The Best Thing About PC Gaming

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Poll The Best Thing About PC Gaming (125 votes)

Graphics 9%
Steam 5%
Modding 7%
Games - Star Citizen , XCOM2 , .... 24%
Backward compatibility 7%
Building your own rig just the way you want 21%
Cheaper in the long run 9%
Open Platform - Supporting all kind of controllers + K/M 18%

what part of PC gaming you love the most warriors ? ...

 • 
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Emulation, M/KB, graphics, cheaper games and so on.

Avatar image for Metallic_Blade
Metallic_Blade

565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Metallic_Blade
Member since 2005 • 565 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

Porn.

Hmm... I think you might be onto something...

But honestly, the best part for me is building the system up itself. Makes for a good weekend project every other year or so.

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

Porn.

charming as always, ff :P

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#55 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts
@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#56 tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

lolwut?

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@the_master_race said:
@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#58  Edited By tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@sovkhan said:
@the_master_race said:
@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

But we are not comparing this purely by hardware standards? If you're spending more on hardware on PC, you are getting better performance... (In this gen)

Also, why are you including laptops?

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@tushar172787

Yes it's true, but it's just to show that the cheap on the long run thing is a total bs...

If you want to keep up with the pc performance levels, there's no way in hell that it will cost you less than consoles/softs combined.

I added laptop because it happens that i have a gaming one since 2k, bought 3 new ones since and upgraded my rigs every 2 years or so.

So, even if you take into account the soft price, playing on pc is more expensive, if you are going after what pc is meant for : performance!!!

Edit : that why i always consider price/perf ratio more important than perf alone, and in this regard consoles have the lead.

Avatar image for Big_Red_Button
Big_Red_Button

6094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 Big_Red_Button
Member since 2005 • 6094 Posts

@Bigboi500 said:
@freedomfreak said:

Porn.

Get a girl/boyfriend you freak. ^ . >

>he thinks that people in relationships don't look at porn

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@Big_Red_Button

So true!!!:

Avatar image for priapus10101
Priapus10101

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#62 Priapus10101
Member since 2013 • 157 Posts

The diverse range of quality games available on PC and strong communities are what primarily draw me to PC gaming. I love how games like The Stanley Parable exist (one of my favourite games) and how I can easily find multiplayer games for titles released over a decade ago. Backwards compatibility, modding, cheap games, PC customisation (both software and hardware) and the open platform nature of PC is also amazing.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#63 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@sovkhan said:
@the_master_race said:
@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

Have you seen steam sales ? Seriously consoles are not even close to PC when it comes to cheap games .... Games on PC tend to have price drops faster and more significant as well.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180205 Posts

Well I'm not really into PC gaming per se (don't have many games on it yet) but I did build my own gaming PC so that's my vote.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#65 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts

For me Backwards Compatibility and Emulation.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#66 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@Big_Red_Button said:
@Bigboi500 said:
@freedomfreak said:

Porn.

Get a girl/boyfriend you freak. ^ . >

>he thinks that people in relationships don't look at porn

^ he doesn't know when someone is joking the **** around. *shakes head in disappointment*

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#68  Edited By Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

mhm... sure you were.

If you were half as smart as you claim you are, you might have considered the person I addressed knew I was joking, since he didn't flame me for what I said.

Maybe peripheral though just isn't your thing? Stick to reactionary passion.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#69 Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

For me, as an ex-PC gamer, I would say the thing I miss the most is the higher frequency of well-written, darker themed titles.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@mjorh said:
@sovkhan said:
@the_master_race said:
@sovkhan said:

Versatility and games mainly...but never in competition with consoles.

I laughed at "cheaper on the long run"...myths are hard to overcome!!!

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

Have you seen steam sales ? Seriously consoles are not even close to PC when it comes to cheap games .... Games on PC tend to have price drops faster and more significant as well.

You can find plenty of games around the 5$ mark, got recently the whole mass effect trilogy for less than 12$...and you have the used ones too.

The question is, how much does cost a new game digital??? One may think it's for cheap and it's certainly not!!!

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#71 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@sovkhan: As i said, it drops faster.

Avatar image for 360ru13r
360ru13r

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 360ru13r
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

Porn.

^^ Number one answer not shown as a selectable answer.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@mjorh:

@mjorh said:

@sovkhan: As i said, it drops faster.

That's why mass effect is 20 bucks at steam instead of 5 on the psn :p

Witcher WH 60 bucks steam, 34 on the psn.../myths i told ya :p

Avatar image for svaubel
svaubel

4571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 133

User Lists: 0

#74  Edited By svaubel
Member since 2005 • 4571 Posts

Everything on that list

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@sovkhan said:
@mjorh said:
@sovkhan said:
@the_master_race said:

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

Have you seen steam sales ? Seriously consoles are not even close to PC when it comes to cheap games .... Games on PC tend to have price drops faster and more significant as well.

You can find plenty of games around the 5$ mark, got recently the whole mass effect trilogy for less than 12$...and you have the used ones too.

The question is, how much does cost a new game digital??? One may think it's for cheap and it's certainly not!!!

Let's see, some games I've bought over the last year

Mad Max, 2 days after release - £13

GTA V, pre-ordered - £24

Assassin's Creed Syndicate 2 weeks after release - £14 (it was cheaper on release day at £13)

Fallout 4, pre-ordered - £22

Batman Arkham Knight with full premium contents, pre-ordered - £24 (yeah, I'm a mug)

Might and Magic VII, 1 week after release - £20

I could go on but I'm sure you get the picture.

Anyone who thinks Steam sales are the only place to get cheap PC games really needs to learn how to use google.

Edit: Just had a look and I can get Tomb Raider pre-order for £20

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

Complete choice.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@sovkhan said:

@mjorh:

@mjorh said:

@sovkhan: As i said, it drops faster.

That's why mass effect is 20 bucks at steam instead of 5 on the psn :p

Witcher WH 60 bucks steam, 34 on the psn.../myths i told ya :p

It's not just steam , we have websites like G2A ... @GarGx1 summed it up pretty much.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4981 Posts

Everything is the best thing about PC.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#79 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

The unique games you don't find on console.

Which is why everyone should have a PC to compliment their console.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#80 Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

Modding.

Don't care for the othe fluff you put there and i can say the option to Build it might be something i hate.

Avatar image for FinalFighters
FinalFighters

3410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 FinalFighters
Member since 2013 • 3410 Posts
  • Open Platform
  • FREE Online play
  • BC / Emu
  • Use any controller you like
Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#83  Edited By tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@sovkhan

@sovkhan said:

@tushar172787

Yes it's true, but it's just to show that the cheap on the long run thing is a total bs...

I am trying to compare console to PC standards here.. I am not comparing ultra high end PCs.

If you want to keep up with the pc performance levels, there's no way in hell that it will cost you less than consoles/softs combined.

A PC isn't just for running better versions of multiplats, it's also useful for running loads of PC exclusives/emulators/last-gen games, mods etc. Personally, me (and probably loads of real world PC gamers) would do just that, and are ok at playing with slightly better than/worse than console settings/power.

I added laptop because it happens that i have a gaming one since 2k, bought 3 new ones since and upgraded my rigs every 2 years or so.

And how does this fit into the discussion of Console vs PC price?

So, even if you take into account the soft price, playing on pc is more expensive, if you are going after what pc is meant for : performance!!!

Why should I get a PC for more performance? Couldn't I get it for the games, features mods, sales, etc?

Edit : that why i always consider price/perf ratio more important than perf alone, and in this regard consoles have the lead.

No they don't.. lol

The initial cost of a PC will be slightly higher, but you will save in the long run due to peripherals, game prices, and the fact that you can do general computing + gaming on it, makes it have higher value for money.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@tushar172787 said:

@sovkhan

@sovkhan said:

@tushar172787

Yes it's true, but it's just to show that the cheap on the long run thing is a total bs...

I am trying to compare console to PC standards here.. I am not comparing ultra high end PCs.

If you want to keep up with the pc performance levels, there's no way in hell that it will cost you less than consoles/softs combined.

A PC isn't just for running better versions of multiplats, it's also useful for running loads of PC exclusives/emulators/last-gen games, mods etc. Personally, me (and probably loads of real world PC gamers) would do just that, and are ok at playing with slightly better than/worse than console settings/power.

I added laptop because it happens that i have a gaming one since 2k, bought 3 new ones since and upgraded my rigs every 2 years or so.

And how does this fit into the discussion of Console vs PC price?

So, even if you take into account the soft price, playing on pc is more expensive, if you are going after what pc is meant for : performance!!!

Why should I get a PC for more performance? Couldn't I get it for the games, features mods, sales, etc?

Edit : that why i always consider price/perf ratio more important than perf alone, and in this regard consoles have the lead.

No they don't.. lol

The initial cost of a PC will be slightly higher, but you will save in the long run due to peripherals, game prices, and the fact that you can do general computing + gaming on it, makes it have higher value for money.

let make it clear...

Ps3 600$ + psn (50$X5) = 250$ : total 850$ for 10 years + games ranging from 60 to 5$ + ( 72 games a year thx to psn++ )

You can save you some money by reselling your new games.

pc : 1000$ ( smallest entry point ) + 400$ upgrade every two years = 3000$ games ranging from 60$ to 5$.

You can easily multiply by two or three, if you wanna be a graphic whore, last cpu's are 1000$ and last gpus are the same. And if you are a globe trotter a gaming laptop is a must, so you can add 1000$ every two, three years...

I'm no graphic whore and in the span of 10 years, i spend ten times more money on my pc hardware than one console, i let you imagine the price paid by a guy running after cutting edge tech!!!

Now, for the majority of people, the pc advantage in graphics is irrelevant due to the entry point, maintenance and know how.

So, there's no way in hell that pc is less expensive in the long run/period.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

I'm not a huge PC gamer, having only a modest laptop at the moment, but the fact that you can buy a years worth of high quality games for peanuts is the most appealing aspect to me. I have roughly 30 games in my Steam library and have spent less than $100 all together.

That's how I feel bro, and I'm like you, a lowly laptop PC gamer. Even though we play games on PC, we aren't part of the mustard race because we don't own 'spensive hardware that we built from grains of sand or hook the machine to our veins. Hermits don't like us any more than they do the bottom feeding consolites. :(

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#88 tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@sovkhan:

let make it clear...

First of all, I was clearly comparing PC vs console cost this gen. But since you already started this argument...

Ps3 600$ + psn (50$X5) = 250$ : total 850$ for 10 years + games ranging from 60 to 5$ + ( 72 games a year thx to psn++ )

PS+ didn't even launch when the PS3 launched, it came out in 2010, and for the most of first year, it offered only one game for free. After that, 1-2 game pattern was followed, so where did you get your "72 games a year" assumption? Also, 1) You do not have choice in the games, so you probably wont like most of the games, 2) PS+ in the beginning, had a worse game selection than now, and 3) you coúldn't actually keep the games. PSN sales also used to have the same situation back in the day, without many worthwhile sales, so you were stuck with physical.

This is, of course completely ignoring the fact that the PS3 had an exclusive drought in the early years, playing multiplats at sub-HD, worse optimization, PSN crashes etc. However, it had full BC for PS1/PS2 titles, which puts it in competition with PC. (Of course, PC had BC for many more consoles) and blu-ray,

So: PS3-$600, PS+ ($50x3) $150 (around total 50 games for the gen), Hard Drive (optional, if you want to keep PS+ games) and games at close to full price due to physical disks, Blu-ray.

.You can save you some money by reselling your new games

And you can save even more money by selling PC components.

pc : 1000$ ( smallest entry point ) + 400$ upgrade every two years = 3000$ games ranging from 60$ to 5$.

lol wut? For $1000, you could easily build a great PC that would run games much better than the PS3. For $700, you could build a mid range PC which would beat the PS3 for 4 years (After which the card will be outdated due to DX11). Also, why I should upgrade for $400 every two years for better than console performance? At close to the end of the life cycle, I could get a GTX 660/i3 sandy bridge/H61 Mobo/4 GB ram for $420 + a 500GB to get on Par with PS4. Plus massively cheaper games due to digital distribution, many more exclusives, better multiplats, cheaper peripherals + it can be used for general computing.

So: PC-$800 + $450 upgrade after 4-5 years to keep up with next-gen consoles, and half price games, cheaper peripherals, etc.

You can easily multiply by two or three, if you wanna be a graphic whore, last cpu's are 1000$ and last gpus are the same.

