System Wars Lounge v79 -- Football season, School, holidays, ect

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#251 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:

The "woke" critics hate it so bad, that they gave it a perfect 0% Rotten rating for not being progressive and living at a different "time period"

@lundy86_4 said:

And people wonder why nobody takes leftist media, or media in general, seriously...

I have yet to watch it, but i'm getting fed up of the severe media bias. I wonder how many of these critics are based in Cali.

So you guys think that 5 people not liking a movie, including one from the National Review, is a big liberal media conspiracy?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#252  Edited By deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: I think we have a fundamental disagreement regarding how these people should be treated on the internet. You seem to believe that they got what was coming and as long as they end up ok then it's all good. That's just the sense I've been getting from your posts. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I find this culture of dogpiling and self righteousness absolutely reprehensible, regardless of how things end up. You can't know how things will end before you start going on a flaming escapade. Just because you're guilty of something, it doesn't mean you become a free target for whatever form of online abuse people feel like throwing at you.

Anita is the embodiment of self righteousness. She is an opportunist that profits off controversy. I am not saying this to degrade her as a person, I'm making observations based off her actions and reputation.

I cannot speak on behalf of GAF and it's history. I've only been lurking and posting there for 2 months. In those 2 months I've seen and had countless conversations with legitimate disagreements. You can actually have a discussion there without needing to steer clear of certain aspects of the community. Tally up the amount of controversies arising from both forums and I'd bet ERA comes out on top by far.

My original point in posting all this was to underline that it isn't just stupidity. There's a serious issue with how people are communicating online and feel like they have free reign to spill people's lives all over the floor. Both sides are guilty, but ERA is one of the absolute worst offenders among gaming communities. Heck you've got threads even on your own forum pointing this out, it's almost a miracle that they aren't locked (probably has to do with all the crap that went down last week).

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#253  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib: Boiling things down to just this release? That would be idiotic. Watching a literal media bias subvert itself across NA? Less idiotic. C'mon Lost, you know me better.

Media is intrinsically biased. Studied it 15+ years ago, and it rings true today. Owners of multiple outlets impose their bias.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#254 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts
@lundy86_4 said:

@uninspiredcup: It's becoming too much, and anyone with even a semblance of objectivity is just outright wrong. I won't get into politics, but NA has become a shithole because of these people. When I went to uni, debate was healthy, but now it's debate, but if you don't agree with some far-leaning people who write left-handed, you best make way.

why only relate this to one side of the political spectrum?

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#255 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts
@lundy86_4 said:

And people wonder why nobody takes leftist media, or media in general, seriously...

I have yet to watch it, but i'm getting fed up of the severe media bias. I wonder how many of these critics are based in Cali.

Watch it ASAP! It's the shit!

And critics have yet to grasp the fact that it's a comedy, that's what comedy is all about, that's what comedy should be.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#256 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts
@lundy86_4 said:

@drlostrib: Boiling things down to just this release? That would be idiotic. Watching a literal media bias subvert itself across NA? Less idiotic. C'mon Lost, you know me better.

then you shouldn't use it as your example.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#257  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib said:

then you shouldn't use it as your example.

I really don't see why not. Even with minimal reviews, it shows an endemic within the media that is easily seen elsewhere. It's an example of clear media bias in this day and age. Jeez, I read an English newspaper the other day, and it had the same leanings.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#258 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

Media is intrinsically biased. Studied it 15+ years ago, and it rings true today. Owners of multiple outlets impose their bias.

Of course they do, and it goes both ways. But your example of some large media bias shouldn't only have 6 critics on it, and out of the 5 negative reviews, already 1 of them is from a conservative source.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#259  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib said:

Of course they do, and it goes both ways. But your example of some large media bias shouldn't only have 6 critics on it, and out of the 5 negative reviews, already 1 of them is from a conservative source.

I know it goes both ways, I said it in my post. I specifically said media in general. You don't have to dig far to see a heavy lean within NA politics at the moment. It's all swings and roundabouts.

