The Conduit most promising new IP since Uncharted Drakes Fortune?

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

I think people putting this game down are admitting that they only play games for graphics.

AdrianWerner

Incorrect I'm afraid sir bleh. First person shooter fans are interested on the Conduit because of motion sensing controls on the Wii. It has potential you see.

I suggest you pull yourself off the floor and dust yourself off. Wii motion sensing is an excellent platform for first person shooting. Stop with the denial, duel analogue is obsolete. It's only saving grace are original games like Call of Duty 4 and Bioshock, but Wii is catching up.

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

I think people putting this game down are admitting that they only play games for graphics.

Tony-Harrison

Incorrect I'm afraid sir bleh. First person shooter fans are interested on the Conduit because of motion sensing controls on the Wii. It has potential you see.

I suggest you pull yourself off the floor and dust yourself off. Wii motion sensing is an excellent platform for first person shooting. Stop with the denial, duel analogue is obsolete. It's only saving grace are original games like Call of Duty 4 and Bioshock, but Wii is catching up.

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

STALKER was the only amazing new IP in 2007. Mass Effect was pretty good too,but dissapointing.stephant_6

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

I think people putting this game down are admitting that they only play games for graphics.

Tony-Harrison

Incorrect I'm afraid sir bleh. First person shooter fans are interested on the Conduit because of motion sensing controls on the Wii. It has potential you see.

*facepalm*

fact is the only reason this is getting attention is for its visuals

That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.-Sphere-

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

I think people putting this game down are admitting that they only play games for graphics.

AdrianWerner

Incorrect I'm afraid sir bleh. First person shooter fans are interested on the Conduit because of motion sensing controls on the Wii. It has potential you see.

I suggest you pull yourself off the floor and dust yourself off. Wii motion sensing is an excellent platform for first person shooting. Stop with the denial, duel analogue is obsolete. It's only saving grace are original games like Call of Duty 4 and Bioshock, but Wii is catching up.

Are we still talking about duel analogue here? :?

Are we still talking about duel analogue here? :?

Tony-Harrison

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

mo0ksi

actually it sold 1 million copies. Plus ubi said they have lots of poeple working on the sequal and it will have ubisoft quality.

Maybe you fail. No wait, you do fail.

[QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="Tony-Harrison"][QUOTE="AdrianWerner"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

I think people putting this game down are admitting that they only play games for graphics.

AdrianWerner

Incorrect I'm afraid sir bleh. First person shooter fans are interested on the Conduit because of motion sensing controls on the Wii. It has potential you see.

I suggest you pull yourself off the floor and dust yourself off. Wii motion sensing is an excellent platform for first person shooting. Stop with the denial, duel analogue is obsolete. It's only saving grace are original games like Call of Duty 4 and Bioshock, but Wii is catching up.

That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.-Sphere-

[QUOTE="-Sphere-"]That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.Haziqonfire

its a third party wii title, what do you think? :roll:

remembers me of an goldeneye level :)

fishfake

Loved that game

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

rgame1

actually it sold 1 million copies. Plus ubi said they have lots of poeple working on the sequal and it will have ubisoft quality.

Maybe you fail. No wait, you do fail.

And so what if it sold a million as a launch game, it was simply a terrible game. By that logic 50 Cent Bullet Proof was awesome too :|

"you fail" - I mean seriously just grow up.

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="-Sphere-"]That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.thegoldenpoo

its a third party wii title, what do you think? :roll:

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

rgame1

actually it sold 1 million copies. Plus ubi said they have lots of poeple working on the sequal and it will have ubisoft quality.

Maybe you fail. No wait, you do fail.

I'll tell you what you've got here:

a) You have a developer with a horrible track record, that really does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

b) You have a bland looking, uninspired, poorly detailed, FPS for the Wii.

c) You have Wii fans excusing the above negatives on the premise that the Wii controls will somehow make up for everything else, as if Wii controls (which, in most Wii games I've played, don't add that much to the experience) automatically make the core content (which looks like it is going to be crap) into divine FPS excellence (or even just a good game, which is still far fetched).

And the logic is where, exactly?

[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"]

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="-Sphere-"]That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.Haziqonfire

its a third party wii title, what do you think? :roll:

The Conduit looks great for a Wii game all they need to do is get the controls down like MOH heroes and it can be an AA titleEPaul

There is a really big problem here people.

Sure if they nail the controls, like MoH Heroes 2 did, does that mean its going to be a good game?
Take MoH Heroes 2 for example..... Yes its controls were good, but there was nothing about the game that made it better than any shooter out there. From a design perspective it was same old MoH, and in that regard average as average can be.

Which is why I dont think the Conduit will be good. Sure it can have good visuals (for the Wii) and good controls, but if its another corridoor crawler alien shooter, with unimpressive and uninspired design which it is looking like, why bother hyping it at all.

I'll tell you what you've got here:

a) You have a developer with a horrible track record, that really does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

b) You have a bland looking, uninspired, poorly detailed, FPS for the Wii.

c) You have Wii fans excusing the above negatives on the premise that the Wii controls will somehow make up for everything else, as if Wii controls (which, in most Wii games I've played, don't add that much to the experience) automatically make the core content (which looks like it is going to be crap) into divine FPS excellence (or even just a good game, which is still far fetched).

And the logic is where, exactly?

jethrovegas

You deserve some pie.

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

Tony-Harrison

Leisure Suit Larry is a CLASSIC FRANCHISE along side the Kings Quest and Space Quest franchise. It's a much older equivalent to something like Redneck Rampage, where the main game that used the engine was Duke Nukem 3D but the other games still had diehard fans.

Learn your videogame history n00b.

What in the hell are you talking about? Lesiure Suit Larry: Magna Cum Laude was in no way associated with Al Lowe; it was a completely seperate game that came nearly a decade after the last LSL adventure game... and it sucked.

Learn your videogame history. :|

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]

The game looks as detailed as NOLF2. That's not saying much. Besides just reading this made lose interest quickly:

"Leisure Suit Larry: Magnum Cum Laude studio readying Wii-exclusive shooter, due Q1 2009"

Red Steel was hyped and failed miserably for the Wii, and I'm expecting the same from this project too.

Tony-Harrison

Leisure Suit Larry is a CLASSIC FRANCHISE along side the Kings Quest and Space Quest franchise. It's a much older equivalent to something like Redneck Rampage, where the main game that used the engine was Duke Nukem 3D but the other games still had diehard fans.

Learn your videogame history n00b.

A classic franchise that has been destroyed ever since its attempted IP ressurection ....

http://us.gamespot.com/pc/adventure/leisuresuitlarrymcl/index.html?tag=result;title;4

http://us.gamespot.com/pc/adventure/leisuresuitlarryboxofficebust/index.html?tag=result;title;6

.........

Its nice to know video game history, but its always nice to keep up to date with more recent illiterations...

I'll tell you what you've got here:

a) You have a developer with a horrible track record, that really does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

b) You have a bland looking, uninspired, poorly detailed, FPS for the Wii.

c) You have Wii fans excusing the above negatives on the premise that the Wii controls will somehow make up for everything else, as if Wii controls (which, in most Wii games I've played, don't add that much to the experience) automatically make the core content (which looks like it is going to be crap) into divine FPS excellence (or even just a good game, which is still far fetched).

And the logic is where, exactly?

jethrovegas

Thank you. As a Wii fan I feel ashamed that people hype this game.

That game looks terrible. Bad graphics + bad controls = no fun.-Sphere-

ohh my good friend , you have played the final game? how was it?:roll: