Third Party Support For The Wii U Gets Stronger- Are We Looking At Next Gen PS2?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for StealthSting
StealthSting

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 StealthSting
Member since 2006 • 6915 Posts

I'll believe it when I see it.

Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with being excited for WiiU, and if Nintendo manages to get as much 3rd party support as the competition, that can only be a good thing.

But I've heard the same reaction from the developers the moment the Wii was announced. I'm not buying it--at least not yet. A lot of it will depend on Nintendo, and we've been through this before. If Nintendo manages to receive 3rd party support in a positive manner--something they've been completely horrible at the past few generations then things could change. What you have to ask yourself is, will Nintendo finally change?

Betting on good quality online gaming for their platform would be a good start. It's all on Nintendo.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]That all sounds reasonable. Personally, I do not see Nintendo overpricing their hardware again, even if that means that they have to take a hit on their profits a little a la the 3DS. Honestly, $250 is the best launch price possible for the machine. $299 is what seems to be the most likely. $349 is the highest I will pay for it (and I assume there are many others who would agree with me on this). Beyond that, the system is guaranteed to sell sluggishly, especially since it will have a fledgling library whereas the PS360, both with well established libraries and online infrastructures at this point in their lifecycle, will, at least initially (until devs are comfortable with the Wii U hardware), provide similar experiences for a cheaper price.shinrabanshou

I should add that I'm also assuming that by this time next year the 360 will be priced:

  • $150 - Arcade standalone
  • $200 - Arcade Kinect
  • $250 - 250GB standalone
  • $300 - 250GB Kinect

While the PS3 will either have dropped another $50, be bundled with 1-2 games as standard, and/or have increased HDD size.

I think Nintendo will still price for profit or at least break-even, mainly because unlike the others, they don't have other divisions to potentially rely on, and with the 3DS currently selling at a (presumably small) loss, investors will want to see some black on the balance sheet - stock is currently at like a 5 year low.

I think people will bite at $399 - $450 if there is a very easily discernible technical improvement over the current gen - not crazy Samaritan tech demo, of course - but I don't think simply 1080p60 as standard will be enough.

Honestly, I'm not sure if hardcore gamers have the consumer confidence in the Nintendo brand to spend those types of prices on a Nintendo console for purely technical reasons. Even if Nintendo were to excel in terms of graphics capability and so-called mature gaming, there's already a great deal of skepticism regarding the Wii U's technical capabilities when compared to the hypothetical PS3/360 successors. Many PS3/360 owners may simply take the route of "wait and see", and why not? Their console is already capable of playing most of the same games...

I'm also curious to what degree people have now become "tied-down" to a particular network infrastructure, like Xbox Live and PSN, especially if that's where their friends all play. There could be some hesitation moving to another console as a primary system after setting roots on another network. Online gaming, and the networks established through them, are an entirely new way hardcore hardware sales could be affected.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#153 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

Lexter45
You mean current gen graphics? :lol: lol
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#154 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

Yep I think so. If the Wii U has a strong third party it will succed.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

carljohnson3456
You mean current gen graphics? :lol: lol

Please watch the tech demos which look way beyond current gen graphics AND are at 1080p 60fps.
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#156 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

ActionRemix
You mean current gen graphics? :lol: lol

Please watch the tech demos which look way beyond current gen graphics AND are at 1080p 60fps.

Gimmie a link sir and I will.
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] You mean current gen graphics? :lol: lol

Please watch the tech demos which look way beyond current gen graphics AND are at 1080p 60fps.

Gimmie a link sir and I will.

Japanese Garden http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4 Also keep in mind that this is at 1080p 60fps which alone requires 4x the graphical power of 720p 30fps. It needs even more power for the enhanced textures, etc.
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
Zelda U http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arHNcSMXaBk There is no way that the PS3 or 360 could run this even at a lower resolution/framerate.
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#159 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Please watch the tech demos which look way beyond current gen graphics AND are at 1080p 60fps.ActionRemix
Gimmie a link sir and I will.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4 Also keep in mind that this is at 1080p 60fps which alone requires 4x the graphical power of 720p 30fps. It needs even more power for the enhanced textures, etc.

