Take a moment to bask in the GLORY of Crysis in DX10.

http://www.glassedgestudios.com/Verw3948JungleFight.wmv

Yes, that feels good. 8)

mmmmmmm prettyyy

Looks great.

(but then again, so did Lair).

only 27FPS still? Still running crysis at that setting is painful but amazing looking. I'll have to wait for a 9 series GFX to be able to truley max out this game. Even with my dual 8800GTX in SLI i can run it at 35FPS max.Kratos_OMEGA

Again SLI is not supported nor are quad cores. I have even heard that it is only running on a single core doesn't support any dual cores processors right now.

only 27FPS still? Still running crysis at that setting is painful but amazing looking. I'll have to wait for a 9 series GFX to be able to truley max out this game. Even with my dual 8800GTX in SLI i can run it at 35FPS max.Kratos_OMEGA

Looks like a white mess of static. Every leaf edge is covered in white. No thanks. Too hard on my eyes.vitz3

lolz your eyes cannot handle it's beauty :P

Why didn't it look like that in the demo when i put it on DX10?

Maybe it's a certain time of day and a certain part of the jungle we didn't explore...

Why didn't it look like that in the demo when i put it on DX10?

Maybe it's a certain time of day and a certain part of the jungle we didn't explore...

FrozenLiquid

The guy who did this did it in response to that infamous "comparison" pic that's been floating around. He adjusted time of day and lighting settings, among other things. I'll just repost something I recently posted about this:

Already noted to be mainly differences in time of day, lighting levels, and fog settings. All fairly easily customizable. Someone figured as much and cooked these up in only one hour in the sandbox after seeing that comparison:

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7197/65285399et6.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7020/43856945qe4.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/6/12451430gf4.jpgZeliard9

And that video that Dreams posted is from that.

In that same post I also mentioned how I thought the "very high" pic in the comparison was BS and not truly at very high settings, mostly noticeable by those low-quality leaves on the bottom, and I posted this pic of what quality vegetation actually looks like.

I just wish more moddersgo for Crysis. The game itself isn't that great, but the technology is.:D

First serious Crysis mod:
http://www.28-months-later.com/

Pretty! :shock: But I think bloom is still a tad bit overdone, if you're looking at a leaf in real life is it white just because sun is shining? Stop overusing the goddamn bloom! :evil: Still, not as bad as DiRT...EntwineX

A tad ? I suppose this is just an exaggerated made pic from the editor though

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

Why didn't it look like that in the demo when i put it on DX10?

Maybe it's a certain time of day and a certain part of the jungle we didn't explore...

Zeliard9

The guy who did this did it in response to that infamous "comparison" pic that's been floating around. He adjusted time of day and lighting settings, among other things. I'll just repost something I recently posted about this:

Already noted to be mainly differences in time of day, lighting levels, and fog settings. All fairly easily customizable. Someone figured as much and cooked these up in only one hour in the sandbox after seeing that comparison:

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7197/65285399et6.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7020/43856945qe4.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/6/12451430gf4.jpgZeliard9

And that video that Dreams posted is from that.

In that same post I also mentioned how I thought the "very high" pic in the comparison was BS and not truly at very high settings, mostly noticeable by those low-quality leaves on the bottom, and I posted this pic of what quality vegetation actually looks like.

IMO it looks MILES behind the first pic in the comparisson, where you can see each leaf, and lighting is so much better applied and distributed, it is obviously a pre-rendered pic though, but they just did not have to lie about it

[QUOTE="EntwineX"]Pretty! :shock: But I think bloom is still a tad bit overdone, if you're looking at a leaf in real life is it white just because sun is shining? Stop overusing the goddamn bloom! :evil: Still, not as bad as DiRT...saolin323

A tad ? I suppose this is just an exaggerated made pic from the editor though

Really confusing pic, i can barely make out the detail in trees etc, IMO something is wrong in AA here, probably it runs on an inferior machine or something ?saolin323

[QUOTE="Kratos_OMEGA"]only 27FPS still? Still running crysis at that setting is painful but amazing looking. I'll have to wait for a 9 series GFX to be able to truley max out this game. Even with my dual 8800GTX in SLI i can run it at 35FPS max.l-_-l

I meant the demo, and yes the game still runs, but it crashes at times. When i disable SLI it's even worse.

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

Why didn't it look like that in the demo when i put it on DX10?

Maybe it's a certain time of day and a certain part of the jungle we didn't explore...

saolin323

The guy who did this did it in response to that infamous "comparison" pic that's been floating around. He adjusted time of day and lighting settings, among other things. I'll just repost something I recently posted about this:

Already noted to be mainly differences in time of day, lighting levels, and fog settings. All fairly easily customizable. Someone figured as much and cooked these up in only one hour in the sandbox after seeing that comparison:

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7197/65285399et6.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7020/43856945qe4.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/6/12451430gf4.jpgZeliard9

And that video that Dreams posted is from that.

In that same post I also mentioned how I thought the "very high" pic in the comparison was BS and not truly at very high settings, mostly noticeable by those low-quality leaves on the bottom, and I posted this pic of what quality vegetation actually looks like.

IMO it looks MILES behind the first pic in the comparisson, where you can see each leaf, and lighting is so much better applied and distributed, it is obviously a pre-rendered pic though, but they just did not have to lie about it

It wasn't supposed to be exactly like the comparison shot. The guy said he only did it in an hour in the sandbox, simply by messing around with lighting settings and such. It was mostly to show that Crysis could probably be made to look very similar to the first pic, simply by changing some settings around, and not even any CVARs. The engine is insanely customizable. I guarantee you some modders out there will create levels and such for Crysis that actually look better than Crytek's.

[QUOTE="vitz3"]Looks like a white mess of static. Every leaf edge is covered in white. No thanks. Too hard on my eyes.The_Ish

lolz your eyes cannot handle it's beauty :P

:lol; He doesn't use eyes, he uses 2 mirrors that project the image and burns it into his brain causing him permanant brain damage control.

awesome graphics- anybody got a rig that can do run it at 60fps? no?- thought not!

[QUOTE="saolin323"]Really confusing pic, i can barely make out the detail in trees etc, IMO something is wrong in AA here, probably it runs on an inferior machine or something ?EntwineX

I meant the non blured ones on the right, but it is probably the exaggerated HDR ?

[QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

Why didn't it look like that in the demo when i put it on DX10?

Maybe it's a certain time of day and a certain part of the jungle we didn't explore...

Zeliard9

The guy who did this did it in response to that infamous "comparison" pic that's been floating around. He adjusted time of day and lighting settings, among other things. I'll just repost something I recently posted about this:

Already noted to be mainly differences in time of day, lighting levels, and fog settings. All fairly easily customizable. Someone figured as much and cooked these up in only one hour in the sandbox after seeing that comparison:

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7197/65285399et6.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/7020/43856945qe4.jpg

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/6/12451430gf4.jpgZeliard9

And that video that Dreams posted is from that.

In that same post I also mentioned how I thought the "very high" pic in the comparison was BS and not truly at very high settings, mostly noticeable by those low-quality leaves on the bottom, and I posted this pic of what quality vegetation actually looks like.

IMO it looks MILES behind the first pic in the comparisson, where you can see each leaf, and lighting is so much better applied and distributed, it is obviously a pre-rendered pic though, but they just did not have to lie about it

It wasn't supposed to be exactly like the comparison shot. The guy said he only did it in an hour in the sandbox, simply by messing around with lighting settings and such. It was mostly to show that Crysis could probably be made to look very similar to the first pic, simply by changing some settings around, and not even any CVARs. The engine is insanely customizable. I guarantee you some modders out there will create levels and such for Crysis that actually look better than Crytek's.

I do not think this is possible, if the core rendering engine is so inferior, there are some huge differences in lighting in the fake pic, same for the shadows and ground, look closely, it looks so amazing in the fake pic, but has a fake factor in the real pics

Still, it looks great, just not mindblowing, and definatly a downgrade from what we had in our minds

Damn that got me...

nice visuals. Crysis is a damn good game!

Damn that got me...

nice visuals. Crysis is a damn good game!

overfiend7777

It takes more than visuals to make a damn good game. This we'll have to see when we can play it in full.

Looks like a white mess of static. Every leaf edge is covered in white. No thanks. Too hard on my eyes.vitz3

I am pretty sure that the person who took the screenshot messed around with the settings so it would appear like that.

*anticipates retail release and installs vista 64*

:shock: DX9 looked gorgeous albeit a little disappointing with my GTX (even with 'dx10 tweaks')...

only 27FPS still? Still running crysis at that setting is painful but amazing looking. I'll have to wait for a 9 series GFX to be able to truley max out this game. Even with my dual 8800GTX in SLI i can run it at 35FPS max.Kratos_OMEGA

SLI is disabled in the demo.........

Damn that got me...

nice visuals. Crysis is a damn good game!

overfiend7777

It's so bright, I have to wear 8)

[QUOTE="overfiend7777"]

Damn that got me...

nice visuals. Crysis is a damn good game!

Dreams-Visions

It's so bright, I have to wear 8)

I found a series of screenshots so beautiful they deserve their own thread but I was wondering if maybe I should post them here.... What do you guys think? Anyway, I will post them here first and maybe make a thread just for them in a bit.

Forest - 1 1600x1200 Wallpaper


Forest - 2 1600x1200 Wallpaper


Meadow - 1


Meadow - 2


Tree 1600x1200 Wallpaper


Hills 1600x1200 Wallpaper


Cove - 1 1600x1200 Wallpaper


Cove - 2

All real-time screenshots. Few tweaks were made to the cvars, and these are all custom maps but theseare 100% real-time screenshots.

found in this thread.

http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?postid=72648

He is running the game on 1Gig of RAM and an ATI Radeon X1800 GTS getting6-8 FPS to take these screenshots but these were just for pure beauty and art.