Latest News
http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6192442.html?action=convert&om_clk=latestnews&tag=latestnews;title;1
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Latest News
http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6192442.html?action=convert&om_clk=latestnews&tag=latestnews;title;1
It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
stephant_6
says you who has already played and experienced the game.
Seriously, it doesn't look that great. Has a bit of a golden eye feeling to it but that's it. It is no where near Uncharted quality :|
What were the devs on when they called the graphics 360/PS3 like?
The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.stephant_6
It's being hyped because it's a shooter on the Wii, which uses motion sensing. The graphics look good for a Wii game.
[QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
lordlors
says you who has already played and experienced the game.
He was giving his opinion, of course he hasn't played it...[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"]Matt from IGN said it was good :(
TDLlama
Matt says that about a lot of games...
Matt is actually Mario? That's why he introduces himself like "Hi, it's Me a Matt from IGN!" Welcoming you to the mushroom kingdom.
[QUOTE="lordlors"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Kook18
says you who has already played and experienced the game.
He was giving his opinion, of course he hasn't played it...he said tightly scripted linear gameplay unless if he's really played and experienced the FULL game he's making stupid assumptions/conclusions. also, i don't hype this game as i have no knowledge of this game. like others, i still have yet to see what's so interesting of this.
It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
stephant_6
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
[QUOTE="Kook18"][QUOTE="lordlors"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
lordlors
says you who has already played and experienced the game.
He was giving his opinion, of course he hasn't played it...he said tightly scripted linear gameplay unless if he's really played and experienced the FULL game he's making stupid assumptions/conclusions. also, i don't hype this game as i have no knowledge of this game. like others, i still have yet to see what's so interesting of this.
It's not hard to tell from the gameplay we've seen. Now leave me and my opinion be.
[QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
terdoo
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
[QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Arkthemaniac
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
Deadly Creatures does have hype from sheep. Spyborgs also has sheep hype and the only reason they were angry at it was because the other systems get RE5, SF4, Dark Void, Bionic Commando. While the wii gets neopets and spyborgs.The Conduit, as of right now, looks like just another generic fps. If Sheep wanted a generic fps they'd get a 360. Nothing about this game looks special imo and the artstyle is horrendous.
Honestly, this game looks extremely mediocre. Graphically. From the screenshots given. I'm sure it looks better in motion and all that jazz, but honestly, MP3 looks vastly superior to this.
Hype games that are worth it, not games that focus on graphics, then have mediocre graphics. From a trash developer.
The Conduit most promising new IP since Uncharted Drakes Fortun?Tony-Harrison
lolno
It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
stephant_6
yes, pretty much, lol.
remembers me of an goldeneye level :)
fishfake
Indeed it does. And those enemies remind me of a bowl of lol mixed with wtf.
[QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Arkthemaniac
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
the most here are just fanboys from the other side :P thats why they compare it with games from other platforms or call it generic because the only games they got are shooters !
what makes moh2 or mps good ? the controls !!
and if they did the controls right with good multiplayer it can looks like shi. and i buy it !
gameplay>graphics !!!
This is actually one of the few games that I will be interested in getting for my wii....But at the same time it looks horrible. Especially the character models. Are those aliens or humans. I cant even tell :|
I will give this game the benefit of the doubt since Im actually a little excited but its not looking too good as of now.
[QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Arkthemaniac
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
speaking of linear gameplay. Can't wait for Killzone2. :lol:It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
stephant_6
[QUOTE="Arkthemaniac"][QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
InsaneBasura
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
that's what's been said about Killzone2, yet people still hype the game even though GG is still yet to deliver an even mediocre FPS on consoles.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
InsaneBasura
Dude let the sheep dream. you should know by now that most sheep on this board spend more time hoping they get good games than playing them.
[QUOTE="InsaneBasura"]It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
Heydanbud92
Dude let the sheep dream. you should know by now that most sheep on this board spend more time hoping they get good games than playing them.
do you want a list of all hyped games from the 360 and ps3 ? or how i called it the flop list ?
the most wii games are under-hyped but you are new in system-wars how it looks like :P
[QUOTE="Arkthemaniac"][QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
InsaneBasura
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
According to the developers, they really were trying on those games, but the publisher stepped in and "monkeyed the whole thing up." That's why they were wary of a publisher.
Also, you have to have a breakout hit eventually. Hopefully this will be it. And, by the way, I really am intrigued on how you know the game is infantile, tasteless and generic from SCREENSHOTS and A DAMN TRAILER.
Seriously, none of us are prophets or sages. We have to experience to know. On that note, give the game a chance.
[QUOTE="InsaneBasura"][QUOTE="Arkthemaniac"][QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Arkthemaniac
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
According to the developers, they really were trying on those games, but the publisher stepped in and "monkeyed the whole thing up." That's why they were wary of a publisher.
Also, you have to have a breakout hit eventually. Hopefully this will be it. And, by the way, I really am intrigued on how you know the game is infantile, tasteless and generic from SCREENSHOTS and A DAMN TRAILER.
Seriously, none of us are prophets or sages. We have to experience to know. On that note, give the game a chance.
your the only person who is actually making scence here...[QUOTE="Samurai_Xavier"]If it promises cr@p, then yes, it looks very promising.fishfake
jep looks really stupid and i was hoping the wii can have better graphic than crisis , look like i bought the wrong console
Ok...that was totally unrelated with what I said.
[QUOTE="InsaneBasura"][QUOTE="Arkthemaniac"][QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Arkthemaniac
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
According to the developers, they really were trying on those games, but the publisher stepped in and "monkeyed the whole thing up." That's why they were wary of a publisher.
Also, you have to have a breakout hit eventually. Hopefully this will be it. And, by the way, I really am intrigued on how you know the game is infantile, tasteless and generic from SCREENSHOTS and A DAMN TRAILER.
Seriously, none of us are prophets or sages. We have to experience to know. On that note, give the game a chance.
So you're excited about the game because a consistenly average developer, after 20-30 titles, is bound to have a breakout hit and The Conduit is hopefully it? All I can say is that I don't get it.It's pretty damn obvious by the alien bug robots and flying red squids being shot by lizardguns carried by "you will be Mr. Ford" and whatnot that this is not exactly the epitome of maturity.
[QUOTE="InsaneBasura"][QUOTE="Arkthemaniac"][QUOTE="terdoo"][QUOTE="stephant_6"]It looks like garbage. The only reason it's being hyped is because it's a shooter,which is a big deal for the wii.
Doesn't change the fact that it looks like a game from 2001 with its horrendous graphics and tightly scripted,linear gameplay.
Nedemis
Halo looks better then that game and it was from 2001.
The Conduit has vastly superior lighting compared to Halo, at least that's what's shown in the trailer
Seriously, why is everyone so freaking harsh on this game? First we hear people complain about Ubisoft not putting any effort into their Wii offerings, now The Conduit is garbage, Spyborgs is stupid, Deadly Creatures is unimpressive, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Here's a thought. Give them a chance. Accept new IPs. Don't judge a game based on a trailer and hype. Quit thinking every game has to be the second coming of Ocarina of Time in ingenuity.
It's from the developer of a countless number of bad-mediocre license games. Why are you exicted about the game is what I'd wanna know.
An infantile, tasteless, generic shooter which seemingly takes the genre back to the PS2-era is so ****ing not what the Wii needs. Or any other system for that matter.
that's what's been said about Killzone2, yet people still hype the game even though GG is still yet to deliver an even mediocre FPS on consoles.
didnt they only make one other FPS? the vietnam game and the psp one were tps werent they? people still hype mistwalker's cry on despite the fact that they got paid 20 million dollars to make 2 mediocre jrpg. i guess people continue to hype KZ2 because every time gameplay is shown, from a technology standpoint(we wont know gameplay until we play it) it blows anything else on consoles away. at least KZ2 hypers have something tangible to hype, something that seems worth hyping. too human looks horrible, still gets hyped, haze looked horrible, still got hyped to be decent, its the nature of things...It's pretty damn obvious by the alien bug robots and flying red squids being shot by lizardguns carried by "you will be Mr. Ford" and whatnot that this is not exactly the epitome of maturity.
ya know sometimes brakeout hits take a long time to happen, plus most of the games high voltage made were licenced games and some shovelwere, so now FINALLY they get to make an orriganal game, not to mention their highest scoring game was a 7.9, and that was in 2004 and it was also an origanal game....so for the last time GIVE IT A FRIGGEN CHANCE.:|EDIT: scratch that thier highest game was actually an 8.0
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/hunterthereckoning/index.html?tag=tabs;summary[/url]
So you're excited about the game because a consistenly average developer, after 20-30 titles, is bound to have a breakout hit and The Conduit is hopefully it? All I can say is that I don't get it.
It's pretty damn obvious by the alien bug robots and flying red squids being shot by lizardguns carried by "you will be Mr. Ford" and whatnot that this is not exactly the epitome of maturity.
InsaneBasura
I couldn't care less about maturity. What I care about is a game that controls well with a fun single player mode and lasting online. The Conduit could very well be all three of these things. They are putting effort into it. You can tell from the trailer that the game looks better than any other third party game out there, and if you disagree, point at the game which looks better.
I am bored out of my mind with the same old stuff on a regular game pad. Even if this is same old samey sametown, it will be fun due to the Wiimote, at least for me.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment