The Witcher 2 is best on PC.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Both look pretty bad tbh

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

I still see dithering in shadows, nowhere near as 360 detailed shadows and no specular mapping like on 360

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

loosingENDS
How come the lighting in mine is better?
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

DragonfireXZ95

How come the lighting in mine is better?

It is the exact same lighting (well, obviously)

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

loosingENDS

How come the lighting in mine is better?

It is the exact same lighting

No it isn't.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

loosingENDS

How come the lighting in mine is better?

It is the exact same lighting (well, obviously)

The lower pic clearly has better lightning.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It is the exact same in bigger resolution, so what is your point ?

loosingENDS

How come the lighting in mine is better?

It is the exact same lighting (well, obviously)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJH-nFl0w0c&feature=g-all-u&context=G23b1466FAAAAAAAAAAA#t=4m51s PC version is best in everyway.
Avatar image for harshv82
harshv82

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#158 harshv82
Member since 2008 • 1120 Posts

 .

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] How come the lighting in mine is better?DragonfireXZ95

It is the exact same lighting

No it isn't.

Sure it is, exactly the same

Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

hermit butthurt is showing :lol:

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It is the exact same lighting

loosingENDS

No it isn't.

Sure it is, exactly the same

No it isn't. Try again.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] No it isn't.DragonfireXZ95

Sure it is, exactly the same

No it isn't. Try again.

So, why dont you take a pic in the exact same spot as mine and in 1024x768 resolution ?

It should be rather simple to do, yet you dont

They are both in Ultra, so they are both exactly the same

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Sure it is, exactly the same

loosingENDS

No it isn't. Try again.

So, why dont you take a pic in the exact same spot as mine and in 1024x768 resolution ?

It should be rather simple to do, yet you dont

They are both in Ultra, so they are both exactly the same

Why would I take it in 1024x768?
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#164 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] No it isn't. Try again.DragonfireXZ95

So, why dont you take a pic in the exact same spot as mine and in 1024x768 resolution ?

It should be rather simple to do, yet you dont

They are both in Ultra, so they are both exactly the same

Why would I take it in 1024x768?

because it serves loosingEnds purpose

Why do you even bother with loosingEnds? the guy thinks shadows and Specular on 360 look the same as on pc ultra.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

Why would I take it in 1024x768?DragonfireXZ95

Because that is the supposed resolution 360 is rendering at of course

because it serves loosingEnds purpose Why do you even bother with loosingEnds? the guy thinks shadows and Specular on 360 look the same as on pc .adamosmaki

Shadows look vastly better on 360 than on PC

And PC lacks most of the specular effects of 360 too

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#166 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Why would I take it in 1024x768?loosingENDS

Because that is the supposed resolution 360 is rendering at of course

because it serves loosingEnds purpose Why do you even bother with loosingEnds? the guy thinks shadows and Specular on 360 look the same as on pc .adamosmaki

Shadows look vastly better on 360 than on PC

And PC lacks most of the specular effects of 360 too

yeah true that. I also heard pc is only 720p and 360 can render it at 1600p and 120fps
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

You're an idiot loosingends. I'm only doing 1080p, because the PC can.

vs

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Sure it is, exactly the same

loosingENDS

No it isn't. Try again.

So, why dont you take a pic in the exact same spot as mine and in 1024x768 resolution ?

It should be rather simple to do, yet you dont

They are both in Ultra, so they are both exactly the same

1024x768p resolution has less canvas for detail than 1600x900p/1920x1080p resolution.

Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

My reaction to this thread: «No sh*t sherlock you don't say? Well thanks a lot captain obvious».

Avatar image for eNT1TY
eNT1TY

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 eNT1TY
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
The "dithered" shadows on the pc version medium or higher are actually soft shadows that are a more demanding effect that is basically superimposed variances in volume of the simple shadow maps of low setting or what appears to be in the 360 pics. The soft shadows also have shifting umbras and penumbras as the light source moves during time of day changes. The solid shadows of the lower settings are a considerably weaker effect regardless of aesthetic preference.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

The "dithered" shadows on the pc version medium or higher are actually soft shadows that are a more demanding effect that is basically superimposed variances in volume of the simple shadow maps of low setting or what appears to be in the 360 pics. The soft shadows also have shifting umbras and penumbras as the light source moves during time of day changes. The solid shadows of the lower settings are a considerably weaker effect regardless of aesthetic preference. eNT1TY

Still, PC shadows looks like garbage comparing to 360 ones

If they wanted soft shadows, they better do them right next time

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Shadows look vastly better on 360 than on PC

And PC lacks most of the specular effects of 360 too

loosingENDS

People who've seen it, like GameSpot, said shadows were cut down.

GameSpot > You're sh*t and wrong opinion.

Avatar image for eNT1TY
eNT1TY

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 eNT1TY
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts

[QUOTE="eNT1TY"]The "dithered" shadows on the pc version medium or higher are actually soft shadows that are a more demanding effect that is basically superimposed variances in volume of the simple shadow maps of low setting or what appears to be in the 360 pics. The soft shadows also have shifting umbras and penumbras as the light source moves during time of day changes. The solid shadows of the lower settings are a considerably weaker effect regardless of aesthetic preference. loosingENDS

Still, PC shadows looks like garbage comparing to 360 ones

If they wanted soft shadows, they better do them right next time

Its cool, although you may prefer the more stylized look of the solid shadows, i prefer the more natural and accurate look of the soft shadows, neither of us are wrong in that regard. However on pc if someone also likes the lower quality solid shadows they can play with those shadows with a simple change of shadow quality setting. I think it is an advantage that i can play with 360 settings on pc by lowering enough individual graphic options if i wanted to while 360 only users can't play with pc settings. 360 one still looks nice just not as much as the lead version, no shame in that i say if it looks close enough.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="eNT1TY"]The "dithered" shadows on the pc version medium or higher are actually soft shadows that are a more demanding effect that is basically superimposed variances in volume of the simple shadow maps of low setting or what appears to be in the 360 pics. The soft shadows also have shifting umbras and penumbras as the light source moves during time of day changes. The solid shadows of the lower settings are a considerably weaker effect regardless of aesthetic preference. eNT1TY

Still, PC shadows looks like garbage comparing to 360 ones

If they wanted soft shadows, they better do them right next time

Its cool, although you may prefer the more stylized look of the solid shadows, i prefer the more natural and accurate look of the soft shadows, neither of us are wrong in that regard. However on pc if someone also likes the lower quality solid shadows they can play with those shadows with a simple change of shadow quality setting. I think it is an advantage that i can play with 360 settings on pc by lowering enough individual graphic options if i wanted to while 360 only users can't play with pc settings. 360 one still looks nice just not as much as the lead version, no shame in that i say if it looks close enough.





There is nothing natural about PC version shadows, they look like someone has sprayed some pixels over the sufaces

That is terrible, this is not good soft shadows

And hard shadows are better than garbage terrible looking soft shadows, that is for sure

Also i played it on all settings, none had hard shadows like 360, look at the above pics for reference

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

There is nothing natural about PC version shadows, they look like someone has sprayed some pixels over the sufaces

That is terrible, this is not good soft shadows

And hard shadows are better than garbage terrible looking soft shadows, that is for sure

Also i played it on all settings, none had hard shadows like 360

loosingENDS

Translation: My computer can't handle TW2 properly so crappy graphics are better.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

Well not impressed with the shadows for this game... not sure if it's a setting causing this or something poorly done on PC. But otherwise, this game looks very good. But to say X360 looks better, common...

But then when I turn shadows all the way to low quality... I barely get any difference in this frame... which is weird.

Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

hermit butthurt is showing :lol:

Harisemo

Butt hurt? The game looks great on PC...

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#179 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

You're an idiot loosingends. I'm only doing 1080p, because the PC can.

vs

DragonfireXZ95

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

You're an idiot loosingends. I'm only doing 1080p, because the PC can.

vs

VanDammFan

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

Well it's Dx9 ... no Dx10 or Dx11... I still think it's good.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

hermit butthurt is showing :lol:

Bebi_vegeta

Butt hurt? The game looks great on PC...

And looks great on 360 as well, better than medium on PC by far

And with effects that PC does not have in any mode, not even in Ultra

So, i cant wait to play it on 360, best controls and visuals by miles

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

hermit butthurt is showing :lol:

loosingENDS

Butt hurt? The game looks great on PC...

And looks great on 360 as well, better than medium on PC by far

And with effects that PC does not have in any mode, not even in Ultra

So, i cant wait to play it on 360, best controls and visuals by miles

It looks pretty much equal to medium with lower resolution... can't tell about AA because the image is so blury.

The only effect PC doesn't do well is shadow, most probably because of Dx9.

Again, you say Best visuals, which is a total lie... maybe you PC can't run on ultra, but don't let it fool you that others can't aswell. Also, how can you say controls, are you saying I can't play with a X360 controller if I wanted to?

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Butt hurt? The game looks great on PC...

Bebi_vegeta

And looks great on 360 as well, better than medium on PC by far

And with effects that PC does not have in any mode, not even in Ultra

So, i cant wait to play it on 360, best controls and visuals by miles

It looks pretty much equal to medium with lower resolution... can't tell about AA because the image is so blury.

The only effect PC doesn't do well is shadow, most probably because of Dx9.

Again, you say Best visuals, which is a total lie... maybe you PC can't run on ultra, but don't let it fool you that others can't aswell. Also, how can you say controls, are you saying I can't play with a X360 controller if I wanted to?

I was just kidding, relax :), that post is only for those that call the 360 version crap, not for normal people

Will look amazing on 360, that is for sure, but it can and will look best on PC, not anything unbleievably better, but a bit better for sure

Obviously

The only thing is that it definatly wont look like crap or like N64 on 360, like some hermit trolls have been saying out of desparation and for damage control

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#184 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

You're an idiot loosingends. I'm only doing 1080p, because the PC can.

vs

VanDammFan

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

Joking right?

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#185 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

You're an idiot loosingends. I'm only doing 1080p, because the PC can.

vs

mitu123

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

Joking right?

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

VanDammFan

Joking right?

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

So what are the games that takes its place for top 20 for graphics then?

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

VanDammFan

Joking right?

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

We all know you're a biased assh*le towards the consoles. We all also know you're a troll. So why would we care about your opinion again?

Also, needs more TW2 love.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#188 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Joking right?

DragonfireXZ95

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

We all know you're a biased assh*le towards the consoles. We all also know you're a troll. So why would we care about your opinion again?

Also, needs more TW2 love.

Nice..name calling..lol..eh,safe behind a thing called cyberspace..its all good lil fella..AND a Troll? Why a troll? I said a few other pc games that look better than your precious Witcher garbage no hate towards pc right??...if you cant take criticism and opinions of a video game you best be getting out of here..

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#189 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

VanDammFan

Joking right?

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

What about modded Crysis?

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#190 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

VanDammFan

We all know you're a biased assh*le towards the consoles. We all also know you're a troll. So why would we care about your opinion again?

Also, needs more TW2 love.

Nice..name calling..lol..eh,safe behind a thing called cyberspace..its all good lil fella..AND a Troll? Why a troll? I said a few other pc games that look better than your precious Witcher garbage no hate towards pc right??...if you cant take criticism and opinions of a video game you best be getting out of here..

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

VanDammFan

We all know you're a biased assh*le towards the consoles. We all also know you're a troll. So why would we care about your opinion again?

Also, needs more TW2 love.

Nice..name calling..lol..eh,safe behind a thing called cyberspace..its all good lil fella..AND a Troll? Why a troll? I said a few other pc games that look better than your precious Witcher garbage no hate towards pc right??...if you cant take criticism and opinions of a video game you best be getting out of here..

Haha, so you're insinuating you could "beat me up?" Oh, the humanity. I said I didn't care about your opinion, and I doubt many others do here either. However, you failed because you never listed games that look better than TW2, you just said it's lower than 20 other games and never listed them. That's fail in many books.
Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#192 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]

We all know you're a biased assh*le towards the consoles. We all also know you're a troll. So why would we care about your opinion again?

Also, needs more TW2 love.

DragonfireXZ95

Nice..name calling..lol..eh,safe behind a thing called cyberspace..its all good lil fella..AND a Troll? Why a troll? I said a few other pc games that look better than your precious Witcher garbage no hate towards pc right??...if you cant take criticism and opinions of a video game you best be getting out of here..

Haha, so you're insinuating you could "beat me up?" Oh, the humanity. I said I didn't care about your opinion, and I doubt many others do here either. However, you failed because you never listed games that look better than TW2, you just said it's lower than 20 other games and never listed them. That's fail in many books.

Strong reading skill bro..lol..where did I say that? even close to that??..LOL..people crazy in here..Again Witcher looks ok but nothing to brag about and post pics like its "owning" or anything..hahh..I mean, it does look better than spaceinvaders on the Atari 2600..I give it that..:)

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

Nice..name calling..lol..eh,safe behind a thing called cyberspace..its all good lil fella..AND a Troll? Why a troll? I said a few other pc games that look better than your precious Witcher garbage no hate towards pc right??...if you cant take criticism and opinions of a video game you best be getting out of here..

VanDammFan

Haha, so you're insinuating you could "beat me up?" Oh, the humanity. I said I didn't care about your opinion, and I doubt many others do here either. However, you failed because you never listed games that look better than TW2, you just said it's lower than 20 other games and never listed them. That's fail in many books.

Strong reading skill bro..lol..where did I say that? even close to that??..LOL..people crazy in here..Again Witcher looks ok but nothing to brag about and post pics like its "owning" or anything..hahh..I mean, it does look better than spaceinvaders on the Atari 2600..I give it that..:)

And you still manage to avoid the question. Keep trolling bro gamer.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#194 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

I refuse to wait for that last pic to load..was there a reason for that?..the game does not look that good no matter the platform no matter the resolution no matter what settings...its not that great looking..SO we dont need countless threads about it please..Heck I miss the good ole days of hermits posting 100 pics a day of Crysis..lol

VanDammFan

Joking right?

NO..actually quite honest..I have YET to see a screen shot of that game that really says...WOW im graphics king or even in the top 20 for graphics..I just dont see it. AND not because its PC, but because its not impressive..Crysis looks ok, BF3 looks ok,Skyrim "with mods" looks great..

I would like to see this list of top 20 games with best graphics then.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15876

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#195 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15876 Posts

Duh?

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

Well, how is best on PC, when 360 has way better shadows ?

PC shadows look like garbage on any setting

Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

Well, how is best on PC, when 360 has way better shadows ?

PC shadows look like garbage on any setting

loosingENDS
Lol,the 360 version is so blurry,you can't even tell one object from the other. Indeed,the 360 version looks worse than The Witcher 1. It seems that TW1 is 1000.0000.000000.000000x better than the 360 version of TW2 by miles.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

My dad ain't a phone.

Duh?

Vaasman

Avatar image for milannoir
milannoir

1663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#200 milannoir
Member since 2008 • 1663 Posts

Well, how is best on PC, when 360 has way better shadows ?

PC shadows look like garbage on any setting

loosingENDS

And yet strangely enough, every screenshot or video posted by you looks like horse dung compared with the PC version. 360 version is so blurry and low res in the firts place, I feel like I forgot to put my glasses on just looking at them.

We can see you're in love with your little plastic box, and that for some reason it's really important for you to believe it's superior to everything out there.

However, you should stop hurting yourself fighting against unpliable facts. The 360's hardware is just obsolete now, and no magic or "optimisashun" will change that. Try to fight the clever fight, and use the right arguments : graphics don't matter, and Kinect is just neat and exclusive to your precious 360.

Because even if your heart is pure, and you wish for it really hard, TW2 in the end will just not look that great on 360.