@-Damien-: please stop lying
lying? see Dark Souls, GTAV just a couple of examples
Stop lying. They are on PC.
I feel like all Damien does is spread misinformation, half truths, or just flat out lies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn_PSJsl0LQ
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@-Damien-: please stop lying
lying? see Dark Souls, GTAV just a couple of examples
Stop lying. They are on PC.
I feel like all Damien does is spread misinformation, half truths, or just flat out lies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn_PSJsl0LQ
@-Damien-: I wouldn't say there are no quality exclusives. However you are right about there not being any big budget high quality games. It is as if developers have lost faith in the platform. Ten years ago the pc was the starting point in a lot of peoples eyes. Now it is just an after thought most of the time. When enormous culturally significant games like Grand Theft Auto 5 are skipping pc, you know there is an issue. Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
PC games don't need to be big budget to have big returns. There's no need for licensing/publishing fees/dev kits/ridiculous ad costs. Surprises crop up all the time through word of mouth, it's an inherent trait of the platform. Not to mention PC communities are really impressive. Steady slow streams of sales keep communities active and people playing all manners of games whereas console devs/pubs gotta make various remasters to see any kind of secondary income.
It's a silly notion to write off the platform for. PC gaming isn't relevant/viable/w.e you're trying to argue because half of a game's budget doesn't go into the above costs? How is that possibly a fault?
I wasn't righting it off.
Then what's the complaint? PC games aren't culturally relevant? They sport huge competitive scenes with prize pools reaching over 10+ million. Twitch streams draw in 10's of thousands of viewers and sometimes even over 100k current viewers. Moba's, Starcraft 2, WoW, Hearthstone, Civ 5 are still some of the most widely played games today with continued years of support.
Like I'm sorry if I'm missing out on something here but consoles can keep the Hollywood style of gaming. Give me the underappreciated niche titles like Valkyria Chronicles, Yakuza and (used to be) Demon Souls over the Gears/Uncharted/Killzone slog. That's what I still keep consoles around for.
There is no complaint. I agree with you about niche titles. Ive been vocal about the lack of actual gameplay on the xbox and playstation. The point was strictly about budgets. There is no comparison here. PC gaming could be so much more than it is if developers treated the platform the same way they do consoles. That is my point--that years ago the pc was pushing a LOT of genre. Console players could only hope for a stripped port. The interface would be catered to pc--the mouse and keyboard.
They tried to treat the PC in the same manner as they do consoles and it never worked out. If you actually look at the way that publishers treat the console market you will realise that they see console players as nothing more than cash cows. Half finished games with day one DLC, pay to play online, HD remakes etc.
You mention stripped down ports, yet from where I'm standing I'm seeing console games being stripped down to virtually nothing. Nothing more than Hollywood style interactive movies.
I can see that there is money to made in console gaming but its at the expensive of you and me. Games back in the day were packed to the gills with content, now we praise games that can be finished in anytime over 10 hours.
The current console market is disgusting, but that doesn't change the facts. I'm setting all that stuff aside. Again, bottom line is that the console market continually gets big budget games. I did not say all were great games.
So don't buy those games. Problem solved.
This has never been an issue. A broken and buggy game fails and the developers cannot continue to function. It's been that way for 30 years. Not changing now.
At the worst the people who backed the projects that fail lose some money. Developers who have failed Kickstarter games can't just come back and beg for more money to make games. If their first one failed to make any profit because it was trash, word of mouth gets out and they'll never be able to gain any money through crowd funding. It's a problem that takes care of itself.
Meanwhile tons of working and good games get launched each year on the PC. Play those. Problem solved.
Making up excuses to not play PC games isn't hurting anybody but yourself. Also if you want short and linear $60 games for their "cinematic" quality, then keep gaming on the console. PC gaming is doing fine without your money and you're the one missing out on some of the best games ever made.
well what if they change their names and start another project?
Didn't work for the guys who tried to scam people for $50,000 for that "stalker-like" game.
The internet is powerful. If their names are attached (and they are with kickstarter), they can't get away with bullshit.
