[QUOTE="AzatiS"][QUOTE="htekemerald"][QUOTE="mysticmike01"][QUOTE="htekemerald"]Half Life imo.
First game was amazing
Second game was Ok, didnt bring anything revolutionary to the fps table
Ep 1 was just crap
Ep 2 was more of the same crap with a decent bit at the end
htekemerald
I somewhat disagree. Just the addition of the gravity gun into HL2 was pretty revolutionary for FPS's. Being forced to use everything around your environment to beat your enemies. I agree with the rest of your comment, though. EP1 and 2 were both pretty much crap. And way too short.
I never really found the gravity gun to be all that usefull, you always had an ample supply of bullets and when you hit the last part of the game it basicaly became a lighting gun.Wasnt the gravity gun that made HL2 an instant classic. Were the crystal-graphics(we are talking about 2004 now),the awesome clear environment and of course the first time physics. You could do anything,broke,take all barrels around with your gravity,was the start for some serious physics in game overall. That was truly revolutionary back there. Besides that i cant think a single game back then (2004) that could win HL2 at any feild (graphics-sound-physics-gameplay-story)
Farcry says hi.Better graphics
equal sound
Basiacly the same physicals, boxes just didnt break
Better AI
Story probaly goes to HL2 but I want a fan of either.
Nop you doin wrong. What made Far cry famous is probably what is Crysis now. Graphics. Nothing more nothing less. As for physics nop. Wasnt the same at all. Not even close. Besides that HL2 engine could run in a "low" machine for that year easily and play good too. Something like COD4 now and still its graphics were awesome.
As for story,wasnt something plain like Far cry that you know what to expect. As for better AI i agree.
Log in to comment