[QUOTE="Tessellation"]the superior PS4 version :cool:heeweesRusfixed :cool: ....*laughs* oh....your actually serious in believing the pc version won't be the top version...wow...thats just so sad...
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Tessellation"]the superior PS4 version :cool:heeweesRusfixed :cool: ....*laughs* oh....your actually serious in believing the pc version won't be the top version...wow...thats just so sad...
[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]
dualshockers...funny name
___
I'm replaying Witcher 2, but I still don't fully understand what the Wild Hunt is (and do we need Spoiler tags to discuss it?)
princeofshapeir
The Wild Hunt is originally presented as a group of spectral riders who gallop through the world, heralding an era of war while snatching up people in the mortal realm to join them. You learn what they really are at the end of TW2 (I think):
[spoiler] In the lengthy dialogue with Letho where he "spills the beans" and tells Geralt of his past, Geralt finally recovers his memories and learns the details of the Wild Hunt and the events that transpired before the first Witcher game.Â
The Wild Hunt is actually an elven cavalry who serve powerful elven sorcerers, hailing from a world dominated by elves. Their spectral form is merely their physical manifestation in the realm in which they are "invading." Their leader is shown below:Â
They basically control time and space and travel between dimensions. [/spoiler]
At the end of TW2 Nilfgaard begins the invasion of the Northern kingdoms, and this war is the focus of TW3, so it makes sense why they have returned as the game's primary antagonists.Â
Oh...I thought that [spoiler] you killed the wild hunt at the end of the first witcher, which was why I was surprised to see them mentioned in the second game without any nod towards the first game's events. So instead, was it just a single rider of the wild hunt that you destroyed at the end of the witcher? [/spoiler]Man, I still have to play Witcher 2. I've had it for a while but I saw how much PC gamers were **** riding the original, so I played it and never before have I ever been so bored by a game in my life. So when people tell me The Witcher 2 is better....I've just been skeptical and have just sort of being avoiding it. Perhaps I should give it a try :?II_Seraphim_II
You should. I never played The Witcher 1, but TW2 was a damn brilliant game! I'm glad i gave it a try.
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]Man, I still have to play Witcher 2. I've had it for a while but I saw how much PC gamers were **** riding the original, so I played it and never before have I ever been so bored by a game in my life. So when people tell me The Witcher 2 is better....I've just been skeptical and have just sort of being avoiding it. Perhaps I should give it a try :?PAL360
You should. I never played The Witcher 1, but TW2 was a damn brilliant game! I'm glad i gave it a try.
Aight, I think i will definitely give it a go sometime this week :D[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]Man, I still have to play Witcher 2. I've had it for a while but I saw how much PC gamers were **** riding the original, so I played it and never before have I ever been so bored by a game in my life. So when people tell me The Witcher 2 is better....I've just been skeptical and have just sort of being avoiding it. Perhaps I should give it a try :?II_Seraphim_II
You should. I never played The Witcher 1, but TW2 was a damn brilliant game! I'm glad i gave it a try.
Aight, I think i will definitely give it a go sometime this week :D if you can get over the dated graphics and gameplay, i would recommend playing the first one. I actually preferred the story in it.[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="PAL360"]Aight, I think i will definitely give it a go sometime this week :D if you can get over the dated graphics and gameplay, i would recommend playing the first one. I actually preferred the story in it. I tried the first one..something about the gameplay just irked me. But since I have the enhanced edition laying around here somewhere, I may try to give it another go. There are certain games you dont appreciate the first time around, so perhaps I'll try it once again and put some serious time into it before I decide whether or not to quit. I would like to complete the first one before the second one, cause I would assume the stories are in some way related, but Im not gonna torture myself if I find it boring as hell lol.You should. I never played The Witcher 1, but TW2 was a damn brilliant game! I'm glad i gave it a try.
dommeus
They are characters in the novels by Andrzej Sapkowski, which predate the PC games. Geralt is presumed dead after the novels, having died to the Wild Hunt. CDPR retcons this with TW1 by having him reappear in the human world, albeit with amnesia. [spoiler] Geralt and Yennefer were lovers. They were both taken by the Wild Hunt, but Geralt made a deal with the Wild Hunt's leader offering his life in return for hers. He is thus presumed dead in the novels' chronology but returns in TW1. Yennefer is also presumed dead but Letho reveals at the end of TW2 that she is alive, though in Nilfgaard. [/spoiler] princeofshapeir
I knew as much, it's just that the flashbacks had too much emphasis on something I thought I was missing - that something was in the books. Bummer, I'll have to get around to read them before playing it again before Witcher 3 comes out.
I like CD Project but this just seems like a bad attempt at replicating the live action Skyrim thing.
Â
Hey CD, The Witcher is a great game and a fantastic series, Skyrim sucks, stop whoring yourself sons. You're better than this.
I don't see how you go from a cg cutscene to "this is like skyrim" the witcher still has characters that matter and a story that makes sense which makes it completely different. Besides the gameplay on witcher 2 already went to the more action oriented way but it's still awesome.I like CD Project but this just seems like a bad attempt at replicating the live action Skyrim thing.
Â
Hey CD, The Witcher is a great game and a fantastic series, Skyrim sucks, stop whoring yourself sons. You're better than this.
uninspiredcup
Highly doubt  the countdown was for a CGI trailer.
Crossel777
The countdown is over and the page leads to the CGI trailer, so yeah the countdown was for a CGI trailer.
Not as good as they said it would be, but they're probably just hyping people up for Gamescom footage.
Trailer was fvcking badass. Good to see Geralt move extremely fast like a Witcher is supposed to and not the slow ass tank that he was in TW2
Bad ass in terms of what? Direction? No way. Narrative? It doesn't tell much. Visual? Well, it looks good, but too drab. Animation? Mediocre.ÂTrailer was fvcking badass. Good to see Geralt move extremely fast like a Witcher is supposed to and not the slow ass tank that he was in TW2
seanmcloughlin
Music? Yes, Badass.Â
It doesn't look as good as modern trailers should and the animation is not fluid.Â
My reaction after the trailer.
IgGy621985
It doesn't look as good as modern trailers should and the animation is not fluid.Â[QUOTE="IgGy621985"]
My reaction after the trailer.
Ravenshout
In all seriousness, the trailer was pretty damn good. And the result is there, it got me hyped.
Bad ass in terms of what? Direction? No way. Narrative? It doesn't tell much. Visual? Well, it looks good, but too drab. Animation? Mediocre.Â[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
Trailer was fvcking badass. Good to see Geralt move extremely fast like a Witcher is supposed to and not the slow ass tank that he was in TW2
Ravenshout
Music? Yes, Badass.Â
yeah yeah yeah we've talked about your excessive admiration for CG before. No one cares
It doesn't look as good as modern trailers should and the animation is not fluid.Â[QUOTE="Ravenshout"]
[QUOTE="IgGy621985"]
My reaction after the trailer.
IgGy621985
In all seriousness, the trailer was pretty damn good. And the result is there, it got me hyped.
Ravenshout nit picks every tiny little detail in CG trailers. It's pointless to get into it with him
Bad ass in terms of what? Direction? No way. Narrative? It doesn't tell much. Visual? Well, it looks good, but too drab. Animation? Mediocre.Â[QUOTE="Ravenshout"]
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
Trailer was fvcking badass. Good to see Geralt move extremely fast like a Witcher is supposed to and not the slow ass tank that he was in TW2
seanmcloughlin
Music? Yes, Badass.Â
yeah yeah yeah we've talked about your excessive admiration for CG before. No one cares
A lot of people care. You certainly care. You exaggerate every CGI for the games that you are hyped with. I've been observing this pattern among few gamespotters since the Cyberpunk teaser. Also, Platid Image did this piece, not the developer. So credits to them.ÂI've been observing this pattern among few gamespotters since the Cyberpunk teaser.Ravenshout
You take this shit way too seriously.
I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
I liked the trailer as well can't wait to see actual in game footage."Killing monsters."
Trailer was great, even if it was CGI. Can't wait for this game.
Doom_HellKnight
I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
jhonMalcovich
He probably would shag her later on.
Anyone who has played the Witcher games or read the stories knows that Geralt has a soft spot for women. No matter how hard he tries to stay neutral, he tends to usually defend them.I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
jhonMalcovich
I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
jhonMalcovich
Â
Hmmm I don't agree.
Geralt isn't cold enough to let three dudes beat, probably rape, and hang a women. Geralt isn't a jerk, he is very much a "hero to the rescue" and won't let someone be murdered in front of his eyes.
[spoiler]
A good example from the books would be (two years since I read this so I forgot all the details) how Geralt got the whole "butcher" nickname. Some cruel magician expiermented on a girl and she returns later grown up with a gang of bandits to get revenge. She threatens to kill the whole village if Geralt doesn't hand over the magician but he refuses and instead he kills the girl and the bandits. In other words, the 3 men > 1 woman theory doesn't hold.
[/spoiler]
I like how Geralt has to choose between walking away and letting the Nilfgarrdians torture the guilty girl to death, or jump in and save her despite her being guilty.
Nice visual is kind of an obsolete statement about a CGI trailer these days. What CGI trailer doesn't have nice visual? Isn't that the main purpose of one?I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
jhonMalcovich
In terms of what? Animation? Detail? The D3 expansion cinematic will blow it away visually.Holy hell that was one of the best cinematics I have ever seen.
NaveedLife
In terms of what? Animation? Detail? The D3 expansion cinematic will blow it away visually.In terms of everything. Â My bro watched it and said "damn, even I want to play this", which is surprising given his lack of interest in singleplayer games. Â[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
Holy hell that was one of the best cinematics I have ever seen.
Ravenshout
In terms of what? Animation? Detail? The D3 expansion cinematic will blow it away visually.In terms of everything. Â My bro watched it and said "damn, even I want to play this", which is surprising given his lack of interest in singleplayer games. Â You should know that this is not Blizzard quality.Â[QUOTE="Ravenshout"]
[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
Holy hell that was one of the best cinematics I have ever seen.
NaveedLife
[QUOTE="jhonMalcovich"]Anyone who has played the Witcher games or read the stories knows that Geralt has a soft spot for women. No matter how hard he tries to stay neutral, he tends to usually defend them.I don´t get this trailer. Geralt was always a grey character, an anti hero. He doesn´t save people for nothing. He just hunts monsters for money and tries to stay off politics.
Why would he save a woman he doesn´t know. I know the scene is tough to look. But this is Middle Ages. The justice wasn´t pretty back then. Will developers will politecorrect this game, introducing western liberal values into a pseudo-history background that shouldn´t have them.Â
What if she ´s a real murderer and deserves to die. Why interchanging one life for three is a good trade, especially without even knowing the background story of that hanging.
So let me understand this:
Geralt collects his reward, then kills his former employers in order to save a convicted to death murderer. But as she´s a woman, we automatically assume she´s innocent ?
If he walked away, that would be much more interesing twist than a typical hero-to-the-rescue-of-the-maid-in-trouble bullshit.
Â
Conclusion: nice visuals, absurd story and atypical behavior of Geralt of Rivia.
tagyhag
Pretty much spot on what Tagy said, Geralt is a pretty neutral person when it comes to pretty much everything tell it involves a woman or as the trailer even implies when he says "picking between two evils, he'd rather pick the lesser one".
Now I want to finish the Blood of Elves book :?
In terms of everything.  My bro watched it and said "damn, even I want to play this", which is surprising given his lack of interest in singleplayer games.  You should know that this is not Blizzard quality. NO ONE F*CKING CARES.[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
[QUOTE="Ravenshout"] In terms of what? Animation? Detail? The D3 expansion cinematic will blow it away visually.
Ravenshout
[QUOTE="Ravenshout"]You should know that this is not Blizzard quality. NO ONE F*CKING CARES.  A lot people out there care. I will create a thread comparing this trailer to the any new CG trailers released during gamescom 2013.Â[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]In terms of everything.  My bro watched it and said "damn, even I want to play this", which is surprising given his lack of interest in singleplayer games. Â
parkurtommo
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment