[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="sexy_chimp"][QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="sexy_chimp"][QUOTE="Homesrfan"] [QUOTE="majadamus"]Gertsman will deduct a point for for lack of oringinality and/or change (Halo 3!!!!!!!!)bringing it down to 9, and then he'll take away .5 for bad conrtols (No other critic will complain about this). Gamer556
No originality? Look at the planets! I don't think originality is going to be a problem.
They'll just make stuff up like they did with Metroid Prime 3 and Bioshock.
You guys critizise Gamespot too much. They are trying to be DIFFERENT. Sure it's hurting their credibility a lot, but c'mon, we should respect them for that.
We should respect them for lying?
Respect them for being unique. And their amazing forums.
No Willy just no. I respect the quality and organized forums...but I expect professional reviews from a site like this.Them deducting points for nearly non existent issues and constantly contradicting themselves with every paragraph sounds pretty unprofessional to me.
Let's just use other sites for reviews, but still use Gamespot forums to discuss them. No big deal.
On the Spot however is pretty good.
So basically, we should only use the sites that give good scores to the games we like?
Even with the new review system (which I hate), GS is still better than just about every other site.
Some of you guys say that Bioshock was robbed of a 9.5 for minor problems, but are things like a lack of enemy variety really minor? I loved the game, but you only fight Big Daddies anda few variations of Splicers for the entire game. The fighting gets extremely repetitive because of this, and for this alone it should not have gotten a 9.5.
And now to MP3, which you sheep are still in an outgrage over. You criticize GS for calling it more of a same, but is it really anything more than that? Other than Wii controls, it makes basically no major additions to the series.
I respect GS for actually stating these issues in their reviews, rather than leaving them out completely like most other major review sites.
It's not an issue of taking off points for being similar--that's fine with me. Thing is, they said MP3 was too similar to the first two (deduction of points), but it was more FPS-style(fast-paced, as opposed to a slower FPA)and therefore lost something for being too different. And then when the Halo 3 review came out, they said it heavily borrowed from the first two, but that it didn't matter because they were all great, and all the changes were just awesome.
It's not about taking off points. It's about contradictingthemselves within one review and across multiple reviews.
Log in to comment