Star Wars: Battlefront 4K Screenshots

console fanboys in this thread be like

And 0% console players will see that game looking like that. Your point?

Same, devs always promise these amazing graphics early in developement, then the downgrades come... Still, let's hope it's not the case.

Texture wise , it is ... But technical wise ... NOT even close .... When you have so much going on at the same time like UC4 you cant have the graphic fidelity of Battlefront , consoles are too weak for such thing. Battlefront looks phenomenal in textures/lighting combo ... but thats it. Are we gonna see the world details of UC 4 ? Physics ? Level design ? Gameplay elements ( UC4 is not just shooting ) ? Story ? Voice acting ? So much going on on the screen at the same time as UC4 ? There so many things UC4 does better actually that really can counter those super duper solid Battlefront graphics in my opinion. We have to wait and see though.

I repeat , in technical aspect of graphics , UC4 is way and beyond from any and every single game there is up to date and when this is coming from a console ... its so damn impressive.

i was just joking :P, check out the full thread, i got some precious reactions!

You got me there , i didnt read it my bad ... Im pretty busy here ( working ) and i dont have such luxury :) I will

What's your point?

Shockingly enough, just like literally everything else in life, rich people get nicer things than poor people. Only rich people can own a McLaren P1, which handles better than a Honda Civic.

We're now going to attempt ownage at saying "but only people with good computers can play it like that"?

Shame it won't fix the dissapointly small scope of the game... what a let down.

Huggles is just extremely salty, no point in discussing anything with that idiot.

No one is taking 4K screens and showcasing them going "Can't wait to play this on PS4!!!"

Got the point, now?

People don't show a Ferrari engine and lead ppl to believe if you have a Yugo you'll be able to go 150mph.

Wonder how many herms that got computers that can run this game 60fps in 4k or even own a 4k screen

According to Nvidia/ATI sales, extremely more PC gamers will run this better than the number of PS4 owners :)

Not what i asked, 1 GPU does not look enough to play at that high setting. Not many "master race" gamers will experience 4k if i take a guess...

Me, minus the 4k panel as I went the 2560x1440 144hz route instead.

Good choice dude

More than the number of console gamers who experience the game at all :), according to data:)

No, I still don't get the point, because instead of plebs showcasing 4K screens we have plebs making threads every day talking about fps and resolution, arguing why their console is better than the other. So in both cases we have gamers hungry for graphics, only on one side the limiting factor is their budget for their PC, while on the other their consoles are so weak they're on par with the lowest rung of the PC gaming ladder.

Where are the Tauntauns? Hoth without Tauntauns :(

I'll still be getting this, prob the premium deluxe edition with all DLC since it's Star Wars. Star Wars is the only universe where my wallet gets raped.

I sense shit loads of costly DLC in the force.

Too bad it's multiplayer only and no space combat, but people will buy it because Star Wars is slapped onto the cover.

I sense $1.99 Force Packs, lots of em. Not joining the dark side, noooooooooope.

I got into the alpha as well. No more than what you've seen in at E3.

Yoda predicts a great disturbance in the force. "Milking, they are going to milk this series,,hmmmm"
The prob is many people are Star Wars fan like myself, so we'll complain but still outlay the dollars to get everything.

Lemming? LMAO!

Well geez, even a PS4 can run games at 1080p... You spend 200 dollars on the gpu alone you might want to play at a resolution higher than what a $300 system (in total for GPU + CPU + blu-ray + motherboard + RAM + HDD, etc..) can play in.

Besides, OP's showing off 4K screens.

Best on PS4 baby! You get to play the game without getting duked up the butt financially like hermits do for their overpriced nerdrigs.

lol yeah ok lets play the inferior version of the game on the PS4 900p below ultra settings without keeping 60 fps .... Um no thanks.

Looks gorgeous, but I will never play it like that, nor will I ever play it. No single player and at full price? I'll pass.

Battlefield 2 didn't have any single player and it was well worth the $49.99 price tag.

My friend, dollars and pounds are two different currency.

£49.99 = $78

Except Battlefield 2 wasn't content starved for a 2005 MP-only game. People are going to end up spending $120 just to get a comparable experience with BFront2015.

3 factions, more vehicles, more weapons and an actual class system. Pretty sad that this title along with the 2004-2005 BFront prequels absolutely smashes BFront2015 in content.

-2 factions when it SHOULD be 4

-Fewer maps

-Fewer vehicles

-No unique classes, only homogenized garbage

-No campaign

-No galactic conquest

-No space battles

-Fewer heroes

-Fewer game modes

Bububut teh graphics. Yeah, we can blow 10/11-year-old games away in graphics, big fuckin' deal. How about we go the whole 9 yards and blow them away in terms of content too? Oh wait, can't peddle DLC if we ship a content-rich game in the first fucking place.

k

You and @gpuking have to lay off the meds. You guys get laughed out of every forum (only to make tons of alts) for a reason man.

@HavocV3: Just a single model in Battlefront has more polygons than an entire level in Battlefront 1 or 2. Battlefront 2 also reused every asset from Battlefront 1 and added ridiculously broken heroes, removed the combined arms maps in favor of "space battles" (where were god awful and anybody who played a proper Star Wars space game would agree), and added some cutscenes in between instant aciton maps and passed that off as a single player. Did you also forget that Battlefront 2 came out only a year after Battlefront? It was a complete cash grab that the fanboys ate up.

Face it. Those games were medicore at best. Loved only by console gamers who couldn't play a real Battlefield game. Their moment to moment gamplay was, frankly, quite shit and the only saving grace is that they were Star Wars games. Strip that out and you've got a pretty bad Battlefield clone most people would laugh at.

So far there has been no mention of DLC outside of the one free one that is to release aside of the new movie this December. No talk of Premium or season passes either.

So really all you posted was bullet points for the sake of bullet points. The actual games, when played by real people, were pretty mediocre and shallow. It won't take DICE much to make a better game.

@uninspiredcup: The missions mode can be played alone. There is just no linear, scripted single player that'll last 2 hours.

Looks better than every PS4 exclusive released to date and has open environments...amazing.

@-God-:

You're just mad because they don't sell PS4 in your third world country jankercop.

Is it true that there are only 40 players max on PC?

40 is max, but maybe servers can be modified to allow more players.

The maps are only made for 40 players.

More != better. People who have been playing the alpha said the player count is just right. Never feels too packed bu never feels empty.

lol Battlefront on PS4