I'm also confused on the lack of reviews.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#260  Edited By Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46831 Posts

Well to be honest it wouldn’t surprise me if people were giving that Chappelle comedy special high reviews simply because they felt that it may have triggered certain people. For me I need more from my comedy then just that. I watched it and personally I just really didn’t find it all that funny at all. I got a few chuckles out of it later on with the whole shotgun bit and the birdshot/buckshot stuff but none of the other stuff really hit my funny bone and just felt kind of ho-hum flat.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#261 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@Archangel3371: Undoubtedly. Morons exist across the board, regardless of political affiliations. I have yet to watch the show, so i'll reserve judgment.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#262  Edited By DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

I'm also confused on the lack of reviews.

stand up specials don't get many movie critic reviews

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#263 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib said:

stand up specials don't get many movie critic reviews

Seems so. On RT, you think they'd accommodate a variety of reviewers across multiple media forms.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#264 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46831 Posts

@lundy86_4: Too many extremists on both sides and it seems to me that there’s people just liking and disliking stuff because they want to annoy or trigger the other side. It’s a pretty sad state of affairs in society in general these days.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#265  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@Archangel3371: Agreed. I've always been largely centrist, but watching politics over the last few years in the US, and Canada to a far lesser extent, i'm leaning more to the right. I studied Poli Sci, but watching all these idiots just makes me wonder what the hell happened within politics... AOC also really rocks my boat.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#266  Edited By DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:

@Archangel3371: Agreed. I've always been largely centrist, but watching politics over the last few years in the US, and Canada to a far lesser extent, i'm leaning more to the right. I studied Poli Sci, but watching all these idiots just makes me wonder what the hell happened... AOC also really rocks my boat.

if you agree that their are extremists on both sides then why decry only one side of things for making the place a "shithole"?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#267  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib said:

if you agree that their are extremists on both sides then why decry only one side of things for making things a "shithole"?

Lost, i'm genuinely confused. I literally just said "all these idiots," in reference to the morons who have no idea what they're talking about on both sides of the political spectrum. You seeing me only address a specific side based on something I just saw (huge disparity between viewer ratings and "professional" ratings,) does not denote that I simply argue for one specific side. I am more right-leaning, as I noted above... I can, and have seen idiocy on both sides in arguments... That boils down to my essence, as you are very aware of my post history.

I won't respond further. You're addressing parts of my posts and avoiding others, as noted above.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#268 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@lundy86_4 said:
@drlostrib said:

if you agree that their are extremists on both sides then why decry only one side of things for making things a "shithole"?

Lost, i'm genuinely confused. I literally just said "all these idiots," in reference to the morons who have no idea what they're talking about on both sides of the political spectrum. You seeing me only address a specific side based on something I just saw (huge disparity between viewer ratings and "professional" ratings,) does not denote that I simply argue for one specific side. I am more right-leaning, as I noted above... I can, and have seen idiocy on both sides in arguments... That boils down to my essence, as you are very aware of my post history.

From your previous post in the last page about "these people" making it a shithole, and then seem to describe "these people" as the left leaning.

But really, are you taking viewer ratings seriously (or even most professional critic reviews)? Also they're not really ratings, it's just the percentage of people/critics that liked something, the critic reviews don't give numerical scores that are averaged like metacritic

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#269 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib: Edited just before you posted. See above.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#270 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts
@lundy86_4 said:

@drlostrib: Edited just before you posted. See above.

I'm not trying to be a dick, and you've always seemed pretty on the level, but the way your previous posts read just seem to blame one side of things for making things a shithole

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#271 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@drlostrib said:

I'm not trying to be a dick, and you've always seemed pretty on the level, but the way your previous posts read just seem to blame one side of things for making things a shithole

Assume what you will. Later.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#272 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

SW Lounge is filled with love today ?

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#273 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

Fucking finally, don't gotta do this on a phone.

@XVision84 said:

@jg4xchamp: I think we have a fundamental disagreement regarding how these people should be treated on the internet. You seem to believe that they got what was coming and as long as they end up ok then it's all good. That's just the sense I've been getting from your posts. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Sure, they had it coming. If you say something bigoted, did something bigoted, or get outed as an offender, you deserve the public criticism. If a platform chooses they don't want to associate with you because of your shit heel conduct, that's on you. Maybe because I do a corporate america ass job in New York for a living, but we sign contracts that have shit like code of conduct and the stuff that allows the corporation, organization, firm, business, what ever to tell you to kick rocks for public image.

No one forced Pewds to say a slur, he did that himself.

No one took Milo out of context, in any context what he stated was transphobic

No one imagined the dumb shit homeboy Jordan Peterson said, the man is a fraud.

@XVision84 said:

I find this culture of dogpiling and self righteousness absolutely reprehensible, regardless of how things end up. You can't know how things will end before you start going on a flaming escapade. Just because you're guilty of something, it doesn't mean you become a free target for whatever form of online abuse people feel like throwing at you.

I don't care for it in the sense that I think there is a massive gap between being petty n ignorant, which is a lot of people who are just annoyed at left leaning tactics, so out of like some idiotic fit of pettyness they decided **** that you can't tell me what to do dawg!, vs straight up being a bigot.

That said, there zero to 60 nature aside, that's still a massive fucking improvement over straight up dismissing shit, or saying inane shit like "omg they are pandering to x community, they never would do this for y, even tho 90% of fucking media has always been about y". Again I can deal with obnoxious, aint got no tolerance to be found for the stupid.

@XVision84 said:

Anita is the embodiment of self righteousness. She is an opportunist that profits off controversy. I am not saying this to degrade her as a person, I'm making observations based off her actions and reputation.

None of which justifies her getting death threats or doxxed or any of that shit. I think it's funny that its okay criticize anita for shit she has done and her reputation, but then you idiots gotta fucking pearl clutch for other goobers getting outed for their bullshit.

@XVision84 said:

You can actually have a discussion there without needing to steer clear of certain aspects of the community. Tally up the amount of controversies arising from both forums and I'd bet ERA comes out on top by far.

I can have plenty of discussions on Gaf2, I need to adapt how I conduct myself, but there is nothing inherently wrong with that. Generally when actually speaking to people we adapt to our present company. For instance on this forum I can just be a dick, I wouldn't exactly call my behavior not toxic lol.

It's just a simple premise one place at least acknowledges shit for what it is. The other forum I'm getting a whole lot of excuses for why they don't want to accept a spade isn't a club.

@XVision84 said:

My original point in posting all this was to underline that it isn't just stupidity. There's a serious issue with how people are communicating online and feel like they have free reign to spill people's lives all over the floor. Both sides are guilty, but ERA is one of the absolute worst offenders among gaming communities. Heck you've got threads even on your own forum pointing this out, it's almost a miracle that they aren't locked (probably has to do with all the crap that went down last week).

But you didn't lead with that energy. Matter of fact yall need it constantly pointed it out what a shit barrel current gaf or the current opposing side is like. I aint pretending its some both sides shit. Because I'm all about pointing out one side is definitely dumber.

Aint giving no pass to stupid mirko types much less the goobers who love bitching about gaf2, when they stuck with gaf1 n Tyler.

@Archangel3371 said:

@lundy86_4: Too many extremists on both sides and it seems to me that there’s people just liking and disliking stuff because they want to annoy or trigger the other side. It’s a pretty sad state of affairs in society in general these days.

Chapelle always been hit or miss as a stand up. He's a great story teller, but that's about the only thing he's particularly great at as a comedian. He had a legendary skit show, but no one has ever really ranked any of his stand up specials against any all timers for fairly obvious reasons.

He had some quality jokes in there, I chuckled at the alphabet people, the another one line, and "if you can kill this mother fucker than I can abandon him". But while I'm actually pretty fine with punch down comedy, I think people are reasonable when they criticize his trans jokes. They aint funny, there was nothing clever or anything about "chinese dude in a black man's body", like in terms of flow you couldn't really argue it had a unique starting point, build up, and then punch line. It was slap dash out the gate.

Otherwise, Rotten Tomatoes has 6 reviews, one of them is a top reviewer on that site for his stand up. Because the other sources are a bunch of fucking no-name shits so who gives a ****?

The one critic who was a top critic? She has a point, what the **** is anyone doing going "woah is the celebs" ....mother fuckers rich as shit, make more money in a day than your bum ass will make in a life time, but you butthurt over the fact that someone thinks its suspect that Chappelle's comedy show makes some wise crack defenses for a pedo in R. Kelly and whatever the **** that is Michael Jackson because you really like Thriller (Thriller's pretty fucking great).

I think there is room to argue that comedy should have some reign to go for broke, but acting like you can't criticize comedy is stupid as **** also goons.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#274 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62631 Posts

Opuim The Kung Fu Master is a great cautionary tale about the effect heroin has on your kung fu.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#275 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
@XVision84 said:

SW Lounge is filled with love today ?

look what you did lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#276 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: You swear so often I don't even know if I'd call it toxic, I'm used to it. I can't even tell if some of them are directed towards me lol. I just don't care either way.

As I said, we disagree on that first point. I agree that their behaviour wasn't good and that they should face consequences for whatever harm they may have caused. I absolutely do not agree with the public delivering those consequences in the form of a hate campaign. That's bound to go horribly wrong and is just not how you carry out justice nor handle facts.

I'm confused why you're suggesting that I believe Anita deserves to be doxed or harassed. I stated several times that I am vehemently against that regardless of the perpetrator.

I don't know who Mirko and Tyler are, but I stand by my previous points (which are the same ones I've led with from the start). You can have actual conversations in GAF. Yes people change the way they communicate based on who they're talking to, but ERA takes that to another level. I've spoken to many ERA regulars who just talk gaming and stay away from anything political in fear of getting banned. That's messed up.

I've yet to see someone say they can't, at the very least, speak their mind freely in GAF. I've still yet to see you point out what GAF has done to even rival ERA's treatment of Etika and the pedo controversy.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#277 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: Nah I blame your swearing, Champ. It's setting a toxic vibe ?

Try replacing all your swear words with compliments lol

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278  Edited By Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51575 Posts

Inside the eye of Dorian

That my friends, is cool as shit!

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#279 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62631 Posts

At this point The Simpsons is basically a Bethesda game where the base game sucks but the user-content keeps it going.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#280  Edited By jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

@XVision84: @XVision84: do something worthy of a compliment first.

Beyond that what should be the consequences then? Goons getting outed n deplatformed n such is productive and gets a point across. You still have your basic human rights, but you wearing a shit heel badge from hence forth.

Simply letting it slide is not viable.

I’ll concede in far as this, that the stuff era finds offensive and suspend worthy is questionable at best. But a lot of the goons that don’t want to talk politics shit also happen to be goons who don’t actually contribute anything fundamentally sound to the conversation to begin with. Just want to bitch because they got inconvenienced as a white boi.

Go look at your own TLoU thread for that shit lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#281 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: I do it all the time, not my fault you don't notice, old man ?

Getting someone outed and deplatformed is not productive. That's been going on for years now, how much 'progress' has been made with this productivity?

People don't learn from that kind of response. It just causes contempt behind a forced behaviour change (which may not even be permanent). That's like teaching your children something is wrong by hitting them. Instead focus on showing them why it's wrong and give them the opportunity to grow instead of tearing them apart (which happens to be a very liberal mindset). Allow the law to carry out justice. If the law fails, then protest and make appeals. It's not perfect but it's magnitudes better than Twitter justice.

There's a reason why we have things like the constitution rather than allowing the masses to govern right/wrong; the latter is corruptible and prone to bias/misinformation. People's lives aren't toys to be played with to stroke other's egos/power complexes.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#282  Edited By nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42196 Posts

Don't ever tell Overwatch fanboys that you're disappointed that the console versions of Overwatch don't have split screen/local multiplayer features. Holy s***! By their logic, these games should've abandoned it completely, including...

-Any fighting game (Smash, Tekken, Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat, DBFZ, SoulCalibur)

-Mario Kart 8

-Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3

-LEGO

Ironically, defend Nintendo's stance on not adding online to Mario 3D World, you get eviscerated.

Avatar image for whiskeystrike
whiskeystrike

12213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#283 whiskeystrike
Member since 2011 • 12213 Posts

anyone who hasn't played ffxiv shadowbringers is wasting their time

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#284 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

Edelgard Stans are sus. She isn’t kind of evil, she is comically evil. Three Houses story is mega dumb.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#285 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: No spoilers, I'm still working through 3 houses. Loving it atm and I'm black eagles lol

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#286 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts

Era's propensity for intolerance and its scope-for-debate-destroying-iron-grip-moderation is annoying as ****, but the forum doesn't have flippant bigoted assholes running around with no one to keep them in check.

Don't get me wrong, Era's a dumpster fire too, and it's only slightly better than GAF in terms of me wanting to post on any of the two forums- but Era is a dumpster fire because it's full of self-righteous obnoxious assholes, and people being assholes for the right reasons is still tolerable to me.

About chaz, anyone with a brain who doesn't want to dogpile as a response to dogpiling could see that it was a post that meant exactly what it said. I don't see how "I hope he gets what's coming" when said for a person accused of terrible shit by multiple people could be taken to mean "I hope he kills himself." The internet hate mobs did that, and Era definitely played a part in that – that is undeniable – but if chaz's post hadn't been literally on the first page of that thread, I doubt anyone would have cared about it. They cared about it because they spotted it easily, and they latched on to it and made it the poster boy for their "let's defeat the lynch mob with a lynch mob" crusade.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#287  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@khoofia_pika: I can only speak for old Chaz, and I would never imagine him going that far off the rocker. I have no idea if Era changed him in any way, but if his comment was made in that sense, then it's wildly out of character. I'm sure the "...gets what's coming" is within the legal sense, but it was a silly go-to given the presumption of innocence, as opposed to Twitter being an utter detriment to society. Quinn does not have much grounding to assume she's truthful.

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#288 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts

@lundy86_4: Nah, his comment wasn't made in that sense. It was more "I hope there are appropriate consequences for his shitty behaviour". Which- I mean, what reasonable person would see anything wrong with such a statement?

Counter-hate mobs twisting his comment into something ugly was weird. And hypocritical. They're complaining about internet hate mobs driving a man to the point of no return, and they respond to that with what- a hate mob? Sure, that makes sense.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#289  Edited By lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@khoofia_pika: Like I said, I really can't speak. But I can't see him making it in that way. It's out of character.

Mobs are mobs, and it's dumb to bandwagon. Regardless of stance, ya kinda need to draw your own conclusions.

BTW, it's been forever, when was the last time you posted?

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#290  Edited By deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts
@lundy86_4 said:

Mobs are mobs, and it's dumb to bandwagon. Regardless of stance, ya kinda need to draw your own conclusions.

Yeah dude. Avoid mobs like the plague.

@lundy86_4 said:

BTW, it's been forever, when was the last time you posted?

Oh been a couple years, I think. Figured I'd check in and see how SW is reacting to GS' Gears review, ended up in the lounge somehow lol

Really glad to see plenty of old faces still active in here

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#291 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

@khoofia_pika: Seriously. Mobs are dumb.

SW is SW, you should dip your head into the thread and post. It's the usual Cows versus Lemmings.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#292 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
@XVision84 said:

@jg4xchamp: No spoilers, I'm still working through 3 houses. Loving it atm and I'm black eagles lol

All the houses are trash, but Edelgard most so lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#293 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@khoofia_pika: Nice to see you back here, khoof ?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#294 deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

@jg4xchamp: Not gonna lie, I really dig Edelgard. She's confident, ambitious and commanding without being overbearing. I didn't expect to like this game so much, but I'm pleasantly surprised!

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#295 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
@XVision84 said:

@jg4xchamp: I do it all the time, not my fault you don't notice, old man ?

Getting someone outed and deplatformed is not productive. That's been going on for years now, how much 'progress' has been made with this productivity?

It's plenty productive. Why would you argue it isn't? Homeboy Milo fell off the face of the earth. Goober scumbag Alex Jones is whatever without his platform. Normalizing shitty behavior isn't a net positive, so absence of it is naturally a boon.

Put it simply if it didn't achieve anything, no one would give that much of a **** to stop goons from deplatforming now would they? So that's an argument that doesn't really fly.

@XVision84 said:

People don't learn from that kind of response.

People have made little effort to learn from any response. You can't fix stupid. ignorant? eh sort of. Stupid? no.

@XVision84 said:

It just causes contempt behind a forced behaviour change (which may not even be permanent). That's like teaching your children something is wrong by hitting them. Instead focus on showing them why it's wrong and give them the opportunity to grow instead of tearing them apart (which happens to be a very liberal mindset).

But they get shown that something is wrong, explained why thing is wrong, and promptly are punished for something that is wrong. Hitting your kids is bad, but we all grasp the concept behind what the parent is doing when they are grounding their kid or taking away tv time n such. Poor behavior is given a consequence. Rewarding poor behavior or letting it just rock, is condoning said poor behavior.

@XVision84 said:

If the law f

What is this inane goober playbook to always bring up " *nerdvoice* it should be brought up in COURT!!!" . Mother fuckers aint losing their basic human rights, they still free to go about their day. They just aren't given a platform because of conduct detrimental to said platform. Lots of places work that way. You have free speech, your speech can also have consequences beyond just legal shit. Hold that.

@XVision84 said:

There's a reason why we have things like the constitution rather than allowing the masses to govern right/wrong;

The constitution is a few centruies old, and written by goons even more stupid n racist than boomers, so while yes we have governing laws to maintain civility, said civility isn't exactly being up turned because people who feel like spewing hateful shit, happen to get punished for spewing hateful shit.

Again it's not the loss of a life, no one gets imprisoned, and more importantly in a lot of these cases the goon being outed did what they did.

If you can legally prove you are unjustly treated, go prove it in court, you'll make more money as a result.

@XVision84 said:

People's lives aren't toys to be played with to stroke other's egos/power complexes.

But the goons being outed actually said what they said, did what they they are being blamed to have done (there is usually some sappy apology tour that follows), routinely took advantage of their position of power, and again I don't see that same energy when "that shitty evil bitch anita" gets doxxed n death threats.

Far more energy is spent on pointing out "god I hate that bitch, she made a bad youtube like 10 times".

Between two brands of stupid, one happens to be tolerating bigots and the other isn't. Hold your L however you want on that one.

@XVision84 said:

@jg4xchamp: Not gonna lie, I really dig Edelgard. She's confident, ambitious and commanding without being overbearing. I didn't expect to like this game so much, but I'm pleasantly surprised!

Game is meh tbh. The lack of a weapon triangle is dumb, and the monastery shit is mad drawn out and just adds tedium to the game. The multiple upgrading options is ultimately a lot of redundant bullshit, since there are obviously optimized paths for these characters that the old games just did by having them already be a class and learning in that class.

It's whatever, I could certainly do worse. I'll at least finish Three Houses which isn't what I would say about Persona 5 or something. So I still much rather play a srpg than a straight up jrpg.

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#296 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts
@XVision84 said:

@khoofia_pika: Nice to see you back here, khoof ?

Yo XV, been a while :D

How've you been, what have you been doing/playing/watching/reading

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#297  Edited By DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58588 Posts

Damn, FireEmblem_Man is gone! R.I.P, you was a good friend :(

Also, welcome back @khoofia_pika I hope you stick around this time :)

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#298 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

Pablo is a two faced little bitch who loves talking shit right up until someone calls him out for it. Nothing of value was lost.

Putz gonna putz.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebea105efb64
deactivated-5ebea105efb64

7262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#299 deactivated-5ebea105efb64
Member since 2013 • 7262 Posts

@davillain- said:

Damn, FireEmblem_Man is gone! R.I.P, you was a good friend :(

Banned for good? Why? Damn :(.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#300 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58588 Posts

@Gamerno6666 said:
@davillain- said:

Damn, FireEmblem_Man is gone! R.I.P, you was a good friend :(

Banned for good? Why? Damn :(.

Sadly, I don't know the details, and I can't see his wall text that's for sure.