Looks pretty good but I really dont expect the Wii U to look THAT much better than PS360. I could very well be wrong, but I didnt think the Wii U was supposed to be much of a graphical leap.
Avatar image for Giant_Panda
Giant_Panda

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Giant_Panda
Member since 2007 • 982 Posts

The Zelda Demo was in 720p at 30 fps with 0 AA, and looks about as impressive as Gears 3.

The Japanese Garden Demo was at 30 fps, with frame dips in some sections,and was likely at 720p.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-e3-nintendo

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"] Gimmie a link sir and I will.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OHUwDShrD4 Also keep in mind that this is at 1080p 60fps which alone requires 4x the graphical power of 720p 30fps. It needs even more power for the enhanced textures, etc.

Looks pretty good but I really dont expect the Wii U to look THAT much better than PS360. I could very well be wrong, but I didnt think the Wii U was supposed to be much of a graphical leap.

Shigeru Miyamoto is the origin of those statements, but then again he isn't a hardware engineer. I think they're doing preemptive damage control in the event that the competitor consoles are loss-leading powerhouses again. The way things look now that might not even be the case. They might be able to get something like the Samaritan demo to run if they cut out the bokeh and tessellation. They always have the option to drop to 720p 30fps if they really want to push the graphics, too. Reading that article now, Panda.
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
The Zelda Demo was in 720p at 30 fps with 0 AA, and looks about as impressive as Gears 3.The Japanese Garden Demo was at 30 fps, with frame dips in some sections,and was likely at 720p.http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-e3-nintendoGiant_Panda
That's really disappointing if true.
Avatar image for spookykid143
spookykid143

10393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 spookykid143
Member since 2009 • 10393 Posts

The Wii U should be a good console but a next gen PS2? not a chance the PS2 is a once in a life time console just like the DS is a once in a life time handheld.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="Giant_Panda"]The Zelda Demo was in 720p at 30 fps with 0 AA, and looks about as impressive as Gears 3.The Japanese Garden Demo was at 30 fps, with frame dips in some sections,and was likely at 720p.http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-e3-nintendoActionRemix
That's really disappointing if true.

It's true about the 720p and no AA, but remember how awful the Zelda tech demo's always look compared to the final product? Also, the textures are definitely more detailed then Gears 3.

Aaaand that demo was rushed and made with not finalised dev kits.

I think the Wii U will blow the HD twins out of the water, wait and see.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
It's true about the 720p and no AA, but remember how awful the Zelda tech demo's always look compared to the final product? Also, the textures are definitely more detailed then Gears 3. Aaaand that demo was rushed and made with not finalised dev kits. I think the Wii U will blow the HD twins out of the water, wait and see.theuncharted34
I thought both demos were very impressive. I'm disappointed because I assumed they could ramp up the graphics 4x if they cut the resolution and framerate.
Avatar image for nintendoman562
nintendoman562

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 nintendoman562
Member since 2007 • 5593 Posts

Don't hype a console based on a list of interested companies. That's what we saw with the 3DS and Wii and that got us nowhere. I'll wait until some actual games.

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]It's true about the 720p and no AA, but remember how awful the Zelda tech demo's always look compared to the final product? Also, the textures are definitely more detailed then Gears 3. Aaaand that demo was rushed and made with not finalised dev kits. I think the Wii U will blow the HD twins out of the water, wait and see.ActionRemix
I thought both demos were very impressive. I'm disappointed because I assumed they could ramp up the graphics 4x if they cut the resolution and framerate.

So did I.

But like I said, those demo's were extremely rushed on un-finished hardware, and if something is coded really badly, someone could get 4x the performance on the same hardware if it has well-written code.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
So did I. But like I said, those demo's were extremely rushed on un-finished hardware, and if something is coded really badly, someone could get 4x the performance on the same hardware if it has well-written code.theuncharted34
The rumor is Epic Games worked with Nintendo to produce the two demos. At the very least we know they didn't build them from scratch.
Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]So did I. But like I said, those demo's were extremely rushed on un-finished hardware, and if something is coded really badly, someone could get 4x the performance on the same hardware if it has well-written code.ActionRemix
The rumor is Epic Games worked with Nintendo to produce the two demos.

That would be a very odd pairing if true :P

Doesn't seem likely lol

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]So did I. But like I said, those demo's were extremely rushed on un-finished hardware, and if something is coded really badly, someone could get 4x the performance on the same hardware if it has well-written code.theuncharted34

The rumor is Epic Games worked with Nintendo to produce the two demos.

That would be a very odd pairing if true :P

Doesn't seem likely lol

I remember reading that the garden demo especially looked like it ran on Unreal Engine 3.
Avatar image for sailor232
sailor232

6880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#171 sailor232
Member since 2003 • 6880 Posts

Its the same with most of Nintendo's new consoles, they spout how so many third parties are on board, then they lose them all, well the support from them anyway, theres always a few exclusives made just for Nintendo but the most part is they get over looked.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
next gen PS2? sure, if MS and Sony act in a dumb way...(which I doubt) just like Nintendo and MS acted back then
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="Giancar"]next gen PS2? sure, if MS and Sony act in a dumb way...(which I doubt) just like Nintendo and MS acted back then

What did they do wrong?
Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

Honestly, I'm not sure if hardcore gamers have the consumer confidence in the Nintendo brand to spend those types of prices on a Nintendo console for purely technical reasons. Even if Nintendo were to excel in terms of graphics capability and so-called mature gaming, there's already a great deal of skepticism regarding the Wii U's technical capabilities when compared to the hypothetical PS3/360 successors. Many PS3/360 owners may simply take the route of "wait and see", and why not? Their console is already capable of playing most of the same games...

I'm also curious to what degree people have now become "tied-down" to a particular network infrastructure, like Xbox Live and PSN, especially if that's where their friends all play. There could be some hesitation moving to another console as a primary system after setting roots on another network. Online gaming, and the networks established through them, are an entirely new way hardcore hardware sales could be affected.

SakusEnvoy

Yeah, I think that's another important potential variable - online capabilities and identity.

To some gamers, an integrated online infrastructure is important and they'll have invested time and effort into building their online identity and network on PSN or XBL. This vendor lock-in effect may mean that Nintendo may be at an inherent disadvantage with these particular gamers as being able to carry over an account to a new generation of Playstation or XBOX may appeal more than minor technical differences.

Avatar image for N-K0d3R
N-K0d3R

500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 N-K0d3R
Member since 2004 • 500 Posts

Scumbag Nintendo - 'WiiU will feature the latest in cutting edge technology', uses (at least) 20 year old resistive technology for controller's touch screen.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

The rumor is Epic Games worked with Nintendo to produce the two demos. At the very least we know they didn't build them from scratch.ActionRemix

Really? All I remember is that DF commented on how the Japanese Garden Demo's water was similar to Gears 2. (I can see the AA, but still questionable on the 720p since it was a compressed stream they were looking at.) Zelda tech demo was done in-house with a few outsiders, so that's a possibility.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#177 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

I am a tad bit interested in Wii U, just looking to see how things are gonna play out, I waited 1 year till I bought any current gen consoles.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

um it doesn't seem the Wii u has anymore 3rd party support then the ps3 or 360 had at one time....

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts

um it doesn't seem the Wii u has anymore 3rd party support then the ps3 or 360 had at one time....

WilliamRLBaker
I think they are comparing it to Nintendo's third party support from this gen and last which was quite poor.
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

That remains to be seen. We thought the same of the 3DS, and then Assassin's Creed was cancelled, then the Saints Row game. Games were delayed. Same could happen with the Wii U. And just because Nintendo might get more third party support for the Wii U doesn't mean it'd be as grand a scale as PS2 automatically just because they're finally getting support. They have the potential to have more third party support than the last three gens. PS2 levels of support is stretching it quite far. We need to at least get to a few steps below that before claiming the top prize.

Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#182 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

um it doesn't seem the Wii u has anymore 3rd party support then the ps3 or 360 had at one time....

WilliamRLBaker
This is true, the only good thing I can say about nintendo is they do have exclusive resident evil games, But really all they need is call of duty and I am sure they will get sales off of that alone. They already got battlefield. A couple of exclusive RPGS and multiplats and they are in it, possibly to win.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#183 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

um it doesn't seem the Wii u has anymore 3rd party support then the ps3 or 360 had at one time....

Santesyu
This is true, the only good thing I can say about nintendo is they do have exclusive resident evil games, But really all they need is call of duty and I am sure they will get sales off of that alone. They already got battlefield. A couple of exclusive RPGS and multiplats and they are in it, possibly to win.

They already have Call of Duty.
Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#184 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

[QUOTE="Santesyu"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

um it doesn't seem the Wii u has anymore 3rd party support then the ps3 or 360 had at one time....

ShadowDeathX

This is true, the only good thing I can say about nintendo is they do have exclusive resident evil games, But really all they need is call of duty and I am sure they will get sales off of that alone. They already got battlefield. A couple of exclusive RPGS and multiplats and they are in it, possibly to win.

They already have Call of Duty.

I do not mean call of duty of old I am talking about mw2 on up.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#185 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

[QUOTE="AzatiS"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

SOURCE:http://www.computerandvideogames.com/321798/previews/battlefield-3-returning-to-its-roots-on-wii-u/

Looks like EA wasn't kidding when it said that it would be fully supporting the Wii U. Is this a sign of better third party suppot for Nintendo's next console? EA, Ninja Theory, Rocksteady, Ubisoft, Activision, Irrational, Epic, Crytek, Bioware, Bethesda, Kojima, Konami, Team Ninja, Capcom and Gearbox have all already confirmed an interest in/projects in progress on the Wii U. Are we looking at what will, if handled correctly, become the next generation's PS2?

charizard1605

Next gen PS2? Didnt you say the same for Wii?

No, I wasn't even a member of these forums when the Wii released.

Well let me remind you then the issue and no , this didnt happen when Wii released .

Were 2 constantly years or more, Nintendo fanboys claimings. Wii is the NEXT PS2 and its almost SURE WILL SURPASS it in sales. That was what most saying. And i was saying "" Dream on "" and i was getting the laughter. Where are they now , Ninties to laugh?

Now about PS2 vs Wii-u .... dream on again! PS2 still sells. Wii almost dead 1 year before Wii-u release. Thats your Nintendo. Why you think Wii-u will be different ? Because it will be better and will compete easily with PS3/X360 , almost 7 years old consoles? Just wait for Ps4/X720 to claim "victory".

Noone will give 300-350 euros or more just to play same games as PS3/X360 with a "bit" better resolutions or whatever. Because thats the issue here. You wont see BF4 ( example ) only for Wii-u.. Youll see BF4 on all consoles and on Wii-u ,IF WONT BE A PORT , youll see a slightly better version. Thats all. But when PS4/x720 release then and only then youll see truly next gen games and guess what Wii-u will be by then??!!! Another Wii outdated console that wont handle most of new gen games.

Quote me here and now if you want.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#186 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

Lexter45
Don't you mean last gen? Won't this just have slightly better textures and perhaps 4 X AA solutions over the 2 X AA solutions... or a simple 720p --> 1080p upgrade?
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
Once the other consoles come out and destroy the Wii U hardware-wise, the 3rd party support will drop off quickly like it always does with Nintendo consoles. Nintendo always finds a way to screw themselves over in the long run when it comes to 3rd parties(aside from handheld consoles)
Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#188 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

Mozelleple112
Don't you mean last gen? Won't this just have slightly better textures and perhaps 4 X AA solutions over the 2 X AA solutions... or a simple 720p --> 1080p upgrade?

My question to your answer is does that matter? Wii had worse graphics then 360/ps3 but still outsold both of them. Now that the wii actually has good graphics thats a bad thing? And really how much more advanced can they go between this and next gen? It wont be like the ps2 jump to 360 far from that. This is why I think Wii U actually has a good chance to get players from ps3/360's attention. I never thought I would defend nintendo but I don't think anyone can deny the potential they have here.
Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="dracolich55"]So 7th gen multiplats will be on ta 8th gen console? Interesting....charizard1605
That's not a new phenomenon, the Xbox 360 got PS2/Xbox/GCN multiplats for almost a year after its release.

and they're still used today in "bigger total library" arguments by Lems, so yep, it'll make just as much sense for sheep to use PS3/360 multiplats to make their library better than PS4/720.

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="Giancar"]next gen PS2? sure, if MS and Sony act in a dumb way...(which I doubt) just like Nintendo and MS acted back then

What did they do wrong?

Nintendo: media storage, 3rd party games MS: focused practically in one region That among other reasons is why the PS2 wiped the floor with the competition. I don't see the WiiU doing things extremly well and the competition doing things extremely bad
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#191 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Wii U exclusive AC? Thats either false or annoying as hell, they said AC3 would be the end of AC for a while... Unless this exclusive one is the going to be the re ignition for the series in about 2013.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#192 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

I do not mean call of duty of old I am talking about mw2 on up.

Santesyu

Yes, and they already have those Call of Duty games. They are even getting Modern Warfare 3 this year.

Well let me remind you then the issue and no , this didnt happen when Wii released .

Were 2 constantly years or more, Nintendo fanboys claimings. Wii is the NEXT PS2 and its almost SURE WILL SURPASS it in sales. That was what most saying. And i was saying "" Dream on "" and i was getting the laughter. Where are they now , Ninties to laugh?

Now about PS2 vs Wii-u .... dream on again! PS2 still sells. Wii almost dead 1 year before Wii-u release. Thats your Nintendo. Why you think Wii-u will be different ? Because it will be better and will compete easily with PS3/X360 , almost 7 years old consoles? Just wait for Ps4/X720 to claim "victory".

Noone will give 300-350 euros or more just to play same games as PS3/X360 with a "bit" better resolutions or whatever. Because thats the issue here. You wont see BF4 ( example ) only for Wii-u.. Youll see BF4 on all consoles and on Wii-u ,IF WONT BE A PORT , youll see a slightly better version. Thats all. But when PS4/x720 release then and only then youll see truly next gen games and guess what Wii-u will be by then??!!! Another Wii outdated console that wont handle most of new gen games.

Quote me here and now if you want.

AzatiS

I was a lurker here, so I do know what happened during that time. But you are missing the point- my post said that the Wii U might be the next PS2 in terms of GAMES. If it launches early, gets a proper install base lead by the time MS and Sony launch their next consoles,, then it could continue to be the lead platform for third party games for the entirety of its gen a la the PS2. Coupled with Nintendo's first party support, that would make the system massive.

Your argument has to do with sales, which really makes no sense in the given context. Finally, as for our last paragraph, all you are doing is assuming. Just like a lot of those same Nintendo fanboys whom you seem to hold a grudge again. How about we wait and watch what actually happens next gen?

Avatar image for stizz-
stizz-

728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 stizz-
Member since 2011 • 728 Posts

^ nintendo's issue with 3rd party games has been getting people to buy them. Companies always say that they'd love to put games on nintendo's platforms, "ooh 80+ million install base, me gusta!!" Then they release a game and no one buys it. They release a similar on other platforms and sell tons. They can't figure out what exactly they're doing wrong, so they give it a few more runs, with similar results. Afterwards they pretty much abandon Nintendo's system. I don't know how exactly Ninty can pull it off, but they somehow need to get thier fanbase to care about something other than thier 1st party titles, otherwise they will be looking at the exact same situation.

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

[QUOTE="PC_Otter"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Okay, so you are talking about 1GB of VRAM and 2GB of system RAM, and an AMD 4850... can all of this be mass produced so that the final console, considering the price of the controller, can be marketed at or around $249?ronvalencia

$249? That would be quite a stretch, though $300 seems kind of feasible. Quad core PowerPC + RV770-esque GPU integrated with northbridge + 2 GB GDDR5 Unified RAM + Blu-ray derived DVD drive + 16 GB NAND Flash + crazy controller I think should be doable at $300. Considering PowerPC architecture and RV7xx GPU tech are all pretty well understood, it's possible that IBM and AMD could've worked on integrating them into a single die in order to cheapen the cost. While the single chip would be quite hot, it means that heat management requirements as well as the motherboard can be more compact and centralized.

The general set up would be much like the older "pre-Slim" 360's with seperate CPU and GPU/Northbridge dies (also disregard the eDRAM daughter die):


Of course, with the CPU and GPU integrated together (along with the Northbridge), we'd have one chip handling the job of two. Either way, both scenarios are entirely possible. There are reasons for both approaches. While not as cheap, seperate CPU and GPU dies would make it easier to produce acceptable chip yields. Producing a very large chip with so many transistors, power planes, and power levels could result in low yields making CPU+GPU dies difficult until issues are worked out with whatever process and it becomes practical from an efficiency and industrial standpoint.

As far as relative capabilities are concerned, even if the Wii U is us completely even with let's say the Xbox 360, it would still have over 8x the texturing and 4x the pixel (as in z-buffering) pushing capability, and over 10x the polygon pushing power as the current Wii system. Frankly though, such simple idealized specs don't do justice since a more modern GPU like the Xbox 360 was designed from the outset to use employ techniques like bumpmapping, normal mapping,etc with no involvment of the CPU. The RV730 GPU (used for the Radeon 4670) is about /twice/ as powerful as the Xbox 360's GPU at it's general normal clock speed (750 MHz). The RV770 at 750 MHz (Radeon 4770), is essentially twice as powerful as the 4670 at 750 MHz. In many ways, yes, the RV770 is potentially 4x the capability of Xenos in terms of it' shader pushing power, though I think full RV770 performance is aiming way to high in expectations, however a low clocked RV770 is a practical idea in order to limit power usage and heat threshold, perhaps at 500 - 600 MHz (as opposed to the standard 750 MHz). RV770 is also "ready" for GDDR5 since it was the only memory type used with the GPU in graphics cards and it should be too difficult to get the chip down to 32 or 28 nm from it's native 40 nm.

IBM already confirmed it's Wii U PPC solution is fab'ed on 45nm i.e. unlikely fusion solution with late Radeon HD 4xx0 40nm design.

"RV770 is also "ready" for GDDR5 since it was the only memory type used" statement is not right. My old RV770 has GDDR4 i.e. AMD source info for Radeon HD 4850

Radeon HD 4870 has support for GDDR3/4/5 and fab on 55 nm tech Where did you get native 40nm for RV770? RV740 is fab'ed with 40nm TSMC.

Radeon HD 4670 = RV730,

Radeon HD 4770 = RV740

Radeon HD 4870 = RV770

Radeon HD 4890 = RV790

It unlikely Wii U will use RV770's 256bit memory interface PCB wiring since Xbox 360, PS3 and mainstream PC GPUs (e.g. Radeon HD 6770) still uses 128bit wide bus. PCB cost hardly change. My bet is something like RV740.

There'sAMD Radeon E4690 i.e. embedded version Radeon HD 46x0M.

I tend to make the mistake of using "RV770" when I refer to the RV740 due to the 770 in 4770. It happens. I agree, a 256 bit bus is pushing way too hard, makes revisions more difficult. You'll never see me argue for it. As for the main CPU being 45 nm, we don't know for sure if a revision has already taken place in the mean time. Dev machines and processors are or were probably using 45 nm ones, but onsidering the cost savings per chip, as well as heat and power management advantages, it would make sense to have the CPU and GPU down to 32 nm by production start. I wonder if IBM has the capacity for 32 nm though, but it could be licensed out to Global Foundaries. Maybe that is why AMD is having trouble with 32 nm production capacity, because Nintendo is taking it all up :P

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

Mozelleple112
Don't you mean last gen? Won't this just have slightly better textures and perhaps 4 X AA solutions over the 2 X AA solutions... or a simple 720p --> 1080p upgrade?

The tech demos make me think otherwise.
Avatar image for Method214
Method214

88

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 Method214
Member since 2011 • 88 Posts
Only for a smartphone to come out a few months later, making the Wii U look ancient...good job Nintendo.
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#197 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

Mozelleple112

Don't you mean last gen? Won't this just have slightly better textures and perhaps 4 X AA solutions over the 2 X AA solutions... or a simple 720p --> 1080p upgrade?

Too soon to tell. All we know is neither PS4 nor nextbox will be much more powerfull than Wii U.

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="Lexter45"]

Anybody else looking forward to playing a Zelda/Mario/ Starfox game with Next Gen graphics. :shock:

BlbecekBobecek

Don't you mean last gen? Won't this just have slightly better textures and perhaps 4 X AA solutions over the 2 X AA solutions... or a simple 720p --> 1080p upgrade?

Too soon to tell. All we know is neither PS4 nor nextbox will be much more powerfull than Wii U.

We don't know yet. We don't know how powerful the Wii U is either. For now, I think the Wii U will be the "half step" towards the next generation, somewhat like the Dreamcast was. The DC was rooted in several previous gen methods with many features that were to become common place with the arrival of the 2nd gen 3D hardware. Wii U will probably be like this. Thing is, what is next gen? More system capability is the easy answer, but we won't know until it gets here. The "step" towards the next gen will like not be like the step between the first 3D generation of consoles (PS1, N64) and that of the second (PS2, NGC, Xbox). I have my doubts that the next generation of consoles will even be equal to current general upper middle range PC graphics like the Radeon 6850 or Geforce GTX 560 Ti. At least optimization will say that future console games will look as good as any PC game now possibly could on current hardware. If this becomes the case, the Wii U even with a conservative GPU (like an RV730) will not be so far off in capability as to just be absolutely outclassed. This would be further dissipated by the adoption of RV740 hence the large support of people for it.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#199 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

ya the wii u's controller could really become useful in alot of games the more you think about, as long as nintendo has a good online set up, im already sold on the wii uTH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Yeah I wanna see the controller used as a pip boy for the next Fallout game. :D

Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="TH1Sx1SxSPARTA"]ya the wii u's controller could really become useful in alot of games the more you think about, as long as nintendo has a good online set up, im already sold on the wii uBigboi500

Yeah I wanna see the controller used as a pip boy for the next Fallout game. :D

Sounds cool, in concept... but ultimately it would just be gimmicky. If the game pauses when you go into the pipboy anyway, there's no real difference in gameplay between the screen popping up on the main screen or on the controller. And as cool as it might be for the game NOT to pause when you go into the pipboy to manage inventory, check maps/questlogs, or view/raise stats, one only has to look at the amount of hate Demons/Dark Souls get about not having pause to get the idea that this wouldn't be a popular design choice.