To the people who say blu-ray isnt necessary

  • 162 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

I hate this argument from 360 fans and it mostly spouts from jealousy as my guess or just ignorance. If you think its not necessary you first need to realize is any advancement in technology necessary??

Is the geforce 9 series necessary? (over 3x faster than the 8800gtx) no its not but itll make games a hell of a lot better.

The answer is no technology is necessary, but dont you guys like and appreciate it when things improve? Games are supposed to improve idk about you guys but games like GeOW and Rainbow six vegas dont seem very next gen to me. Theyre great games with fantastic mindblowing graphics but very very last gen gameplay.

Do you want to live in a world where nothing improves? Would u like it here if there were no cell phones, ipods or game consoles or advancing computers? Im just sayings its absolutely stupid to say a next gen format like blu-ray with 5 times the space of a dvd9 isnt necessary because no technology is necessary but they all help improve the world around us.

Avatar image for linarite
linarite

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 linarite
Member since 2007 • 112 Posts
So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?
Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

Lets see, what games now use over the space of a DVD?

It isn't needed right now, not saying that it shouldn't be used for gaming. If I have a DVD player that works and is old as hell, why should I spend more money for a new one that does the same exact thing? If I have a TV that's over 10 years old that works, why should I spend more money for another TV when it does the same exact thing? Sometimes more advanced technology isn't needed.

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?linarite
yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.
Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
Ok, how does Blu-Ray improve gameplay then? Last I checked that was more an issue of programming. More space on a disk just means more garbage if the core game isn't any good.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?linarite

when did i say that? its just an example of a game that the devs couldve spent more time on making the gameplay more unique or innovative, and for your info i have gears and rainbow six and still play them its just my opinion

Avatar image for subject117
subject117

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 subject117
Member since 2002 • 4824 Posts

blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?jack_russel

Please. Elaborate.

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

[QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?jack_russel
yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

Avatar image for norfair_dweller
norfair_dweller

1639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 norfair_dweller
Member since 2007 • 1639 Posts

Blu-ray isn't needed until games won't fit onto a couple discs. We've had disc-swapping before.

And how does Blu-ray make gameplay better?

Avatar image for mazdaspeed-rx8
mazdaspeed-rx8

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 mazdaspeed-rx8
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts
all i know is , im buying 300 on blu ray today YAAAAy
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts

[QUOTE="jack_russel"]blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?subject117

Please. Elaborate.

$599.
Avatar image for linarite
linarite

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 linarite
Member since 2007 • 112 Posts

[QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?blues3531

when did i say that? its just an example of a game that the devs couldve spent more time on making the gameplay more unique or innovative, and for your info i have gears and rainbow six and still play them its just my opinion

So was that a yes or no?

I mean, your thread is about the necessity of Blu-ray, and then your example involves gameplay. Can't you understand where some of us got that impression?

So, again, is it your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay better somehow?

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray disc
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?linarite

when did i say that? its just an example of a game that the devs couldve spent more time on making the gameplay more unique or innovative, and for your info i have gears and rainbow six and still play them its just my opinion

So was that a yes or no?

I mean, your thread is about the necessity of Blu-ray, and then your example involves gameplay. Can't you understand where some of us got that impression?

So, again, is it your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay better somehow?

gears was just my example of a game that doenst feel very next gen to me

Avatar image for soiguessialive
soiguessialive

670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 soiguessialive
Member since 2007 • 670 Posts

Since the ps3's only AAA games have fitted on a dvd then i think not.

Look Lair massive flop

Avatar image for linarite
linarite

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 linarite
Member since 2007 • 112 Posts

gears was just my example of a game that doenst feel very next gen to me

blues3531
So, what does that have to do with Blu-ray?
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?blues3531

yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

better physics? how? How much better can a falling body get? And bigger levels aren't always better. The point of the level size was to encourage close quarters combat. Nobody wants to play a 30 minute game of hide and seek in a gigantic oversized level.
Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts

the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discblues3531

and it would of ben even better if it was 360 exclusive and devs didnt have to spend days trying to work with useless ps3.

Avatar image for subject117
subject117

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 subject117
Member since 2002 • 4824 Posts
[QUOTE="subject117"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"]blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?jack_russel

Please. Elaborate.

$599.

Funny, I spend 599 on my PS3, and I find the Blu-Ray to be a great value for the price. In fact, I purchase a lot less standard DVD's as the quality is so bad comparitively.I also have a nice surround sound system (which cost about twice as much as my PS3 by the way). How is that a bad value, if you're getting something that you like and appreciate?

I've seen people spend more than 600 on a video card for their PC that gets outdated in 6 months... That I think is a bad cost/benefit ratio.

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discblues3531
they would have made the game smaller anyway. They said they made it smaller than san andreas because there were a lot of spaces in that game where you were just driving around doing nothing. It took forever to get from point A to point B.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

Since the ps3's only AAA games have fitted on a dvd then i think not.

Look Lair massive flop

soiguessialive

i was never interested in lair from the beginning, it never looked very fun

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts
Blue Ray is what makes the PS3 so expensive, which makes it not sell well.  I don't care how powerful Blue Ray is, I never wanted it.  I just wanted another PS2 with updated graphics.  Sony messed up, end of story.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

[QUOTE="blues3531"]the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discjack_russel
they would have made the game smaller anyway. They said they made it smaller than san andreas because there were a lot of spaces in that game where you were just driving around doing nothing. It took forever to get from point A to point B.

so dude even if it is small it couldve been where u can enter every single building in the game without loading, and i like driving from point a to b is was more realistic to have a commute and exploring was fun

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="subject117"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"]blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?subject117

Please. Elaborate.

$599.

Funny, I spend 599 on my PS3, and I find the Blu-Ray to be a great value for the price. In fact, I purchase a lot less standard DVD's as the quality is so bad comparitively.I also have a nice surround sound system (which cost about twice as much as my PS3 by the way). How is that a bad value, if you're getting something that you like and appreciate?

I've seen people spend more than 600 on a video card for their PC that gets outdated in 6 months... That I think is a bad cost/benefit ratio.

congradulations, welcome to the mniority. Everybody else bought the 360 and Wii.
Avatar image for linarite
linarite

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 linarite
Member since 2007 • 112 Posts

so dude even if it is small it couldve been where u can enter every single building in the game without loading, and i like driving from point a to b is was more realistic to have a commute and exploring was fun

blues3531
Blu-ray eliminates load times?
Avatar image for omarguy01
omarguy01

8139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 omarguy01
Member since 2004 • 8139 Posts

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
What has Blu-ray done for games? Provided space for uncompressed content that could easily be compressed on a disc and then streamed from a HDD?

Blu-ray has done and will do nothing for games. It was an incredibly poor choice for the PS3 and is one of the main reasons to why the system is so expensive.
Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts

Blue Ray is what makes the PS3 so expensive, which makes it not sell well. I don't care how powerful Blue Ray is, I never wanted it. I just wanted another PS2 with updated graphics. Sony messed up, end of story.Svarthek

Mass up for you but not for me! I love Blu-Ray! Is a great deal that I get a game machine and a blu-ray player for $599. it goes perfectly for my HDTV and Sound system :D

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
Blue Ray is what makes the PS3 so expensive, which makes it not sell well.  I don't care how powerful Blue Ray is, I never wanted it.  I just wanted another PS2 with updated graphics.  Sony messed up, end of story.Svarthek
...Will you marry me?
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?jack_russel

yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

better physics? how? How much better can a falling body get? And bigger levels aren't always better. The point of the level size was to encourage close quarters combat. Nobody wants to play a 30 minute game of hide and seek in a gigantic oversized level.

yea but everything in gears is pretty much a backdrop or parts of levels ull never be able to reach, buildings you can never enter, thats why they have such hi-res textures everywhere, there is also almost no dynamic lighting in the game, thats very last gen

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discblues3531

they would have made the game smaller anyway. They said they made it smaller than san andreas because there were a lot of spaces in that game where you were just driving around doing nothing. It took forever to get from point A to point B.

so dude even if it is small it couldve been where u can enter every single building in the game without loading, and i like driving from point a to b is was more realistic to have a commute and exploring was fun

1. loading times have little to do with the disc format, it's more about the harddrive. 2. I geuss if you like driving around and doing nothing for the sake of realism then thats fine.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

omarguy01

yea and my point was no technological advancements are necessary but its cool when things improve right? did everyone miss that just cuz of the gears insert seriously learn to read and comprehend (not directed at just u but everyone)

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?blues3531

yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

better physics? how? How much better can a falling body get? And bigger levels aren't always better. The point of the level size was to encourage close quarters combat. Nobody wants to play a 30 minute game of hide and seek in a gigantic oversized level.

yea but everything in gears is pretty much a backdrop or parts of levels ull never be able to reach, buildings you can never enter, thats why they have such hi-res textures everywhere, there is also almost no dynamic lighting in the game, thats very last gen

so, It's still the best looking game going. it didnt' need that much lighting, they wanted the game to look dark. it had nothing to do with blueray or "nextgen-ness". It was just a design choice.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discjack_russel

they would have made the game smaller anyway. They said they made it smaller than san andreas because there were a lot of spaces in that game where you were just driving around doing nothing. It took forever to get from point A to point B.

so dude even if it is small it couldve been where u can enter every single building in the game without loading, and i like driving from point a to b is was more realistic to have a commute and exploring was fun

1. loading times have little to do with the disc format, it's more about the harddrive. 2. I geuss if you like driving around and doing nothing for the sake of realism then thats fine.

1. somethign the 360 doesnt have standard

2. its not very realistic when every mission your sent on is a 30 second drive now is it?

Avatar image for subject117
subject117

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 subject117
Member since 2002 • 4824 Posts
[QUOTE="subject117"][QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="subject117"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"]blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?jack_russel

Please. Elaborate.

$599.

Funny, I spend 599 on my PS3, and I find the Blu-Ray to be a great value for the price. In fact, I purchase a lot less standard DVD's as the quality is so bad comparitively.I also have a nice surround sound system (which cost about twice as much as my PS3 by the way). How is that a bad value, if you're getting something that you like and appreciate?

I've seen people spend more than 600 on a video card for their PC that gets outdated in 6 months... That I think is a bad cost/benefit ratio.

congradulations, welcome to the mniority. Everybody else bought the 360 and Wii.

I guess I'm "everybody else" then. I bought all 3 at launch. I love my Xbox 360 (if it wasn't off for repair), and I WOULD love my Wii if some good games would come out. By the way, you are being ignorant if you can't recognize the value of the PS3, ESPECIALLY when the good games start coming out. Think about where the PS3 would be WITHOUT Blu-Ray.

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts
[QUOTE="Svarthek"]Blue Ray is what makes the PS3 so expensive, which makes it not sell well.  I don't care how powerful Blue Ray is, I never wanted it.  I just wanted another PS2 with updated graphics.  Sony messed up, end of story.jack_russel
...Will you marry me?


Hahahaha, I take it you agree with me?

Mass up for you but not for me! I love Blu-Ray! Is a great deal that I get a game machine and a blu-ray player for $599. it goes perfectly for my HDTV and Sound system :D

ni6htmare01

I still watch DVDs on my piece of crap TV.  I just wanna play vidja gaems :(
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="omarguy01"]

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

blues3531

yea and my point was no technological advancements are necessary but its cool when things improve right? did everyone miss that just cuz of the gears insert seriously learn to read and comprehend (not directed at just u but everyone)

And our point is that "blu-ray is even less necessary than the other kinds of technology because it doesn't help gaming".
Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="Svarthek"]Blue Ray is what makes the PS3 so expensive, which makes it not sell well. I don't care how powerful Blue Ray is, I never wanted it. I just wanted another PS2 with updated graphics. Sony messed up, end of story.Svarthek
...Will you marry me?


Hahahaha, I take it you agree with me?

Mass up for you but not for me! I love Blu-Ray! Is a great deal that I get a game machine and a blu-ray player for $599. it goes perfectly for my HDTV and Sound system :D

ni6htmare01


I still watch DVDs on my piece of crap TV. I just wanna play vidja gaems :(

That is why I said Mass up for you and not for me XD

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?jack_russel

yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

better physics? how? How much better can a falling body get? And bigger levels aren't always better. The point of the level size was to encourage close quarters combat. Nobody wants to play a 30 minute game of hide and seek in a gigantic oversized level.

yea but everything in gears is pretty much a backdrop or parts of levels ull never be able to reach, buildings you can never enter, thats why they have such hi-res textures everywhere, there is also almost no dynamic lighting in the game, thats very last gen

so, It's still the best looking game going. it didnt' need that much lighting, they wanted the game to look dark. it had nothing to do with blueray or "nextgen-ness". It was just a design choice.

i didnt say bright day time lighting i said dynamic, thats where light casts real shadows, gears had almost none, it uses mainly canned pre-set lighting which has been done since ps1 and n64

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="subject117"][QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="subject117"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"]blu-ray has a poor cost-to-benifit ratio. There is that better?subject117

Please. Elaborate.

$599.

Funny, I spend 599 on my PS3, and I find the Blu-Ray to be a great value for the price. In fact, I purchase a lot less standard DVD's as the quality is so bad comparitively.I also have a nice surround sound system (which cost about twice as much as my PS3 by the way). How is that a bad value, if you're getting something that you like and appreciate?

I've seen people spend more than 600 on a video card for their PC that gets outdated in 6 months... That I think is a bad cost/benefit ratio.

congradulations, welcome to the mniority. Everybody else bought the 360 and Wii.

I guess I'm "everybody else" then. I bought all 3 at launch. I love my Xbox 360 (if it wasn't off for repair), and I WOULD love my Wii if some good games would come out. By the way, you are being ignorant if you can't recognize the value of the PS3, ESPECIALLY when the good games start coming out. Think about where the PS3 would be WITHOUT Blu-Ray.

LOL, where would the PS3 without blu-ray??? In my house thats where. It would be selling better too, and because it would be selling so well it would be getting even more 3rd party support, thus more good games.
Avatar image for xxtechn9ne
xxtechn9ne

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 xxtechn9ne
Member since 2006 • 169 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]the gears and gameplay was just an example that came to mind when i was typing this just forget about it i wasnt implying that gears would be better on blu-ray but do u honestly think gta4 couldnt be better if it was ps3 exclusive? sure the game will be huge even on 360's dvd9 but it couldve been sooooo much better if it were ps3 exclusive and took advantage of hdd standard and blu-ray discjack_russel

they would have made the game smaller anyway. They said they made it smaller than san andreas because there were a lot of spaces in that game where you were just driving around doing nothing. It took forever to get from point A to point B.

so dude even if it is small it couldve been where u can enter every single building in the game without loading, and i like driving from point a to b is was more realistic to have a commute and exploring was fun

1. loading times have little to do with the disc format, it's more about the harddrive. 2. I geuss if you like driving around and doing nothing for the sake of realism then thats fine.

plz plz plz tell me whathard drives have to do with loading times???

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="omarguy01"]

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

jack_russel

yea and my point was no technological advancements are necessary but its cool when things improve right? did everyone miss that just cuz of the gears insert seriously learn to read and comprehend (not directed at just u but everyone)

And our point is that "blu-ray is even less necessary than the other kinds of technology because it doesn't help gaming".

it would help gaming if used with the right ideas in mind, more space = more room for hi res textures, more polygons per level, bigger more realistic levels, more room for complex ai coding, light coding, physics coding and such just give it up.

if you dont believe gta4 would be a better game had it be ps3 exclusive or hell even leave it on 360 but make it hdd necessary then i cant help you there and you are truely ignorant, only thing is ms wont let the game be hdd necessary

Avatar image for Svarthek
Svarthek

1431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 Svarthek
Member since 2005 • 1431 Posts

I still watch DVDs on my piece of crap TV. I just wanna play vidja gaems :(ni6htmare01

That is why I said Mass up for you and not for me XD


I dunno what that means.  Do you mean that I'm apart of the majority?...or something else?
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
When you have a harddrive you can temporarily load data in the background.
Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
i gtg to work now so i wont be hear to reply but serioulsy just admit blu-ray will have a place in the future of games rather than making last gen games with next gen textures
Avatar image for subject117
subject117

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 subject117
Member since 2002 • 4824 Posts

LOL, where would the PS3 without blu-ray??? In my house thats where. It would be selling better too, and because it would be selling so well it would be getting even more 3rd party support, thus more good games. jack_russel

You're wrong about that. The 3rd party support and good games WILL come. It's too bad you can't see far enough ahead to realize the benefit. It's not like the development turnaround is a short time. It takes more than a year to make most games (the system has not even been out for a year).

I'm sorry that you can't afford a PS3. I'm sure if someone gave it to you, or you could afford one you'd be happy with it as I am.I certainly play it about 10X more than my Wii.

Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"]

[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="linarite"]So it is your opinion that Blu-ray would make GeOW gameplay next gen?blues3531

yeah, more room for extra gameplay. I'm not exactly sure how that works either.

well these games could have better physics or bigger levels, these games are too linear to say the least

better physics? how? How much better can a falling body get? And bigger levels aren't always better. The point of the level size was to encourage close quarters combat. Nobody wants to play a 30 minute game of hide and seek in a gigantic oversized level.

yea but everything in gears is pretty much a backdrop or parts of levels ull never be able to reach, buildings you can never enter, thats why they have such hi-res textures everywhere, there is also almost no dynamic lighting in the game, thats very last gen

so, It's still the best looking game going. it didnt' need that much lighting, they wanted the game to look dark. it had nothing to do with blueray or "nextgen-ness". It was just a design choice.

i didnt say bright day time lighting i said dynamic, thats where light casts real shadows, gears had almost none, it uses mainly canned pre-set lighting which has been done since ps1 and n64

and yet still looks better than anything on a 'superior' and much more expensive console.

Avatar image for omarguy01
omarguy01

8139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 omarguy01
Member since 2004 • 8139 Posts
[QUOTE="omarguy01"]

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

blues3531

yea and my point was no technological advancements are necessary but its cool when things improve right? did everyone miss that just cuz of the gears insert seriously learn to read and comprehend (not directed at just u but everyone)

...so it's NOT necessary. if it was then it would be necessary for everyone to upgrade pc's whenever something better comes out
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"][QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="omarguy01"]

its not necessary

it's nice to have but not necessary

blues3531

yea and my point was no technological advancements are necessary but its cool when things improve right? did everyone miss that just cuz of the gears insert seriously learn to read and comprehend (not directed at just u but everyone)

And our point is that "blu-ray is even less necessary than the other kinds of technology because it doesn't help gaming".

it would help gaming if used with the right ideas in mind, more space = more room for hi res textures, more polygons per level, bigger more realistic levels, more room for complex ai coding, light coding, physics coding and such just give it up.

if you dont believe gta4 would be a better game had it be ps3 exclusive or hell even leave it on 360 but make it hdd necessary then i cant help you there and you are truely ignorant, only thing is ms wont let the game be hdd necessary

What does the hard drive have to do with this??? And why did you call me ignorant??? and once again games can't get much better looking than they are now, gears of war is the best looking game going right now and it didn't even fill up and entire disc. So why do we need more room already?