The Witcher 2 vs crysis(1,2)

I think Witcher 2 looks better.

Here are the pics I posted in the other similar thread...

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

sleepingzzz

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

sleepingzzz

whereas pc graphics can be a lot more varied.

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

sleepingzzz

[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

PcGamingRig

whereas pc graphics can be a lot more varied.

To be fair, it's not like PC games are really flexing their muscles. They seem to have the same sort of restrictions as consoles, not becasue of hardware, but becasue of software.

Crysis is able to achieve photorealism, so the tech is better. But Witcher 2 being a fantasy game has a much broader color palette and much more style, so it can look a lot more appealing that way.

TW2 looks AMAZING!!! but I would still give the edge to Crysis 1

[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

anandmw2

I heared that witcher 2 dethrones crysis in graphics.is it true? What do you think has better graphics crysis or witcher 2?anandmw2

To me crysis 1 is still king. But TW2 looks unbelievable. It looks realistic but not too real at the same time which is key to keeping its fantasy look. It does some things with dx10 that normally you only see in Dx11. Such as the terrain and geometry look really good and it is very very consistently beautiful

Edit: wait its only Dx9??? then its even more impressive

Not even by close........Crysis 2 is the graphics king.Witcher 2 it is not even look better than Crysis 1.AtariKidX

Not even by close........Crysis 2 is the graphics king.Witcher 2 it is not even look better than Crysis 1.AtariKidX

Crysis 1 hands down

4 years later, its still the king

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

crysis has no weak spots like tw2 with its awful shadows

crysis looks more real

crysis looks more real

dontshackzmii

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

Barbariser

To be frank that is a overblown feature.. The only destructable buildings there are, are just flimsy ass shacks.. You can't destroy the trailers, you can't destroy bunkers, you can't destroy any concrete buildings, or any of the warehouses....

I think Crysis 2 will still b better in graphics in long run..... :))

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

Barbariser

Nope but Hermits are going to say it beats Crysis 2 because its multiplat but not crysis since its PC exclusive and there graphic god.

Wow the games looks beutiful!

Nope but Hermits are going to say it beats Crysis 2 because its multiplat but not crysis since its PC exclusive and there graphic god.

Golden_Boy187

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

sSubZerOo

To be frank that is a overblown feature.. The only destructable buildings there are, are just flimsy ass shacks.. You can't destroy the trailers, you can't destroy bunkers, you can't destroy any concrete buildings, or any of the warehouses....

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

bobbetybob

To be frank that is a overblown feature.. The only destructable buildings there are, are just flimsy ass shacks.. You can't destroy the trailers, you can't destroy bunkers, you can't destroy any concrete buildings, or any of the warehouses....

Nope but Hermits are going to say it beats Crysis 2 because its multiplat but not crysis since its PC exclusive and there graphic god.

Golden_Boy187

Even if hermits say Crysis 2 is better, it's still the PC version we're talking about.

crysis has no weak spots like tw2 with its awful shadows

Cranler

Crysis vanilla can look ugly at times, let's be honest. I never had that problem with Witcher 2 besides a low poly NPC model, everything looks amazing.

[QUOTE="Cranler"]

crysis has no weak spots like tw2 with its awful shadows

mitu123

Crysis vanilla can look ugly at times, let's be honest. I never had that problem with Witcher 2 besides a low poly NPC model, everything looks amazing.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Cranler"]

crysis has no weak spots like tw2 with its awful shadows

SaltyMeatballs

crysis is still technically better.... even though i still find the art in TW2 to be far superior. Never have liked this comparing graphics with technical terms.

[QUOTE="Cranler"]

crysis has no weak spots like tw2 with its awful shadows

mitu123

It goes like this.

Crysis>The Witcher 2>Crysis 2.

As for art style, I vote The Witcher 2.

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

Barbariser

That's physics, not graphics -.-, and it's something you could do since hl2, not even vaguely impressive. (tw2 could do that if you made one of those stupid shacks too)

Tech = Crysis

Art = TW2

TW2 will age better, and the shadows are cleened up a bit with supersampling, and the game looks much better in motion than in a screenshot, would be nice if the shadows did just look better though...

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

Barbariser

Well, TW2 flat out beats Crysis 2, but as for Crysis 1 I'd say they are tied.Zero5000X

Technically: Crysis>>>>>Witcher 2>Crysis 2

Artistically: Witcher 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>everything else>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Crysis 2>Crysis

Overall: Crysis=Witcher2>Crysis 2

[QUOTE="Barbariser"]

Crysis 1 is better technically. Haven't blown up a house in the Witcher 2 yet.

Inconsistancy

That's physics, not graphics -.-, and it's something you could do since hl2, not even vaguely impressive. (tw2 could do that if you made one of those stupid shacks too)

Tech = Crysis

Art = TW2

TW2 will age better, and the shadows are cleened up a bit with supersampling, and the game looks much better in motion than in a screenshot, would be nice if the shadows did just look better though...

He has a point there. Blowing up a lot of stuff does not mean a game is a graphics power house. I can smash just about every thing in Super Mario Bros and that game wasn't much of a looker even during it's time. We are comparing which one looks better, not what we can do in the game. Plus the Witcher is not going to go drive around in a tank and fire missiles into houses.

[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]

Funny how hermits are always the first to jump into graphic king threads saying they are dumb and just shouldn't be made. Now here they are starting up new threads.

Arach666