Denton riding a chocobo while saving the world with a group of teens, I will hurl! :Pmo0ksi

Oh,my word...Arach666

If we all went by that logic, then games like Battlefield 2 should suck because it has an EA label on it :P.

NVIDIATI

[QUOTE="Arach666"] Oh,my word...mo0ksi

Horrible company that should have NOTHING to do with the game. Hope they didn't mess anything up.

peanutbudduh

they are publishing it because they own Eidos who are the old publishers..they wont interfere as they arent the actual developer all i see is a paranoid android talkin about stuff they dont know about.

If we all went by that logic, then games like Battlefield 2 should suck because it has an EA label on it :P.

NVIDIATI

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yup, coz real RPGs are about conversations and choices right? .AdrianWerner

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yup, coz real RPGs are about conversations and choices right? .Birdy09

I guess to you they are mundane because they don´t try to act emotional(and the only emotion they usually achieve from the gamer is embarrasement) every 5 seconds and cry like babies all the time while spouting the cheesiest dialogue lines ever. :P

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yup, coz real RPGs are about conversations and choices right? .Birdy09

So you like stories and eventful characters that read like Twiglight fanfics? ;)

AdrianWerner

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]No, just the good ones are :)

Arach666

I guess to you they are mundane because they don´t try to act emotional(and the only emotion they usually achieve from the gamer is embarrasement) every 5 seconds and cry like babies all the time while spouting the cheesiest dialogue lines ever. :P

Horrible company that should have NOTHING to do with the game. Hope they didn't mess anything up.

peanutbudduh

Well I suppose if Miranda and Shepard were both fake-laughing like peacocks, it wouldn't be that boring for you.

I mean, the hell with optional dialog right? Who needs it? It's not like it's there for character development or anything like that.

[QUOTE="Birdy09"]Yea... this game actually might have some life in its charcters now.... oh wait.... WRPG fans only like lifeless husks.texasgoldrush

i agree with this statement now

but before KOTOR or Baldurs gate 2, JRPG's were better

particularly in the 2D era

Your right, i suppose Miranda losing her childhood friend would be an emotional time, yet all thye could musta was alittle angry face, a cheesey macho "youl pay for that" and attack... and then you speak to her afterwards shes just like every character, an information kiosk that talks in a mundain voice. Fair enough if you like standing there and clicking optional dialogue which in a good majority of the case has no real effect on the game at all as apposed to scripted RP or self-played RP (Morrowind ect) ... but its not for me, I dont like being bored.Birdy09

but before KOTOR or Baldurs gate 2, JRPG's were better

particularly in the 2D era

gillri