So what's your point? $1000 CPU and $1000 GPU exist today also, why should I get them? They're complete overkill and a waste of money..

And if you are a globe trotter a gaming laptop is a must, so you can add 1000$ every two, three years...

And, this still doesn't fit into the discussion. We are comparing PC vs console cost of same power. But of course, if you are a globe trotter, that is another advantage for laptop gaming.

I'm no graphic whore and in the span of 10 years, i spend ten times more money on my pc hardware than one console, i let you imagine the price paid by a guy running after cutting edge tech!!!

Lolno, PC doesn't cost anywhere that much if you’re looking for equivalent performance/decently better performance than a PS4. Again, why should I buy 4x titan sli, 5960x CPU? Why Wouldn’t I be fine with an i3/GTX 750Ti/R9 270x?

Now, for the majority of people, the pc advantage in graphics is irrelevant due to the entry point, maintenance and know how.

Completely off-topic. btw, if you don’t care about graphics, then you might as well game on a pre-built PC or Mobile. You wont buy a console because it’s entry point is too high, and you know how to use it better than your PC/handheld/Smartphone.

So, there's no way in hell that PC is less expensive in the long run than console , without having better graphics, period.

In conclusion, fixed that for you.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#89 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36126 Posts

The best thing is that PC is best at everything.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#90  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62871 Posts

The games are more sophisticated.

Avatar image for miiiiv
miiiiv

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#91  Edited By miiiiv
Member since 2013 • 943 Posts

Much better gameplay due to higher frame rates and control options. 30 fps which most console games run at makes looking around/camera movement jittery and imprecise.

Avatar image for Legend002
Legend002

13405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

#92 Legend002
Member since 2007 • 13405 Posts

buying old shit for cheap. I still get all new releases on my PS4 because **** nasty ass drm.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

I cant choose!

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

@tushar172787 said:

@sovkhan:

let make it clear...

First of all, I was clearly comparing PC vs console cost this gen. But since you already started this argument...

Ps3 600$ + psn (50$X5) = 250$ : total 850$ for 10 years + games ranging from 60 to 5$ + ( 72 games a year thx to psn++ )

PS+ didn't even launch when the PS3 launched, it came out in 2010, and for the most of first year, it offered only one game for free. After that, 1-2 game pattern was followed, so where did you get your "72 games a year" assumption? Also, 1) You do not have choice in the games, so you probably wont like most of the games, 2) PS+ in the beginning, had a worse game selection than now, and 3) you coúldn't actually keep the games. PSN sales also used to have the same situation back in the day, without many worthwhile sales, so you were stuck with physical.

This is, of course completely ignoring the fact that the PS3 had an exclusive drought in the early years, playing multiplats at sub-HD, worse optimization, PSN crashes etc. However, it had full BC for PS1/PS2 titles, which puts it in competition with PC. (Of course, PC had BC for many more consoles) and blu-ray,

So: PS3-$600, PS+ ($50x3) $150 (around total 50 games for the gen), Hard Drive (optional, if you want to keep PS+ games) and games at close to full price due to physical disks, Blu-ray.

.You can save you some money by reselling your new games

And you can save even more money by selling PC components.

pc : 1000$ ( smallest entry point ) + 400$ upgrade every two years = 3000$ games ranging from 60$ to 5$.

lol wut? For $1000, you could easily build a great PC that would run games much better than the PS3. For $700, you could build a mid range PC which would beat the PS3 for 4 years (After which the card will be outdated due to DX11). Also, why I should upgrade for $400 every two years for better than console performance? At close to the end of the life cycle, I could get a GTX 660/i3 sandy bridge/H61 Mobo/4 GB ram for $420 + a 500GB to get on Par with PS4. Plus massively cheaper games due to digital distribution, many more exclusives, better multiplats, cheaper peripherals + it can be used for general computing.

So: PC-$800 + $450 upgrade after 4-5 years to keep up with next-gen consoles, and half price games, cheaper peripherals, etc.

You can easily multiply by two or three, if you wanna be a graphic whore, last cpu's are 1000$ and last gpus are the same.

So what's your point? $1000 CPU and $1000 GPU exist today also, why should I get them? They're complete overkill and a waste of money..

And if you are a globe trotter a gaming laptop is a must, so you can add 1000$ every two, three years...

And, this still doesn't fit into the discussion. We are comparing PC vs console cost of same power. But of course, if you are a globe trotter, that is another advantage for laptop gaming.

I'm no graphic whore and in the span of 10 years, i spend ten times more money on my pc hardware than one console, i let you imagine the price paid by a guy running after cutting edge tech!!!

Lolno, PC doesn't cost anywhere that much if you’re looking for equivalent performance/decently better performance than a PS4. Again, why should I buy 4x titan sli, 5960x CPU? Why Wouldn’t I be fine with an i3/GTX 750Ti/R9 270x?

Now, for the majority of people, the pc advantage in graphics is irrelevant due to the entry point, maintenance and know how.

Completely off-topic. btw, if you don’t care about graphics, then you might as well game on a pre-built PC or Mobile. You wont buy a console because it’s entry point is too high, and you know how to use it better than your PC/handheld/Smartphone.

So, there's no way in hell that PC is less expensive in the long run than console , without having better graphics, period.

In conclusion, fixed that for you.

Hahaha!!!

The only thing that you fixed is that you are unaware of what pc gaming is about!!!

But nice try though, let's leave here, it will only be a waste of time!!!

Avatar image for tushar172787
tushar172787

2561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#95  Edited By tushar172787
Member since 2015 • 2561 Posts

@sovkhan said:
@tushar172787 said:

@sovkhan:

let make it clear...

First of all, I was clearly comparing PC vs console cost this gen. But since you already started this argument...

Ps3 600$ + psn (50$X5) = 250$ : total 850$ for 10 years + games ranging from 60 to 5$ + ( 72 games a year thx to psn++ )

PS+ didn't even launch when the PS3 launched, it came out in 2010, and for the most of first year, it offered only one game for free. After that, 1-2 game pattern was followed, so where did you get your "72 games a year" assumption? Also, 1) You do not have choice in the games, so you probably wont like most of the games, 2) PS+ in the beginning, had a worse game selection than now, and 3) you coúldn't actually keep the games. PSN sales also used to have the same situation back in the day, without many worthwhile sales, so you were stuck with physical.

This is, of course completely ignoring the fact that the PS3 had an exclusive drought in the early years, playing multiplats at sub-HD, worse optimization, PSN crashes etc. However, it had full BC for PS1/PS2 titles, which puts it in competition with PC. (Of course, PC had BC for many more consoles) and blu-ray,

So: PS3-$600, PS+ ($50x3) $150 (around total 50 games for the gen), Hard Drive (optional, if you want to keep PS+ games) and games at close to full price due to physical disks, Blu-ray.

.You can save you some money by reselling your new games

And you can save even more money by selling PC components.

pc : 1000$ ( smallest entry point ) + 400$ upgrade every two years = 3000$ games ranging from 60$ to 5$.

lol wut? For $1000, you could easily build a great PC that would run games much better than the PS3. For $700, you could build a mid range PC which would beat the PS3 for 4 years (After which the card will be outdated due to DX11). Also, why I should upgrade for $400 every two years for better than console performance? At close to the end of the life cycle, I could get a GTX 660/i3 sandy bridge/H61 Mobo/4 GB ram for $420 + a 500GB to get on Par with PS4. Plus massively cheaper games due to digital distribution, many more exclusives, better multiplats, cheaper peripherals + it can be used for general computing.

So: PC-$800 + $450 upgrade after 4-5 years to keep up with next-gen consoles, and half price games, cheaper peripherals, etc.

You can easily multiply by two or three, if you wanna be a graphic whore, last cpu's are 1000$ and last gpus are the same.

So what's your point? $1000 CPU and $1000 GPU exist today also, why should I get them? They're complete overkill and a waste of money..

And if you are a globe trotter a gaming laptop is a must, so you can add 1000$ every two, three years...

And, this still doesn't fit into the discussion. We are comparing PC vs console cost of same power. But of course, if you are a globe trotter, that is another advantage for laptop gaming.

I'm no graphic whore and in the span of 10 years, i spend ten times more money on my pc hardware than one console, i let you imagine the price paid by a guy running after cutting edge tech!!!

Lolno, PC doesn't cost anywhere that much if you’re looking for equivalent performance/decently better performance than a PS4. Again, why should I buy 4x titan sli, 5960x CPU? Why Wouldn’t I be fine with an i3/GTX 750Ti/R9 270x?

Now, for the majority of people, the pc advantage in graphics is irrelevant due to the entry point, maintenance and know how.

Completely off-topic. btw, if you don’t care about graphics, then you might as well game on a pre-built PC or Mobile. You wont buy a console because it’s entry point is too high, and you know how to use it better than your PC/handheld/Smartphone.

So, there's no way in hell that PC is less expensive in the long run than console , without having better graphics, period.

In conclusion, fixed that for you.

Hahaha!!!

The only thing that you fixed is that you are unaware of what pc gaming is about!!!

But nice try though, let's leave here, it will only be a waste of time!!!

Oh really? What is PC gaming all about, then? Care to enlighten me?

Inb4 "b..but PC gaming is only for teh graphics!!"

PC gaming is first and foremost for gaming, just like any other platform.

You haven't disproved my points yet...

Nice deflection though!

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

For me space sims and mods.

Avatar image for walloftruth
WallofTruth

3471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#97 WallofTruth
Member since 2013 • 3471 Posts

The best thing about PC is not a single thing of these options but all of them combined. That's the sweet thing about PC gaming, you don't have to choose because you can have them all.

Avatar image for walloftruth
WallofTruth

3471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#98 WallofTruth
Member since 2013 • 3471 Posts

@tushar172787 said:
@sovkhan said:

Hahaha!!!

The only thing that you fixed is that you are unaware of what pc gaming is about!!!

But nice try though, let's leave here, it will only be a waste of time!!!

Oh really? What is PC gaming all about, then? Care to enlighten me?

Inb4 "b..but PC gaming is only for teh graphics!!"

PC gaming is first and foremost for gaming, just like any other platform.

You haven't disproved my points yet...

Nice deflection though!

You're arguing with a troll, did you really expect him to refute anything you said?

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#99 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Nude mods

Avatar image for arunsunk
ArunsunK

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#100  Edited By ArunsunK
Member since 2014 • 335 Posts

@sovkhan said:
@mjorh said:
@sovkhan said:
@the_master_race said:

it's a fact , not a myth. PC Gaming is really cheaper on the long run in terms of quality and quantity since the cost of yearly upgrades will reduce to zero eventually , and that's besides cheaper online gaming services

No it's not...

Since 2000, i have spent more than 10k$ in hardware upgrade only on pc/laptops!!!3

Nowhere near what i spent on all my consoles hardware...So stop with the myths.

Spending 50$ a year for 1000++$ worth of software is a bargain by my standards, but you can look at it otherwise.

And no new software is not that much cheaper on pc even if it's digital only, and the consoles also have now the summer sales like pc.

So yes, these are myths!!!

Have you seen steam sales ? Seriously consoles are not even close to PC when it comes to cheap games .... Games on PC tend to have price drops faster and more significant as well.

You can find plenty of games around the 5$ mark, got recently the whole mass effect trilogy for less than 12$...and you have the used ones too.

The question is, how much does cost a new game digital??? One may think it's for cheap and it's certainly not!!!

Bandai Namco games sell $10 cheaper on Steam than on console.

The two most recent Bamco games released Tales of Zestiria and Saint Seiya Soldiers Souls are both $49.99 on Steam and at the Playstation Store both are $59.99 for the PS4. - SSSS , ToZ

This holds true for the like of Dark Souls 2 as another example. $49.99 for the original and $29.99 for the upgrade to SotFS. Both versions for the PS3 + PS4 are at $59.99 original price for a total of $120 versus only $80 for PC. - DS2 , SotfS /

Another example of this is 2015's Game of the Year The Witcher 3 was cheaper on the PC for players that previously owned W1 + W2, $47.99. - W3 PS / W3 PC

I probably could go on but when an entire publishing company sells their games cheaper new on the PC than consoles, there really is no point especially when PC saved $40 on only one specific game while console player had to have bought two consoles to play both Dark Souls 2 versions new.

Four different games, 2 versions of 1 game, $227.95 cost for PC and $299.95 for PS3/PS4. That is over a $70 saving on only 5 brand new games!

*For PC sources just check Steam.