The Nintendo Wii Continues To Have The Most Diverse Library In 2009

It can't be better than PC FPS, but when compared to teh clunky 360/PS3 FPS, it could be better.

Please don't lump PS3/360 in with the PC ever again...ever!

DaBrainz

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="mdisen2"]

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]:lol:The ConduitDaBrainz

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

It can't be better than PC FPS, but when compared to teh clunky 360/PS3 FPS, it could be better.

Please don't lump PS3/360 in with the PC ever again...ever!

The best Wii shooter, MOH, doesn't compare to the best shooters on the PS3/360, not in the control department or any other department.

They just look horribly generic or uninspired. I don't know exactly what you expect me to say.

A House of the Dead that adds nothing over the old XBox House of the Dead 3 (and that game scored a 6 something for the XBox,) the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse, another Tenchu, Fatal Frame, etc. etc. Another Wii Sports, Another Endless Ocean, etc.

RuprechtMonkey

here's where it gets interesting. why are all these games being compared to other games? why cant they be looked at on their own, as games in their own right? why must a comparison be made?

Me thinks you should add: Dynamic Slash - Action RPG

---

---

SER69

New IP from Nintendo mirite?

mad world and fatal frame were pushed back to 09???

*FACEPALMS.....

VendettaRed07

*FACEPALMS.....

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

if you compare it to a pc shooter yea but if the controls are soild it will be better then most other console shotters

gameplay is what matters most

Haziqonfire

Not when the games art direction look like Halo and Half Life had an ugly child.

yes still then even though it seems "science fiction" to you means halo or HL personaly i would have picked the duke over them

if a game is fun why care what it looks like

[QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="mdisen2"]

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]:lol:The ConduitRuprechtMonkey

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

It can't be better than PC FPS, but when compared to teh clunky 360/PS3 FPS, it could be better.

Please don't lump PS3/360 in with the PC ever again...ever!

The best Wii shooter, MOH, doesn't compare to the best shooters on the PS3/360, not in the control department or any other department.

:roll:

i don't think TC's trying to prove wii will have a better lineup than 360 and ps3. i think he's simply just showing us promising games. No ones even hyping these AAA or even AA yet. sheep are just simply keeping a lookout. which is understandable considering nintendo themselves lately aren't exact;y bringing out anything spectacular.

I find it ironic though that the the wii games to look forward to this time are third party titles. >_

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

They just look horribly generic or uninspired. I don't know exactly what you expect me to say.

A House of the Dead that adds nothing over the old XBox House of the Dead 3 (and that game scored a 6 something for the XBox,) the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse, another Tenchu, Fatal Frame, etc. etc. Another Wii Sports, Another Endless Ocean, etc.

redmetal86

here's where it gets interesting. why are all these games being compared to other games? why cant they be looked at on their own, as games in their own right? why must a comparison be made?

A comparison between past games in a series is usually a pretty solid way to determine how a sequel game will play, especially when it comes to generic titles like House of the Dead, or stuff like Wii Sports and Endless Ocean. Do you honestly think Endless Ocean 2 is going to suddenly depart from the first game and "reinvent" a boring series, or that House of the Dead is going to be anything other than the lightgun game the series has always been? I've watched the Sin and Punishment trailers, it looks exactly like the old Sin and Punishment apart from motion control, and that does not bode well.

What exactly are you basing your anticipation of these titles on, pure intuition, 5 screenshots?

So many of those games look like average 7.0, meh, titles.

[QUOTE="mdisen2"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

:lol:The ConduitHaziqonfire

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

Why are you grouping 360/PS3 FPS with PC FPS? :?

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="mdisen2"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

:lol:The ConduitHexagon_777

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

Why are you grouping 360/PS3 FPS with PC FPS? :?

Probably because Wii hasn't come anywhere close to establishing a decent base (or even one single game) of FPS's games on the system whereas the PS3, 360 and PC certainly have.

The best playing FPS so far on the Wii, MOH, was lackluster.

True its very diverse but all of those games have one thing in common...they all suck not a single game that interest me. imo of course :D

New IP from Nintendo mirite?

SMR-Venom

i don't think TC's trying to prove wii will have a better lineup than 360 and ps3. i think he's simply just showing us promising games. No ones even hyping these AAA or even AA yet. sheep are just simply keeping a lookout. which is understandable considering nintendo themselves lately aren't exact;y bringing out anything spectacular.

I find it ironic though that the the wii games to look forward to this time are third party titles. >_Sonick54

Isn't that a good thing? I mean a new Zelda and Pikmin are already in development so we know the first party titles will deliver. It is good to see great third party support :)

All those games that the TC listed looks boring.

[QUOTE="DaBrainz"]

It can't be better than PC FPS, but when compared to teh clunky 360/PS3 FPS, it could be better.

Please don't lump PS3/360 in with the PC ever again...ever!angelkimne

Because games are solely judged on controls?

Wasn't Lair totally crippled by its bad controls? :? Didn't that result in its abysmal score?

lol. are you serious. I can find a game for everything you showed for the 360 and PS3, and there will be more of it. The wii has a diverse library but it pales in comparison to the 360 and PS3.too_much_eslim

Im sorry, but ^This

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="mdisen2"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

:lol:The ConduitRuprechtMonkey

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

Why are you grouping 360/PS3 FPS with PC FPS? :?

Probably because Wii hasn't come anywhere close to establishing a decent base (or even one single game) of FPS's games on the system whereas the PS3, 360 and PC certainly have.

The best playing FPS so far on the Wii, MOH, was lackluster.

Is that so? GameSpot deems it as "Great" and the majority of the GameRankings scores for this game are in the 80%s. Having an opinion is fine but you make it sound like fact. Don't let the fanboy take over.

What exactly are you basing your anticipation of these titles on, pure intuition, 5 screenshots?

RuprechtMonkey

isnt that what the majority of system wars bases its anticipation on?

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

mad world and fatal frame were pushed back to 09???

*FACEPALMS.....

nintendoman562

*FACEPALMS.....

sega said it was 08 and wtf is taking so long with fatal frame.. its been out for months in japan.. But oh well i guess there really are 0 wii games to get for this year

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]No new Nintendo IP = fail.princeofshapeir

bu... teh Wii Sports RESORT!!! :cry:

Honestly, i'm just happy about Sin and Punishment 2 and even Punch Out!! The next Nintendo IP I want to come out is Pikmin. If that is announced, then the Wii really does have the most diverse line-up in 2009.

Here, let me change that:

No new Zelda or Star Fox game = Fail.

I know its unlikely, but we don't know for sure that the new Zelda game won't come out by the end of 2009.

Both Fatal Frame 4 and House of the Dead are Survival Horror games, FAIL!

Nice list though... You're also missing the gamecube remakes like Pikmin 1 and 2 and Metroid Prime.

No new Nintendo IP = fail.princeofshapeir

I could be wrong but isn't Disaster a new Nintendo IP?

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="mdisen2"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

:lol:The ConduitHexagon_777

..will be a good game.

... Will be average.

Why are you grouping 360/PS3 FPS with PC FPS? :?

Probably because Wii hasn't come anywhere close to establishing a decent base (or even one single game) of FPS's games on the system whereas the PS3, 360 and PC certainly have.

The best playing FPS so far on the Wii, MOH, was lackluster.

Is that so? GameSpot deems it as "Great" and the majority of the GameRankings scores for this game are in the 80%s. Having an opinion is fine but you make it sound like fact. Don't let the fanboy take over.

that game was horrible

the only game ive bought and returned in for credit in the past 4 years

Great list TC, Looking forward to The Conduit, Punch-Out and Disaster

And isn't Disaster coming out this year? Or has it been delayed?

This alone makes the Wii epic.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]No new Nintendo IP = fail.SexySasquatch11

I could be wrong but isn't Disaster a new Nintendo IP?

It is a new IP but according to Wikipedia Disaster comes out in 2008, therefore it shouldn't be in the list.

[QUOTE="nintendoman562"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

mad world and fatal frame were pushed back to 09???

*FACEPALMS.....

VendettaRed07

*FACEPALMS.....

sega said it was 08 and wtf is taking so long with fatal frame.. its been out for months in japan.. But oh well i guess there really are 0 wii games to get for this year

I know! I thought Fatal Frame 4 was suppose to be released in the US in September. If their pushing it back to twik the controls I'm fine with it because it'll turn out better in the long run.

P.S. I've bought 10 games for my Wii this year alone, compaired to my 7 360 games. So at least I found fun games worth playing!

---

Muramasa: The Demon Blade - 2D Action

---

This alone makes the Wii epic.

kansasdude2009

Gotta agree with you there kansas, that game looks awesome.

[QUOTE="SexySasquatch11"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]No new Nintendo IP = fail.fabz_95

I could be wrong but isn't Disaster a new Nintendo IP?

It is a new IP but according to Wikipedia Disaster comes out in 2008, therefore it shouldn't be in the list.

>< oops. Forgot what the title said. It was suppose to be out this month if I'm not mistaken.

[QUOTE="redmetal86"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Diversity is fine, but the problem is so many of those games look like compete garbage.

Does anyone honestly think the Wii has any chance at all in ever catching the 360 in AAA and AA count? - honest question.

RuprechtMonkey

theres just one question. why do these games look like compete garbage?

They just look like average, "meh." titles.

And some are just downright bad, even some of the most anticipated ones. Monster Hunter? The highest Monster Hunter scored what, 6 something?

im really getting sick of Nintendo Wii's Diverse (garbage).

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

That's my point.

Probably because Wii hasn't come anywhere close to establishing a decent base (or even one single game) of FPS's games on the system whereas the PS3, 360 and PC certainly have.

The best playing FPS so far on the Wii, MOH, was lackluster.

RuprechtMonkey

Is that so? GameSpot deems it as "Great" and the majority of the GameRankings scores for this game are in the 80%s. Having an opinion is fine but you make it sound like fact. Don't let the fanboy take over.

It has a 75 on GR, and are you honestly suggesting that can compete with the FPS's on the 360/PS3/PC?!? The game has a barely passable multiplayer and the campaign was completely lackluster.

That's my point. The Wii has no established FPS presence.

I am not suggesting that. You were talking about how the Wii "hasn't come anywhere close to establishing a decent base (or even one single game) of FPS's games on the system whereas the PS3, 360 and PC certainly have." I was merely proving you wrong where you suggested that the Wii doesn't have a single good FPS game. Since we go by professional reviewers here and not random fans and/or fanboys, you are wrong. It's as simple as that.

And I've played more MOH than probably any of those reviewers, on and offline:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26597511&page=0

I'm sorry, but as a FPS is just isn't very good. It's very lackluster, and doesn't stand out in any way.

It has a 75 on GR too, and as far as FPS's goes that's quite average.

[QUOTE="fabz_95"][QUOTE="SexySasquatch11"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]No new Nintendo IP = fail.SexySasquatch11

I could be wrong but isn't Disaster a new Nintendo IP?

It is a new IP but according to Wikipedia Disaster comes out in 2008, therefore it shouldn't be in the list.

>< oops. Forgot what the title said. It was suppose to be out this month if I'm not mistaken.

Yeah, it came out 4 days ago in the UK.

Yeah, and it didn't turn out so good.

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/933002.asp

Even NintendoWiiFanboy.com gave it only a 7/10.

Deadly creatures looks way to scary !!! i hate spiders :(

But wow didnt knew a new Punch out coming out that is a day 1 buy !! :D

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"]

---

Muramasa: The Demon Blade - 2D Action

---

This alone makes the Wii epic.

fabz_95

Gotta agree with you there kansas, that game looks awesome.

I wish we got more 2d games these days... sigh:(

i don't think TC's trying to prove wii will have a better lineup than 360 and ps3. i think he's simply just showing us promising games. No ones even hyping these AAA or even AA yet. sheep are just simply keeping a lookout. which is understandable considering nintendo themselves lately aren't exact;y bringing out anything spectacular.

I find it ironic though that the the wii games to look forward to this time are third party titles. >_Sonick54

Nothing ironic about it. This was bound to happen because of the hardware install base and it's exactly what some of us said would happen.

[QUOTE="redmetal86"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

They just look like average, "meh." titles.

And some are just downright bad, even some of the most anticipated ones. Monster Hunter? The highest Monster Hunter scored what, 6 something?

RuprechtMonkey

but why do they look like average, "meh" titles? surely there has to be a reason

the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse,

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/sinandpunishmentsote/index.html?tag=result;title;1

unless you think 8.0 games are "meh average"

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="redmetal86"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

They just look like average, "meh." titles.

And some are just downright bad, even some of the most anticipated ones. Monster Hunter? The highest Monster Hunter scored what, 6 something?

Shinobishyguy

but why do they look like average, "meh" titles? surely there has to be a reason

the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse,

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/sinandpunishmentsote/index.html?tag=result;title;1

unless you think 8.0 games are "meh average"

It got a 8.0 ten years after it was released... It would have scored higher had it been reviewed at the time of it's N64 release...

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"][QUOTE="nintendoman562"][QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]

mad world and fatal frame were pushed back to 09???

*FACEPALMS.....

SexySasquatch11

*FACEPALMS.....

sega said it was 08 and wtf is taking so long with fatal frame.. its been out for months in japan.. But oh well i guess there really are 0 wii games to get for this year

I know! I thought Fatal Frame 4 was suppose to be released in the US in September. If their pushing it back to twik the controls I'm fine with it because it'll turn out better in the long run.

P.S. I've bought 10 games for my Wii this year alone, compaired to my 7 360 games. So at least I found fun games worth playing!

i meant for the rest of this year,

ive bought, i think 3 or 4 this year first half was ok this half is just, a barren wasteland

And I've played more MOH than probably any of those reviewers, on and offline:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26597511&page=0

I'm sorry, but as a FPS is just isn't very good. It's very lackluster, and doesn't stand out in any way.

It has a 75 on GR too, and as far as FPS's goes that's quite average.

RuprechtMonkey

its pretty good for a psp game...

but that being said, a quality psp game is unexceptable on a console, even the wii, it can do much better than that, i was almost insulted by that game

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="redmetal86"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

They just look like average, "meh." titles.

And some are just downright bad, even some of the most anticipated ones. Monster Hunter? The highest Monster Hunter scored what, 6 something?

Shinobishyguy

but why do they look like average, "meh" titles? surely there has to be a reason

the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse,

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/sinandpunishmentsote/index.html?tag=result;title;1

unless you think 8.0 games are "meh average"

i cant find that guys original post, but dude, the original sin and punishment was freaking awesome, one of the best games to never be released outside of japan.

It seems that many fanboys are mindlessly bashing the lineup(with no other argument then"there crap"), but take this in mind.

Think about the 360s 09 lineup. Alan wake, Halo 3: Recon, Bioshock 2? Mass Effect 2? (If I'm missing something, tell me)

Now compare that to the Wii's lineup. Yeah...

Obviously thats only so far, but so is the Wii's.

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="redmetal86"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

They just look like average, "meh." titles.

And some are just downright bad, even some of the most anticipated ones. Monster Hunter? The highest Monster Hunter scored what, 6 something?

GundamGuy0

but why do they look like average, "meh" titles? surely there has to be a reason

the original Sin and Punishment was a "meh" average game - this new one looks even worse,

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/sinandpunishmentsote/index.html?tag=result;title;1

unless you think 8.0 games are "meh average"

It got a 8.0 ten years after it was released... It would have scored higher had it been reviewed at the time of it's N64 release...

uhh hu....

7.1 is higher than 8.0 now?