ok this graphics debate is over it is well known that wii is not a power house nintendo said through a mic it wasnt ment to be does it have to be yelled in your ear this is not 2006
and secondly if you wanted graphics to begin with get a ps3 360 or pc
online play well its free , you know i wouldnt complain about nintendos first attempt because you didnt complain about xbox or ps2s first attempt at online
we all know it wasnt a bed of roses for them
=from microsoft forcing you to use a credit card and ps2 online almost dead for the most part,
so you get what you pay for honestly
you paid 199,99 for a wii -at launch 249 , if you bought yours at launch of course 249,
if hd was included wii would cost 349.99-500 (could be 600 , motion controls cost money to)
nintendo did not want to make the mistake sony made
so they didnt included hd , so what we still got awsome games
your complaining about 3 simple not so important features ,
sheesh ,if hd were so important ds or psp wouldnt selll at all in fact i dont think wii would be selling
you pay600 you get all the flash
you pay 300 you get half-appearently by sonys rules-no ps2 bc
you pay 199,99 you get only 4 gigs of memory
you pay 199 for a wii you get motion gaming and xbox 1 plus visuals ,
no hd you pay 1000 you get a good gaming rig its a simple known fact,
Log in to comment