Why are people complaining about Quality Control? I'm sure that there are tons of games the big 3 wish they could pull from their roster right now.
What a lame thread title guy. I thought you were brofists for a second lol. Like seriously..., this is a dilemma about early access policy, ...not PC; which has been discussed countless times. It's just another early access game that people took the risk of funding, KNOWING full well of the risk of trusting devs with your money. Just like any other investment. How does this warrant the lame title of "PC isn't all it's cracked up to be". You're not forced to invest your money with a "work-in-progress" title. It's just another option, So why hate? It seems like you're grasping at straws to fit your jaded agenda. It's an open platform, which is a huge plus for the industry. Therefore, people are free to fund projects at will. As well as PC still receives AAA titles, multiplats, etc.
But checking your post history, you seem to be another lame PC basher lol. At seems like you're pretty much stuck in your ways, so I'm just going to cut this conversation short. Good talk.
Steam lacks quality control: PC gaming sucks
Steam starts applying quality control and removes bullshit: PC gaming still sucks
Man it just makes me smile to know I lead a happy life without any resentment against consoles :) I can only imagine how miserable some consolites are with their 24/7 grudge against PC
@-Damien-: I wouldn't say there are no quality exclusives. However you are right about there not being any big budget high quality games. It is as if developers have lost faith in the platform. Ten years ago the pc was the starting point in a lot of peoples eyes. Now it is just an after thought most of the time. When enormous culturally significant games like Grand Theft Auto 5 are skipping pc, you know there is an issue. Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
PC games don't need to be big budget to have big returns. There's no need for licensing/publishing fees/dev kits/ridiculous ad costs. Surprises crop up all the time through word of mouth, it's an inherent trait of the platform. Not to mention PC communities are really impressive. Steady slow streams of sales keep communities active and people playing all manners of games whereas console devs/pubs gotta make various remasters to see any kind of secondary income.
It's a silly notion to write off the platform for. PC gaming isn't relevant/viable/w.e you're trying to argue because half of a game's budget doesn't go into the above costs? How is that possibly a fault?
I wasn't righting it off.
Then what's the complaint? PC games aren't culturally relevant? They sport huge competitive scenes with prize pools reaching over 10+ million. Twitch streams draw in 10's of thousands of viewers and sometimes even over 100k current viewers. Moba's, Starcraft 2, WoW, Hearthstone, Civ 5 are still some of the most widely played games today with continued years of support.
Like I'm sorry if I'm missing out on something here but consoles can keep the Hollywood style of gaming. Give me the underappreciated niche titles like Valkyria Chronicles, Yakuza and (used to be) Demon Souls over the Gears/Uncharted/Killzone slog. That's what I still keep consoles around for.
There is no complaint. I agree with you about niche titles. Ive been vocal about the lack of actual gameplay on the xbox and playstation. The point was strictly about budgets. There is no comparison here. PC gaming could be so much more than it is if developers treated the platform the same way they do consoles. That is my point--that years ago the pc was pushing a LOT of genre. Console players could only hope for a stripped port. The interface would be catered to pc--the mouse and keyboard.
They tried to treat the PC in the same manner as they do consoles and it never worked out. If you actually look at the way that publishers treat the console market you will realise that they see console players as nothing more than cash cows. Half finished games with day one DLC, pay to play online, HD remakes etc.
You mention stripped down ports, yet from where I'm standing I'm seeing console games being stripped down to virtually nothing. Nothing more than Hollywood style interactive movies.
I can see that there is money to made in console gaming but its at the expensive of you and me. Games back in the day were packed to the gills with content, now we praise games that can be finished in anytime over 10 hours.
The current console market is disgusting, but that doesn't change the facts. I'm setting all that stuff aside. Again, bottom line is that the console market continually gets big budget games. I did not say all were great games.
Big budgets aren't making console games any better though. They're getting worse due to devs not taking any chances. CoD, Assassin's Creed, yearly sports title, Battlefield and more found immense success and then got rehashed to death because publisher's can't wait to mine all the gold. That kind of business mentality isn't healthy and it reflects. Console gaming is a seller's market, PC gaming reflects what the people choose.
Star Citizen, is that even big budget...
lolyes...
Thats a joke right?
Why? If you can define "big budget" by industry standards, then I may listen. I'll wait.
It needs licensed music, professional voice acting, huge ad budgets, licensing/publishing fees and lots of money set aside to pay for patches and whatnot.
@-Damien-: I wouldn't say there are no quality exclusives. However you are right about there not being any big budget high quality games. It is as if developers have lost faith in the platform. Ten years ago the pc was the starting point in a lot of peoples eyes. Now it is just an after thought most of the time. When enormous culturally significant games like Grand Theft Auto 5 are skipping pc, you know there is an issue. Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
PC games don't need to be big budget to have big returns. There's no need for licensing/publishing fees/dev kits/ridiculous ad costs. Surprises crop up all the time through word of mouth, it's an inherent trait of the platform. Not to mention PC communities are really impressive. Steady slow streams of sales keep communities active and people playing all manners of games whereas console devs/pubs gotta make various remasters to see any kind of secondary income.
It's a silly notion to write off the platform for. PC gaming isn't relevant/viable/w.e you're trying to argue because half of a game's budget doesn't go into the above costs? How is that possibly a fault?
I wasn't righting it off.
Then what's the complaint? PC games aren't culturally relevant? They sport huge competitive scenes with prize pools reaching over 10+ million. Twitch streams draw in 10's of thousands of viewers and sometimes even over 100k current viewers. Moba's, Starcraft 2, WoW, Hearthstone, Civ 5 are still some of the most widely played games today with continued years of support.
Like I'm sorry if I'm missing out on something here but consoles can keep the Hollywood style of gaming. Give me the underappreciated niche titles like Valkyria Chronicles, Yakuza and (used to be) Demon Souls over the Gears/Uncharted/Killzone slog. That's what I still keep consoles around for.
There is no complaint. I agree with you about niche titles. Ive been vocal about the lack of actual gameplay on the xbox and playstation. The point was strictly about budgets. There is no comparison here. PC gaming could be so much more than it is if developers treated the platform the same way they do consoles. That is my point--that years ago the pc was pushing a LOT of genre. Console players could only hope for a stripped port. The interface would be catered to pc--the mouse and keyboard.
They tried to treat the PC in the same manner as they do consoles and it never worked out. If you actually look at the way that publishers treat the console market you will realise that they see console players as nothing more than cash cows. Half finished games with day one DLC, pay to play online, HD remakes etc.
You mention stripped down ports, yet from where I'm standing I'm seeing console games being stripped down to virtually nothing. Nothing more than Hollywood style interactive movies.
I can see that there is money to made in console gaming but its at the expensive of you and me. Games back in the day were packed to the gills with content, now we praise games that can be finished in anytime over 10 hours.
The current console market is disgusting, but that doesn't change the facts. I'm setting all that stuff aside. Again, bottom line is that the console market continually gets big budget games. I did not say all were great games.
And the PC gets big budget games. Star Citizen being one of them. Stop making out that the PC doesn't get those AAA releases when it does.
It needs licensed music, professional voice acting, huge ad budgets, licensing/publishing fees and lots of money set aside to pay for patches and whatnot.
That's probably not enough... It also needs the Sun to revolve around the Earth. Only way.
You know you're fully capable of avoiding Early Access games right?
They're there for people who are interested in helping the development process of a game. In return for their feedback the developers give them the opportunity to play it while it's being made.
It's not an evil premise by any means.
Star Citizen, is that even big budget...
lolyes...
Thats a joke right?
Why? If you can define "big budget" by industry standards, then I may listen. I'll wait.
Have you read the Money/Goals? For Three Hundred and Seventy Five MILLION we will include an additional ship. I mean what the ****. lol. That is just a fucking joke. So for five million dollars the team will include professional motion capture. First, isn't the whole project professional? Second, I thought this was a graphical beast, yet the professional motion capture is back in 2012?
This isn't the criteria. There isn't risk here. This is a team of people pulling fans along for the ride.
You know you're fully capable of avoiding Early Access games right?
They're there for people who are interested in helping the development process of a game. In return for their feedback the developers give them the opportunity to play it while it's being made.
It's not an evil premise by any means.
You would think people would like to have the option
Star Citizen, is that even big budget...
lolyes...
Thats a joke right?
Why? If you can define "big budget" by industry standards, then I may listen. I'll wait.
Have you read the Money/Goals? For Three Hundred and Seventy Five MILLION we will include an additional ship. I mean what the ****. lol. That is just a fucking joke. So for five million dollars the team will include professional motion capture. First, isn't the whole project professional? Second, I thought this was a graphical beast, yet the professional motion capture is back in 2012?
This isn't the criteria. There isn't risk here. This is a team of people pulling fans along for the ride.
Mocap doesn't age numbnuts. So a game has to be backed by a faceless corporation to be considered legit? I'll tell ya what makes SC better compared to the likes of GTA5. The SC devs are releasing each module to the public so they can asses the feedback from players as to where to make changes. Do you see that coming from those AAA devs like ND or R*? Are we mere mortals allowed to play and test the modes for GTA before release? If we could we might of been able to stop GTA Online from sucking so bad.
I think the term we are looking for here, "moving the goalposts".
Have you read the Money/Goals? For Three Hundred and Seventy Five MILLION we will include an additional ship. I mean what the ****. lol. That is just a fucking joke. So for five million dollars the team will include professional motion capture. First, isn't the whole project professional? Second, I thought this was a graphical beast, yet the professional motion capture is back in 2012?
This isn't the criteria. There isn't risk here. This is a team of people pulling fans along for the ride.
Care to link? What is the 375 million to which you refer?
Who was talking about goals? You specifically spoke of big budget games... This is a big-budget game, so sit down.
-----
There's no risk? Research the game... There are multiple portions of the game, including dog-fighting/FPS sections/Hangar modules + more to come.
Star Citizen, is that even big budget...
lolyes...
Thats a joke right?
Why? If you can define "big budget" by industry standards, then I may listen. I'll wait.
Have you read the Money/Goals? For Three Hundred and Seventy Five MILLION we will include an additional ship. I mean what the ****. lol. That is just a fucking joke. So for five million dollars the team will include professional motion capture. First, isn't the whole project professional? Second, I thought this was a graphical beast, yet the professional motion capture is back in 2012?
This isn't the criteria. There isn't risk here. This is a team of people pulling fans along for the ride.
What are you talking about?
One bad game makes an entire platform, which by the way is only growing in total yearly revenue while console and handheld gaming are dwindling substantially, a bad thing?
Okay then, I'm glad you are so fickle.
Its a broken game.... Its not like consoles have broken games...... Keep reaching though.
consoles actually don't many broken games, and now they all go through inspections before the console company allows the devs to release it on their platform. even mine craft didn't pass inspections and was delayed for ps4.
@-Damien-: I wouldn't say there are no quality exclusives. However you are right about there not being any big budget high quality games. It is as if developers have lost faith in the platform. Ten years ago the pc was the starting point in a lot of peoples eyes. Now it is just an after thought most of the time. When enormous culturally significant games like Grand Theft Auto 5 are skipping pc, you know there is an issue. Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
You do know its heading to the PC right? nothing is being skipped. And to answer your question..the total war series
Yeah....Total War series is a great one....they haven't had any major issues.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_QK-lcW8a8
Steam doing quality control. Thought people were whining that they needed to do this. Now they did and they're whining that they are?
Anyways, Huggles abandoned the thread just like how he abandoned his avvy.
I played some games....something I don't think half of you actually do here.
And I don't know what you're talking about...I haven't abandoned anything.
@-Damien-: I wouldn't say there are no quality exclusives. However you are right about there not being any big budget high quality games. It is as if developers have lost faith in the platform. Ten years ago the pc was the starting point in a lot of peoples eyes. Now it is just an after thought most of the time. When enormous culturally significant games like Grand Theft Auto 5 are skipping pc, you know there is an issue. Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
You do know its heading to the PC right? nothing is being skipped. And to answer your question..the total war series
Yeah....Total War series is a great one....they haven't had any major issues.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_QK-lcW8a8
Yup..one bad installment completely wipes the series grand success. *yawns*
Its still a big budget PC exclusive series.
Have you read the Money/Goals? For Three Hundred and Seventy Five MILLION we will include an additional ship. I mean what the ****. lol. That is just a fucking joke. So for five million dollars the team will include professional motion capture. First, isn't the whole project professional?Second, I thought this was a graphical beast, yet the professional motion capture is back in 2012?
This isn't the criteria. There isn't risk here. This is a team of people pulling fans along for the ride.
Care to link? What is the 375 million to which you refer?
Who was talking about goals? You specifically spoke of big budget games... This is a big-budget game, so sit down.
-----
There's no risk? Research the game... There are multiple portions of the game, including dog-fighting/FPS sections/Hangar modules + more to come.
before i respond, i'll preface this by reminding everyone of heirren's opening statement, "Have you read the Money/Goals?"
technically the amount required for that stretch goal's been incorrectly overreported by a factor of 100. it's 3.75 M dollars to reach the stretch goal of Aegis Dynamics Retaliator. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/funding-goals the previous goal was 3.50 M so the inter-goal cost for the world to have the ship available was 250 K.
they probably mean they'll use a superior motion capture technique. they might be capturing at 1000 Hz for all we know. how many anatomical landmarks? has this method been done before? i don't know. furthermore, regarding whether 'the motion capture was done back in 2012', well it hasn't. Squadron 42 is still in production https://robertsspaceindustries.com/project-status
That's correct the risk is low for them. It's also fairly low for me, I only stand to lose about 80 USD, and at the moment I'm not at all worried about the safety of my investment.
I'm glad Star Citizen's employed that team of people. I'm sure they're all glad to have work. No worries if you're not convinced by the novel method of release - maybe once the game hits retail you could choose to consume it the traditional way. I for one welcome this transparent method of development, it has entirely different compromises to traditional published games (been consuming them for 25+ years).
Yeah....Total War series is a great one....they haven't had any major issues.....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_QK-lcW8a8
You aren't addressing the question... lawless was referencing the Question, in which Heirren failed to put a question mark...
Come to think of it I cant think of ONE big budget exclusive pc game. .
Yet another poster I wish hadn't made it to 500 I see.
As if there isn't sort of thing going on constantly from the PC crowd.
If this board wasn't full of PC hermits who would kill someone over trying not to let the PC get any negative light maybe more ppl would be open to being part of the community.
Hell man...I don't want to be a part of the PC community here, if some of the ppl in this thread are what represent it. I was all for PC before coming here.
Yeah yeah..."we don't want you anyway".....right....then I'm glad we agree.
One bad game makes an entire platform, which by the way is only growing in total yearly revenue while console and handheld gaming are dwindling substantially, a bad thing?
Okay then, I'm glad you are so fickle.
Dwindling, eh?
Is that why the PS4 is making record sales for consoles...and I believe the X1 is above what the 360 was in the same time frame.
Yet another poster I wish hadn't made it to 500 I see.
As if there isn't sort of thing going on constantly from the PC crowd.
If this board wasn't full of PC hermits who would kill someone over trying not to let the PC get any negative light maybe more ppl would be open to being part of the community.
Hell man...I don't want to be a part of the PC community here, if some of the ppl in this thread are what represent it. I was all for PC before coming here.
Yeah yeah..."we don't want you anyway".....right....then I'm glad we agree.
Well that's because you're kind of a giant asshole
I just recently learned about the flag system....since all you polite ppl gang up on all my posts and I couldn't post for a day....or 2....I dunno....so, I'll just keep it nice and say I flagged your post.
But nothing will happen...b/c I'm the only one who will flag your post...and if I say one word like you just did...every one of the PC hermits will flag me and only god will be able to handle that much free time.
PC gaming has lower standards, and Hermies eat it up. Publishers expect PC gamers to fix a broken ass game's bugs with mods. It's quite sad. Quality control is much better on Console. Games never get out of beta on PC these days.
Funny that PC gamers turn around and talk bad about blockbuster titles on console, as if actually having a story or narrative combined with solid gameplay is a bad thing. It's because they aren't used to such quality as Gears or Uncharted. On PC, because of limited budgets and talent in these small studios with no console maker backing, you have to choose either solid gameplay or a decent story- never both.
If the game has an interesting concept and story, the gameplay is dumbed down to point and click. If the gameplay is great, the game feels like an empty shell because they couldn't afford even a writer or story planner from a CW show.
Yet another poster I wish hadn't made it to 500 I see.
As if there isn't sort of thing going on constantly from the PC crowd.
If this board wasn't full of PC hermits who would kill someone over trying not to let the PC get any negative light maybe more ppl would be open to being part of the community.
Hell man...I don't want to be a part of the PC community here, if some of the ppl in this thread are what represent it. I was all for PC before coming here.
Yeah yeah..."we don't want you anyway".....right....then I'm glad we agree.
Well that's because you're kind of a giant asshole
I just recently learned about the flag system....since all you polite ppl gang up on all my posts and I couldn't post for a day....or 2....I dunno....so, I'll just keep it nice and say I flagged your post.
But nothing will happen...b/c I'm the only one who will flag your post...and if I say one word like you just did...every one of the PC hermits will flag me and only god will be able to handle that much free time.
Um, you can be moderated for flag abuse. And flagging too many posts will karma ban you...so keep it up
Yet another poster I wish hadn't made it to 500 I see.
As if there isn't sort of thing going on constantly from the PC crowd.
If this board wasn't full of PC hermits who would kill someone over trying not to let the PC get any negative light maybe more ppl would be open to being part of the community.
Hell man...I don't want to be a part of the PC community here, if some of the ppl in this thread are what represent it. I was all for PC before coming here.
Yeah yeah..."we don't want you anyway".....right....then I'm glad we agree.
Well that's because you're kind of a giant asshole
I just recently learned about the flag system....since all you polite ppl gang up on all my posts and I couldn't post for a day....or 2....I dunno....so, I'll just keep it nice and say I flagged your post.
But nothing will happen...b/c I'm the only one who will flag your post...and if I say one word like you just did...every one of the PC hermits will flag me and only god will be able to handle that much free time.
Um, you can be moderated for flag abuse. And flagging too many posts will karma ban you...so keep it up
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
Well that's because you're kind of a giant asshole
I just recently learned about the flag system....since all you polite ppl gang up on all my posts and I couldn't post for a day....or 2....I dunno....so, I'll just keep it nice and say I flagged your post.
But nothing will happen...b/c I'm the only one who will flag your post...and if I say one word like you just did...every one of the PC hermits will flag me and only god will be able to handle that much free time.
Um, you can be moderated for flag abuse. And flagging too many posts will karma ban you...so keep it up
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
Because as far as I know it's not a moderatable offense
PC gaming has lower standards, and Hermies eat it up. Publishers expect PC gamers to fix a broken ass game's bugs with mods. It's quite sad. Quality control is much better on Console. Games never get out of beta on PC these days.
Funny that PC gamers turn around and talk bad about blockbuster titles on console, as if actually having a story or narrative combined with solid gameplay is a bad thing. It's because they aren't used to such quality as Gears or Uncharted. On PC, because of limited budgets and talent in these small studios with no console maker backing, you have to choose either solid gameplay or a decent story- never both.
If the game has an interesting concept and story, the gameplay is dumbed down to point and click. If the gameplay is great, the game feels like an empty shell because they couldn't afford even a writer or story planner from a CW show.
actually according to gamespot, PC has higher standards
Flagging you all.
Especially crownkingarthur for being such an exemplary poster week after week. Enjoy the vacay ;O
Um, you can be moderated for flag abuse. And flagging too many posts will karma ban you...so keep it up
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
Because as far as I know it's not a moderatable offense
I thought that was part of the karma system......that the mods determine if the flag was worth it....I think it is.
I got 10 points or whatever and I called ppl names just like they called me names....so, the only thing I can go by is that sort of thing. I mean....all you PC guys have it out for me....not sure whats a modable offense if calling someone an asshole isn't.
Few ppl called my fiance fat....so....yet I got 10 points or whatever. So, gotta be the name calling.
Mod? Please clarify?
Um, you can be moderated for flag abuse. And flagging too many posts will karma ban you...so keep it up
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
Because as far as I know it's not a moderatable offense
I thought that was part of the karma system......that the mods determine if the flag was worth it....I think it is.
I got 10 points or whatever and I called ppl names just like they called me names....so, the only thing I can go by is that sort of thing. I mean....all you PC guys have it out for me....not sure whats a modable offense if calling someone an asshole isn't.
Few ppl called my fiance fat....so....yet I got 10 points or whatever. So, gotta be the name calling.
Mod? Please clarify?
You have to actually tag the mods or message them directly for them to see it. Just getting flagged/karma banned doesn't mean you got moderated. It just means that you either flagged ten posts or ten of your posts were flagged (or some mixture in between equaling ten). If you actually got moderated then they would tell you. And there are names you can't use on here
This "problem with PC gaming" is that everyone and their mother treat kickstarters like they're pre-orders. The only way people will break out of this mindset of this is if this was written bold and italicized rainbow text:
FUNDING A VIDEO GAME PROJECT ON KICKSTARTER IS NOT THE SAME AS PRE-ORDERING. BY FUNDING THIS PROJECT, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THE RISK OF NOT GETTING ANYTHING IN RETURN.
Because as far as I know it's not a moderatable offense
I thought that was part of the karma system......that the mods determine if the flag was worth it....I think it is.
I got 10 points or whatever and I called ppl names just like they called me names....so, the only thing I can go by is that sort of thing. I mean....all you PC guys have it out for me....not sure whats a modable offense if calling someone an asshole isn't.
Few ppl called my fiance fat....so....yet I got 10 points or whatever. So, gotta be the name calling.
Mod? Please clarify?
You have to actually tag the mods or message them directly for them to see it. Just getting flagged/karma banned doesn't mean you got moderated. It just means that you either flagged ten posts or ten of your posts were flagged (or some mixture in between equaling ten). If you actually got moderated then they would tell you. And there are names you can't use on here
Well, I don't use racist or sexist terms which I'm guessing are no-nos....such things like that.
I never said anything worse than what was said to me...so yeah...I'm guessing it was the PC hermits ganging up on me. Not whining...just my idea of what happened.
But, all I can get from the rule thread is that you flag a post and a mod deems it fit or not for a flag....so, you guys can keep being disrepsectful and insulting to me and all I can do is keep flagging you while I try to keep my cool.
If I get banned for such a thing, then so be it. Not sure how the rules are if the mod deems this insult ok, but not this one but this one is but not this one....save for racist and sexist stuff and the like.
Why can't you be civil like you are now....this is a much more pleasant lostrib.
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
You're new to this whole internet thing are you? Of course you're going to get called on by spewing bullshit platitudes about PC gaming.
Also nobody is forcing anyone (specifically PC gamers) to literally buy early access games, moron.
You called me an asshole...how is that not flaggable?
I intend on flagging every posts that calls me a name or insults my fiance...or anything like that.
If I get banned for doing that...then....yeah...this forum wasn't worth it. It's cool now though...now that I know about the flag system.
You're new to this whole internet thing are you? Of course you're going to get called on by spewing bullshit platitudes about PC gaming.
Also nobody is forcing anyone (specifically PC gamers) to literally buy early access games, moron.
You assume too much....and your world is pretty small if you consider the Gamespot forums "this whole internet thing".
You're new to this whole internet thing are you? Of course you're going to get called on by spewing bullshit platitudes about PC gaming.
Also nobody is forcing anyone (specifically PC gamers) to literally buy early access games, moron.
You assume too much....and your world is pretty small if you consider the Gamespot forums "this whole internet thing".
I wasn't referring to just these forums, I'm talking about pretty much any internet community site. But by the looks of it, you should go cry somewhere else about how supposedly PC gaming is not "what's it's cracked out to be."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment