The Matrix Awakens PS5 destroys the Series X version by 1FPS. Digital Foundry Analysis.

Then you should be playing on PC for the best performance on 99.9% of games releasing.

Your coping is fun to watch. 😎

What? At xbox games? Lmao.

@sakaixx:

All Xbox studios games are at a higher FR and better fidelity/graphics setting than ps studio games,in fact every PlayStation studios game would be much better if the Devs had the series X power,Not a single ps game looks or runs better than FH5,,no game on PlayStation comes close to hellblade 2 in the looks department yet here you are trying to convince people to buy into your bullshit damage control pain relief.

Bless 🤣

@simple-facts: all that but still got slapped by it takes two at the TGA 🤣🤣

Started watching the analysis. They kept saying there's no pop-in but I'm fairly certain I have seen pop-in at multiple instances in the same video.

They don't want to showcase how good the UE5 results could be. They want to showcase its scalability and that it's good enough on consoles. They don't want developers to think that their tech is only good for high end systems and potentially don't even consider Lumen/Nanite or just stick to UE4. Hence it's only on consoles.

They put up a related article about an old ass game people largely seem to have forgotten about.

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2021-12-10-the-double-a-team-enter-the-matrix-allowed-us-to-become-kung-fu-masters

Say "article", it's like, 4 lines. Talking about a time in his life nobody cares about.

Or it's the good old Epic mantra "all pc gamers are pirates" showing again.

@sakaixx:

Pleased to see you agree the ps5 is weak sauce 🤣

@simple-facts: also pleased you agree xbox studios is nothing special if its best effort still got beaten by It Takes Two 🤣🤣🤣

@sakaixx: I am sorry that the year has been rough on you.😂

@blaznwiipspman1: excuse after excuse. I think it's time you drop the 9tf narrative. It's been proven false before. Continue with it and you won't be taken seriously.

@regnaston: Someone doesn't like these results. I'll take DF analysis over your cherry picked source, thanks..

Did you watch the video from DF? I did, the whole 50ish minutes of it

They laughed when they mentioned the 1 fps difference saying it wasn't important... I personally don't care, but if people are going to post random screen shots as "proof" it can be done both ways (that was the point of my post).... and as for "cherry picked source" NX Gamer is very good at what he does and is not some random guy out there, in fact he has done work for IGN for articles comparing performance in different games.

And here is the DF clip talking about the 1fps difference in that one sequence.. they are mocking people who make a big deal about this and they are attributing it to Chaos physics

Like I said in my other post it is a TECH DEMO which DF points out multiple times and that Epic says the engine needs more optimization and that is one reason they put this out there

@Pedro: ? This year been great for me 🤣

20 fps, 1080p. no wonder they didn't release a pc version. Consoles would look like pathetic outdated boxes.

@sakaixx: If also destroyed R&C and Returnal the only next gen games. 😂

I would take one less frame over less frame -rate pacing issues the PS5 has.

@xhawk27: ikr? Yet somehow lems think this is a win all publisher, nintendo sony xbox lost to It Takes Two 🤣🤣

Don't be in denial. 😎

FTFY

@pc_rocks: the UE5 engine is being used in like 50 different pc games already. Gears of War and perfect dark, hellblade 2, they all are going to use the same engine matrix is using, ue5 and all these games will be on PC.

Whats even there to deny 😏

@BenjaminBanklin: Oh great, there's another genius with this narrative. Yay.

Has nothing to do with what I said.

@sakaixx:

It takes two is an Xbox game 🤣

Glad to see you double down of the weakstation 5

🤣🤣🤣

@pc_rocks: it has everything to do with what you said:

"They don't want to showcase how good the UE5 results could be. They want to showcase its scalability and that it's good enough on consoles. They don't want developers to think that their tech is only good for high end systems and potentially don't even consider Lumen/Nanite or just stick to UE4. Hence it's only on consoles."

The ue5 engine is literally being used in 50 other games beside matrix. In fact I was surprised matrix isn't on pc, it's not even a big title in the first place. Gears of War, hellblade 2 and perfect dark will be much bigger titles that showcase the ue5 engine.

Im not arguing t flops, I’m saying that cold hard facts, as powerful as the xsx is, their exclusives only look marginally better than the ps5, if at all, and that’s with the current library, and Halo isn’t one of those “high graphical” games either. It may look good, but definitely not “generational defining“ as FH5 can be considered of being.

I spent some time with this today. The demo, or whatever you wanna call it looks fantastic. But it runs like ass. All this does is show us these consoles aren’t ready to properly run what’s coming next in games.

Thanks AMD

And also a PS game 🤣

Glad you admit xbox best efforts were just on same level as PS efforts this year.

🤣🤣🤣

This is certainly a thread that a user has created on this forum.

A year later and the PS5 is still winning.... don't wory lems the tools are coming.

@hardwenzen: It's hard for me to pay attention to such foolishness when Halo is on my XSX.

They can’t make this run at 60fps… You telling me this is gonna be another 30fps generation? Or will it be another 1080p generation?

@goldenelementxl: or they can keep last gen levels of graphics and greatly increase resolution and frame rate.

Maybe there is case to make for always 60 fps, but i would not choose same graphics as previous generation with better resolution. Doesn't seem to be worth it.

Its on your xbox, but you're blinded by the hype, and as a lem, you're not even allowed to bash the game, anyways.

I just wish Xbox or PlayStation would go Nvidia, instead of just going with the lowest bidder for these console contracts. I’ve always said, you get what you pay for. AMD is and has been behind with GPU tech for some time. We are getting 2060 Super - 2070 Super performance right now, and that’s gonna stand for the next 5 years at least. And I know for a fact Nvidia had something better to offer, but the margins weren‘t as attractive. It’s just frustrating playing this Matrix demo and seeing it perform the way it does. This could be better! But lol AMD…

@goldenelementxl: Your anti AMD stance is silly. Their 6000 series GPUs are excellent for rasterization which is still the most important aspect of graphics rendering. Also, don't you admit to playing the Switch the most? It is the most shit of all the platforms and an Nvidia platform at that. So, why are you so concerned about all this? You make no sense.

I think it's a miracle that the XSX manages to keep it so close to the PS5 considering according SW experts UE5 features are only possible thanks to the PS5's SSD.

The demo is insane, but i believe it could be much better optimized, maybe to the point of running at 60fps.

I have seen small objects, like a plastic bottle, made by hundreds of nanites/polygons. Assets like that could be made with 90% less detail and no one would notice the difference.

Still nothing to do with what I said. Try again!

@BassMan: The Switch does what it does on a 7W-15W TDP. AMD couldn’t do that. If AMD made the Switch, it would be double the size, twice the heat, triple the TDP and half the batter life. AMD is behind in desktop GPUs. They’re even further behind on small form factor products.

@hardwenzen: Actually, if you go on the hype thread. I did criticize things about it.

I am an Xbox fan, but I'm not a rabid fanboy. I also like Nintendo a lot - I just don't have time for multiple gaming platforms.

@girlusocrazy: Most people on these boards don’t know what these features mean beyond their buzzword use in marketing. I’ve heard VRS thrown around like it’s some game changing feature. Watch a RDNA2 hyping Lem deflate as you explain to them that VRS is a tech that degrades image quality for performance purposes. If the GPU is so capable, why does it need VRS at 1440p-1800p and 60fps?!?!

I need to find a clip of this Xbox Youtuber, Dee Bach, explaining what machine learning is. It’s quite comical. These guys would be considered clueless even on System Wars…